Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Cancer Therapy: Clinical

Bortezomib-Induced Apoptosis with Limited Clinical Response Is Accompanied by Inhibition of Canonical but not Alternative Nuclear Factor-κB Subunits in Head and Neck Cancer

Clint Allen, Kunal Saigal, Liesl Nottingham, Pattatheyil Arun, Zhong Chen and Carter Van Waes
Clint Allen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kunal Saigal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Liesl Nottingham
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pattatheyil Arun
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhong Chen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carter Van Waes
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4470 Published July 2008
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Immunohistochemical analysis of NF-κB subunits in patient matched HNSCC and noncancerous epithelium biopsies. A, SCC of tonsil (bottom; magnification, 400×) compared with epithelium from opposite tonsil (top; magnification, 400×). B, SCC of tongue (bottom; magnification, 400×) compared with biopsy from adjacent lingual epithelium (top; magnification, 400×). Both SCC biopsies show diffuse positive nuclear staining of variable intensity of all five NF-κB subunits. NF-κB subunit nuclear staining limited to the basal layers is shown in the matched noncancerous epithelia, with nuclear staining reduced or lost in the suprabasal layers. p-RELA, phosphorylated RELA (Ser536); Isotype, rabbit IgG isotype-negative control.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Immunohistochemistry analysis of pretreatment and 24-h posttreatment biopsies from patients 1 and 4 after 0.6 mg/m2 bortezomib. Patient 1 (A) shows decreased staining from pretreatment (top; magnification, 1,000×) to posttreatment (bottom; magnification, 1,000×) in phosphorylated RELA, c-REL, p50, p52, and Ki67, as well as increased TUNEL staining, whereas RELB seems to be unaffected. Conversely, patient 4 (B) shows very weak pretreatment nuclear phosphorylated RELA and no change after bortezomib therapy in NF-κB subunit nuclear localization or TUNEL staining, but did show decreased Ki67. In both patients, activated ERK1/2 and STAT3 are unaffected by bortezomib therapy. p-ERK1/2, phosphorylated ERK (Thr202/Tyr204); p-STAT3, phosphorylated STAT3 (Tyr705); pre-tx, pretreatment; post-tx, posttreatment.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Panel of histograms summarizing the pretreatment and posttreatment apoptotic indices, proliferation indices, and histoscores for four patients with evaluable biopsies. In patients 1 to 3 (A-C), decreased activated nuclear RELA correlated with increased apoptosis measured via TUNEL assay. Patient 4 (D) showed no decrease in activated RELA and no increase in TUNEL. Change in nuclear localization of total c-REL, RELB, p50, and p52 was variable among the four patients. Decreased proliferation, measured via Ki67 staining, was consistently observed after bortezomib therapy. Nuclear staining of activated ERK1/2 and STAT3 was unaffected by bortezomib in four of four patients. Staining scores shown as a mean of three high power fields. *, statistically significant differences between pretreatment and posttreatment staining scores (P < 0.05, Student's t test).

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Baseline NF-κB subunit localization and DNA binding activity of HNSCC cell lines. A, Western blot analysis of cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions reveals variable by positive nuclear localization of total RELA, RELB, c-REL, p50, and p52. Whereas UMSCC-11B shows the greatest relative quantity of nuclear RELA, RELB, p50, and p52, UMSCC-9 shows the greatest relative amount of c-REL. Greater relative amounts of the precursor proteins p105 and p100 were found in the cytoplasm compared with the nucleus. B, compared with negative and wild-type oligonucleotide controls, all three cell lines show significant constitutive DNA binding activity of RELA, p50, RELB, and p52, whereas only UMSCC-9 shows weak but significant constitutive c-REL DNA binding. *, significant (P < 0.05) increase in DNA binding above the negative control; †, significant (P > 0.05) increase in DNA binding above the wild-type competition oligonucleotide.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Cytotoxicity and altered DNA binding activity after bortezomib treatment in HNSCC cell lines. A, MTT assays reveal variable cytotoxicity to low dose bortezomib. High dose (10−7 mol/L) bortezomib caused significant cell death universally by day 1, low dose (10−9 mol/L) caused significant cell death in UMSCC-11B by day 5 only, and intermediate dose (10−8 mol/L) caused significant cytotoxicity by day 1 in UMSCC-9 and UMSCC-11B and by day 3 in UMSCC-11A. *, first time point at which 10−9 mol/L bortezomib shows significant (P < 0.05) cytotoxicity compared with control (untreated) cells; **, first time point at which 10−8 mol/L bortezomib shows significant cytotoxicity; †, first time point at which 10−7 mol/L bortezomib shows significant (P < 0.05) cytotoxicity. B and C, inhibition of TNF-α inducible RELA and p50 DNA binding, respectively. There seems to be no early (4 h) difference in inhibition of inducible RELA or p50 DNA binding by 10−9 or 10−8 mol/L bortezomib. However, as inhibition by 10−8 mol/L increased with time, inhibition by 10−9 mol/L remains constant or decreases with time creating significant differences in inhibition by the 12-h or 24-h time points. ‡, significant (P < 0.05) difference in inhibition of inducible activity.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
  • Table 1.

