Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
    • CME
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
    • CME
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Cancer Therapy: Preclinical

Therapeutic Significance of Elevated Tissue Transglutaminase Expression in Pancreatic Cancer

Amit Verma, Sushovan Guha, Parmeswaran Diagaradjane, Ajaikumar B. Kunnumakkara, Angela M. Sanguino, Gabriel Lopez-Berestein, Anil K. Sood, Bharat B. Aggarwal, Sunil Krishnan, Juri G. Gelovani and Kapil Mehta
Amit Verma
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sushovan Guha
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Parmeswaran Diagaradjane
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ajaikumar B. Kunnumakkara
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Angela M. Sanguino
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gabriel Lopez-Berestein
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anil K. Sood
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bharat B. Aggarwal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sunil Krishnan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Juri G. Gelovani
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kapil Mehta
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4529 Published April 2008
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Purpose: Tissue transglutaminase (TG2) is a multifunctional protein that is implicated in development of drug resistance and metastasis. Therefore, we examined therapeutic targeting of TG2 for inhibiting growth and metastasis of in vivo growing pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in nude mice.

Experimental Design: We implanted Panc-28 pancreatic cancer cells to induce orthotopic PDAC tumors in nude mice and determined the efficacy of liposomal TG2 small interfering RNA (siRNA) either alone or in combination with gemcitabine.

Results: We show that down-regulation of endogenous TG2 by siRNA could effectively block the growth of PDAC. Moreover, down-regulation of TG2 significantly enhanced the therapeutic efficacy of gemcitabine against PDAC and inhibited metastatic spread of the disease. The antitumor activity was related to inhibition of proliferation, angiogenesis, and Akt phosphorylation.

Conclusion: siRNA-mediated down-regulation of TG2 represents a promising therapeutic approach for improved treatment of PDAC.

  • siRNA
  • liposomes
  • transglutaminase
  • chemoresistance
  • metastasis
  • pancreatic cancer
  • focal adhesion kinase
  • NF-κB

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a serious health problem. In the United States alone, ∼33,000 new cases are diagnosed annually, and about the same number of patients die of the disease (1). Gemcitabine (Gemzar), the drug of choice for treating PDAC, has had minimal effect on patients' survival. Most patients with PDAC exhibit marked intrinsic resistance to radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Therefore, surgical resection is the only curative therapy but the disease is so aggressive that only 10% to 20% of patients qualify for surgery at the time of diagnosis (2). Therefore, identification of novel targets and development of new therapeutic approaches are urgently needed.

Recently, we reported that the majority of PDAC tumors and cell lines have high basal levels of tissue transglutaminase (TG2) expression. TG2 is a unique member of the transglutaminase family of enzymes that can catalyze calcium-dependent posttranslational modification of proteins as well as calcium-independent activities, such as protein disulfide isomerase, GTP/ATP hydrolase, and serine/threonine kinase functions (3–8). In recent years, convincing evidence supporting a role for TG2 in cancer cell survival and invasive functions has accumulated. Thus, development of drug resistance and metastatic phenotypes in various cancer cell types is frequently associated with increased expression of TG2 (9–17). Studies showed that down-regulation of TG2 expression by antisense, ribozyme, or small interfering RNA (siRNA) reversed drug resistance in lung and breast cancer cells (11, 14, 15). Conversely, treatment of breast cancer cells with epidermal growth factor induced expression of TG2 and protected the cells against doxorubicin-induced apoptosis (18). Moreover, inhibition of TG2 expression by siRNA significantly inhibited the invasiveness of PDAC cells and increased their propensity to undergo autophagic death (19). These results suggest that aberrant expression of TG2 in cancer cells contributes to the development of drug resistance and metastatic phenotypes.

We have recently elucidated the mechanisms by which TG2 regulates cell survival functions. For example, we found that TG2 expression results in constitutive activation of focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and its downstream cell survival phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt pathway (20). In addition, TG2 expression in cancer cells results in constitutive activation of the nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB; refs. 14, 21). Based on these observations, we speculated that inhibition of TG2 expression could serve as a therapeutic target for reversing intrinsic resistance of PDAC to chemotherapeutic drugs. Therefore, in the present study, we used liposome-based delivery for TG2 siRNA and showed that siRNA-induced down-regulation of TG2 augmented the therapeutic efficacy of gemcitabine, restrained tumor growth, and inhibited metastasis of PDAC in nude mice. Our results suggest that liposome-based delivery of TG2 siRNA is a promising, therapeutically relevant approach for TG2 silencing.

Materials and Methods

Materials. Rabbit polyclonal antibodies against phosphorylated Akt (pAkt; Ser473) were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology. The anti-TG2 monoclonal antibody CUB7401 was purchased from NeoMarkers. A monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. An anti–β-actin antibody was purchased from Sigma Chemical Co., and horseradish peroxidase–conjugated goat anti-rabbit and sheep anti-mouse antibodies were purchased from Amersham Biosciences. DMEM/F12, fetal bovine serum, and the antibiotic (Normocin) were purchased from Invivogen. The liquid DAB+ Substrate Chromogen System-horseradish peroxidase used for immunohistochemistry was obtained from DakoCytomation. Gemzar, which was supplied by Eli Lilly and Company, was stored at 4°C and dissolved in sterile PBS on the day of use. d-Luciferin potassium salt (Xenogen Corp.) was dissolved in sterile PBS at a concentration of 40 mg/mL.

