Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
    • CME
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
    • CME
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Molecular Pathways

Estrogen Receptor Mutations and Changes in Downstream Gene Expression and Signaling

Ines Barone, Lauren Brusco and Suzanne A.W. Fuqua
Ines Barone
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lauren Brusco
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Suzanne A.W. Fuqua
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1753 Published May 2010
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Estrogens play a crucial role in regulating the growth and differentiation of breast cancers, with approximately two thirds of all breast tumors expressing the estrogen receptor alpha (ERα). Therefore, therapeutic strategies directed at inhibiting the action of ERα by using anti-estrogens such as tamoxifen, or reducing estrogens levels by using aromatase inhibitors, such as letrozole, anastrozole, or exemestane, are the standard treatments offered to women with ERα-positive cancer. However, not all patients respond to endocrine therapies (termed de novo resistance), and a large number of patients who do respond will eventually develop disease progression or recurrence while on therapy (acquired resistance). Recently, variant forms of the receptor have been identified owing to alternative splicing or gene mutation. This article reviews these variant receptors and their clinical relevance in resistance to endocrine therapy, by addressing their molecular cross-talk with growth factor receptors and signaling components. Understanding the complexity of receptor-mediated signaling has promise for new combined therapeutic options that focus on more efficient blockade of receptor cross-talk. Clin Cancer Res; 16(10); 2702–8. ©2010 AACR.

Background

Human estrogen receptors belong to a superfamily of nuclear hormone receptors that function as ligand-activated transcription factors. Two isoforms of estrogen receptor have been described: ERα and ERβ. Each is encoded by unique genes, but share a common structural and functional organization. Classical estrogen receptor (ERα or hERα-66) contains an amino-terminal region that harbors the ligand-independent activation function (AF-1), a central DNA binding domain (DBD), and a carboxy-terminal hormone binding domain (HBD), which contains the ligand-dependent activation function (AF-2; Fig. 1). Binding of hormone to ERα facilitates “classical” genomic activities of the receptor (Fig. 2), and its binding to estrogen response elements (ERE) in target genes function to either activate or repress gene expression.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

A representation of the structural domains, the sites of post-translational modifications, and mutations within ERα. Growth factor signaling leads to numerous downstream phosphorylation events located within the AF-1, DBD, and hinge domains, thus affecting ERα signaling through the “nonclassical” signaling pathways. Post-translational modifications located within the HBD/AF-2 domain affect the “classical” signaling pathway of ERα. In the AF-1 domain, S118 and S167 are phosphorylated by Erk1/2 and Akt, respectively, in the hinge domain, S305 by Akt, PKA, and PAK-1. Phosphorylation of these three sites regulates both ERα's sensitivity to tamoxifen as well as ligand-independent activation of the receptor. Acetylation at residues K266/8, K299, and K302/3 by p300 also modulates ERα activation. A somatic mutation, K303R, allows ERα to be more highly phosphorylated by PKA and Akt, resulting in estrogen hypersensitivity and endocrine resistance. Methylation, occurring by Set7 interaction with ERα, causes increased receptor stability and a heightened recruitment of ERα to its target genes. In the AF-2 domain, the Y537 site is target of c-Src. The Y537N mutation eliminates this phosphorylation site, resulting in constitutive receptor activity. ERα can also be modified by alternative splicing at the DNA level, resulting in exon skipping and a truncated protein with a subsequently altered function. For example, in ERα Δ3, the third exon is alternatively spliced resulting in a truncated DBD. This isoform does not bind to DNA and is a dominant negative inhibitor to the wild-type ERα. Another truncated ERα isoform is ERα-46, which is missing the AF-1 domain and has been found to localize at the plasma membrane. It acts as a competitive inhibitor to full length ERα. A third alternatively spliced form of ERα is ERα-36, which lacks the AF-1 and AF-2 domains but has an additional 27-amino-acid sequence added at the COOH terminus. This isoform also localizes to the plasma membrane and also acts as a suppressor of full length ERα.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

