Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Imaging, Diagnosis, Prognosis

The Prognostic Biomarkers HOXB13, IL17BR, and CHDH Are Regulated by Estrogen in Breast Cancer

Zuncai Wang, Sonika Dahiya, Heather Provencher, Beth Muir, Erin Carney, Kathryn Coser, Toshi Shioda, Xiao-Jun Ma and Dennis C. Sgroi
Zuncai Wang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sonika Dahiya
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Heather Provencher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Beth Muir
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erin Carney
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kathryn Coser
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Toshi Shioda
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiao-Jun Ma
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dennis C. Sgroi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0310 Published November 2007
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Purpose: We previously identified three genes, HOXB13, IL17BR, and CHDH, that strongly predict clinical outcome in estrogen receptor (ER)–positive breast cancer patients receiving tamoxifen monotherapy. The biological mechanisms linking these genes to estrogen signaling and tamoxifen response in breast cancer remain to be determined.

Experimental Design: In a consecutive series of 148 ER-positive and ER-negative breast cancers, HOXB13, IL17BR, and CHDH gene expression was measured by quantitative real-time PCR and correlated with ER, PR, and HER2 expression. The role of estrogen and ER in the regulation of these three genes was assessed in several ER-positive and ER-negative breast cancer cell lines.

Results: In primary breast tumors, HOXB13 expression correlated negatively, and IL17BR and CHDH expression correlated positively, with ER status, and all three genes exhibited an ER-dependent correlation pattern with HER2 status that differs from PR and PS2, two canonical estrogen-regulated genes. Results using breast cancer cell lines show that these genes are regulated by estradiol in an ER-dependent manner, and that this regulation is abrogated by tamoxifen.

Conclusions:HOXB13, IL17BR, and CHDH are estrogen-regulated genes, but their pattern of correlation with known positive (ER, PR) and negative (HER2) predictors of tamoxifen response differs from canonical ER signature genes. These results provide a biological rationale for the prognostic utility of these three genes in early-stage ER-positive breast cancer and for their potential to predict anti-estrogen resistance.

  • HOXB13
  • IL17BR
  • CHDH
  • estrogen
  • tamoxifen
  • HER2
  • breast cancer

Microarray analysis of various breast cancer cohorts have led to the identification of multiple prognostic gene expression signatures (1–10). Previously, we showed through a microarray-based analysis that three genes, HOXB13 (a homeo-domain–containing protein), IL17BR (interleukin-17 receptor B) and CHDH (choline dehydrogenase, originally reported as Genbank accession number AI240933; ref. 4) were significantly associated with clinical outcome in a cohort of early-stage estrogen receptor (ER)–positive breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen monotherapy (4). IL17BR and CHDH were overexpressed in patients with favorable outcome, whereas the homeobox gene HOXB13 was overexpressed in patients who experienced a more aggressive clinical course (i.e., tamoxifen resistance).

Since these initial observations, three additional studies have further assessed the prognostic and predictive utility of the HOXB13:IL17BR expression ratio in women with breast cancer (11–13). Goetz et al. (11) analyzed the two-gene expression index in a cohort of 206 postmenopausal women with ER-positive breast cancer from a prospective randomized adjuvant tamoxifen trial and revealed that a high HOXB13:IL17BR index was predictive of early relapse and death in node-negative but not in node-positive patients. In a cohort of 852 breast cancer patients, the two-gene index was further shown to be a strong independent prognostic factor for ER-positive node-negative breast cancer patients irrespective of tamoxifen therapy (13). Independently, Jansen et al. (14) have recently shown in a cohort of 812 ER-positive breast cancer patients that high HOXB13:IL17BR index expression levels were associated with both tumor aggressiveness and tamoxifen therapy failure.