Cell lines. The Panc-28 cell line was kindly provided by Dr. Shrikanth Reddy (The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX). The cells were cultured in DMEM/F12 supplemented with FCS (10%, v/v), Normocin (0.1 mg/mL), l-glutamine (2 mmol/L), and HEPES (10 mmol/L; U.S. Biochemical) at 37°C in a CO2 incubator.

TG2 down-regulation by siRNA and liposomal siRNA preparation. TG2-targeted siRNA sequence (5′-AAGGGCGAACCACCTGAACAA-3′) was synthesized and then purified as described previously (22). A sequence (5′-AATTCTCCGAACGTGTCACGT-3′) that did not have homology to any human mRNA as determined by blast search was used as a control. For in vivo delivery, siRNA was incorporated into neutral liposomes composed of 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine (DOPC) as described previously (23). Briefly, the siRNA and DOPC were mixed in the presence of excess t-butanol at a ratio of 1:10 (w/w). Tween 20 was added to the mixture, which was then vortexed, frozen in an acetone/dry ice bath, and lyophilized. Before administration into mice, the preliposomal formulation powder (lyophilizate) containing the lipid and siRNA was hydrated with normal saline at a concentration of 15 μg/mL. Once reconstituted, the DOPC-siRNA preparation was used within 12 h.

PDAC orthotopic tumor model. Male athymic nu/nu mice (4 wk old) were obtained from the Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. The animals were housed four per cage in standard acrylic glass cages in a room maintained at constant temperature and humidity with a 12-h light and darkness cycle and fed a regular autoclaved chow diet with water ad libitum. Before initiating the experiment, animals were acclimatized to a pulverized diet for 3 d. All studies were conducted according to an experimental protocol reviewed and approved by the M. D. Anderson Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

At 70% confluence, Panc-28 cells were stably transduced with the firefly luciferase gene as described previously (24). Cells were harvested from subconfluent cultures after brief exposure to 0.25% trypsin and 0.2% EDTA. Trypsinization was stopped with the medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum. The cells were washed once in serum-free medium and resuspended in PBS. Single-cell suspensions with >90% cell viability were used for implantation into the mice. Animals were anesthetized using i.p. injection of 200 μL ketamine (100 mg/kg) and xylazine (5-10 mg/kg). For orthotopic implantation of tumor cells into the mice, a small incision (2 cm long) was made on the left flank, the pancreas was gently pulled out using blunt forceps, and a 100 μL suspension of luciferase-infected Panc-28 cells (1 × 106) was injected directly into the pancreas using a 27-gauge needle (1-mL disposable tuberculin syringe). The incision was closed in a single layer using sterile surgical Autoclips (Braintree Scientific), antibacterial mycotic cream was applied to the wound, and the animal was placed on a heating pad to maintain body temperature and closely monitored until conscious.

Luminescence imaging. Tumor growth in the mice after tumor cell implantation was monitored weekly using a noninvasive bioimaging technique. Before imaging, animals were anesthetized using 1.5% isoflurane/air inhalation and injected i.p. with d-luciferin potassium salt in PBS (150 mg/kg). Ten minutes after injection, each mouse was placed in the right lateral decubitus position, and bioluminescence was measured using a cryogenically cooled IVIS imaging system coupled with a data acquisition computer running Living Image software (Xenogen). A digital grayscale image of each animal was acquired followed by acquisition and overlay of a pseudocolor image of the spatial distribution of photons emerging from active luciferase within the tumor. The signal intensity was quantified as the sum of all detected photons within the region of interest per second per cm2 per steridian.

Before evaluation of the therapeutic efficacy of TG2 siRNA, the ability of liposomal-encapsulated siRNA (Alexa Fluor 546 labeled) to down-regulate TG2 expression in Panc-28 tumors was examined by giving the liposomal formulation in the tail vein or i.p. in four mice each (150 μg/kg/dose/route, three doses total, each 3 d apart). Based on the extent of down-regulation of TG2 expression in the two groups, the tail vein route was apparently superior to the i.p. route for the delivery of TG2 siRNA (Fig. 1 ).

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

In vivo uptake of TG2 siRNA-DOPC and down-regulation of TG2 in tumors. A, Western blot analysis of tumors collected 24 h after the last and third treatment with TG2 siRNA-DOPC, given either i.p. (lanes 1-4) or i.v. (in tail vein; lanes 5-8). Lysate from Panc-28 cells was used as positive control. Membrane was reprobed with anti–β-actin antibody to ensure even loading of protein in each lane. B, tumors were harvested and frozen in OCT medium, and slides were fixed in acetone and exposed to 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) to stain nuclei blue before viewing fluorescent emission of Alexa Fluor 555 siRNA delivered in DOPC liposomes.

