Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
    • CME
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
    • CME
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Molecular Pathways

CXCL12 (SDF-1)/CXCR4 Pathway in Cancer

Beverly A. Teicher and Simon P. Fricker
Beverly A. Teicher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simon P. Fricker
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2329 Published June 2010
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Chemokines, small proinflammatory chemoattractant cytokines that bind to specific G-protein-coupled seven-span transmembrane receptors, are major regulators of cell trafficking and adhesion. The chemokine CXCL12 [stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1)] binds primarily to CXC receptor 4 (CXCR4; CD184). The binding of CXCL12 to CXCR4 induces intracellular signaling through several divergent pathways initiating signals related to chemotaxis, cell survival and/or proliferation, increase in intracellular calcium, and gene transcription. CXCR4 is expressed on multiple cell types including lymphocytes, hematopoietic stem cells, endothelial and epithelial cells, and cancer cells. The CXCL12/CXCR4 axis is involved in tumor progression, angiogenesis, metastasis, and survival. This pathway is a target for therapeutics that can block the CXCL12/CXCR4 interaction or inhibit downstream intracellular signaling. Clin Cancer Res; 16(11); 2927–31. ©2010 AACR.

Background

Chemokines are 8 to 12 kDa peptides that function as chemoattractant cytokines involved in cell activation, differentiation, and trafficking. Chemokines bind to specific G-protein-coupled seven-span transmembrane receptors (1–3). Most chemokines bind to multiple receptors, and the same receptor may bind to more than one chemokine. The chemokine CXCL12 (stromal cell-derived factor-1) binds to the receptors CXC receptor 4 (CXCR4, CD184) and CXC receptor 7 (RDC1, CXCR7; refs. 1, 4–7). CXCR4 or CXCL12 gene knockout in mice results in impaired hematopoiesis exhibited as a defect in trafficking of hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) from the fetal liver to the embryonic bone marrow, and defects in heart and brain development, and vascularization. Thus, CXCR4 and CXCL12 knockouts are embryonic lethal (8, 9).

CXCL12 is a homeostatic chemokine. The major function of the homeostatic chemokines is to regulate hematopoietic cell trafficking and secondary lymphoid tissue architecture. CXCL12 knockout studies show that bone marrow colonization during the third trimester of gestation is controlled by CXCL12/CXCR4 pathway function. The CXCL12/CXCR4 pathway function in adults is integral to the retention and homing of HSC in the bone marrow microenvironment and lymphocyte trafficking. CXCL12 is constitutively expressed in several organs including lung, liver, skeletal muscle, brain, kidney, heart, skin, and bone marrow. CXCL12 secretion is also associated with tissue damage such as heart infarct, limb ischemia, toxic liver damage, excessive bleeding, total body irradiation, and after tissue damage related to chemotherapy. CXCR4 is expressed by endothelial cells and pericytes of hypoxic, injured, or pathological tissues, including injured carotid arteries and atherosclerotic plaques. Finally, endothelial precursor cells express and secrete CXCL12.

CXCR4 is widely expressed on hematopoietic cells including CD34+ HSC, T-lymphocytes, B-lymphocytes, monocytes and macrophages, neutrophils and eosinophils as well as by brain, lung, colon, heart, kidney, and liver, and endothelial and epithelial cells, microglia, astrocytes and neuronal cells, and progenitor cells including endothelial and smooth muscle progenitors. Functional CXCR4 is expressed on embryonic pluripotent stem cells and several types of tissue-committed stem cells, for example, neural tissue, skeletal muscles, heart, liver, endothelium, and renal tubular- and retina pigment-epithelium (8). These cells express functional CXCR4 and migrate and/or invade along CXCL12 gradients. CXCR4+ proangiogenic cells include immature and mature hematopoietic cells, endothelial precursor cells, and smooth muscle cell progenitors, which have direct or indirect proangiogenic properties. CXCL12 plays a role in the mobilization and recruitment of these cells to the neoangiogenic niches supporting revascularization of ischemic tissue and tumor growth (10).

