Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
    • CME
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
    • CME
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Cancer Therapy: Preclinical

Improved Oral Delivery of N-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)Retinamide with a Novel LYM-X-SORB Organized Lipid Complex

Barry J. Maurer, Ondrej Kalous, David W. Yesair, Xiaqin Wu, Jitka Janeba, Vanessa Maldonado, Vazgen Khankaldyyan, Tomas Frgala, Bee-Chun Sun, R. Travis McKee, Stephen W. Burgess, Walter A. Shaw and C. Patrick Reynolds
Barry J. Maurer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ondrej Kalous
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David W. Yesair
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiaqin Wu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jitka Janeba
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vanessa Maldonado
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vazgen Khankaldyyan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tomas Frgala
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bee-Chun Sun
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Travis McKee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen W. Burgess
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Walter A. Shaw
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Patrick Reynolds
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1889 Published May 2007
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Purpose: Fenretinide [N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide (4-HPR)] is a cytotoxic retinoid that suffers from a wide interpatient variation in bioavailability when delivered orally in a corn oil capsule. The poor bioavailability of the capsule formulation may have limited responses in clinical trials, and the large capsules are not suitable for young children. To support the hypothesis that a novel organized lipid matrix, LYM-X-SORB, can increase the oral bioavailability of fenretinide, fenretinide in LYM-X-SORB matrix and in a powderized LYM-X-SORB formulation was delivered to mice.

Experimental Design: Fenretinide was delivered orally to mice as the contents of the corn oil capsule, in LYM-X-SORB matrix (4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB matrix) or in a LYM-X-SORB matrix powderized with sugar and flour (4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB oral powder). Levels of 4-HPR, and its principal metabolite, N-(4-methoxyphenyl)retinamide, were assayed in plasma and tissues.

Results: In a dose-responsive manner, from 120 to 360 mg/kg/d, delivery to mice of 4-HPR in LYM-X-SORB matrix, or as 4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB oral powder, increased 4-HPR plasma levels up to 4-fold (P < 0.01) and increased tissue levels up to 7-fold (P < 0.01) compared with similar doses of 4-HPR delivered using capsule contents. Metabolite [N-(4-methoxyphenyl)retinamide] levels mirrored 4-HPR levels. Two human neuroblastoma murine xenograft models showed increased survival (P < 0.03), when treated with 4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB oral powder, confirming the bioactivity of the formulation.

Conclusions: 4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB oral powder is a novel, oral drug delivery formulation, suitable for pediatric use, which warrants further development for the delivery of fenretinide in the treatment of cancer. A phase I clinical trial in pediatric neuroblastoma is in progress.

  • fenretinide
  • 4-HPR
  • LYM-X-SORB
  • neuroblastoma
  • xenograft

A synthetic retinoid made in the late 1960s, N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide (4-HPR; fenretinide), has been reported to be cytotoxic to, or inhibit the growth of, primary tumor cells, cell lines, and/or xenografts of various cancers, including those of neuroblastoma (1–3), colorectal (4), prostate (5, 6), breast (7, 8), ovarian (9–11), small-cell lung cancer (12), and both acute lymphoid and myeloid leukemias (13–15). Fenretinide cytotoxicity in vitro may be mediated through retinoic acid receptor–dependent and retinoic acid receptor–independent mechanisms (16), is p53 independent (12, 17–19), and can be caspase independent (19). Mechanisms of fenretinide cytotoxicity may involve reactive oxygen species generation (19–22) and/or an increase in ceramide species (saturated and desaturated N-acyl-sphingolipids; refs. 3, 15, 22–24).

Clinically, fenretinide has been studied in phase I, II, and III chemoprevention and chemotherapeutic trials using both low- and high-dose schedules using an oral gelatin capsule containing fenretinide (100 mg) in corn oil and polysorbate 80 [currently available through the National Cancer Institute (NCI)]. The systemic toxicity of fenretinide using chronic, low-dose schedules (generally 100–400 mg/d, obtaining ≤ 3 μmol/L plasma levels) has been minimal with the major clinical toxicity being reversible nyctalopia (decreased night vision) due to reduced plasma retinol levels (25). High-dose schedules (1,800 mg/m2/d, divided into two or three daily doses, for 7 days, every 21 days) have also been well tolerated in adults (26). In pediatric cancer patients, occasional cases of hepatic toxicity and non-dose–related pseudotumor cerebri were observed in one pediatric phase I study, which determined a maximum tolerated dose at 2,450 mg/m2/d (divided thrice daily, for 7 days, every 21 days; ref. 27); however, no dose-limiting toxicities were observed in another pediatric study using the capsule formulation at up to 4,000 mg/m2/d (single daily dosing, for 4 weeks, every 5 weeks; ref. 28). Dose escalation in this later study was terminated without reaching a maximum tolerated dose due to patient noncompliance with the number of capsules that needed to be consumed. However, even high-dose schedules of the capsule formulation have obtained relatively low micromolar plasma levels with a wide interpatient variation that has complicated interpretation of response data (26–28). Thus, developing improved formulations of fenretinide that obtain higher and/or more consistent plasma levels in a more patient-friendly dosing formulation could enhance 4-HPR antitumor activity.

