Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
    • CME
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
    • CME
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Cancer Therapy: Clinical

Intraindividual Comparison of Selective Arterial versus Venous 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in Patients with Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Clemens Kratochwil, Frederik L. Giesel, Ruben López-Benítez, Nadine Schimpfky, Kirsten Kunze, Michael Eisenhut, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor and Uwe Haberkorn
Clemens Kratochwil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frederik L. Giesel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ruben López-Benítez
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nadine Schimpfky
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kirsten Kunze
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Eisenhut
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hans-Ulrich Kauczor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Uwe Haberkorn
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-0004 Published May 2010
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    A-B, comparison of maximal SUVs after i.v. and i.a. application, respectively, of 68Ga-DOTATOC in 122 liver metastases of 11 patients suffering from metastasized gastroenteropancreatic cancer (paired t test, P < 0.001). The main statistic is summarized as a box plot (A). The individual lesions are also presented in a scatter plot (B; note the different scales in X- and Y-axes). However, it was previously shown that vascular fraction and receptor binding are independent factors determining the SUV in DOTATOC-PET and therefore the linear regression analysis (line) might be insufficient to predict the benefit of a particular lesion.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Comparison of intraindividual 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in a patient with multiple liver metastases, presented as a maximum intensity projection after i.v. (A) versus i.a. (B) application. Average SUV(max) presents a 3.2-fold higher value (122.9 versus 38.5) after i.a. 68Ga-DOTATOC infusion. C, digital subtraction angiography illustrates the nearly exclusive arterial perfusion of neuroendocrine liver metastases.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Patient with neuroendocrine cancer in the mesenteric root (P-NET) shown by contrast-enhanced CT (arrow, tumor lesion). After selective exploration of the gastroduodenal artery, tumor uptake was enhanced 7.8-fold (SUV 279.4 versus 35.7) after i.a. (C) in comparison with i.v. (B) injection of 68Ga-DOTATOC.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    DOTATOC biodistribution presented as maximum intensity projections. A, 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in a patient with low tumor burden. The two solitary liver metastases (arrows) show enhanced uptake after arterial injection (right), whereas whole-body distribution (kidneys, spleen) did not differ significantly. B, 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in a patient with high tumor burden of the liver. After i.v. application (left), the most intense uptake was seen inside the spleen and there is circumscribable uptake in the kidneys. After i.a. application, the main volume of DOTATOC was trapped in the liver metastases during the first-pass effect, whereas the uptake from the kidneys and spleen was decreased remarkably.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    NOA-B, comparison of maximal SUVs after i.v. and tumor-targeted i.a. application of 68Ga-DOTATOC in the pituitary gland (A) and kidney (B) of 15 patients suffering from gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine cancer. A significant decrease was shown for the pituitary gland (P < 0.05, paired t test), the reduction of kidney uptake only tends to be significant (P = 0.08, paired t test).

PreviousNext
Back to top
Clinical Cancer Research: 16 (10)
May 2010
Volume 16, Issue 10
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Clinical Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Intraindividual Comparison of Selective Arterial versus Venous 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in Patients with Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Clinical Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Intraindividual Comparison of Selective Arterial versus Venous 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in Patients with Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
Clemens Kratochwil, Frederik L. Giesel, Ruben López-Benítez, Nadine Schimpfky, Kirsten Kunze, Michael Eisenhut, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor and Uwe Haberkorn
Clin Cancer Res May 15 2010 (16) (10) 2899-2905; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-0004

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Intraindividual Comparison of Selective Arterial versus Venous 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in Patients with Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
Clemens Kratochwil, Frederik L. Giesel, Ruben López-Benítez, Nadine Schimpfky, Kirsten Kunze, Michael Eisenhut, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor and Uwe Haberkorn
Clin Cancer Res May 15 2010 (16) (10) 2899-2905; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-0004
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Biomarker Analysis from the BERIL-1 Study
  • Radiation and TGFβ Blockade in Metastatic Breast Cancer
  • DAF Inhibition in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Show more Cancer Therapy: Clinical
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • CCR Focus Archive
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Clinical Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Clinical Cancer Research
eISSN: 1557-3265
ISSN: 1078-0432

Advertisement