The expression of CXCR4 on malignant epithelial cells and on cells from several hematopoietic malignancies implies that the CXCL12/CXCR4 pathway may influence the biology of cancer and play a pivotal role in directing the metastasis of CXCR4+ tumor cells to organs that express CXCL12 (e.g., lymph nodes, lungs, liver, or bones). Several CXCR4+ cancers metastasize to the bones and lymph nodes in a CXCL12-dependent manner in which the bone marrow in particular can provide a protective environment for tumor cells (11). CXCR4 can also promote tumor vascularization (see above) and act as a survival or growth factor; the implications of this are discussed further below.

CXCR4-activating mutations involving CXCR4 C-terminus truncations have been described in patients suffering from warts, hypogammaglobulinemia, immunodeficiency, and myelokathexis (WHIM) syndrome (12). Myelokathexis manifests as severe chronic neutropenia, lymphopenia, and hypercellular bone marrow, attributed to a defect in the release of neutrophils with an accompanying apoptosis of mature myeloid cells.

CXCL12/CXCR4 Pathway

The binding of CXCL12 to CXCR4 initiates divergent signaling pathways downstream of ligand binding, which can result in a variety of responses such as chemotaxis, cell survival and/or proliferation, increase in intracellular calcium, and gene transcription. Figure 1 represents some of the key signaling pathways thought to be involved in CXCR4 signal transduction. The precise nature of these pathways may be tissue-dependent and thus may differ between cell types.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

A schematic of the CXCL12/CXCR4 intracellular signal transduction pathways.

As a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) the mechanism of CXCR4 receptor activation is mediated by coupling to an intracellular heterotrimeric G-protein associated with the inner surface of the plasma membrane. The heterotrimer is composed of Gα, Gβ and Gγ subunits, which in its basal state binds the guanine nucleotide GDP. Upon activation by ligand binding, GDP is released and replaced by GTP, which leads to subunit dissociation into a βγ dimer and the α monomer to which the GTP is bound. The GTP is rapidly hydrolyzed to GDP resulting in reassociation of the receptor and the trimeric G-protein complex. On the basis of sequence similarity, the Gα subunits have been divided into four families: Gαs, Gαi, Gαq, and Gα12. Each Gα subunit relays the GPCR signal via different routes (13, 14). The Gαs subunit stimulates adenyl cyclase whereas Gαi inhibits adenyl cyclase. The Gαq family acts via PLC, such as PLCβ, to activate phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipases, which hydrolyze PIP2 to generate two second messengers, IP3 and DAG. IP3 and DAG increase the intracellular concentrations of free Ca2+ and activate a number of protein kinases, including PKC. Gαq activates the transcription factor NFκB through PYK2. Both Gαi- and Gαq-coupled receptors stimulate mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activation. Gα12 is associated with low molecular weight G proteins such as Rho and Ras. One of the features of chemokine receptors is that they are primarily Gαi-coupled receptors and as such can be inhibited by pertussus toxin. Ligand stimulation can result in an increase in intracellular calcium. This calcium flux can be readily measured and is frequently used as a measure of chemokine activity. Interestingly, calcium flux is not associated with Gαi but with Gαq, which raises the question of how chemokines elicit a calcium flux. This process seems to be achieved via the Gβγ subunit, which can trigger PLC activation and formation of IP3 and DAG, resulting in mobilization of Ca2+ from intracellular stores (14). There are recent data, however, that suggest that CXCR4 signaling may not be limited to Gαi as first thought, and that CXCR4 can couple to other Gα proteins such as Gαq, Gαo, and Gαs (15).