Therapeutic efficacy of liposomal TG2 siRNA. Panc-28 cells (1 × 106) were implanted orthotopically in the pancreases of nude (nu/nu) mice. The resulting tumor growth was monitored weekly for 3 wk using the bioluminescence IVIS Imaging System 200 (Xenogen). After the 3-wk monitoring period, mice were randomly distributed into four treatment groups (five mice per group): group I received control liposomal siRNA (control siRNA; 150 μg/kg) thrice weekly by i.v. injection, group II received gemcitabine alone (25 mg/kg) twice weekly by i.p. injection, group III received liposomal TG2 siRNA alone (150 μg/kg) thrice weekly by i.v. injection, and group IV received both gemcitabine (25 mg/kg) twice weekly by i.p. injection and liposomal TG2 siRNA (150 μg/kg) thrice weekly by i.v. injection.

Mice were imaged for tumor growth on days 0, 2, 9, 16, and 23 during the treatment. After delivery of a total of 10 doses and 3 d after delivery of the last dose, all of the animals were killed. Their primary pancreatic tumors were excised, and the final tumor volumes were measured using a digital clipper and calculated using the formula V = 2/3πr3, in which r is the mean radius in three different dimensions (length, width, and depth). One third of the tumor tissue was formalin fixed and paraffin embedded for immunohistochemistry and routine H&E staining. The other one third of the tumor tissue was fixed in OCT for fluorescence and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase–mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay, and the remaining tumor tissue was snap frozen and stored at −80°C until use.

Western blot analysis. Pancreatic tumor tissue samples obtained from control and experimental mice were minced and incubated on ice for 30 min in 0.5 mL of ice-cold lysate buffer [20 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), containing 10% NP40, 5 mol/L NaCl, 1 mol/L HEPES, 0.5 mol/L EDTA, 0.1 mol/L phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.2 mol/L sodium orthovanadate, 1 mol/L NaF, 2 μg/mL aprotinin, and 2 μg/mL leupeptin]. The minced tissue was homogenized using a Dounce homogenizer and centrifuged at 16,000 × g at 4°C for 10 min. Fifty micrograms of total protein from each sample were then fractionated using SDS-polyacrylamide gel, electrotransferred onto nitrocellulose membranes, and blotted with appropriate antibodies, and antigen-antibody reaction was detected using enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Some of the membranes were stripped using Restore stripping buffer (Pierce) and reprobed with another antibody. The protein bands obtained were quantified using the AlphaEase FC (FluorChem 8900) software program (Alpha Innotech).

Immunohistochemistry. Tissue microarray slides constructed using 65 formalin-fixed patient tumor samples and 9 normal pancreatic tissue samples were used for this study. Samples were obtained from patients with primary PDAC who underwent initial pancreaticoduodenectomy without prior chemotherapy or radiation therapy. TG2 protein expression in these tumor samples and xenograft tumors from siRNA-treated mice was evaluated immunohistochemically using the Vectastain Elite avidin-biotin complex method immunostaining kit (Vector Laboratories) as described previously (20). In brief, antigen retrieval was done by treating tissue samples in a steamer for 30 min. Mouse anti-TG2, rabbit anti-pAkt (Ser473; Cell Signaling Technology), rabbit anti–Ki-67 (clone SP6; NeoMarkers), or mouse anti-CD31 (PharMingen) antibodies overlaying the tissue sections were incubated at 4°C for 16 h. Secondary antibody incubation was done at ambient temperature for 1 h. Mayer's hematoxylin nuclear stain was used as a counterstain. Immunostaining results were evaluated and scored independently by a pathologist and the laboratory personnel in a double-blinded manner. TG2 expression in tumor cells was categorized as negative (weak or negative cytoplasmic staining) or positive (diffuse moderate to strong cytoplasmic staining). pAkt (Ser473) expression in tumor cells was categorized as negative (no or very weak cytoplasmic staining) or positive (diffuse moderate or strong cytoplasmic staining).

Proliferation. Ki-67 staining was used to evaluate the proliferation index of in vivo growing xenografts and expressed as the number of Ki-67+ cells ± SE as determined by counting 10 random microscopic fields for three different tumor samples per treatment group.

Microvessel density. A rat anti-mouse CD31 monoclonal antibody was used to determine the microvessel density in xenografts, as previously described (24). The CD31-stained slides were observed under a Leica DM4000B fluorescence microscope (Leica Microsystems, Inc.) equipped with SPOT-RTKE digital camera (Diagnostic Instruments), and the images were acquired and stored using SPOT advanced software (Diagnostic Instruments). The stored images were processed using NIH Image software. The vessel density in each image was estimated by setting a minimum threshold of 4 pixel2. Setting a minimum threshold enables to avoid the background nonspecific staining and to eliminate the fluorescence signal from single endothelial cell. Results were expressed as the mean number of vessels ± SE per high-power field (×100 magnification). A total of 20 random high-power fields were examined and counted in four different tumor samples from each treatment group.

TUNEL assay. TUNEL assay (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) of frozen sections to detect apoptotic cells was done according to the manufacturer's protocol. The apoptotic fluorescence-positive cells were counted under a microscope and expressed as the percentage of total cells ± SE. Ten fields in three tumors per treatment group were examined.