LYM-X-SORB is an organized lipid matrix of lysophosphatidylcholine, monoglyceride, and free fatty acids, specifically designed to improve the solubility and oral bioavailability of drugs by forming chylomicron-like particles in the stomach and enhancing drug absorption via the lymphatics in the proximal intestine (29, 30). The LYM-X-SORB matrix is composed of U.S. Food and Drug Administration Generally Regarded As Safe list components and has a safety and tolerance showed in a 1-year double blind oral feeding study in cystic fibrosis patients (31). We have incorporated fenretinide into a LYM-X-SORB matrix (4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB matrix) and formulated it as a free-flowing powder, with roughly the flavor of raw cookie dough, for direct oral administration or for mixing in foods, juices, or nonmilk fat–containing liquid oral nutritional supplements. We report here that this new formulation, fenretinide/LYM-X-SORB oral powder (4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB oral powder), obtained significantly higher plasma and tissue levels in mice than did an equivalent dose of fenretinide delivered using the contents of the corn oil capsule. We also report that 4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB oral powder prolonged survival in two of three human neuroblastoma murine xenograft models. Additionally, it is anticipated that the powdered format of the formulation will be more acceptable to patients than the several dozen large fenretinide corn oil capsules currently required daily for an adult to obtain 4-HPR plasma levels >10 μmol/L. Thus, 4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB has the potential to improve the clinical anticancer activity of fenretinide by increasing drug systemic exposure, decreasing interpatient variability in absorption, and increasing patient compliance.

Materials and Methods

Chemicals. 4-HPR (fenretinide), N-(4-methoxyphenyl)retinamide (4-MPR), and N-(4-ethoxyphenyl)retinamide were obtained from the NIH NCI. All chemicals were high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) grade and were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. Matrigel Matrix HC was from BD Biosciences.

Cell lines. The human neuroblastoma cell lines, SMS-KCNR, CHLA-140, and CHLA-90, have been described previously (32–35). SMS-KCNR is a p53-functional cell line established at progressive disease after dual-agent induction chemotherapy; CHLA-140 is a multidrug-resistant, p53 functional cell line established at progressive disease after intensive multiagent chemotherapy that overexpresses MDR1; and CHLA-90 is a multidrug-resistant, p53 mutant cell line derived at relapse after myeloablative therapy and autologous bone marrow transplant that overexpresses MDR1.6 Cell lines were maintained at 37°C in a humidified incubator containing 95% room air + 5% CO2 atmosphere as described (3).

Drugs and formulation. Clinical grade, bulk fenretinide was obtained from the NCI and formulated into various compositions of LYM-X-SORB organized lipid matrix (4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB matrix) at a 4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB molar ratio of 0.8:1.0 under conditions of Good Manufacturing Practice by Avanti Polar Lipids, Inc. (36), operating under license from LYM-DRUG Products, LLC, and BioMolecular Products, Inc. (30). Fenretinide/LYM-X-SORB oral powder (4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB powder) was formulated by blending the 4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB matrix with sugar and wheat flour to final products that were either 2.2% or 3% by weight fenretinide, 16% or 22% LYM-X-SORB (lysophosphatidylcholine, monoglycerides, and free fatty acids, 1:4:2), ∼20% sucrose, and the remainder wheat flour (37). 4-HPR capsules (100 mg in corn oil and polysorbate 80; NSC #374551, IND# 40294) were obtained from the NCI.

Animals. Five- to six-week-old BALB/c and Harlan athymic nude-Foxn1nu mice were obtained from commercial vendors. For delivery of fenretinide from the (corn oil) capsules currently available from the NCI, the contents of the capsules were expressed after puncturing the capsule, or extracted with a needle and syringe, into an Eppendorf tube, and the amount of fenretinide obtained was quantified by HPLC assay. The capsule contents were then vortexed and mixed with crushed mouse chow or SlimFast liquid nutritional supplement (“nutritional shake”) for oral or gavage delivery. For delivery of fenretinide in 4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB matrix (a hard wax at room temperature), 4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB matrix was compounded in crushed chow, or slurried in nutritional shake for oral syringe or gavage feeding, depending on the dose and volume required. For delivery of fenretinide in 4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB oral powder, the powder was mixed with water or nutritional shake for gavage feeding.

Cohorts of mice were administered the indicated dose of 4-HPR, on a divided daily schedule, for the number of doses indicated. In general, cohorts of five mice were used for each experimental condition or associated controls; the exact number of animals used for each experiment is listed in the figure legends. 4-HPR was well tolerated in all dose forms. The ability of mice to tolerate drug administration was assessed by daily examination of general activity and overall appearance and body weights at least twice weekly. Animals were sacrificed at 3 or 4 h after the last dose by carbon dioxide narcosis, and blood and organs were harvested and stored at -80°C for HPLC analysis. Fenretinide-containing materials were wrapped in foil, or kept in tinted tubes, to reduce exposure to light. For xenograft models, human neuroblastoma cell lines were established s.c. in nude mice. For passage and expansion, 16 to 20 million cells of established tumors were mixed in Matrigel Matrix HC per manufacturer's directions and injected s.c. (total volume of 0.2 mL) above the shoulder blade. All experiments were done using xenografts of ≤ passage 3 in mice. Drug treatment was begun when tumors measured 100 to 200 mm3. Animals received 4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB oral powder, or powderized LYM-X-SORB matrix-alone (controls), mixed in 0.2 cc nutritional shake by gavage, in divided daily doses, Mondays to Fridays, for up to 18 weeks. Dosing by gavage was used to insure consistent dosing of the animals. Tumors were measured using calipers twice weekly and tumor volumes were calculated as 0.5 × height × width × length (38). Animals were sacrificed by carbon dioxide narcosis when tumor volumes exceeded 1,500 mm3 per Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines. Treatment was well tolerated. All animals were housed and treated according to protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Fenretinide assay. Fenretinide (4-HPR), and its principal metabolite, 4-MPR, were quantified in plasma and tissues using a HPLC method as described previously (39). Briefly, the plasma samples were added to internal standard, and ice-cold acetonitrile was added before homogenate was mixed by vortex and placed in an ultrasonic bath for 10 min. The mixture was then centrifuged at 10,000 × g at 4°C for 5 min. The supernatant was transferred to an autosampler and injected directly into the HPLC system. Tissues were homogenized using a Tissue Tearor (Biospec, Inc.) with a 1:3 ratio of physiologic saline (0.9% NaCl, w/v).