One of the major functions of chemokines is lymphocyte trafficking. CXCR4-mediated chemotaxis is mediated by PI3 kinase (PI3K; refs. 14, 16). PI3K can be activated both by Gβγ and Gα subunits. PI3K activation can result in the phosphorylation of several focal adhesion components such as proline-rich kinase-2 (Pyk-2), Crk-associated substrate (p130Cas), focal adhesion kinase (FAK), paxilin, Nck, Crk, and Crk-L (17, 18). Crk, which belongs to the adaptor family of proteins composed of SH2 and SH3 domains, has a putative role in signaling. JNK is activated by v-Crk. The activation of JNK by v-Crk may involve the guanine nucleotide exchange proteins SOS or C3G, both of which bind to the Crk SH3 domain. JAK2, JAK3, and Tyk-2 may also associate with CXCR4 and be activated by transphosphorylation in a Gαi-independent manner. Chemotaxis has been shown to be mediated via MAPK either through PKC, or through Gαi, which can signal through Erk/1/2 (14, 19). CXCR4 signaling has been shown to involve the Ras-activated signaling pathway, several src-related kinases such as Src, Lyn, Fyn, and Lck, T-cell activating molecule ZAP-70, and vav and small GTPases.

PI3K can lead to the activation of the serine-threonine kinase AKT, which has been found to play a key role in tumor cell survival, and possibly proliferation (20). However AKT may not be the only player in cell survival signaling. Both p38 and Erk1/2 have been implicated in tumor cell survival (21). CXCL12 can promote cell survival through the PI3-kinase- and MAP-kinase cascades without cell cycle progression. The proapoptotic Bcl-2 antagonistic of cell death protein BAD can be inactivated by the CXCL12-mediated activation of MAPK extracellular signal regulated kinases (MEK), extracellular signal-regulated kinase-ribosomal S6 kinases, and PI3K-pathways. Genes associated with cell survival can be up-regulated upon CXCL12 exposure. Thus, CXCL12 may promote cell survival by two mechanisms: post-translational inactivation of the cell death machinery and an increased transcription of cell survival-related genes (22).

Signaling through Gαi has been linked to transcription and expression through the PI3K-AKT-NF-κB axis, and also via MEK1/2 and Erk 1/2. ERK can phosphorylate and activate other cellular proteins (like p90RSK), as well as translocate into the nucleus and phosphorylate and/or activate transcription factors, leading to changes in gene expression and cell cycle progression. Adhesion molecules are key proteins involved in tumor cell invasion, and CXCL12 can up-regulate expression of adhesion molecules such as VLA-4 (23, 24).

GPCR oligomerization has been postulated to play a role in modulating GPCR signaling. Both CXCR4 homodimers and heterodimers have been reported. Homodimerization of CXCR4 has been suggested to result in G-protein-independent signaling through the JAK/Stat signaling pathway (14). However, this is still a subject of debate and the role of JAK/Stat in CXCR4 signal transduction has been questioned (25).

CXCR4 signaling is rapidly desensitized after ligand binding by receptor internalization. The intracellular C-terminus of CXCR4 is rapidly phosphorylated at serine sites by G-protein receptor kinases (GRK) after ligand binding (15). This process is followed by recruitment of β-arrestin and clathrin-mediated endocytosis. The neutrophils from patients with the rare autoimmune disease WHIMS have enhanced chemotactic responsiveness to CXCL12 caused by impaired desensitization and internalization of CXCR4, attributed to truncations in the CXCR4 C-terminus resulting in dysregulation of the normal attenuation of CXCR4 function by GRK3 (26). However, GRK-β-arrestin interactions may play more subtle roles in CXCR4 signaling with different GRKs having differential effects on receptor internalization, calcium flux, and Erk activation (26).

CXCR4 and Cancer

The CXCL12/CXCR4 axis is involved in several aspects of tumor progression including angiogenesis, metastasis, and survival (1, 27–42). The bone marrow microenvironment facilitates the survival, differentiation, and proliferation of normal hematopoietic cells, malignant hematopoietic cells, and epithelial tumor cell bone metastasis. Bone marrow factors produced, such as CXCL12 and interleukin 6 (IL-6), mediate homing, survival, and proliferation of tumor cells, and integrin-mediated adhesion sequesters tumor cells to this niche. The CXCL12/CXCR4 pathway is responsible for retention of acute lymphoid leukemia and acute myeloid leukemia cells in the bone marrow (43, 44). Environment-mediated drug resistance is induced immediately by the microenvironment and is independent of epigenetic or genetic changes caused by drug exposure, and therefore is a form of de novo drug resistance (11).