Electrophoretic mobility shift assay. To determine the level of NF-κB activation in xenografts, electrophoretic mobility shift assay was used as described previously (21). Briefly, nuclear extracts from tumor homogenates were incubated with a 32P-end–labeled 45-mer double-stranded NF-κB oligonucleotide (15 μg protein with 16 fmol DNA) for 30 min at 37°C, and the DNA-protein complex that formed was separated from free oligonucleotide on 6.6% native polyacrylamide gels. The dried gels were autoradiographed, and radioactive bands were quantitated using a STORM 220 PhosphorImager (Amersham Biosciences) with the ImageQuant software program (Molecular Dynamics).

Statistical analysis. We used SD of 100 and mean difference between control and modified/treated groups as 200 for tumor volume to do the power calculation for in vivo studies based on the two-sided, two-sample Student's t test (nQuery 5.0). Using P < 0.05, we observed that n = 5 mice per group is adequate to achieve a power (1-β) of 80%. For tumor volume calculation, values were initially subjected to one-way ANOVA and then compared among groups using unpaired Student's t test. For TG2 expression in patient samples, values were calculated using Fisher's exact test with P < 0.001 set as statistically significant. For Ki-67 staining, microvessel density, and in situ TUNEL assay, values were initially subjected to one-way ANOVA and then compared among groups using unpaired Student's t test.

Results

TG2 expression in PDAC tumors. We previously reported that TG2 protein is aberrantly expressed in most PDAC tumors and cell lines (20). In the present study, we examined additional 65 PDAC tumor samples and 9 normal pancreatic tissue samples for TG2 expression and confirmed that TG2 expression was significantly higher in PDAC tumor samples (78%) than in normal ducts (11%; P < 0.0001). Although the sample size was too small to comment on the correlation between TG2 expression and histologic grades (1-3), node status (N stage), or metastasis (M stage), we observed a trend toward an increasing TG2 expression as the tumor stage increased [T1, 3 of 5 (60%); T2, 32 of 44 (73%); T3, 13 of 16 (81%)].

We also previously reported that TG2 expression confers resistance to gemcitabine and promotes invasiveness in PDAC cells (20). Therefore, in the present study, we chose to evaluate the potential of TG2 as a therapeutic target for chemoresistant and metastatic PDAC. For this purpose, we used highly aggressive, gemcitabine-resistant, and high TG2-expressing Panc-28 cells. We stably infected cells with luciferase gene and injected them into the pancreases of nude mice to establish orthotopic pancreatic tumors. Resulting Panc-28 tumors in the mice were highly aggressive and advanced rapidly to locally disseminated disease over ∼6 weeks after tumor cell implantation.

In vivo silencing by TG2-specific siRNA-DOPC liposomes. Based on the evidence that elevated expression of TG2 in PDAC is closely related to aggressive tumor behavior, we investigated its potential as a therapeutic target. In a preliminary experiment, we first determined the optimal route for delivery of DOPC-encapsulated TG2 siRNA to down-regulate TG2 expression in tumors. Immunohistochemical and Western blot analysis consistently revealed >80% reduction in TG2 expression in the tumors obtained from mice that received TG2 siRNA i.v. (Fig. 1A). The reduction in TG2 expression was also evident in tumors obtained from mice that received TG2 siRNA i.p., but the degree of inhibition from mouse to mouse was less consistent than that in i.v. group. Furthermore, fluorescence microscopy revealed a significant uptake of fluorescent-labeled TG2 siRNA in tumors treated i.v. (Fig. 1B). Based on these results, we used the i.v. route for administration of siRNA-DOPC in subsequent therapeutic experiments.

In vivo therapy of PDAC using liposomal siRNA targeting TG2. Three weeks after tumor cell implantation, mice were treated according to protocol described in Materials and Methods. Three days after the last treatment, mice were killed and examined carefully for tumor size, metastasis, and other gross pathologic changes. Luciferase bioluminescence data derived from weekly IVIS images revealed that the tumor growth in mice given TG2 siRNA-DOPC in combination with gemcitabine was significantly retarded (P = 0.019) when compared with that in the mice given control siRNA-DOPC (Fig. 2A and B ). Treatment with either TG2 siRNA-DOPC or gemcitabine alone resulted in ∼50% reduction in the final tumor volumes (Fig. 2C). Thus, the combination of TG2 siRNA-DOPC and gemcitabine had a much superior efficacy than did TG2 siRNA-DOPC or gemcitabine alone. Mice tolerated siRNA-DOPC treatment extremely well as there was no change in eating habits or motility and mouse weights were not significantly different among the four groups of animals.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

In vivo therapy experiments with TG2 siRNA-DOPC. A, IVIS images of representative mice in each treatment group taken at the indicated days of treatment. Mice were imaged in the ventral view using the Living Image software program. B, analysis of the IVIS images revealing that tumor growth in mice given TG2 siRNA-DOPC in combination with gemcitabine (group IV) was significantly inhibited (P = 0.019) compared with that in mice given control siRNA-DOPC (group I). C, final tumor volumes in mice at the end of treatment. Treatment with TG2 siRNA-DOPC alone (group III) or gemcitabine alone (group II) resulted in 50% to 60% reduction in tumor growth when compared with treatment with control siRNA-DOPC (group I). Treatment with the combination of TG2 siRNA-DOPC and gemcitabine (group IV) resulted in a much superior response when compared with treatment with TG2 siRNA-DOPC or gemcitabine alone (P < 0.05). Columns, mean tumor volumes in mice in different treatment groups; bars, SD.