To begin to understand the biological context underlying the prognostic and predictive potential of HOXB13, IL17BR, and CHDH, we sought to determine whether these genes are regulated by estrogen signaling in breast cancer. In a population-based, consecutive series of women diagnosed with ER-positive and ER-negative breast cancer, we show that HOXB13, IL17BR, and CHDH expression correlates with ER and HER2 status. Furthermore, we show that gene expression of HOXB13, IL17BR, and CHDH is regulated by estrogen in an ER-dependent manner, which, in turn, is abrogated by tamoxifen. The estrogen-regulated pattern of HOXB13, IL17BR, and CHDH expression differs from canonical ER signature genes, suggesting that these genes may serve as a biomarker for dysfunctional ER signaling.

Materials and Methods

Patients. The Massachusetts General Hospital institutional review board approved this study in accordance to NIH guidelines. To avoid bias, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor samples from 75 consecutive ER-positive and 73 consecutive ER-negative invasive breast carcinomas diagnosed at the Massachusetts General Hospital (Boston, MA) between 2005 and 2006 were prospectively collected and processed for RNA extraction and real-time quantitative PCR. Receptor status had been determined by immunohistochemistry using the BenchMark XT automated system (Ventana Medical Systems Inc.). Only cases with more than 10% positivity of tumor cells were considered as ER positive. HER2 amplification was determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization using the PathVysion HER-2 DNA probe kit (Vysis). For each case, the ratio of ≥2 HER2 to CEP 17 signals in at least 60 interphase tumor cell nuclei was considered as amplification of HER2. Clinicopathologic characteristics are described in Table 1 .

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Clinicopathologic characteristics of 148 patients

RNA isolation from FFPE tumor samples and real-time quantitative PCR. Total RNA was isolated from two to three 5-μm tissue sections for each sample using Optimum FFPE RNA isolation kit from Ambion Diagnostics according to the manufacturer's instructions and reverse-transcribed into cDNA using gene-specific reverse priming using Powerscript Reverse Transcriptase (Clontech Laboratories) Reagent System. TaqMan primers and probes were designed using Primer Express (Applied Biosystems) for 10 genes (Table 2 ). The three reference genes (ACTB, HMBS, and UBC) were selected by assessing 10 commonly used housekeeping genes in an independent breast cancer cohort, as described previously (13). Gene expression was quantitated by TaqMan reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) in triplicate in 96-well plate using an ABI 7900HT (Applied Biosystems) as described previously (4). For each gene, a standard curve with cDNA dilutions derived from human universal total RNA (Stratagene) was constructed and was run on each plate to control for the interplate variability.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Real-time PCR primer and probe design

Cell culture and reagents. The T47D cell line was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection and maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% FCS (DMEM-FCS). The MDA-MB-436, -453, and -468 human breast cancer cells were a generous gift from Daphne Bell (Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA). MCF-7 cells (BUS stock) were maintained as previously described (15, 16). MDA-MB-231-neo and MDA-MB-231-ER8 cells were generously provided by Robert Weinberg (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA) and maintained as described (17). Charcoal/dextran-treated fetal bovine serum (cFBS) and fetal bovine serum (FBS) were obtained from Hyclone Laboratories, Inc. Tamoxifen and 17β-estradiol were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co.

Data analysis. All statistical analysis was done in the R statistical software. Association of continuous variables with binary factors (e.g., ER/HER2 status) was tested using nonparametric Wilcoxon two-sample test. Pair-wise gene-gene correlations were examined using the Pearson correlation coefficients. Relative gene expression levels in the cell line studies were compared between two conditions using the Student's t test with unequal variance. All P values are two-sided, and P values <0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Correlation of HOXB13, IL17BR, and CHDH expression with the estrogen and progesterone receptor. Using a population-based cohort of 75 consecutive ER-positive and 73 ER-negative invasive breast cancers, we investigated the correlation of HOXB13, IL17BR, and CHDH gene expression with the estrogen and progesterone receptors, two well-known positive biomarkers of tamoxifen response. First, we correlated the mRNA levels of HOXB13, IL17BR, and CHDH with ER status as determined by immunohistochemistry (Fig. 1 ). The relative expression of HOXB13 mRNA was higher in ER-negative tumors as compared with ER-positive tumors (Fig. 1A), whereas the relative expression of IL17BR and CHDH was significantly higher in ER-positive tumors as compared with ER-negative tumors (Fig. 1B and C). Using a Gaussian model–based clustering technique, HOXB13 mRNA levels were found to be bimodal, with 67% of ER-negative tumors and 50% of ER-positive tumors expressing HOXB13 (Fig. 1D). Next, we correlated the expression of HOXB13, IL17BR, and CHDH with ER mRNA levels as well as two other well-characterized estrogen-regulated genes, PR and pS2. Clustering of all pair-wise correlation coefficients among these genes indicated that HOXB13 correlated negatively with ER, whereas IL17BR and CHDH correlated positively with each other and with ER (Fig. 2 and Table 3 ). As expected, the expression of PR and PS2 (Trefoil factor 1, TFF1), two canonical ER signature genes, correlated most strongly with ER. However, the positive correlation of IL17BR and CHDH with ER was less than that of PR and pS2 (Table 3).