Clinical-Translational Advances

CXCL12/CXCR4 antagonists

The CXCL12/CXCR4 pathway is a target for therapeutics that block CXCL12/CXCR4 interaction or inhibit downstream intracellular enzyme activities. Small molecular inhibitors of CXCR4, such as plerixafor or BKT140, and blocking antibodies toward CXCR4 or CXCL12 are being investigated in various cancer settings (45). Plerixafor is a small molecule with two cyclam rings connected by a phenylene linker. At physiological pH, two nitrogens on each ring are protonated allowing specific charge-charge interactions with the carboxylate groups on CXCR4, thus inhibiting CXCL12 binding and downstream signaling events (46–50).

Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is an important treatment option for hematologic malignancies. Autologous HSCT following high dose chemotherapy or radiotherapy is used for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and multiple myeloma, and allogeneic HSCT is used for several leukemias. Hematopoietic growth factors such as granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), either alone or in combination with chemotherapy, are used for mobilizing and collecting HSC for transplant. However, some patients fail to mobilize adequate HSC for transplant when treated with G-CSF.

CXCL12/CXCR4 disruption is essential for the egress of hematopoietic stem and/or progenitor cells from bone marrow into circulation. Conversely, CXCL12/CXCR4 function is essential for homing and/or engraftment of hematopoietic stem cells to the bone marrow after transplantation. Clinical trials showed that non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and multiple myeloma patients treated with plerixafor and G-CSF resulted in significantly more patients collecting the optimal number of HSC for autologous transplant compared with G-CSF alone (51–53).

The bone marrow provides protection for leukemic cells from chemotherapeutic agents conferred by interactions with stromal cells, in part mediated by CXCR4 and CXCL12. In a mouse model of acute promyelocytic leukemia, treatment with a CXCR4 antagonist made the leukemia cells more sensitive to cytarabine and prolonged the survival of tumor bearing mice compared with both untreated mice, and mice treated with cytarabine alone, thus suggesting a role for CXCL12/CXCR4 inhibition in hematological malignancy treatment (44). Clinical trials are ongoing investigating the potential of CXCL12/CXCR4 inhibitors as chemosensitizers in acute myeloid leukemia and other hematological malignancies.

Conclusion

Inhibition of CXCR4 with plerixafor has shown utility by facilitating mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells for autologous transplant in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and multiple myeloma. There are early indications that CXCR4 blockade may have further applications in certain hematologic cancers. CXCR4 signals via divergent signaling pathways mediating functions that include cell migration and survival. The usurping of these pathways by tumor cells for metastasis and protection from apoptosis may provide therapeutic opportunities for CXCR4 blockade in cancer. However, much remains to be done to define these signaling pathways and the role of CXCR4 in tumor progression.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