A representation of the “classical” and “nonclassical” estrogen receptor signaling pathways. Estrogen receptor mediates transcription of its target genes using two types of mechanisms, these are known as “classical” and “nonclassical” signaling. First, “classical” signaling initiates with the binding of estrogen to estrogen receptor, causing it to bind directly to regions of DNA called EREs, located within transcriptional start sites of estrogen-regulated genes, which subsequently activate transcription of downstream genes. There are several mechanisms of “nonclassical” signaling. The first of these mechanisms is mediated by the signaling of growth factors (such as IGFR and EGFR) and G-protein coupled receptors, through downstream signaling molecules to estrogen receptor. These pathways mediate estrogen receptors' state of post-transcriptional modification (by affecting its phosphorylation, acetylation, methylation) and thus its activity, independent of estrogen binding. It is likely that crosstalk of these pathways not only results in estrogen-independent activation of estrogen receptor but also endocrine resistance. Signaling has also been shown to occur through truncated membrane bound forms of estrogen receptor; this signaling is usually inhibitory of full length estrogen receptor activity. Finally, another mechanism of “nonclassical” signaling requires the binding of estrogen receptor to other transcription factors (including SP-1 and AP-1), causing a recruitment of estrogen receptor to transcriptional start sites other than EREs and transcription of downstream genes.

Estrogen actions are also mediated by other “nonclassical” mechanisms (Fig. 2): (a) ligand-independent ERα signaling, in which gene activation occurs through second-messengers downstream of growth factor signaling pathways [such as the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), the insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGFR), and the G protein coupled receptor (GPCR) pathways], which alter intracellular kinase and phosphatase activity, resulting in altered phosphorylation of ERα (1); (b) rapid, “nongenomic” effects through a membrane-associated receptor; and (c) ERE-independent signaling, in which ERα regulates genes via protein-protein interactions with other transcription factors, such as c-Fos/c-Jun B (AP-1), Sp1, and nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB; refs. 2–4). These alternative mechanisms alter downstream target protein expression instrumental in cell division, angiogenesis, and survival, leading to sustained breast cancer growth and progression.

Several laboratories have evaluated the effects of phosphorylation by second-messengers on receptor action. Among the kinases that can phosphorylate ERα are important signaling molecules such as Akt, extracellular regulated kinase (Erk) 1/2 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), p21-activated kinase 1 (PAK-1), and protein kinase A (PKA), resulting in diverse responses to ligands (Fig. 1; ref. 5). For example, phosphorylation of ERα serine (S) 167 by Akt and S118 by Erk1/2 can result in acquired resistance to the anti-estrogen tamoxifen, and ligand-independent activation of ERα (6–8). Phosphorylation of S305, which is mediated by both PKA and PAK-1 signaling, can impact estrogen hypersensitivity and tamoxifen responsiveness (9–11). These phosphorylation events are complex and interdependent. For instance, phosphorylation at ERα S305 can regulate the subsequent phosphorylation of S118 (12), and receptor acetylation (9).

The region between the DBD and the LBD, known as the hinge, has long been considered to simply serve as a flexible linker to orient the other two functional domains. However, it is now thought that this region is a multifunctional domain that binds a number of coregulatory proteins and participates in the binding of estrogen receptor to DNA (9, 13, 14). The lysine residues K266, K268, K299, K302, and K303 within this domain are conserved residues that can be acetylated by the histone acetylase protein p300 (Fig. 1; refs. 14–17). Acetylation of K266 and K268 induced DNA-binding and ligand-dependent activation (14), whereas acetylation of K302 and K303 inhibited ERα activation (15). The phosphorylation status of ERα S305 coordinately regulates the acetylation of the K302/303 residues, sensitizing ERα to ligand stimulation (9). ERα K302 is also methylated by the SET7 methyltransferase (Fig. 1); this methylation stabilizes the receptor and is necessary for the efficient recruitment of ERα to its target genes and subsequent transactivation (18). Acetylation of K303 attenuates ERα-driven transcription, not just from antagonism via acetylation, but also by inhibition of K302 methylation and subsequent destabilization of ERα. Other modifications, such as ubiquitination at K302 (19) and sumoylation at K266 and K268 (20), have also been shown to affect ERα stability and activity. Thus residues in the hinge domain are frequent targets for post-translational modifications that affect hormone sensitivity through alteration of receptor stability or regulation of estrogen-dependent gene transcription. It is tempting to speculate that immunohistochemical quantitation of these post-translational modifications could provide important prognostic or predictive information in clinical samples.