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Real-time quantitative PCR analysis of HOXB13, IL17BR, and CHDH expression according to ER status. A-C, box plots of HOXB13, IL17BR, and CHDH mRNA levels (Y-axis) versus ER status (X-axis). P values are from Wilcoxon two-sample test. D, bimodal distribution of HOXB13 expression. Histograms of HOXB13 mRNA levels (X-axis) in ER-positive and ER-negative tumors. Using a cutoff of −9 (vertical dotted line), high HOXB13 expression was seen in 50% ER-positive and 67% ER-negative tumors (P = 0.047).

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Heat map of pair-wise correlation coefficients of gene expression values after hierarchical clustering.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

Pearson correlation between HOXB13, IL17BR, CHDH, ESR, and PGR in 148 breast cancer patient cohort

Correlation of HOXB13, IL17BR, and CHDH expression with HER2. Using the same cohort described above, we next investigated the correlation of HOXB13, IL17BR, and CHDH mRNA expression with HER2 status, a known negative predictor of tamoxifen response. Notably, these three genes exhibited an ER-dependent correlation pattern with HER2 status (Fig. 3 ). More specifically, HOXB13 expression positively correlated with HER2 status in ER-positive but not in ER-negative tumors, and IL17BR and CHDH negatively correlated with HER2 status more strongly in ER-positive tumors than in ER-negative tumors. Interestingly, this ER-dependent correlative pattern for these genes with HER2 is distinct from that for PR and PS2 in that neither of these latter genes showed significant correlation with HER2 status in ER-positive tumors (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

ER-dependent correlation with HER2 status. Box plots of real-time quantitative PCR gene expression values (Y-axis) in ER-positive and ER-negative breast cancers are plotted according to HER2 status (X-axis). P values are from Wilcoxon two-sample test.

Expression of HOXB13, IL17BR, and CHDH is regulated by estradiol. The observation that IL17BR and CHDH expression directly correlates and HOXB13 expression inversely correlates with ER expression raises the possibility that these three genes are targets of estrogen signaling. To address this issue, we exposed several ER-positive and ER-negative breast cancer cell lines to estradiol (E2) and measured transcript levels of all three genes by real-time quantitative-PCR (QRT-PCR). As expected, E2 stimulation resulted in elevated expression of PS2 in the ER-positive MCF7 and T47D cells, but in none of the three ER-negative cell lines (Fig. 4A ). HOXB13 expression was significantly reduced, and IL17BR and CHDH expression was significantly increased by E2 in the ER-positive MCF7 and T47D cell lines, but not in the ER-negative cell lines (MDA-MB-436, MDA-MB468, and MDA-MB-453; Fig. 4A). Therefore, these data suggest that HOXB13, IL17BR, and CHDH are estrogen-responsive genes, consistent with their respective correlations with ER status in primary breast tumors described above. Furthermore, this estrogen response is not seen in ER-negative cells, suggesting a requirement for the ER.