B. Teicher, S. Fricker, employment, ownership interest, Genzyme.

  • Received January 19, 2010.
  • Accepted March 17, 2010.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Balkwill F
    . Cancer and the chemokine network. Nat Rev Cancer 2004;4:540–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Viola A,
    2. Luster AD
    . Chemokines and their receptors: drug targets in immunity and inflammation. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2008;48:171–97.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Lagerstrom MC,
    2. Schioth HB
    . Structural diversity of G protein-coupled receptors and significance for drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2008;7:339–57.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Murdoch C
    . CXCR4: chemokine receptor extraordinaire. Immunol Rev 2000;177:175–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Nagasawa T,
    2. Tachibana K,
    3. Kishimoto T
    . A novel CXC chemokine PBSF/SDF-1 and its receptor CXCR4: their functions in development, hematopoiesis and HIV infection. Semin Immunol 1998;10:179–85.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Miao Z,
    2. Luker KE,
    3. Summers BC,
    4. et al
    . CXCR7 (RDC1) promotes breast and lung tumor growth in vivo and is expressed on tumor-associated vasculature. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007;104:15735–40.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Balabanian K,
    2. Lagane B,
    3. Infantino S,
    4. et al
    . The chemokine SDF-1/CXCL12 binds to and signal through the orphan receptor RDC1 in T lymphocytes. J Biol Chem 2005;280:35760–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Ratajczak MZ,
    2. Zuba-Surma E,
    3. Kucia M,
    4. Reca R,
    5. Wojakowski W,
    6. Ratajczak J
    . The plieotropic effects of the SDF-1-CXCR4 axis in organogenesis, regeneration and tumorigenesis. Leukemia 2006;20:1915–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Ma Q,
    2. Jones D,
    3. Borghesani PR,
    4. et al
    . Impaired B-lymphopoiesis, myelopoiesis and derailed cerebellar neuron migration in CXCR4- and SDF-1-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998;95:9448–53.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Petit I,
    2. Jin D,
    3. Rafii S
    . The SDF-1-CXCR4 signaling pathway: a molecular hub modulating neo-angiogenesis. Trends Immunol 2007;28:299–307.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Meads MB,
    2. Hazlehurst LA,
    3. Dalton WS
    . The bone marrow microenvironment as a tumor sanctuary and contributor to drug resistance. Clin Cancer Res 2008;14:2519–26.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Kawai T,
    2. Malech HL
    . WHIM syndrome congenital immune deficiency disease. Curr Opin Hematol 2009;16:20–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Goldsmith ZG,
    2. Dhanasekaran DN
    . G protein regulation of MAPK networks. Oncogene 2007;26:3122–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Mellado M,
    2. Rodriguez-Frade JM,
    3. Manes S,
    4. Martinez AC
    . Chemokine signaling and functional responses: the role of receptor dimerization and TK pathway activation. Annu Rev Immunol 2001;19:397–421.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Rubin JB
    . Chemokine signaling in cancer. One hump or two? Semin Cancer Biol 2009;19:116–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Ward SG
    . T lymphocytes on the move: chemokines, PI3-kinase and beyond. Trends Immunol 2006;27:80–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Wang JF,
    2. Park IW,
    3. Groopman JE
    . Stromal cell-derived factor-1α stimulates tyrosine phosphorylation of multiple focal adhesion proteins and induces migration of hematopoietic progenitor cells: roles of phosphoinositide-3 kinase and protein kinase C. Blood 2000;95:2505–13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Zhang XF,
    2. Wang JF,
    3. Matczak E,
    4. Proper J,
    5. Groopman JE
    . Janus kinase 2 is involved in stromal cell-derived factor-1α-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of focal adhesion proteins and migration of hematopoietic progenitor cells. Blood 2001;97:3342–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Bendall LJ,
    2. Baraz R,
    3. Juarez J,
    4. Shen W,
    5. Bradstock KF
    . Defective p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling impairs chemotaxic but not proliferative responses to stromal-derived factor-1α in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer Res 2005;65:3290–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Barbero S,
    2. Bonavia R,
    3. Bajetto A,
    4. et al
    . Stromal cell-derived factor 1α stimulates human glioblastoma cell growth through the activation of both extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2 and Akt. Cancer Res 2003;63:1969–74.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Vlahakis SR,
    2. Villasis-Keever A,
    3. Gomez T,
    4. Vanegas M,
    5. Vlahakis N,