The HPLC used was a Waters Alliance 2690 Separation Module with a Waters 717 autosampler. Waters 2487 UV-Visible absorbance detector was set at a wavelength of 340 nm and autosampler temperature was set at 4°C. The column used for separation was a chemically bonded reversed-phase Symmetry C18 column (3.5 μm, 150 × 4.6 mm) with a Symmetry C18 guard column (5 μm, 3.9 × 20 mm). Isocratic elution with acetonitrile/water/glacial acetic acid (88:10:2, v/v/v) was used at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. Drug levels were calculated using the Empower Pro chromatographic data system. Calibration curves were prepared in methanol/acetonitrile (1:1, v/v) with concentrations ranging from 0.16 to 20 μg/mL depending on expected levels of analyte in the unknown samples. 4-HPR and 4-MPR were used as standards, and N-(4-ethoxyphenyl)retinamide was used as an internal standard. Blanks and low, middle, and high quality control samples were incorporated in each run. The same extraction procedure used for plasma and tissue samples was used for the calibration curves. The plasma concentration of 4-HPR and 4-MPR was presented in micrograms of drug per milliliter of plasma (μg/mL) or in micromolar per liter (μmol/L). The final tissue concentrations of drugs were presented in micrograms of drug per gram of wet tissue weight (μg/g).

Statistical analysis. The statistical significance of differences in means was evaluated by the Student's t test using Microsoft Excel 2000 software. P values were two sided. Analysis of human neuroblastoma murine xenograft models was by Kaplan-Meier log-rank analysis of survival. All tests were considered significant at P < 0.05.

Results

LYM-X-SORB matrix increased fenretinide levels. LYM-X-SORB organized lipid matrix can be formulated at various ratios of lysophosphatidylcholine, monoglycerides, and free fatty acids, to optimize incorporation of the target drug. Fenretinide (4-HPR) was incorporated into several hard, wax-like LYM-X-SORB lipid matrix (4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB matrix) preparations with the LYM-X-SORB matrix variously formulated with lysophosphatidylcholine/monoglycerides/free fatty acids ratios of 1:2:4; 1:4:2; or 1:3:3. Mice were orally dosed, either with these 4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB matrix formulations or with the expressed (expelled) contents of the currently available NCI fenretinide capsule (essentially a microcrystal slurry in corn oil). Levels of fenretinide, and its principal metabolite, 4-MPR, were then measured in plasma and tissues.

Figure 1 shows the fenretinide plasma and tissue levels obtained when 4-HPR incorporated into LYM-X-SORB matrix (1:3:3) was administered in various vehicles at doses of 120 and 250 mg 4-HPR/kg/d for 4.5 days compared with 4-HPR levels obtained by the contents of NCI 4-HPR capsules. Compared with NCI capsule contents, at doses of 120 mg/kg/d, use of the wax-like 4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB matrix approximately doubled plasma and tissue levels of 4-HPR; at doses of 250 mg kg/d, 4-HPR plasma levels increased over 3-fold and tissue levels up to 6-fold (Fig. 1A). In accordance with results reported for rats (40), 4-HPR levels in the intact brain were the lowest of the tissues assayed, but even in brain, the 4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB matrix increased 4-HPR levels ∼4-fold at doses of 250 mg/kg/d. 4-MPR levels in plasma and tissues generally mirrored 4-HPR levels, albeit at lower levels (Fig. 1B). Results obtained with 4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB matrix formulated at lysophosphatidylcholine/monoglycerides/free fatty acids ratios of 1:2:4 and 1:4:2 at doses of 120 mg/kg/d, for 4.5 days, were comparable with those obtained with the 1:3:3 matrix (data not shown).