Variant ERα Protein Isoforms

Several groups have identified ERα splice variants in a number of different normal tissues such as human breast epithelium, endometrium, and pituitary, as well as various tumor types including breast cancer, endometrial carcinoma, and meningiomas; these mRNA variants are usually co-expressed along with the wild-type receptor (reviewed in ref. 21). These splice variants can confer either dominant-positive or dominant-negative effects on cancer cells, and are hypothesized to contribute to the hormone-independent phenotype of some breast tumors. Among these variants is ERα exon Δ3, that is missing part of the DBD (22), which showed the most significant increase in levels in breast cancer tissue (Fig. 1; ref. 23). The ERα Δ3 isoform functions as a dominant-negative receptor, able to suppress estrogen-induced transcriptional activity (24), reduce anchorage-dependent growth, soft-agar colony forming ability, and in vitro invasion when transfected in breast cancer cells (25). It is hypothesized that this reduction in estrogen receptor signaling may lead to unchecked estrogen stimulation, establishing permissive conditions for further carcinogenetic events.

Despite the different estrogen receptor splice variants described thus far, relatively few variant ERα protein isoforms have been characterized, in part owing to the practical limitations of their detection (26–28). Previous reports have shown the presence of three predominant bands of 35 to 39, 46, and 66 kDa in immunoblots probed with an anti-ERα antibody raised against the LBD (26–28). There is accumulating evidence that these isoforms could play significant roles in estrogen receptor signaling events.

For instance, the hERα−46 isoform has been biochemically isolated from MCF-7 breast cancer cells (29), vascular endothelial cells (30), and osteoblasts (26). This isoform lacks the first 173 amino acids in the amino-terminal AF-1 domain because of alternative splicing of exon 1, and it copurifies with plasma membrane markers (Fig. 1; ref. 31). This altered location allows cells to mediate rapid estrogen signaling events, such as stimulation of nitrogen oxide synthesis (27). hERα−46 forms heterodimers with full-length ERα acting as a strong competitive inhibitor in ERα-positive cells, and it can promote activation of genomic activities in ERα-negative tissues (26, 29). Further studies are needed to identify the exact function of this isoform in estrogen target cell proliferation, and to understand its potential prognostic role in clinical samples.

hERα−36 is a naturally occurring isoform that is expressed in both ERα-positive and -negative breast cancer cells, and is generated from a promoter located in the first intron of the hERα−66 gene (32, 33). It lacks both AF-1 and AF-2, but retains the DBD and portions of the HBD (Fig. 1). It possesses an extra, unique 27-amino-acid domain that replaces the last 138 amino acids encoded by exons 7 and 8 of the hERα−66 gene (28). The hERα−36 isoform also contains three potential myristoylation sites located near the amino-terminal region, which are postulated to direct it to the plasma membrane. This isoform lacks intrinsic transcriptional activity, but it efficiently suppresses the transactivation activities mediated by full-length ERα, suggesting that it is a potent inhibitor of genomic estrogen signaling. Interestingly, the hERα−36 isoform primarily localizes to the plasma membrane, where it transduces “nongenomic” signaling cascades initiated by both estrogens and anti-estrogens, such as activation of the MAPK/ERK signaling pathway, thus stimulating cell proliferation (34). In clinical samples, overexpression of hERα-36 was associated with poorer disease-free survival in patients, identifying a subset of patients who are less likely to benefit from tamoxifen treatment (33). In summary, ERα protein isoforms capable of modulating ERα-mediated signaling have been identified, and their integration into the accurate classification of ERα status may be warranted.

ERα Mutations in Tumors

The number of naturally occurring mutations identified in breast cancers to date is relatively low (35), which is surprising because mutation of the clinical target is a common resistance mechanism in tumors. The Y537N (Tyr537Asn) mutation was discovered in a metastatic breast tumor (36). This mutation eliminates a carboxy-terminal tyrosine residue that is considered to be an important c-Src phosphorylation site with potential roles in regulating ligand binding, homodimerization, and transactivation of ERα. It was shown that the Y537N ERα mutant exhibits constitutive transactivation activity, and that this activity was only slightly affected by estradiol, tamoxifen, or the steroidal anti-estrogen ICI 164,384 (36). A mutation at this site may allow ERα to escape phosphorylation-mediated controls, providing cells with a potential selective advantage, but unfortunately, only a few metastatic breast tumors have yet been examined for mutations at this site.