    6. Paya CV
    . G protein-coupled chemokine receptors induce both survival and apoptotic signaling pathways. J Immunol 2002;169:5546–54.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Suzuki Y,
    2. Rahman M,
    3. Mitsuya H
    . Diverse transcriptional response of CD4+ T cells to stromal cell-derived factor (SDF)-1: cell survival promotion and priming effects of SDF-1 on CD4+ t cells. J Immunol 2001;167:3064–73.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Sanz-Rodriguez F,
    2. Hidalo A,
    3. Teixido J
    . Chemokine stromal cell-derived factor-1a modulates VLA-4 integrin-mediated multiple myeloma cell adhesion to CS-1/fibronectin and VCAM-1. Blood 2001;97:346–51.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Ngo HT,
    2. Leleu X,
    3. Lee J,
    4. et al
    . SDF-1/CXCR4 and VLA-4 interaction regulates homing in Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia. Blood 2008;112:150–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Moriguchi M,
    2. Hissong BD,
    3. Gadina M,
    4. et al
    . CXCL12 signaling is independent of Jak2 and Jak3. J Biol Chem 2005;280:17408–14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Balabanian K,
    2. Levoye A,
    3. Klemm L,
    4. et al
    . Leukocyte analysis from WHIM syndrome patients reveals a pivotal role for GRK3 in CXCR4 signaling. J Clin Invest 2008;118:1074–84.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Kryczek I,
    2. Wei S,
    3. Keller E,
    4. Liu R,
    5. Zou W
    . Stroma-derived factor (SDF-1/CXCL12) and human tumor pathogenesis. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2007;292:C987–95.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Piovan E,
    2. Tosello V,
    3. Indraccolo S,
    4. et al
    . Differential regulation of hypoxia-induced CXCR4 triggering during B-cell development and lymphomagenesis. Cancer Res 2007;67:8605–14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Diomedi-Camassei F,
    2. McDowell HP,
    3. De Loris MA,
    4. et al
    . Clinical significance of CXC chemokine receptor-4 and c-Met in childhood rhabdomyosarcoma. Clin Cancer Res 2008;14:4119–27.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Fischer L,
    2. Korfel A,
    3. Pfeiffer S,
    4. et al
    . CXCL13 and CXCL12 in central nervous system lymphoma patients. Clin Cancer Res 2009;15:5968–73.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Meier R,
    2. Muhlethaler-Mottet A,
    3. Flahaut M,
    4. et al
    . The chemokine receptor CXCR4 strongly promotes neuroblastoma primary tumor and metastatic growth but not invasion. PLoS ONE 2007;2:e1016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Xu Q,
    2. Yuan X,
    3. Xu M,
    4. et al
    . Chemokine CXC receptor 4-mediated glioma tumor tracking by bone marrow-derived neural progenitor/stem cells. Mol Cancer Ther 2009;8:2746–53.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Barbieri F,
    2. Bajetto A,
    3. Stumm R,
    4. et al
    . Overexpression of stromal cell-derived factor1 and its receptor CXCR4 induces autocrine/paracrine cell proliferation in human pituitary adenomas. Clin Cancer Res 2008;14:5022–32.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. De Falco V,
    2. Guarino V,
    3. Avilla E,
    4. et al
    . Biological role and potential therapeutic targeting of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 in undifferentiated thyroid cancer. Cancer Res 2007;67:11821–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Sung B,
    2. Jhurani S,
    3. Ahn KS,
    4. et al
    . Zerumbone down-regulates chemokine receptor CXCR4 expression leading to inhibition of CXCL12-induced invasion of breast and pancreatic tumor cells. Cancer Res 2008;68:8938–44.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Sauve K,
    2. Lepage J,
    3. Sanchez M,
    4. Heveker N,
    5. Tremblay A
    . Positive feedback activation of estrogen receptors by the CXCL12–4 pathway. Cancer Res 2009;69:5793–800.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Wang Z,
    2. Ma Q,
    3. Liu Q,
    4. et al
    . Blockade of SDF-1/CXCR4 signaling inhibits pancreatic cancer progression in vitro via inactivation of canonical Wnt pathway. Br J Cancer 2008;99:1695–703.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Singh S,
    2. Bond VC,
    3. Powell M,
    4. et al
    . CXCR4–120-IIIB interactions induce caspase-mediated apoptosis of prostate cancer cells and inhibit tumor growth. Mol Cancer Ther 2009;8:178–84.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Otsuka S,
    2. Bebb G
    . The CXCR4/SDF-1 chemokine receptor axis a new target therapeutic for non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2008;3:1379–83.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Gassmann P,
    2. Haier J,
    3. Schluter K,
    4. et al
    . CXCR4 regulates the early extravasation of metastatic tumor cells in vivo. Neoplasia 2009;11:651–61.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Kwong J,
    2. Kulbe H,
    3. Wong D,