The Panc-28–induced tumors rapidly progressed into locally advanced disease in nude mice. Therefore, we also examined the effect of various treatments on the number of metastatic foci in organs adjacent to pancreas, such as the spleen, mesentery/omentum, and liver, in these mice. The results shown in Fig. 3 clearly show that treatment with TG2 siRNA-DOPC alone was highly effective in inhibiting the progression of PDAC tumors to metastatic disease. Interestingly, treatment with gemcitabine alone, which caused noticeable reduction in tumor growth, was completely ineffective in inhibiting metastasis. Mice given TG2 siRNA-DOPC in combination with gemcitabine also had significant decreases in their metastasis scores similar to those in mice given TG2 siRNA-DOPC (Fig. 3; Table 1 ). These results suggested that treatment with gemcitabine alone, although capable of inhibiting the growth of or inducing cell death in some Panc-28 clones, does not affect the survival or growth of metastatic clones.

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Inhibition of metastasis by treatment with TG2 siRNA. Histogram showing the mean metastasis scores in mice in different treatment groups. Mice given TG2 siRNA-DOPC either alone (group III) or in combination with gemcitabine (group IV) had dramatic decreases in the average metastasis score (P = 0.004) when compared with mice given control siRNA (group I). Mice given gemcitabine alone (group II) had no decreases in the metastasis score when compared with mice in the control group (group I).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Cross-tabulation of the metastasis scores in individual mice observed at the end of the treatment period

Effect of targeting TG2 on survival pathways. Based on our previous results that TG2 expression results in constitutive activation of the FAK/Akt and NF-κB survival pathways, we next examined the effect of TG2 siRNA treatment on these pathways. As shown in Fig. 4 , TG2 siRNA-DOPC–mediated down-regulation of TG2 in xenograft tumors was associated with inhibition of NF-κB activity and expression of its downstream target gene, VEGF. Moreover, tumors obtained from TG2 siRNA-DOPC–treated mice showed inhibition of pAkt (Ser473; Fig. 5 ). Tumors obtained from mice that received gemcitabine or control siRNA-DOPC alone showed no significant changes in NF-κB activity or pAkt levels.

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Inhibition of NF-κB activity and VEGF expression in TG2 siRNA-DOPC–treated tumors. A, electrophoretic mobility shift assay of representative tumors showing >4-fold inhibition of constitutive NF-κB activation in Panc-28 tumors in response to treatment with TG2 siRNA-DOPC either alone (group III) or in combination with gemcitabine (group IV) compared with a 1-fold inhibition in gemcitabine-treated group (II). B, Western blot analysis showing TG2 expression in representative Panc-28 tumors resected from mice in each treatment group. More than 80% down-regulation of TG2 expression is evident in tumors obtained from mice given TG2 siRNA-DOPC either alone (group III) or in combination with gemcitabine (group IV). The membranes were stripped and reprobed with an anti-VEGF antibody. Down-regulation of TG2 expression in tumors obtained from mice in groups III and IV was associated with a parallel decrease in VEGF expression when compared with mice in the control siRNA (group I) and gemcitabine alone (group II) groups. The membranes were probed with an anti–β-actin antibody to ensure even loading of proteins in each lane. +, positive control.

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Effect of targeting TG2 on cell growth and cell survival pathways. A, the representative micrographs show immunohistochemical staining for TG2 expression, pAkt expression, and cell proliferation (Ki-67) in tumor tissues obtained from mice. Also shown is staining for CD31 to indicate neovascularization in representative tumors growing in mice in the various treatment groups (CD31). A significant decrease in TG2 expression, Ki-67 staining, and pAkt (Ser473) expression was evident in tumor tissue samples obtained from mice given TG2 siRNA-DOPC alone (group III) or in combination with gemcitabine (group IV) when compared with mice given control siRNA (group I) or gemcitabine alone (group II). Similarly, a significant reduction in CD31 expression, representing neovascularization, was evident in tumors obtained from mice given TG2 siRNA-DOPC in combination with gemcitabine (group IV). B, number of Ki-67+ cells (mean ± SE) determined by counting 10 random microscopic fields, each in three tumor samples from different treatment groups. C, number of microvessels (mean ± SE) counted in 20 random fields, each in four tumor samples from each treatment group.

Effect of TG2 inhibition on cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and apoptosis. To determine potential mechanisms underlying the antitumor effect of TG2 siRNA-DOPC, we examined its effect on several biological end points, including cell proliferation (Ki-67), angiogenesis (CD31), and apoptosis (TUNEL). More than 90% reduction in Ki-67 expression was evident (P < 0.001) in tumors obtained from mice given TG2 siRNA-DOPC alone or in combination with gemcitabine (Fig. 5). Tumors obtained from mice given gemcitabine alone or control siRNA-DOPC consistently showed high levels of Ki-67 staining (Fig. 5).