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Fenretinide (4-HPR) and metabolite (4-MPR) levels obtained in mouse plasma and tissues using fenretinide were administered in 4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB (LXS) organized lipid matrix or as the contents of NCI corn oil capsules. BALB/c mice were orally administered the extracted contents of NCI fenretinide capsules mixed in crushed mouse chow (4-HPR, 120 mg/kg/d, n = 5, black columns) or in a nutritional shake (4-HPR, 250 mg/kg/d, n = 5, yellow columns) or administered fenretinide inserted into LYM-X-SORB matrix (4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB molar ratio: 0.8:1.0; LYM-X-SORB composition, 1:3:3, molar ratio of lysophosphatidylcholine, monoglyceride, and free fatty acid). 4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB matrix was softened for delivery in water (n = 5), or in nutritional shake (n = 5), at two different doses (4-HPR, 120 mg/kg/d, white columns; 4-HPR, 250 mg/kg/d, red columns). Animals were administered drug in two equal daily doses (twice daily), for nine total doses, and sacrificed for analysis 3 h after the last dose. A, fenretinide (4-HPR) levels in plasma (μmol/L) and tissues (μg/g) were increased by delivery in LYM-X-SORB matrix compared with capsule contents: in plasma, 120 mg/kg/d (P < 0.01) and 250 mg/kg/d (P < 0.01); in liver, 120 mg/kg/d (P < 0.01) and 250 mg/kg/d (P < 0.01); in lungs, 120 mg/kg/d (P < 0.02) and 250 mg/kg/d (P = 0.02); in kidney, 120 mg/kg/d (P = 0.14) and 250 mg/kg/d (P < 0.01); and in brain, 120 mg/kg/d (P = 0.05) and 250 mg/kg/d (P = 0.03). B, metabolite (4-MPR) levels in plasma (μmol/L) and tissues (μg/g) were increased by fenretinide delivery in LYM-X-SORB matrix compared with NCI capsule contents: in plasma, 120 mg/kg/d (P = 0.05) and 250 mg/kg/d (P < 0.01); in liver, 120 mg/kg/d (P < 0.01) and 250 mg/kg/d (P < 0.01); in lungs, 120 mg/kg/d (P < 0.01) and 250 mg/kg/d (P < 0.03); in kidney, 120 mg/kg/d (P < 0.04) and 250 mg/kg/d (P < 0.01); and in brain, 120 mg/kg/d (P = 0.04) and 250 mg/kg/d (P = 0.02). Columns, 4-HPR concentration (A) and 4-MPR concentration (B); bars, SD.

As the three different LYM-X-SORB matrix lysophosphatidylcholine/monoglycerides/free fatty acids ratios tested seemed to be approximately equivalent in increasing 4-HPR bioavailability, formulation development proceeded with a LYM-X-SORB matrix ratio of 1:4:2, as LYM-X-SORB matrix-alone at this ratio had previously received phase I clinical testing as a nutritional supplement in cystic fibrosis patients (31).

Powderized LYM-X-SORB matrix increased fenretinide levels. LYM-X-SORB matrix, a hard wax at room temperature, can be consumed neat, or delivered in capsules. However, to maximize patient acceptance of the 4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB matrix, especially to children, and to facilitate delivery through nasogastric feeding tubes, the 4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB matrix (1:4:2) was “powderized” by blending the matrix oil with table sugar and wheat flour to a final 4-HPR concentration of 3% by weight. This formulation, 4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB oral powder, could be delivered neat, mixed with applesauce, or slurried in liquid carriers for delivery. 4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB oral powder delivered at 120 mg 4-HPR/kg/d, for 2.5 days, increased plasma levels ∼3.5-fold and tissue levels up to 3-fold compared with capsule contents (Fig. 2A ). 4-MPR levels generally mirrored 4-HPR levels, albeit at lower levels (Fig. 2B). 4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB oral powder at this dose increased 4-HPR plasma levels (P < 0.01) compared with the wax-like 4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB matrix delivered by itself (Fig. 1A), perhaps as a result of powderization facilitating absorption by reducing the particle size of the ingested LYM-X-SORB matrix.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Fenretinide (4-HPR) and metabolite (4-MPR) levels obtained in mouse plasma and tissues using 4-HPR administered in powderized 4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB matrix or as the contents of NCI corn oil capsules. Nude mice were orally administered fenretinide (4-HPR, 120 mg/kg/d) as the extracted contents of NCI fenretinide capsules mixed in a nutritional shake (n = 9, black columns) or in 4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB matrix (4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB molar ratio: 0.8:1.0; LYM-X-SORB composition, 1:4:2, molar ratio of lysophosphatidylcholine, monoglyceride, and free fatty acids) that was powderized with flour and sugar. 4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB oral powder (white columns) was slurried for delivery in water (n = 5) or in a nutritional shake (n = 5). Animals were administered drug in two equal daily doses (twice daily), for five total doses, and then sacrificed for analysis 4 h after the last dose. All animals were assayed for plasma levels. For tissue levels, animals administered 4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB oral powder in nutritional shake (n = 5) were analyzed for comparison against animals administered NCI capsule contents in nutritional shake (n = 4). A, fenretinide (4-HPR) levels in plasma and most tissues were increased by delivery in 4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB oral powder compared with capsule contents: in plasma, liver, kidney, brain, and heart, all P < 0.05; in lungs, P = 0.09; and in spleen, P = 0.08. B, metabolite (4-MPR) levels in plasma and most tissues were increased by 4-HPR delivery in powderized LYM-X-SORB matrix compared with NCI capsule contents: in plasma, kidney, brain, heart, and spleen, P < 0.05; in liver, P < 0.08; and in lungs, P < 0.06. Columns, 4-HPR concentration (A) and 4-MPR concentration (B); bars, SD.

Supported by the above data, a grant was secured from the NCI Developmental Therapeutics Program's Rapid Access to Intervention Development program for the Good Manufacturing Practice (i.e., clinical grade) production of 4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB oral powder to support phase I trials in pediatrics and adults. 4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB oral powder was prepared at final 4-HPR concentrations of 2.2% and 3%. Both preparations were free-flowing powders; whereas the 2.2% powder had superior dissolution properties in liquids, the 3% powder could be adequately slurried in liquids and had a consistency more amenable to direct ingestion or mixing with solids for ingestion. Clinical grade 4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB oral powders (2.2% and 3%) were administered to mice at doses from 120 to 360 mg/kg/d, for 2.5 days, and plasma and liver 4-HPR and 4-MPR levels were assayed (Fig. 3 ). 4-HPR levels in plasma and liver were increased 3- to 7-fold compared with 4-HPR delivered at similar doses using capsule contents (Figs. 1 and 2) and the levels obtained were dose responsive in this range.