    4. Chakravarty P,
    5. Balkwill F
    . An antagonist of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 induces mitotic catastrophe in ovarian cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther 2009;8:1893–905.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Fricker SP
    . A novel CXCR4 antagonist for hematopoietic stem cell mobilization. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2008;17:1749–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Juarez J,
    2. Dela Pena A,
    3. Baraz R,
    4. et al
    . CXCR4 antagonists mobilize childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells into the peripheral blood and inhibit engraftment. Leukemia 2007;21:1249–57.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Nervi B,
    2. Ramirez P,
    3. Rettig MP,
    4. et al
    . Chemosensitization of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) following mobilization by the CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100. Blood 2009;113:6206–14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Burger JA,
    2. Peled A
    . CXCR4 antagonists: targeting the microenvironment in leukemia and other cancers. Leukemia 2009;23:43–52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Wong RSY,
    2. Bodart V,
    3. Metz M,
    4. Labrecque J,
    5. Bridger G,
    6. Fricker SP
    . Comparison of the potential multiple binding modes of bicyclam, monocyclam and noncyclam small-molecule CXC chemokine receptor 4 inhibitors. Mol Pharmacol 2008;74:1485–95.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Rosenkilde MM,
    2. Gerlach LO,
    3. Jakobsen JS,
    4. Skerlj RT,
    5. Bridger GJ,
    6. Schwartz TW
    . Molecular mechanism of AMD3100 antagonism in the CXCR4 receptor. J Biol Chem 2004;279:3033–41.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Gerlach LO,
    2. Skerlj RT,
    3. Bridger GJ,
    4. Schwartz TW
    . Molecular interactions of cyclam and bicyclam non-peptide antagonists with the CXCR4 chemokine receptor. J Biol Chem 2001;276:14153–60.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Hatse S,
    2. Princen K,
    3. Bridger G,
    4. De Clerq E,
    5. Schols D
    . Chemokine receptor inhibition by AMD3100 is strictly confined to CXCR4. FEBS Lett 2002;527:255–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Fricker SP,
    2. Anastassov V,
    3. Cox J,
    4. et al
    . Characterization of the molecular pharmacology of the G-protein coupled chemokine receptor, CXCR4. Biochem Pharmacol 2006;72:588–96.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Flomenberg N,
    2. Devine SM,
    3. DiPersio JF,
    4. et al
    . The use of AMD3100 plus G-CSF for autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization is superior to G-CSF alone. Blood 2005;106:1867–74.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. DiPersio JF,
    2. Stadtmauer EA,
    3. Nademanee A,
    4. et al
    . Plerixafor and G-CSF versus placebo and G-CSF to mobilize hematopoietic stem cells for autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood 2009;113:5720–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. DiPersio JF,
    2. Micallef IN,
    3. Stiff PJ,
    4. et al
    . Phase III prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial for plerixafor plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor compared with placebo plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for autologous stem-cell mobilization and transplantation for patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:4767–73.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Clinical Cancer Research: 16 (11)
June 2010
Volume 16, Issue 11
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Clinical Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
CXCL12 (SDF-1)/CXCR4 Pathway in Cancer
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Clinical Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
CXCL12 (SDF-1)/CXCR4 Pathway in Cancer
Beverly A. Teicher and Simon P. Fricker
Clin Cancer Res June 1 2010 (16) (11) 2927-2931; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2329

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
CXCL12 (SDF-1)/CXCR4 Pathway in Cancer
Beverly A. Teicher and Simon P. Fricker
Clin Cancer Res June 1 2010 (16) (11) 2927-2931; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2329
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Background
    • CXCL12/CXCR4 Pathway
    • CXCR4 and Cancer
    • Clinical-Translational Advances
    • Conclusion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Therapeutic Targeting of the Liver Microenvironment
  • Targeting the Protein Kinase Wee1 in Cancer
  • Metabolic Control of Histone Methylation and Gene Expression
Show more Molecular Pathways
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • CCR Focus Archive
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Clinical Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Clinical Cancer Research
eISSN: 1557-3265
ISSN: 1078-0432

Advertisement