Next, we evaluated the blood vessel density in tumors obtained from mice in the different treatment groups. The representative images shown in Fig. 5 reveal a significant decrease in the mean blood vessel density in tumors obtained from mice that received TG2 siRNA-DOPC or gemcitabine alone. Densitometric analysis showed a significant difference in the mean microvascular density (P < 0.0013) in the mice that received TG2 siRNA-DOPC plus gemcitabine compared with the mice that received control siRNA-DOPC. Taken together, these results suggested that down-regulation of TG2 expression in combination with gemcitabine can result in decreased VEGF expression and decreased mean blood vessel density. Thus, treatment with TG2 siRNA-DOPC plus gemcitabine can affect the neovascularization process in a paracrine manner by affecting VEGF levels rather than due to down-regulation of TG2 in endothelial cells.

Finally, we evaluated apoptosis in orthotopic tumors using TUNEL assay. PDAC tumors treated with gemcitabine alone or in combination with TG2 siRNA-DOPC showed significant increases in the numbers of apoptotic cells. No differences in the apoptotic index in TG2 siRNA-DOPC–treated tumors were evident, and the extent of apoptosis in this group was similar to that in the control siRNA-DOPC group (data not shown).

Discussion

In this study, we examined the potential of TG2 as a therapeutic target for treating PDAC in an orthotopic nude mouse model. Using DOPC liposomes as the delivery system, we showed that TG2 siRNA could effectively down-regulate TG2 expression in tumors and inhibit their growth and metastatic spread. Previous studies convincingly documented that overexpression of TG2 in various cancer types is closely related to drug resistance and metastasis (9–17). In addition, the majority of PDAC tumors and cell lines have increased basal levels of TG2 expression (20). A comprehensive analysis of 33,000 genes using three different methods identified TG2 as one of the most differentially expressed genes in PDAC tumors (16). Similarly, in an attempt to identify metastasis-associated proteins using proteomic analysis, Jiang et al. (17) identified TG2 as one of 11 proteins selectively amplified in metastatic human lung carcinoma. Based on these observations, we reasoned that elevated expression of TG2 in pancreatic cancer cells could serve as a novel target in treating PDAC tumors, which exhibit intrinsic resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs and high metastatic potential. The data presented here clearly show the usefulness of down-regulating TG2 expression in inhibiting PDAC tumor growth and metastatic spread of the disease. Notably, down-regulation of TG2 expression by siRNA-DOPC rendered PDAC cells sensitive to gemcitabine, the drug most commonly used to treat this tumor, both alone and in combination with other therapeutic modalities, without much effect on survival.

Several recent reports have documented a role for TG2 in promoting cell migration and invasion. For example, TG2 was implicated to play a role in transmigration of T lymphocytes (25); migration of retinal pigment epithelial (26), monocytic (27), and neuroblastoma cells (28); and invasion of breast (22) and pancreatic cancer cells (20). Many types of cancer cells, especially when rendered resistant to drugs or isolated from metastatic sites, have high basal levels of TG2 expression (9–17, 29). Indeed, inhibition of TG2 expression using siRNA, antisense, or ribozyme approach resulted in reversal of drug resistance in breast and lung cancer cells (11, 14, 15). Similarly, down-regulation of TG2 by siRNA inhibited the invasiveness whereas ectopic expression promoted the invasiveness in breast cancer cells (22). These findings were further supported by a recent report showing diminished dissemination of tumors on the peritoneal surface and mesentery following TG2 knockdown in an i.p. ovarian xenograft model (30).

Despite all of these findings, the mechanism by which TG2 contributes to the development of chemoresistance and metastatic phenotypes remains unknown. A recent report by Akimov et al. (31) suggested that TG2 could interact and form stable complexes with β1 and β3 integrins. This finding led to the delineation of significance of increased TG2 expression in cancer cells. We previously showed that, in addition to β1 integrin, TG2 could bind to and form complexes with β4 and β5 integrin in breast cancer (11), malignant melanoma (12), and pancreatic cancer7 cells. TG2 is known to associate with integrins primarily in the extracellular domains of integrins and to promote their interaction with the extracellular matrix ligands, such as fibronectin, collagen, and vitronectin (22, 31). Therefore, it is possible that TG2 contributes to the aggressive behavior of PDAC by constitutively activating the integrin-mediated cell survival signaling pathways.

Indeed, our efforts to understand the biological significance of increased TG2 expression in PDAC cells led us to the discovery that TG2 expression results in constitutive activation of FAK, Akt, and NF-κB (20, 21). Thus, TG2 expression activated and autophosphorylated FAK (pY397), and down-regulation of TG2 expression inhibited this activation. Moreover, TG2-induced activation of FAK results in activation of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt cell survival signaling pathway (20). Our more recent studies have provided some interesting leads and suggest that expression of TG2 in PDAC cells is inversely correlated with PTEN expression (32). TG2 inhibited the phosphorylation of PTEN at Ser380 and promoted its degradation via the ubiquitin/proteasome pathway. Thus, TG2 plays a dual role in the FAK/phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt signaling pathway by promoting direct phosphorylation of FAK and inhibiting its upstream phosphatase, PTEN, resulting in constitutive activation of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt pathway.