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Estrogen and the ER regulate HOXB13, IL17BR, and CHDH expression. A, relative gene expression levels of HOXB13, IL17BR, CHDH, and PS2 were assessed by real-time quantitative PCR in ER-negative (MDA-MB-436, -453, and -468) and ER-positive (MCF7, T47D) breast cancer cells lines. Cells were estrogen deprived by incubating them in DMEM phenol-free medium containing 5% charcoal-stripped serum for 72 h. After this period, the cells were treated with 1.0 nmol/L of 17β-estradiol (E2) or ethanol vehicle (control). After 24 h of E2 exposure, the cells were harvested and processed for real-time PCR. B, real-time quantitative PCR analysis of HOXB13, IL17BR, CHDH, and PS2 expression in ER-negative breast cancer cells expressing a control vector (MDA-MB231-neo) or an ER expression vector (MDA-MB231-ER8). MDA-MB231-neo and MDA-MB231-ER8 cells were grown in medium containing non-charcoal–stripped FBS. Gene expression values were normalized to β-actin. Columns, means from triplicate experiments; bars, SE. *, P = 0.05; **, P = 0.01; ***, P = 0.001.

To further test whether the E2 response of HOXB13, IL17BR, and CHDH requires functional ER, we evaluated the ability of ectopically expressed ER to modulate HOXB13, IL17BR, and CHDH expression. We measured transcript levels of these three genes in ER-negative MDA-MB-231 cells engineered to stably express a functional ER (17, 18). As compared with the parental MDA-MB-231 cell line, the ER-expressing MDA-MB-231 cells (MDA-MB-ER8) in the presence of E2 show dramatically elevated expression of IL17BR and CHDH and a near-complete suppression of HOXB13 expression (Fig. 4B). These results suggest that E2 regulation of HOXB13, IL17BR, and CHDH is mediated through the ER.

Because HOXB13, IL17BR, and CHDH were initially discovered as prognostic biomarkers in ER-positive patients treated with tamoxifen monotherapy (4), we next determined whether the estrogen response of these genes could be modulated by tamoxifen, a partial anti-estrogen. We stimulated MCF7 cells with two doses (0.1 and 1 nmol/L) of E2 in the presence or absence of 5 nmol/L tamoxifen. As a control, E2 resulted in 15-fold increase in PS2 expression, which was blocked by tamoxifen (Fig. 5 ). Notably, the enhancement of IL17BR and CHDH expression and the suppression of HOXB13 expression by E2 were abrogated by tamoxifen (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Regulation of HOXB13, IL17BR, and CHDH by estradiol is abrogated by tamoxifen. Real-time PCR analysis of HOXB13, IL17BR, CHDH, and PS2 in MCF7 cells were grown in culture conditions identical to that described in Fig. 4 and exposed to ethanol vehicle (control) or varying concentrations of E2 in the presence and absence of tamoxifen. Gene expression values were normalized to β-actin. Columns, means from triplicate experiments; bars, SE.

Discussion

Estrogen plays an important role in breast cancer pathogenesis, and selective interference of the estrogen/ER-mediated signaling cascade is the most effective means of treating ER-positive breast cancer patients. High-throughput gene expression technologies have revealed a robust gene expression signature that readily distinguishes ER-positive tumors from ER-negative tumors (6, 19). Comparative analysis of ER-positive breast tumor gene expression profiles with those generated from E2-stimulated breast cancer cell lines has shown a remarkable overlap of genes (20). However, despite the identification of such ER gene expression signatures, it remains to be determined which gene or subset of genes regulated by estrogen is critical for breast tumorigenesis.

Previously, through genome-wide expression profiling, we identified a simple gene expression pattern that sub-stratifies ER-positive breast cancer patients into good and poor prognosis categories (4). More specifically, we have shown that a distinct breast cancer gene expression pattern characterized by higher levels of HOXB13 and lower levels IL17BR and CHDH gene expression predicts for distant tumor recurrence in tamoxifen-treated patients with ER-positive breast cancer (4, 11, 13). More recently, data generated by Jansen et al. (12, 14) suggest that HOXB13 and IL17BR expression is predictive of response to first-line tamoxifen monotherapy in ER-positive breast cancer patients with metastatic disease.