A somatic mutation at nucleotide 908 of ERα (A908G) has been identified in about a third of premalignant breast hyperplasias and one half of invasive breast tumors from untreated patients (37, 38). The A908G mutation introduces a lysine-to-arginine transition at residue 303 (termed K303R) within the hinge domain. Molecular analyses of the K303R ERα mutation have shown that the mutated arginine at the 303 position allows ERα to be more highly phosphorylated by PKA (9) and Akt kinase signaling (39), and alters the dynamic recruitment of co-activators and corepressors, such as BRCA-1 or calmodulin (40, 41).

Overexpression of the K303R ERα mutation in ERα-positive MCF-7 breast cancer cells confers estrogen hypersensitivity (37), and decreased sensitivity to tamoxifen treatment when engaged in cross-talk with growth factor receptor signaling pathway (42). Enhanced growth factor receptor cross-talk with ERα is a known mechanism of hormone resistance in breast cancer (43). Expression of the K303R ERα mutation also conferred resistance to the nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor anastrozole in ERα-positive cells, via a dynamic interaction between the K303R ERα mutation, S305 phosphorylation, and the IGF-1R signaling pathway (39, 44). Signaling components both upstream and downstream of the IGF-1R were altered in mutant-overexpressing cells. The frequency of the mutation is still contentious (45–49), however, the sequencing method used in some of these studies might not have been sensitive enough for straight-forward detection of this specific mutation (38). The presence of the K303R ERα mutation was associated with poor outcomes in univariate analyses of tumors from untreated breast cancer patients, and its presence was correlated with older age, larger tumor size, and lymph node-positive disease, all clinical factors associated with worse outcomes (38). Collectively these data suggest that this mutation could play an important role as a predictive marker in breast cancer, and strategies to accurately measure it in clinical samples are currently underway.

Clinical-Translational Advances

Combination therapies: How do ERα variants come into play?

Because a number of different signaling pathways can be simultaneously active in ERα-positive breast tumors, and a variety of estrogen receptor activities, such as receptor turnover, cellular localization, and hormone responsiveness can all be influenced by the presence of ERα variants, strategies to prevent signaling to these variants may present a unique opportunity for complete blockade of estrogen receptor. Future directions include peptide mimetics capable of blocking altered post-translational modifications on the receptor (39, 42). We speculate that the ERα hinge region may be a particularly attractive target to block the multiple post-translational modifications, including phosphorylation, acetylation, methylation, sumoylation, and ubiquitination, occurring in this important regulatory region.

Major breakthroughs in understanding the molecular dynamics of cell-signaling networks operative in tumors are rapidly being translated into the clinic, with a number of potent drugs selectively targeting the MAPK and PI3K/Akt pathways entering into clinical trials (Table 1). There is also evidence of potential cross-talk between these signaling pathways, necessitating horizontal blockade, or combined use of multiple signaling inhibitors. The complex bidirectional cross-talk that exists between growth factor receptors, these second-messenger signaling pathways, and ERα, along with the variant ERα forms suggests that simultaneous blockade will be required to bypass resistance mechanisms or restore hormone sensitivity in some breast cancer patients. The potential utility of these new therapeutics to signaling components, along with combined ERα-directed therapy is predicted to improve clinical care and reduce mortality from breast cancer.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Clinical trials using drugs that target pathways known to interact with the ERα pathway in patients with ERα-positive breast disease

Conclusions

A significant challenge for effective blockade of ERα signaling is the inherent cellular heterogeneity present in breast tumors. Not only can variant forms of ERα be expressed along with wild-type receptor in tumors, but ERα-positive patients can present with alterations in the growth factor receptors themselves, as well as critical signaling molecules such as PI3K and Akt (50). Accurate determination of this molecular heterogenity is requisite for accurate and effective treatment decisions. The development of new biomarkers to detect this heterogenity is key.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Acknowledgments

Grant Support: National Cancer Institute: RO1 CA72038.