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Fenretinide (4-HPR) and metabolite (4-MPR) levels obtained in mouse plasma and liver using 2.2% and 3% clinical grade 4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB oral powder. Nude mice were gavaged with 4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB oral powder formulated under Good Manufacturing Practice conditions. 4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB matrix (4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB molar ratio: 0.8:1.0; LYM-X-SORB composition, 1:4:2, molar ratio of lysophosphatidylcholine, monoglyceride, and free fatty acid) was powderized with flour and sugar to final 4-HPR concentrations of 2.2% or 3%. Mice received the following: 4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB oral powder (4-HPR, 120 mg/kg/d, white columns) slurried for delivery in water (2.2% powder, n = 5; 3% powder, n = 5) or in a nutritional shake (3% powder, n = 5); 4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB oral powder (4-HPR, 240 mg/kg/d, gray columns) slurried for delivery in water (2.2% powder, n = 5; 3% powder, n = 3) or nutritional shake (3% powder, n = 5); or 4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB oral powder (4-HPR, 360 mg/kg/d, black columns) slurried for delivery in nutritional shake (3% powder, n = 5). Animals were administered drug in two equal daily doses (twice daily), for five total doses, and then sacrificed for analysis 4 h after the last dose. Both 4-HPR and 4-MPR levels in plasma and liver significantly increased with drug dosage: 120 versus 240 mg/kg/d, P < 0.01; 240 versus 360 mg/kg/d, P < 0.05. For a given fenretinide dosage level, there was no statistical differences in 4-HPR or 4-MPR plasma or liver levels obtained between animals receiving the 2.2% versus 3% powder or in plasma levels obtained using powder slurried in water versus nutritional shake. 4-HPR and 4-MPR liver levels trended lower in animals receiving oral powder in nutritional shake compared with water at 120 mg/kg/d (P < 0.04 and P < 0.01, respectively) but not at 240 mg/kg/d (P = 0.20 and P = 0.14, respectively). Columns, concentration; bars, SD.

Fenretinide/LYM-X-SORB oral powder prolonged survival in neuroblastoma xenograft models. Three human neuroblastoma cell lines were established as xenografts in nude mice. SMS-KCNR is drug-sensitive in vitro, whereas CHLA-140 and CHLA-90 are multidrug-resistant in vitro (32–35). CHLA-90 has loss of p53 function via a TP53 mutation; both CHLA-140 and CHLA-90 overexpress the MDR1 gene.6 Xenografts received 4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB oral powder, or powderized LYM-X-SORB matrix-alone (controls), by gavage for up to 18 weeks. Treatment with 4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB oral powder prolonged survival in two of the three xenograft models and for the combined data from all three models, as shown by Kaplan-Meier analysis (,Fig. 4 ). This showed that fenretinide delivered in 4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB oral powder was both bioavailable and bioactive. Chronic dosing of 4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB oral powder seemed well tolerated by mice; mouse body weights were not different from the controls (Fig. 5 ).

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB oral powder prolonged survival in human neuroblastoma murine xenografts. Human neuroblastoma cell lines SMS-KCNR, CHLA-90, and CHLA-140 were established as s.c. xenografts in nu/nu mice. Animals received 120 mg/kg/d, by gavage, in daily divided doses, 5 d a week (CHLA-140, n = 5 per cohort), or 240 mg/kg/d, by gavage, in daily divided doses, 5 d a week (SMS-KCNR, n = 5 per cohort; CHLA-90, n = 6 per cohort). Control animals received powderized LYM-X-SORB matrix-alone. Animals were sacrificed when tumors reached 1,500 mm3. A, CHLA-90. B, CHLA-140. C, SMS-KCNR. D, combined survival for SMS-KCNR, CHLA-90, and CHLA-140 (n = 16 per cohort). 4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB oral powder significantly prolonged survival in CHLA-90 and SMS-KCNR and in the combined survival data of the three models. Survival analysis by Kaplan-Meier log-rank test.

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Body weights of mice during the initial 30 d of the experiment presented in Fig. 4. Weight comparisons could only be carried out for the initial 30 d (a total of four 5-d courses of 4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB oral powder) as mice were culled due to tumor burdens. Statistical differences were assessed at day 14; there was no significant difference (P > 0.05) in body weights for those mice treated with 4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB compared with controls for mice carrying CHLA-90 and CHLA-140 xenografts. The SMS-KCNR control mice had significantly (P = 0.035) lower weights than 4-HPR-treated mice due to morbidity from tumor xenograft growth.

Discussion

To date, clinical investigations of 4-HPR (fenretinide) have principally focused on its oncologic use as a chemoprevention or chemotherapeutic agent, although recent preclinical data suggest that fenretinide may have clinical potential in the prevention or treatment of obesity-related type II diabetes (41, 42) and/or retinal degenerative diseases, such as age-related macular degeneration and Stargardt's macular degeneration (43–45). Direct clinical activity observed with fenretinide in cancers to date has been modest, possibly due to the low drug levels obtained, although tumor responses and/or disease stability have been noted in neuroblastoma (27, 46), platinum-refractory ovarian cancer (47), and oral leukoplakia (48). Fenretinide has been generally well tolerated on both low-dose and high-dose schedules with a reversible decrease in night vision being the most common side effect (25). Decreased night vision (nyctalopia), however, has not prevented daily fenretinide administration for up to 5 years (49).

