Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
    • CME
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
    • CME
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Cancer Therapy: Preclinical

EXEL-7647 Inhibits Mutant Forms of ErbB2 Associated with Lapatinib Resistance and Neoplastic Transformation

Torsten Trowe, Sotiria Boukouvala, Keith Calkins, Richard E. Cutler Jr., Ryan Fong, Roel Funke, Steven B. Gendreau, Yong D. Kim, Nicole Miller, John R. Woolfrey, Valentina Vysotskaia, Jing Ping Yang, Mary E. Gerritsen, David J. Matthews, Peter Lamb and Timothy S. Heuer
Torsten Trowe
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sotiria Boukouvala
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Keith Calkins
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard E. Cutler Jr.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ryan Fong
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roel Funke
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven B. Gendreau
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yong D. Kim
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicole Miller
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John R. Woolfrey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Valentina Vysotskaia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jing Ping Yang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mary E. Gerritsen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David J. Matthews
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Lamb
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Timothy S. Heuer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4367 Published April 2008
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Schematic of the in vitro screen for ErbB2 drug resistance–associated mutations. An ErbB2 V659E expression construct was subjected to random mutagenesis. Cells expressing mutated ErbB2 that survived and grew in the presence of lapatinib or EXEL-7647 concentrations that prevented growth of cells expressing unmutagenized ErbB2 were selected and resistance-associated mutations were identified by DNA sequencing. The ErbB2 resistance-associated mutations were cloned and expressed in Ba/F3 cells to confirm that drug resistance was conferred by the detected mutation. Following stable expression of the mutated ErbB2 protein, survival IC50 values for all mutations and phosphorylation IC50 values for selected mutations were determined from 10-point dose-response assays.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    A, a schematic of the ErbB2 juxtamembrane and kinase domains shows the resistance-associated mutations identified in our studies. Functional domains are indicated. Seventeen different single amino acid substitutions, which map to 16 ErbB2 amino acid residues, are marked at the corresponding sequence positions. L785F was identified in both lapatinib and EXEL-7647 screens. B, amino acids where resistance-associated substitution mutations were identified are shown on an ErbB2 structural model. The model shown is an inactive form of the ErbB2 kinase domain with lapatinib docked in the ATP-binding site. The box shows a magnification of the ATP-binding region. Blue, activation loop; cyan, Cα-helix; green, nucleotide-binding loop; red, NH2-terminal extension; pink, COOH-terminal extension.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Expression of mutant ErbB2 in Ba/F3 cells and determination of phosphorylation IC50 values. Ba/F3 cells selected for stable expression of resistance-associated mutations were used for ErbB2 and ERK phosphorylation IC50 determination. Cells were transferred to medium without serum or IL-3 2 h before compound addition. Following 1-h compound treatment (30,000, 10,000, 3,300, 1,100, 370, 123, 41, 14, 5, and 0 nmol/L), cells were harvested for Western blot analysis of pErbB2, total ErbB2 (FLAG), pERK, and total ERK. IC50 values were determined from a 10-point lapatinib or EXEL-7647 dose response. Western blot images of pErbB2, ErbB2, and pERK from cells expressing ErbB2 V659E, ErbB2 V659E_T798I, ErbB2 V659E_L785F, or ErbB2 V659E_L755S. IC50 values for pErbB2 were calculated using pErbB2 intensity after normalization to total ErbB2 levels. IC50 values for pERK were calculated using pERK intensity after normalization to total actin levels (data not shown). At least two immunoblot experiments were completed, and representative data are shown. The decreased ErbB2 protein level observed with 30 μmol/L EXEL-7647 treatments was associated with cell death (this effect was diminished in some samples by normalized protein loading).

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Lapatinib binds an inactive ErbB2 conformation and mutations that introduce steric interference or promote stability of the active kinase conformation can cause resistance. A, lapatinib is shown docked into inactive (left) and active (right) conformations of the ErbB2 structural model. In the active conformation, the Cα-helix (cyan) Glu-Lys salt bridge is formed, and the Cα-helix is positioned closer to the ATP-binding pocket where it clashes with lapatinib. Blue, activation loop. B, resistance-associated mutations predicted to cause lapatinib resistance by steric interference with lapatinib binding are shown. The amino acid mutation replaces a WT side chain in proximity to the ligand binding area with a bulkier side chain that interferes with lapatinib binding in the structural model.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    ErbB2 drug resistance–associated mutations are transforming in NIH-3T3 cells. Mutations identified by DNA sequencing in lapatinib-resistant cells were introduced into WT ErbB2 expression constructs by site-directed mutagenesis to resynthesize the resistance-associated mutations in the absence of the V659E primary mutation. The mutant ErbB2 constructs were expressed in NIH-3T3 cells and stable expressing cells were selected. Cells were grown to confluence. Growth mode was documented by observation and photography. A, uninfected NIH-3T3 cells grow to confluence and form a monolayer. B, NIH-3T3 cells expressing ErbB2 V659E fail to reach confluence and form foci of piled-up cells. C, NIH-3T3 cells expressing WT ErbB2 grow to confluence and form a monolayer as observed for uninfected cells. D, NIH-3T3 cells expressing ErbB2 L755S fail to reach confluence and form foci of piled-up cells as observed for ErbB2 V659E.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table 1.