    Patient tumor and treatment characteristics and clinical outcomes

    PatientTumor histologyTumor locationTherapy before recurrenceBortezomib doseBortezomib schedule*Posttreatment biopsy†Local control on treatment; by 3 mo‡
    1Recurrent SCCFloor of mouth and anterior triangle neckS, C, R0.6 mg/m2Twice weekly × 7 wk without breakYes50% tumor reduction; PD below field at 4 wk
    2Recurrent SCCBase of tongue and anterior triangle neckS, C, R0.6 mg/m2Twice weekly × 7 wk without breakYesPD below field at 2 wk on treatment
    3Recurrent SCCLeft base of tongue and valleculaS, R0.6 mg/m2Twice weekly × 7 wk with 2 wk breakYesStable disease on treatment; PD in field at 3 mo
    4Recurrent SCCAnterior neck and parapharyngeal spaceS, C, R0.6 mg/m2Twice weekly × 7 wk without breakYesStable disease on treatment PD out of field at 1 wk
    5Recurrent SCCAnterior neck with tracheal extensionS, R0.6 mg/m2Twice weekly × 7 wk without breakNo90% tumor reduction PD in field at 5 mo
    6Recurrent SCCBase of tongueS, R0.6 mg/m2Twice weekly × 7 wk with 2 wk breakNo30% tumor reduction PD 3 mo
    • NOTE: S, surgery; C, chemotherapy; R, radiation; PD, progressive disease.

    • ↵* Bortezomib given concurrently with fractionated radiotherapy (to 50-70 Gy) given daily (Monday to Friday).

    • ↵† Timing of all posttreatment biopsies is 24 h after initial treatment before the start of radiotherapy.

    • ↵‡ Based upon RECIST criteria, stable disease is defined as <30% tumor reduction and partial response is defined as >30% tumor reduction.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplementary Data, Allen, et al.

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplementary Data
PreviousNext
Back to top
Clinical Cancer Research: 14 (13)
July 2008
Volume 14, Issue 13
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Clinical Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Bortezomib-Induced Apoptosis with Limited Clinical Response Is Accompanied by Inhibition of Canonical but not Alternative Nuclear Factor-κB Subunits in Head and Neck Cancer
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Clinical Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Bortezomib-Induced Apoptosis with Limited Clinical Response Is Accompanied by Inhibition of Canonical but not Alternative Nuclear Factor-κB Subunits in Head and Neck Cancer
Clint Allen, Kunal Saigal, Liesl Nottingham, Pattatheyil Arun, Zhong Chen and Carter Van Waes
Clin Cancer Res July 1 2008 (14) (13) 4175-4185; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4470

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Bortezomib-Induced Apoptosis with Limited Clinical Response Is Accompanied by Inhibition of Canonical but not Alternative Nuclear Factor-κB Subunits in Head and Neck Cancer
Clint Allen, Kunal Saigal, Liesl Nottingham, Pattatheyil Arun, Zhong Chen and Carter Van Waes
Clin Cancer Res July 1 2008 (14) (13) 4175-4185; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4470
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Biomarker Analysis from the BERIL-1 Study
  • Radiation and TGFβ Blockade in Metastatic Breast Cancer
  • Novel Intermediate Endpoint in Immunotherapy Studies
Show more Cancer Therapy: Clinical
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • CCR Focus Archive
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Clinical Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Clinical Cancer Research
eISSN: 1557-3265
ISSN: 1078-0432

Advertisement