Moreover, TG2 expression results in constitutive activation of NF-κB (14, 21, 33). Under normal conditions, the inflammation-induced NF-κB activation is transient, which is critical for the controlled growth and survival of normal cells. Thus, TG2-mediated constitutive activation of NF-κB in cancer cells may be critical to conferring chemoresistance and metastatic phenotypes. Indeed, our recent data supported this contention and suggested that down-regulation of TG2 expression by siRNA in drug-resistant breast cancer and PDAC cells results in inhibition of NF-κB and increases their sensitivity to chemotherapeutic drugs (11, 20, 21). Kim et al. (14) observed a similar correlation between TG2 expression, drug resistance, and NF-κB activation in breast cancer cells. Taken together, these results suggest that TG2 plays an important role in promoting cell survival signaling and thus protects PDAC cells against drug-induced cell death.

Importantly, the present study provided the proof of concept that therapeutic delivery of gene-specific siRNA to PDAC tumors can be achieved using DOPC liposomes. Two recent reports documented a similar effect of DOPC liposomal delivery of siRNA to silence the expression of the oncoprotein EphA2 (23) and FAK (34). Using this approach, both studies documented encouraging responses to the treatment of ovarian tumors in mice. Thus, the significance of the results of this study can be rapidly translated into the clinical setting for treatment of aggressive forms of PDAC.

Acknowledgments

We thank Jansina Fok for expert technical help and Donald R. Wood of the Scientific Publications for editorial help.

Footnotes

  • ↵7 J. Fok, K. Mehta. Unpublished data.

  • Grant support: NIH grant CA092115 (K. Mehta), M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Physician Scientist Program Award (S. Guha), and Ovarian Cancer Research Fund, Inc. Program Project Development Grant (A.K. Sood).

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

  • Note: A. Verma and S. Guha contributed equally to this work.

    • Accepted November 26, 2007.
    • Received October 3, 2007.
    • Revision received October 31, 2007.