  • Received February 4, 2010.
  • Revision received March 12, 2010.
  • Accepted March 12, 2010.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Weigel NL,
    2. Zhang Y
    . Ligand-independent activation of steroid hormone receptors. J Mol Med 1998;76:469–79.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Gaub MP,
    2. Bellard M,
    3. Scheuer I,
    4. Chambon P,
    5. Sassone-Corsi P
    . Activation of the ovalbumin gene by the estrogen receptor involves the fos-jun complex. Cell 1990;63:1267–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Ray A,
    2. Prefontaine KE,
    3. Ray P
    . Down-modulation of interleukin-6 gene expression by 17 β-estradiol in the absence of high affinity DNA binding by the estrogen receptor. J Biol Chem 1994;269:12940–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Webb P,
    2. Lopez GN,
    3. Uht RM,
    4. Kushner PJ
    . Tamoxifen activation of the estrogen receptor/AP-1 pathway: potential origin for the cell-specific estrogen-like effects of antiestrogens. Mol Endocrinol 1995;9:443–56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Likhite VS,
    2. Stossi F,
    3. Kim K,
    4. Katzenellenbogen BS,
    5. Katzenellenbogen JA
    . Kinase-specific phosphorylation of the estrogen receptor changes receptor interactions with ligand, deoxyribonucleic acid, and coregulators associated with alterations in estrogen and tamoxifen activity. Mol Endocrinol 2006;20:3120–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Campbell RA,
    2. Bhat-Nakshatri P,
    3. Patel NM,
    4. Constantinidou D,
    5. Ali S,
    6. Nakshatri H
    . Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/AKT-mediated activation of estrogen receptor α: A new model for anti-estrogen resistance. J Biol Chem 2001;276:9817–24.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Kato S,
    2. Endoh H,
    3. Masuhiro Y,
    4. et al
    . Activation of the estrogen receptor through phosphorylation by mitogen-activated protein kinase. Science 1995;270:1491–4.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Lee H,
    2. Jiang F,
    3. Wang Q,
    4. et al
    . MEKKI activation of human estrogen receptor α and stimulation of the agonistic activity of 4-hydroxytamoxifen in endometrial and ovarian cancer cells. Mol Endocrinol 2000;14:1882–96.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Cui Y,
    2. Zhang M,
    3. Pestell R,
    4. Curran EM,
    5. Welshons WV,
    6. Fuqua SA
    . Phosphorylation of estrogen receptor α blocks its acetylation and regulates estrogen sensitivity. Cancer Res 2004;64:9199–208.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Wang RA,
    2. Mazumdar A,
    3. Vadlamudi RK,
    4. Kumar R
    . P21-activated kinase-1 phosphorylates and transactivates estrogen receptor-α and promotes hyperplasia in mammary epithelium. EMBO J 2002;21:5437–47.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  8. ↵
    1. Michalides R,
    2. Griekspoor A,
    3. Balkenende A,
    4. et al
    . Tamoxifen resistance by a conformational arrest of the estrogen receptor α after PKA activation in breast cancer. Cancer Cell 2004;5:597–605.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Rayala SK,
    2. Talukder AH,
    3. Balasenthil S,
    4. et al
    . P21-activated kinase 1 regulation of estrogen receptor-α activation involves serine 305 activation linked with serine 118 phosphorylation. Cancer Res 2006;66:1694–701.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Haelens A,
    2. Tanner T,
    3. Denayer S,
    4. Callewaert L,
    5. Claessens F
    . The hinge region regulates DNA binding, nuclear translocation, and transactivation of the androgen receptor. Cancer Res 2007;67:4514–23.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Kim MY,
    2. Woo EM,
    3. Chong YT,
    4. Homenko DR,
    5. Kraus WL
    . Acetylation of estrogen receptor α by p300 at lysines 266 and 268 enhances the deoxyribonucleic acid binding and transactivation activities of the receptor. Mol Endocrinol 2006;20:1479–93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Wang C,
    2. Fu M,
    3. Angeletti RH,
    4. et al
    . Direct acetylation of the estrogen receptor α hinge region by p300 regulates transactivation and hormone sensitivity. J Biol Chem 2001;276:18375–83.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Fu M,
    2. Wang C,
    3. Zhang X,
    4. Pestell RG
    . Acetylation of nuclear receptors in cellular growth and apoptosis. Biochem Pharmacol 2004;68:1199–208.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Fu M,
    2. Wang C,
    3. Zhang X,
    4. Pestell R
    . Nuclear receptor modifications and endocrine cell proliferation. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2003;85:133–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Subramanian K,
    2. Jia D,
    3. Kapoor-Vazirani P,
    4. et al
    . Regulation of estrogen receptor α by the SET7 lysine methyltransferase. Mol Cell 2008;30:336–47.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Berry NB,
    2. Fan M,