    ErbB2 mutations associated with lapatinib resistance and survival IC50 analysis of cloned ErbB2 resistance-associated mutations expressed in Ba/F3 cells

    ErbB2 mutationClonesMutation frequency (%)Protein domainBa/F3 cell lineLapatinib
    EXEL-7647
    IC50 (nmol/L)SDIC50 (nmol/L)SD
    NoneNANANAV659E962114825
    C630Y11.1EC—————
    E717K11.1JMV659E_E717K46150294103
    E719K11.1JM—————
    E719G11.1JMV659E_E719G894162436
    L726F89.0KinaseV659E_L726F1,0566531588
    T733I22.2KinaseV659E_T733I67025515153
    L755S55.6KinaseV659E_L755S2,86174637113
    P780L44.5KinaseV659E_P780L1,12776448129
    S783P55.6KinaseV659E_S783P3,273518161
    L785F1516.9KinaseV659E_L785F1,15465554175
    T798I3539.3KinaseV659E_T798I3,339289419131
    Y803N11.1KinaseV659E_Y803N49617012324
    E812K66.7KinaseV659E_E812K407741871
    D821N11.1KinaseV659E_D821N249531849
    V839G11.1KinaseV659E_V839G28614968
    L915M11.1KinaseV659E_L915M2535315289
    S1002R11.1CT—————
    • NOTE: Mutations identified by DNA sequencing in lapatinib-resistant cells were introduced into ErbB2 V659E expression constructs by site-directed mutagenesis to resynthesize the resistance-associated mutations. The mutant ErbB2 constructs were expressed in Ba/F3 cells, and stable expressing cells were selected. Cell viability was measured following 48-h compound treatment in the absence of IL-3. Viability IC50 values were calculated from a 10-point lapatinib or EXEL-7647 dose response.

      Abbreviations: EC, extracellular; JM, juxtamembrane; CT, COOH terminus.

  • Table 2.

    IC50 values for cell viability, ErbB2 phosphorylation, and ERK phosphorylation

    Ba/F3 cell lineResistance mutationSurvival IC50 (nmol/L)
    pErbB2 IC50 (nmol/L)
    pERK IC50 (nmol/L)
    LapatinibEXEL-7647LapatinibEXEL-7647LapatinibEXEL-7647
    V659ENone961487429831,259559
    V659E_L755SL755S2,8613713,6109549,3751,248
    V659E_L785FL785F1,1545543,9183,34110,1075,966
    V659E_T798IT798I3,339419>30,0003,267>30,0003,296
PreviousNext
Back to top
Clinical Cancer Research: 14 (8)
April 2008
Volume 14, Issue 8
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Clinical Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
EXEL-7647 Inhibits Mutant Forms of ErbB2 Associated with Lapatinib Resistance and Neoplastic Transformation
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Clinical Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
EXEL-7647 Inhibits Mutant Forms of ErbB2 Associated with Lapatinib Resistance and Neoplastic Transformation
Torsten Trowe, Sotiria Boukouvala, Keith Calkins, Richard E. Cutler Jr., Ryan Fong, Roel Funke, Steven B. Gendreau, Yong D. Kim, Nicole Miller, John R. Woolfrey, Valentina Vysotskaia, Jing Ping Yang, Mary E. Gerritsen, David J. Matthews, Peter Lamb and Timothy S. Heuer
Clin Cancer Res April 15 2008 (14) (8) 2465-2475; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4367

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
EXEL-7647 Inhibits Mutant Forms of ErbB2 Associated with Lapatinib Resistance and Neoplastic Transformation
Torsten Trowe, Sotiria Boukouvala, Keith Calkins, Richard E. Cutler Jr., Ryan Fong, Roel Funke, Steven B. Gendreau, Yong D. Kim, Nicole Miller, John R. Woolfrey, Valentina Vysotskaia, Jing Ping Yang, Mary E. Gerritsen, David J. Matthews, Peter Lamb and Timothy S. Heuer
Clin Cancer Res April 15 2008 (14) (8) 2465-2475; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4367
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Targeting HER2 with Osimertinib in NSCLC
  • Combined VEGF/EGFR Inhibition
  • Radiotherapy with IDO1/PD-1 Blockade Treats Advanced GBM
Show more Cancer Therapy: Preclinical
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • CCR Focus Archive
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Clinical Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Clinical Cancer Research
eISSN: 1557-3265
ISSN: 1078-0432

Advertisement