One impediment to the clinical development of fenretinide has been its historical delivery vehicle, a large, corn oil-based capsule of limited bioavailability that delivers plasma levels with a wide interpatient variability. In one trial, the daily consumption of up to 4,000 mg/m2 fenretinide (40 capsules/m2), for 4 weeks of every 5 weeks, resulted in mean plasma levels of only 12.9 μmol/L (28). Patient dissatisfaction with the capsule formulation on high-dose schedules has been noted (28, 50).

In an attempt to improve drug delivery and maximize tumor response, we have placed fenretinide in a novel, organized lipid matrix, called LYM-X-SORB, and powderized the 4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB matrix for delivery. As the data presented show, this formulation increased plasma and tissue levels in mice from 3- to 7-fold compared with identical doses delivered as the contents of fenretinide in corn oil capsules and prolonged survival in human neuroblastoma xenograft models. We observed that 4-HPR delivered in any form of LYM-X-SORB matrix increased 4-HPR bioavailability. However, working with the hard, wax-like LYM-X-SORB matrix produced intermouse variability in drug levels obtained, likely due to the technical difficulties associated with its consistency. Powderizing the 4-HPR/LYM-X-SORB matrix produced a product that was easier to deliver mechanically and that obtained higher drug levels with a lower interanimal variance.

In the formulation ultimately developed for clinical trials, fenretinide/LYM-X-SORB oral powder has roughly the consistency of brown sugar. It is intended to be dissolved or slurried in nonmilk fat–containing liquids, mixed with foods, or consumed neat for patient delivery. It is hoped that this powderized format will be user-friendly to patients and facilitate compliance on high-dose fenretinide schedules. Indeed, fenretinide/LYM-X-SORB oral powder slurried into a liquid nutritional supplement has been delivered via nasogastric tube to a cancer patient with restricted oral intake.7 Powderized LYM-X-SORB organized lipid matrix (as described in this report, but lacking fenretinide) will also be tested as a dietary supplement in cystic fibrosis patients in an upcoming randomized, double-blinded, nutritional intervention study funded by the NIH National Institutes of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases (grant 2 R44 DK060302-02A1).

Based on the preclinical data reported here, a phase I trial of fenretinide/LYM-X-SORB oral powder (NL2004-04, B. Maurer, Chair) in pediatric neuroblastoma patients is in progress in the NCI-funded, New Approaches to Neuroblastoma Therapy consortium8 with the drug supplied via by a Rapid Access to Intervention Development grant from the NCI Developmental Therapeutics Program. It is anticipated that this novel formulation will deliver higher and/or more uniform fenretinide levels for use in future single- and combination-agent clinical trials in cancer and other disease states.

Footnotes

  • ↵6 N. Keshelava, personal communication.

  • ↵7 B.J. Maurer, unpublished data.

  • ↵8 http://www.nant.org

  • Grant support: National Cancer Institute grants CA100895 (B.J. Maurer) and CA81403 (C.P. Reynolds and B.J. Maurer); NCI Developmental Therapeutics Program Rapid Access to Intervention Development grant (B.J. Maurer); The Whittier Foundation (C.P. Reynolds and B.J. Maurer); The Cusumano Leukemia Fund of the Michael Hoefflin Foundation (B.J. Maurer); and The Tyler's Team Leukemia Fund (B.J. Maurer).

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

  • Note: Certain intellectual property rights to fenretinide/LYM-X-SORB organized lipid matrix formulations may be reserved by Childrens Hospital Los Angeles (Los Angeles, CA) and/or BioMolecular Products, Inc. (Byfield, MA).

    • Accepted March 1, 2007.
    • Received July 31, 2006.
    • Revision received February 3, 2007.