    3. Nephew KP
    . Estrogen receptor-α hinge-region lysines 302 and 303 regulate receptor degradation by the proteasome. Mol Endocrinol 2008;22:1535–51.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Sentis S,
    2. Le Romancer M,
    3. Bianchin C,
    4. Rostan MC,
    5. Corbo L
    . Sumoylation of the estrogen receptor α hinge region regulates its transcriptional activity. Mol Endocrinol 2005;19:2671–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Herynk MH,
    2. Fuqua SA
    . Estrogen receptor mutations in human disease. Endocr Rev 2004;25:869–98.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Wang Y,
    2. Miksicek RJ
    . Identification of a dominant negative form of the human estrogen receptor. Mol Endocrinol 1991;5:1707–15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Poola I,
    2. Speirs V
    . Expression of alternatively spliced estrogen receptor α mRNAs is increased in breast cancer tissues. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2001;78:459–69.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Iwase H,
    2. Omoto Y,
    3. Iwata H,
    4. Hara Y,
    5. Ando Y,
    6. Kobayashi S
    . Genetic and epigenetic alterations of the estrogen receptor gene and hormone independence in human breast cancer. Oncology 1998;55:11–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Erenburg I,
    2. Schachter B,
    3. Mira y Lopez R,
    4. Ossowski L
    . Loss of an estrogen receptor isoform (ER α δ 3) in breast cancer and the consequences of its reexpression: interference with estrogen-stimulated properties of malignant transformation. Mol Endocrinol 1997;11:2004–15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Denger S,
    2. Reid G,
    3. Kos M,
    4. et al
    . ERα gene expression in human primary osteoblasts: evidence for the expression of two receptor proteins. Mol Endocrinol 2001;15:2064–77.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Li L,
    2. Haynes MP,
    3. Bender JR
    . Plasma membrane localization and function of the estrogen receptor α variant (ER46) in human endothelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100:4807–12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Wang Z,
    2. Zhang X,
    3. Shen P,
    4. Loggie BW,
    5. Chang Y,
    6. Deuel TF
    . Identification, cloning, and expression of human estrogen receptor-α36, a novel variant of human estrogen receptor-α66. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2005;336:1023–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Flouriot G,
    2. Brand H,
    3. Denger S,
    4. et al
    . Identification of a new isoform of the human estrogen receptor-α (hER-α) that is encoded by distinct transcripts and that is able to repress hER-α activation function 1. EMBO J 2000;19:4688–700.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Russell KS,
    2. Haynes MP,
    3. Sinha D,
    4. Clerisme E,
    5. Bender JR
    . Human vascular endothelial cells contain membrane binding sites for estradiol, which mediate rapid intracellular signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000;97:5930–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Marquez DC,
    2. Pietras RJ
    . Membrane-associated binding sites for estrogen contribute to growth regulation of human breast cancer cells. Oncogene 2001;20:5420–30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Lee LM,
    2. Cao J,
    3. Deng H,
    4. Chen P,
    5. Gatalica Z,
    6. Wang ZY
    . ER-α36, a novel variant of ER-α, is expressed in ER-positive and -negative human breast carcinomas. Anticancer Res 2008;28:479–83.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Shi L,
    2. Dong B,
    3. Li Z,
    4. et al
    . Expression of ER-{α}36, a novel variant of estrogen receptor {α}, and resistance to tamoxifen treatment in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:3423–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Wang Z,
    2. Zhang X,
    3. Shen P,
    4. Loggie BW,
    5. Chang Y,
    6. Deuel TF
    . A variant of estrogen receptor-{α}, hER-{α}36: transduction of estrogen- and antiestrogen-dependent membrane-initiated mitogenic signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006;103:9063–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Roodi N,
    2. Bailey LR,
    3. Kao WY,
    4. et al
    . Estrogen receptor gene analysis in estrogen receptor-positive and receptor-negative primary breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995;87:446–51.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Zhang QX,
    2. Borg A,
    3. Wolf DM,
    4. Oesterreich S,
    5. Fuqua SA
    . An estrogen receptor mutant with strong hormone-independent activity from a metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Res 1997;57:1244–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Fuqua SA,
    2. Wiltschke C,
    3. Zhang QX,
    4. et al
    . A hypersensitive estrogen receptor-α mutation in premalignant breast lesions. Cancer Res 2000;60:4026–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Herynk MH,