To begin to understand the biological mechanisms underlying their prognostic and predictive potential, we investigated whether estrogen signaling regulates HOXB13, IL17BR, and CHDH expression. Our results provide two lines of evidence indicating that these genes are regulated by estrogen. First, in a population-based, prospectively collected, consecutive series of ER-positive and ER-negative breast tumors, HOXB13 expression correlated negatively, and IL17BR and CHDH expression correlated positively, with ER status. Second, using a panel of ER-positive and ER-negative breast cancer cell lines, we showed that all three genes are estrogen responsive in an ER-dependent manner. Although these experiments do not formally establish that these genes are direct targets of the ER, this possibility is supported by results from a recent genome-wide location analysis of ER binding sites by chromatin immunoprecipitation combined with microarrays (ChIP-on-chip) in MCF7 cells upon E2 stimulation (21). In this published ChIP-on-chip database, an ER binding site exists within the second intron (2.4 kb from the transcriptional start site) of IL17BR (21). Due to the head-to-head genomic arrangement of CHDH and IL17BR, this same ER binding site is also just 2.8 kb upstream of CHDH, likely explaining their co-regulation by ER. In addition, this database reveals an ER-binding site that maps 76 kb upstream of the HOXB13 transcriptional start site; this long distance does not rule out its functional relevance to HOXB13 because long-range, non–proximal-promoter regulation may be important in many ER-regulated genes (21). The functional relevance of these ER binding sites needs direct experimentation in future studies.

The bimodal expression of HOXB13 in breast cancer is notable. The promoter region and the first exon of HOXB13 contain a CpG island, and it has been shown to be hypermethylated in renal cell carcinoma as a mechanism of shutting down its expression (22). Perhaps the bimodal expression pattern of HOXB13 in breast cancer reflects this epigenetic regulation, where promoter methylation status serves as an on-off switch for transcription.

Furthermore, our findings suggest that HOXB13, IL17BR, and CHDH are regulated by ER in a manner different from other well-known ER-regulated genes such as PR and pS2 based on the following observations. First, HOXB13 belongs to a class of genes negatively regulated by ER, likely through a different mechanism than gene activation (21). Secondly, although IL17BR and CHDH are both positively correlated with ER expression, their extent of correlation is less than that for PR and pS2. Thirdly, all three genes showed an ER-dependent correlation pattern with HER2 status not seen with PR and pS2. Previously, the HOXB13:IL17BR index was found to be higher in HER2-positive tumors than that in HER2-negative tumors (13). The relationship of these three E2-regulated genes to HER2 is notable because recent data from preclinical models indicate that crosstalk between the HER2 and ER signaling pathways directly contributes to the development of tamoxifen resistance (23, 24).

Taken together, our current results suggest a biological framework to understand the proposed HOXB13:IL17BR index as a novel prognostic factor in early-stage ER-positive breast cancer patients and its potential for predicting tamoxifen resistance. Because ER functions to suppress HOXB13 and augment IL17BR expression, either directly or indirectly, hormone-responsive tumors will have a low HOXB13:IL17BR index. When estrogen signaling is impaired by either loss of ER (25, 26), aberrant expression of certain cofactors (27), or by HER2 signaling (24), suppression of HOXB13 and induction of IL17BR expression is lost, resulting in a high HOXB13:IL17BR index. Therefore, the HOXB13:IL17BR index may serve as a biomarker for dysregulation of gene expression by ER and, thus, for tamoxifen resistance. Moreover, due to their distinctive patterns of correlation with ER and HER2 as noted above, HOXB13 and IL17BR may serve to report a subset of ER signaling targets different from canonical ER signature genes such as ER, PR, and pS2, thus providing distinct prognostic or predictive information. Intriguingly, a possible interplay between growth factor and estrogen signaling in the regulation of HOXB13 may be particularly relevant because we have observed synergistic action of epidermal growth factor and ectopic HOXB13 overexpression in stimulating MCF10A cell motility and invasion (4). This interrelationship between HOXB13/IL17BR, ER, and HER2 may also be important in the context of tamoxifen resistance because a high HOXB13:IL17BR index may indicate impaired ER signaling and increased growth factor signaling, both known to predict tamoxifen resistance (28, 29).