References

  1. ↵
    Ponzoni M, Bocca P, Chiesa V, et al. Differential effects of N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide and retinoic acid on neuroblastoma cells: apoptosis versus differentiation. Cancer Res 1995;55:853–61.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. Di Vinci A, Geido E, Infusini E, Giaretti W. Neuroblastoma cell apoptosis induced by the synthetic retinoid N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide. Int J Cancer 1994;59:422–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Maurer BJ, Melton L, Billups C, Cabot MC, Reynolds CP. Synergistic cytotoxicity in solid tumor cell lines between N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide and modulators of ceramide metabolism. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:1897.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Ziv Y, Gupta MK, Milsom JW, Vladisavljevic A, Brand M, Fazio VW. The effect of tamoxifen and fenretinimide on human colorectal cancer cell lines in vitro. Anticancer Res 1994;14:2005–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    Hsieh TC, Ng C, Wu JM. The synthetic retinoid N-(4-hydroxyphenyl) retinamide (4-HPR) exerts antiproliferative and apoptosis-inducing effects in the androgen-independent human prostatic JCA-1 cells. Biochem Mol Biol Int 1995;37:499–506.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    Igawa M, Tanabe T, Chodak GW, Rukstalis DB. N-(4-hydroxyphenyl) retinamide induces cell cycle specific growth inhibition in PC3 cells. Prostate 1994;24:299–305.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    Kazmi SM, Plante RK, Visconti V, Lau CY. Comparison of N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide and all-trans- retinoic acid in the regulation of retinoid receptor-mediated gene expression in human breast cancer cell lines. Cancer Res 1996;56:1056–62.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Coradini D, Biffi A, Pellizzaro C, Pirronello E, Di Fronzo G. Combined effect of tamoxifen or interferon-β and 4-hydroxyphenylretinamide on the growth of breast cancer cell lines. Tumor Biol 1997;18:22–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. ↵
    Supino R, Crosti M, Clerici M, et al. Induction of apoptosis by fenretinide (4HPR) in human ovarian carcinoma cells and its association with retinoic acid receptor expression. Int J Cancer 1996;65:491–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. Sabichi AL, Hendricks DT, Bober MA, Birrer MJ. Retinoic acid receptor β expression and growth inhibition of gynecologic cancer cells by the synthetic retinoid N-(4-hydroxyphenyl) retinamide. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998;90:597–605.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Formelli F, Cleris L. Synthetic retinoid fenretinide is effective against a human ovarian carcinoma xenograft and potentiates cisplatin activity. Cancer Res 1993;53:5374–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Kalemkerian GP, Slusher R, Ramalingam S, Gadgeel S, Mabry M. Growth inhibition and induction of apoptosis by fenretinide in small-cell lung cancer cell lines. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995;87:1674–80.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Delia D, Aiello A, Lombardi L, et al. N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide induces apoptosis of malignant hemopoietic cell lines including those unresponsive to retinoic acid. Cancer Res 1993;53:6036–41.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. Chan LN, Zhang S, Shao J, Waikel R, Thompson EA, Chan TS. N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide induces apoptosis in T lymphoma and T lymphoblastoid leukemia cells. Leuk Lymphoma 1997;25:271–80.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    O'Donnell PH, Guo WX, Reynolds CP, Maurer BJ. N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide increases ceramide and is cytotoxic to acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell lines, but not to non-malignant lymphocytes. Leukemia 2002;16:902–10.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Wu JM, Dipietrantonio AM, Hsieh TC. Mechanism of fenretinide (4-HPR)-induced cell death. Apoptosis 2001;6:377–88.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Delia D, Aiello A, Formelli F, et al. Regulation of apoptosis induced by the retinoid N-(4-hydroxyphenyl) retinamide and effect of deregulated bcl-2. Blood 1995;85:359–67.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. Zou C-P, Kurie JM, Lotan D, Zou C-C, Hong WK, Lotan R. Higher potency of N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide than all-trans-retinoic acid in induction of apoptosis in non-small cell lung cancer cell lines. Clin Cancer Res 1998;4:1345–55.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  19. ↵
    Maurer BJ, Metelitsa LS, Seeger RC, Cabot MC, Reynolds CP. Increase of ceramide and induction of mixed apoptosis/necrosis by N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-retinamide in neuroblastoma cell lines. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999;91:1138–46.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. Oridate N, Suzuki S, Higuchi M, Mitchell MF, Hong WK, Lotan R. Involvement of reactive oxygen species in N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide-induced apoptosis in cervical carcinoma cells. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997;89:1191–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. Delia D, Aiello A, Meroni L, Nicolini M, Reed JC, Pierotti MA. Role of antioxidants and intracellular free radicals in retinamide-induced cell death. Carcinogenesis 1997;18:943–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Dipietrantonio A, Hsieh T-C, Olson SC, Wu JM. Regulation of G1/S transition and induction of apoptosis in HL-60 leukemia cells by fenretinide (4HPR). Int J Cancer 1998;78:53–61.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. Batra S, Reynolds CP, Maurer BJ. Fenretinide cytotoxicity for Ewing's sarcoma (ES) and primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET) cell lines is decreased by hypoxia and synergistically enhanced by ceramide modulators. Cancer Res 2004;64:5415–24.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Rehman F, Shanmugasundaram P, Schrey MP. Fenretinide stimulates redox-sensitive ceramide production in breast cancer cells: potential role in drug-induced cytotoxicity. Br J Cancer 2004;91:1821–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Torrisi R, Parodi S, Fontana V, et al. Factors affecting plasma retinol decline during long-term administration of the synthetic retinoid fenretinide in breast cancer patients. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1994;3:507–10.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  26. ↵
    Jasti BR, LoRusso PM, Parchment RE, et al. Phase I clinical trial of fenretinide (NSC374551) in advanced solid tumors. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2001;20:122a.