References

  1. ↵
    Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2006;56:106–30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Maheshwari V, Moser AJ. Current management of locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005;2:356–64.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Fesus L, Piacentini M. Transglutaminase 2: an enigmatic enzyme with diverse functions. Trends Biochem Sci 2002;27:534–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. Mehta K. Mammalian transglutaminases: a family portrait. Prog Exp Tumor Res 2005;38:1–18.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. Lorand L, Graham R. Transglutaminases: crosslinking enzymes with pleiotropic functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2003;4:140–56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. Hassegawa G, Suwa M, Ichikawa Y, et al. A novel function of tissue-type transglutaminase: protein disulphide isomerase. Biochem J 2003;373:793–803.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. Nakaoka H, Perez DM, Baek KJ, et al. Gh: a GTP-binding protein with transglutaminase activity and receptor signaling function. Science 1994;264:1593–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Mishra S, Murphy LJ. Tissue transglutaminase has intrinsic kinase activity: identification of transglutaminase 2 as an insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 kinase. J Biol Chem 2004;279:23863–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Mehta K, Fok JY, Mangala LS. Tissue transglutaminase: from biological glue to cell survival cues. Front Biosci 2006;11:173–85.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. Verma A, Mehta K. Tissue transglutaminase-mediated chemoresistance in cancer cells. Drug Resist Updat 2007;10:144–51.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Herman JF, Mangala LS, Mehta K. Implications of increased tissue transglutaminase (TG2) expression in drug-resistant breast cancer (MCF-7) cells. Oncogene 2006;25:3049–58.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Fok J, Ekmekcioglu S, Mehta K. Implications of tissue transglutaminase expression in malignant melanoma. Mol Cancer Ther 2006;5:1493–503.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. Mehta K, Fok J, Miller FR, Koul D, Sahin AA. Prognostic significance of tissue transglutaminase in drug resistant and metastatic breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:8068–76.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Kim DS, Park SS, Nam BH, Kim IH, Kim SY. Reversal of drug resistance in breast cancer cells by transglutaminase 2 inhibition and nuclear factor-κB inactivation. Cancer Res 2006;66:10936–43.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Han JA, Park SC. Reduction of transglutaminase 2 expression is associated with an induction of drug sensitivity in the PC-14 human lung cancer cell line. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 1999;125:89–95.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Iacobuzio-Donahue CA, Ashfaq R, Maitra A, et al. Highly expressed genes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas: a comprehensive characterization and comparison of the transcription profiles obtained from three major technologies. Cancer Res 2003;63:8614–22.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Jiang W, Ying Y, Lu J. Identification of metastasis-associated proteins by proteomic analysis and functional exploration of interleukin-18 in metastasis. Proteomics 2003;3:724–37.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Antonyak MA, Miller AM, Jansen JM, et al. Augmentation of tissue transglutaminase expression and activation by epidermal growth factor inhibit doxorubicin-induced apoptosis in human breast cancer cells. J Biol Chem 2004;279:41461–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Akar U, Ozpolat B, Mehta K, Fok J, Kondo Y, Lopez-Berestein G. Tissue transglutaminase inhibits autophagy in pancreatic cancer cells. Mol Cancer Res 2007;5:241–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Verma A, Wang H, Manavathi B, et al. Increased expression of tissue transglutaminase in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and its implications in drug resistance and metastasis. Cancer Res 2006;66:10525–33.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Mann AP, Verma A, Sethi G, et al. Overexpression of tissue transglutaminase leads to constitutive activation of nuclear factor-κB in cancer cells: delineation of a novel pathway. Cancer Res 2006;66:8788–95.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Mangala LS, Fok JY, Zorrilla-Calancha IR, Verma A, Mehta K. Tissue transglutaminase expression promotes cell attachment, invasion and survival in breast cancer cells. Oncogene 2007;26:2459–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Landen CN Jr, Chavez-Reyes A, Bucana C, et al. Therapeutic EphA2 gene targeting in vivo using neutral liposomal small interfering RNA delivery. Cancer Res 2005;65:6910–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Kunnumakkara AB, Guha S, Krishnan S, et al. Curcumin potentiates antitumor activity of gemcitabine in an orthotopic model of pancreatic cancer through suppression of proliferation, angiogenesis, and inhibition of nuclear factor-κB regulated gene products. Cancer Res 2007;67:3853–61.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Mohan K, Pinto D, Issekutz TB. Identification of tissue transglutaminase as a novel molecule involved in human CD8+ T cell transendothelial migration. J Immunol 2003;171:3179–86.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Priglinger SG, Alge CS, Neubauer AS, et al. TGF-β2-induced cell surface tissue transglutaminase increases adhesion and migration of RPE cells on fibronectin through the gelatin-binding domain. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:955–63.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    Akimov SS, Belkin AM. Cell surface tissue transglutaminase is involved in adhesion and migration of monocytic cells on fibronectin. Blood 2001;98:1567–76.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    Joshi S, Guleria R, Pan J, DiPette D, Singh US. Retinoic acid receptors and tissue-transglutaminase mediate short-term effect of retinoic acid on migration and invasion of neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells. Oncogene 2006;25:240–7.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. ↵
    Mehta K. High levels of transglutaminase expression in doxorubicin-resistant human breast carcinoma cells. Int J Cancer 1994;58:400–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    Satpathy M, Cao L, Pincheira R, et al. Enhanced peritoneal ovarian tumor dissemination by tissue transglutaminase. Cancer Res 2007;67:7194–202.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    Akimov SS, Krylov D, Fleischman LF, Belkin AM. Tissue transglutaminase is an integrin-binding adhesion coreceptor for fibronectin. J Cell Biol 2000;148:825–38.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    Verma A, Guha S, Wang H, et al. Tissue transglutaminase regulates focal adhesion kinase/AKT activation by modulating PTEN expression in pancreatic cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res 2008;14. In press.
  33. ↵
    Verma A, Mehta K. Transglutaminase-mediated activation of nuclear transcription factor-κB in cancer cells: a new therapeutic opportunity. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 2007;7:559–65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. Halder J, Aprana AK, Landen CN, et al. Focal adhesion kinase targeting using in vivo short interfering RNA delivery in neutral liposomes for ovarian carcinoma therapy. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12:4916–24.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Clinical Cancer Research: 14 (8)
April 2008
Volume 14, Issue 8
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Clinical Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Therapeutic Significance of Elevated Tissue Transglutaminase Expression in Pancreatic Cancer
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Clinical Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Therapeutic Significance of Elevated Tissue Transglutaminase Expression in Pancreatic Cancer
Amit Verma, Sushovan Guha, Parmeswaran Diagaradjane, Ajaikumar B. Kunnumakkara, Angela M. Sanguino, Gabriel Lopez-Berestein, Anil K. Sood, Bharat B. Aggarwal, Sunil Krishnan, Juri G. Gelovani and Kapil Mehta
Clin Cancer Res April 15 2008 (14) (8) 2476-2483; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4529

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Therapeutic Significance of Elevated Tissue Transglutaminase Expression in Pancreatic Cancer
Amit Verma, Sushovan Guha, Parmeswaran Diagaradjane, Ajaikumar B. Kunnumakkara, Angela M. Sanguino, Gabriel Lopez-Berestein, Anil K. Sood, Bharat B. Aggarwal, Sunil Krishnan, Juri G. Gelovani and Kapil Mehta
Clin Cancer Res April 15 2008 (14) (8) 2476-2483; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4529
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Targeting HER2 with Osimertinib in NSCLC
  • Combined VEGF/EGFR Inhibition
  • Radiotherapy with IDO1/PD-1 Blockade Treats Advanced GBM
Show more Cancer Therapy: Preclinical
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • CCR Focus Archive
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Clinical Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Clinical Cancer Research
eISSN: 1557-3265
ISSN: 1078-0432

Advertisement