    2. Parra I,
    3. Cui Y,
    4. et al
    . Association between the estrogen receptor α A908G mutation and outcomes in invasive breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2007;13:3235–43.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Barone I,
    2. Iacopetta D,
    3. Covington KR,
    4. et al
    . Phosphorylation of the mutant K303R estrogen receptor α at serine 305 affects aromatase inhibitor sensitivity. Oncogene 2010, Epub 2010 Jan 25.
  36. ↵
    1. Ma Y,
    2. Fan S,
    3. Hu C,
    4. et al
    . BRCA1 regulates acetylation and ubiquitination of estrogen receptor-α. Mol Endocrinol 2010;24:76–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Herynk MH,
    2. Hopp T,
    3. Cui Y,
    4. Niu A,
    5. Corona-Rodriguez A,
    6. Fuqua SA
    . A hypersensitive estrogen receptor α mutation that alters dynamic protein interactions. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2009, Epub 2009 Oct 20.
  38. ↵
    1. Giordano C,
    2. Cui Y,
    3. Barone I,
    4. et al
    . Growth factor-induced resistance to tamoxifen is associated with a mutation of estrogen receptor α and its phosphorylation at serine 305. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010;119:71–85.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Musgrove EA,
    2. Sutherland RL
    . Biological determinants of endocrine resistance in breast cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2009;9:631–43.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Barone I,
    2. Cui Y,
    3. Herynk MH,
    4. et al
    . Expression of the K303R estrogen receptor-α breast cancer mutation induces resistance to an aromatase inhibitor via addiction to the PI3K/Akt kinase pathway. Cancer Res 2009;69:4724–32.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    1. Davies MP,
    2. O'Neill PA,
    3. Innes H,
    4. Sibson DR
    . Hypersensitive K303R oestrogen receptor-α variant not found in invasive carcinomas. Breast Cancer Res 2005;7:R113–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Tebbit CL,
    2. Bentley RC,
    3. Olson JA Jr..,
    4. Marks JR
    . Estrogen receptor α (ESR1) mutant A908G is not a common feature in benign and malignant proliferations of the breast. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2004;40:51–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Tokunaga E,
    2. Kimura Y,
    3. Maehara Y
    . No hypersensitive estrogen receptor-α mutation (K303R) in Japanese breast carcinomas. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2004;84:289–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Zhang Z,
    2. Yamashita H,
    3. Toyama T,
    4. et al
    . Estrogen receptor α mutation (A-to-G transition at nucleotide 908) is not found in different types of breast lesions from Japanese women. Breast Cancer 2003;10:70–3.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Conway K,
    2. Parrish E,
    3. Edmiston SN,
    4. et al
    . The estrogen receptor-α A908G (K303R) mutation occurs at a low frequency in invasive breast tumors: results from a population-based study. Breast Cancer Res 2005;7:R871–80.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Gonzalez-Angulo AM,
    2. Stemke-Hale K,
    3. Palla SL,
    4. et al
    . Androgen receptor levels and association with PIK3CA mutations and prognosis in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2009;15:2472–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Clinical Cancer Research: 16 (10)
May 2010
Volume 16, Issue 10
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Clinical Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Estrogen Receptor Mutations and Changes in Downstream Gene Expression and Signaling
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Clinical Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Estrogen Receptor Mutations and Changes in Downstream Gene Expression and Signaling
Ines Barone, Lauren Brusco and Suzanne A.W. Fuqua
Clin Cancer Res May 15 2010 (16) (10) 2702-2708; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1753

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Estrogen Receptor Mutations and Changes in Downstream Gene Expression and Signaling
Ines Barone, Lauren Brusco and Suzanne A.W. Fuqua
Clin Cancer Res May 15 2010 (16) (10) 2702-2708; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1753
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Background
    • Variant ERα Protein Isoforms
    • ERα Mutations in Tumors
    • Clinical-Translational Advances
    • Conclusions
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Therapeutic Targeting of the Liver Microenvironment
  • Targeting the Protein Kinase Wee1 in Cancer
  • Metabolic Control of Histone Methylation and Gene Expression
Show more Molecular Pathways
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • CCR Focus Archive
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Clinical Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Clinical Cancer Research
eISSN: 1557-3265
ISSN: 1078-0432

Advertisement