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    Villablanca JG, Krailo MD, Ames MM, Reid JM, Reaman GH, Reynolds CP. Phase I trial of oral fenretinide in children with high risk solid tumors: a report from the Children's Oncology Group (CCG 09709). J Clin Oncol 2006;24:3423–30.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    Garaventa A, Luksch R, Piccolo MS, et al. Phase I trial and pharmacokinetics of fenretinide in children with neuroblastoma. Clin Cancer Res 2003;9:2032–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    Yesair DW. Composition for delivery of orally administered drugs and other substances. United States patent U.S. 4874795. 1989 October 17.
  30. ↵
    Yesair DW. Composition for the delivery of orally administered drugs and other substances. United States patent U.S. 5972911. 1999 October 26.
  31. ↵
    Lepage G, Yesair DW, Ronco N, et al. Effect of an organized lipid matrix on lipid absorption and clinical outcomes in patients with cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr 2002;141:178–85.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    Keshelava N, Tsao-Wei D, Reynolds CP. Pyrazoloacridine is active in multidrug-resistant neuroblastoma cell lines with nonfunctional p53. Clin Cancer Res 2003;9:3492–502.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. Keshelava N, Zuo JJ, Chen P, et al. Loss of p53 function confers high-level multidrug resistance in neuroblastoma cell lines. Cancer Res 2001;61:6185–93.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. Keshelava N, Seeger RC, Groshen S, Reynolds CP. Drug resistance patterns of human neuroblastoma cell lines derived from patients at different phases of therapy. Cancer Res 1998;58:5396–405.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    Keshelava N, Groshen S, Reynolds CP. Cross-resistance of topoisomerase I and II inhibitors in neuroblastoma cell lines. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2000;45:1–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    Yesair DW, Shaw WA, Burgess SW, McKee RT. Modification of solid 3-sn-phosphoglycerides. United States patent U.S. 2004/0259837 A1.
  37. ↵
    Maurer BJ, Reynolds CP, Yesair DW, McKee RT, Burgess SW, Shaw WA. Oral compositions of fenretinide having increased bioavailability and methods of using the same. United States patent U.S. 2005/0106216 A1.
  38. ↵
    Tomayko MM, Reynolds CP. Determination of subcutaneous tumor size in athymic (nude) mice. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1989;24:148–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    Vratilova J, Frgala T, Maurer BJ, Patrick CP. Liquid chromatography method for quantifying N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide and N-(4-methoxyphenyl)retinamide in tissues. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 2004;808:125–30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    Le Doze F, Debruyne D, Albessard F, Barre L, Defer GL. Pharmacokinetics of all-trans retinoic acid, 13-cis retinoic acid, and fenretinide in plasma and brain of Rat. Drug Metab Dispos 2000;28:205–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    Yang Q, Graham TE, Mody N, et al. Serum retinol binding protein 4 contributes to insulin resistance in obesity and type 2 diabetes. Nature 2005;436:356–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    Graham TE, Yang Q, Bluher M, et al. Retinol-binding protein 4 and insulin resistance in lean, obese, and diabetic subjects. N Engl J Med 2006;354:2552–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    Bui TV, Han Y, Radu RA, Travis GH, Mata NL. Characterization of native retinal fluorophores involved in biosynthesis of A2E and lipofuscin-associated retinopathies. J Biol Chem 2006;281:18112–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. Radu RA, Han Y, Bui TV, et al. Reductions in serum vitamin A arrest accumulation of toxic retinal fluorophores: a potential therapy for treatment of lipofuscin-based retinal diseases. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:4393–401.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    Radu RA, Mata NL, Nusinowitz S, Liu X, Travis GH. Isotretinoin treatment inhibits lipofuscin accumulation in a mouse model of recessive Stargardt's macular degeneration. Novartis Found Symp 2004;255:51–63.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  46. ↵
    Villablanca JG, London W, McGrady P, et al. Children's Oncology Group Protocol ANBL0321: a phase II study of 4-hydroxyphenylretinamide (4-HPR/fenretinide) in pediatric patients with refractory or recurrent neuroblastoma. Adv Neuroblast Res 2006;122.
  47. ↵
    Garcia AA, Morgan R, McNamara M, et al. Phase II trial of fenretinide (4-HPR) in recurrent ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinoma: a California Cancer Consortium Trial. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2004;23:461.
    OpenUrl
  48. ↵
    Lippman SM, Lee JJ, Martin JW, et al. Fenretinide activity in retinoid-resistant oral leukoplakia. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12:3109–14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    Veronesi U, de Palo G, Marubini E, et al. Randomized trial of fenretinide to prevent second breast malignancy in women with early breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999;91:1847–56.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    Otterson GA, Lavelle J, Villalona-Calero MA, et al. A phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of fenretinide combined with paclitaxel and cisplatin for refractory solid tumors. Invest New Drugs 2005;23:555–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Clinical Cancer Research: 13 (10)
May 2007
Volume 13, Issue 10
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Clinical Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Improved Oral Delivery of N-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)Retinamide with a Novel LYM-X-SORB Organized Lipid Complex
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Clinical Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Improved Oral Delivery of N-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)Retinamide with a Novel LYM-X-SORB Organized Lipid Complex
Barry J. Maurer, Ondrej Kalous, David W. Yesair, Xiaqin Wu, Jitka Janeba, Vanessa Maldonado, Vazgen Khankaldyyan, Tomas Frgala, Bee-Chun Sun, R. Travis McKee, Stephen W. Burgess, Walter A. Shaw and C. Patrick Reynolds
Clin Cancer Res May 15 2007 (13) (10) 3079-3086; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1889

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Improved Oral Delivery of N-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)Retinamide with a Novel LYM-X-SORB Organized Lipid Complex
Barry J. Maurer, Ondrej Kalous, David W. Yesair, Xiaqin Wu, Jitka Janeba, Vanessa Maldonado, Vazgen Khankaldyyan, Tomas Frgala, Bee-Chun Sun, R. Travis McKee, Stephen W. Burgess, Walter A. Shaw and C. Patrick Reynolds
Clin Cancer Res May 15 2007 (13) (10) 3079-3086; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1889
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Survivin mAbs Inhibit Tumor Growth
  • B7-H3 Negatively Modulates Cancer Immunity
  • RB1 and TYMP as Biomarkers of Capecitabine Response in TNBC
Show more Cancer Therapy: Preclinical
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • CCR Focus Archive
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Clinical Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Clinical Cancer Research
eISSN: 1557-3265
ISSN: 1078-0432

Advertisement