In summary, HOXB13, IL17BR, and CHDH are estrogen-regulated genes, and their prognostic utility is likely to reflect their complex regulation through both ER- and HER2-dependent pathways. Future work will be directed toward elucidating the pathways and cofactors used by ER to regulate these genes, understanding the functional interrelationship of these genes to the HER2 signaling pathway, and determining whether aberrant expression of these genes contributes directly to the clinical behavior of breast cancer.

Acknowledgments

We thank M. Erlander, L. Ellisen, S. Orsulic, D. Haber, and K. Joung for helpful discussions and reading of the manuscript.

Footnotes

  • Grant support: NIH RO1-1CA112021-01 (D.C. Sgroi), U.S. Department of Defense grant W81XWH-04-1-0606 (D.C. Sgroi), Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation grants BCTR0402932 (D.C. Sgroi) and BCTR0503620 (T. Shioda), and the Avon Foundation (D.C. Sgroi).

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

  • Note: Z. Wang and S. Dahiya contributed equally to this work.

    • Accepted May 25, 2007.
    • Received February 7, 2007.
    • Revision received April 5, 2007.

References

  1. ↵
    't Veer LJ, Dai H, van de Vijver MJ, et al. Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature 2002;415:530–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. Chang HY, Sneddon JB, Alizadeh AA, et al. Gene expression signature of fibroblast serum response predicts human cancer progression: similarities between tumors and wounds. PLoS Biol 2004;2:E7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. Change JC, Wooten EC, Tsimelzon A, et al. Gene expression profiling for the prediction of therapeutic response to docetaxel in patients with breast cancer. Lancet 2003;362:362–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Ma XJ, Wang Z, Ryan PD, et al. A two-gene expression ratio predicts clinical outcome in breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen. Cancer Cell 2004;5:607–16.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. Paik S, Shak S, Tang G, et al. A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;351:2817–26.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB, et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 2000;406:747–52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R, et al. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001;98:10869–74.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. Sotiriou C, Wirapati P, Loi S, et al. Gene expression profiling in breast cancer: understanding the molecular basis of histologic grade to improve prognosis. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006;98:262–72.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. Wang Y, Klijn JG, Zhang Y, et al. Gene-expression profiles to predict distant metastasis of lymph-node-negative primary breast cancer. Lancet 2005;365:671–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    Jansen MP, Foekens JA, van Staveren IL, et al. Molecular classification of tamoxifen-resistant breast carcinomas by gene expression profiling. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:732–40.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Goetz MP, Suman VJ, Ingle JN, et al. A two-gene expression ratio of homeobox 13 and interleukin-17B receptor for prediction of recurrence and survival in women receiving adjuvant tamoxifen. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12:2080–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Jansen MP, Foekens JA, Klijn JG, Berns EM. Re: Limits of predictive models using microarray data for breast cancer clinical treatment outcome. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:1851–2.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Ma XJ, Hilsenbeck SG, Wang W, et al. The HOXB13:IL17BR expression index is a prognostic factor in early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:4611–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Jansen MP, Sieuwerts AM, Look MP, et al. A HOXB13-to-IL17BR expression ration is related with tumor aggressiveness and response to tamoxifen of recurrent breast cancer: a retrospective study. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:662–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Soto AM, Sonnenschein C, Chung KL, Fernandez MF, Olea N, Serrano FO. The E-SCREEN assay as a tool to identify estrogens: an update on estrogenic environmental pollutants. Environ Health Perspect 1995;103:113–22.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    Coser KR, Chesnes J, Hur J, Ray S, Isselbacher KJ, Shioda T. Global analysis of ligand sensitivity of estrogen inducible and suppressible genes in MCF7/BUS breast cancer cells by DNA microarray. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100:13994–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Planas-Silva MD, Donaher JL, Weinberg RA. Functional activity of ectopically expressed estrogen receptor is not sufficient for estrogen-mediated cyclin D1 expression. Cancer Res 1999;59:4788–92.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Planas-Silva MD, Shang Y, Donaher JL, Brown M, Weinberg RA. AIB1 enhances estrogen-dependent induction of cyclin D1 expression. Cancer Res 2001;61:3858–62.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Gruvberger S, Ringner M, Chen Y, et al. Estrogen receptor status in breast cancer is associated with remarkably distinct gene expression patterns. Cancer Res 2001;61:5979–84.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Creighton CJ, Cordero KE, Larios JM, et al. Genes regulated by estrogen in breast tumor cells in vitro are similarly regulated in vivo in tumor xenografts and human breast tumors. Genome Biol 2006;7:R28.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Carroll JS, Meyer CA, Song J, et al. Genome-wide analysis of estrogen receptor binding sites. Nat Genet 2006;38:1289–97.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Okuda H, Toyota M, Ishida W, et al. Epigenetic inactivation of the candidate tumor suppressor gene HOXB13 in human renal cell carcinoma. Oncogene 2006;25:1733–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Benz CC, Scott GK, Sarup JC, et al. Estrogen-dependent, tamoxifen-resistant tumorigenic growth of MCF-7 cells transfected with HER2/neu. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1992;24:85–95.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Kurokawa H, Lenferink AE, Simpson JF, et al. Inhibition of HER2/neu (erbB-2) and mitogen-activated protein kinases enhances tamoxifen action against HER2-overexpressing, tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer cells. Cancer Res 2000;60:5887–94.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Harvey JM, Clark GM, Osborne CK, Allred DC. Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:1474–81.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Kuukasjarvi T, Kononen J, Helin H, Holli K, Isola J. Loss of estrogen receptor in recurrent breast cancer is associated with poor response to endocrine therapy. J Clin Oncol 1996;14:2584–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  27. ↵
    Osborne CK, Bardou V, Hopp TA, et al. Role of estrogen receptor coactivator AIB1 (SRC-3) and HER-2/neu in tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003;95:353–61.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    Massarweh S, Osborne CK, Jiang S, et al. Mechanisms of tumor regression and resistance to estrogen deprivation and fulvestrant in a model of estrogen receptor-positive, HER-2/neu-positive breast cancer. Cancer Res 2006;66:8266–73.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    Schiff R, Massarweh SA, Shou J, et al. Advanced concepts in estrogen receptor biology and breast cancer endocrine resistance: implicated role of growth factor signaling and estrogen receptor coregulators. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2005;56:10–20.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Clinical Cancer Research: 13 (21)
November 2007
Volume 13, Issue 21
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Clinical Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Prognostic Biomarkers HOXB13, IL17BR, and CHDH Are Regulated by Estrogen in Breast Cancer
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Clinical Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The Prognostic Biomarkers HOXB13, IL17BR, and CHDH Are Regulated by Estrogen in Breast Cancer
Zuncai Wang, Sonika Dahiya, Heather Provencher, Beth Muir, Erin Carney, Kathryn Coser, Toshi Shioda, Xiao-Jun Ma and Dennis C. Sgroi
Clin Cancer Res November 1 2007 (13) (21) 6327-6334; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0310

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Prognostic Biomarkers HOXB13, IL17BR, and CHDH Are Regulated by Estrogen in Breast Cancer
Zuncai Wang, Sonika Dahiya, Heather Provencher, Beth Muir, Erin Carney, Kathryn Coser, Toshi Shioda, Xiao-Jun Ma and Dennis C. Sgroi
Clin Cancer Res November 1 2007 (13) (21) 6327-6334; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0310
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • FDOPA PET Survival Predictions for Glioma
  • In vivo Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging for Monitoring the Cancer Treatment
  • Variability in Assessing Response in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Show more Imaging, Diagnosis, Prognosis
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • CCR Focus Archive
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Clinical Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Clinical Cancer Research
eISSN: 1557-3265
ISSN: 1078-0432

Advertisement