Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Imaging, Diagnosis, Prognosis

Overexpression of p73 as a Tissue Marker for High-Risk Gastritis

Gonzalo Carrasco, Jose Diaz, Jose R. Valbuena, Paulina Ibanez, Paz Rodriguez, Gabriela Araya, Carolina Rodriguez, Javiera Torres, Ignacio Duarte, Edmundo Aravena, Fernando Mena, Carlos Barrientos and Alejandro H. Corvalan
Gonzalo Carrasco
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jose Diaz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jose R. Valbuena
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paulina Ibanez
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paz Rodriguez
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gabriela Araya
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carolina Rodriguez
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Javiera Torres
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ignacio Duarte
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edmundo Aravena
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fernando Mena
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carlos Barrientos
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alejandro H. Corvalan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2491 Published June 2010
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Purpose: Histologic assessment of high-risk gastritis for the development of gastric cancer is not well defined. The identification of tissue markers together with the integration of histologic features will be required for this assessment.

Experimental Design: Matched tumor/nontumor adjacent mucosa (NTAM) of 91 early gastric cancer and 148 chronic gastritis cases were evaluated for histologic characteristics (atrophy, intestinal metaplasia, chronic inflammation, polymorphonuclear infiltration, and Helicobacter pylori) by the Sydney System. Atrophy risk assessment was also evaluated by the Operative Link on Gastritis Assessment (OLGA) staging system. Eight tissue markers (BRCA1, HSP90, STAT1, FHIT, EGFR, p73, p53, p16INK4a) and EBV were also evaluated by tissue microarray/immunohistochemistry/in situ hybridization platform. Data were analyzed by contingency tables (2 × 2) using Fisher's exact two-tailed test (P < 0.001) and integrated by Significance Analysis of Microarrays (SAM) and clustering analysis.

Results: Histologically, NTAM have severe intestinal metaplasia/chronic inflammation and severe atrophy assessed by Sydney and OLGA staging systems. H. pylori infection was similar in both groups, and EBV was found only in 5.5% of the tumor samples. Overexpression of p73 was higher in NTAM (50.5%) than in chronic gastritis (10.8%; P < 0.0001). Integration of histologic features and tissue markers showed that overexpression of p73, severe atrophy, and OLGA stage 4 were the most relevant features in NTAM. Clustering analysis correctly assigned NTAM and control cases (P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Overexpression of p73 should be considered for the assessment of high-risk chronic gastritis. SAM allows the integration of histology and tissue markers for this assessment. Clin Cancer Res; 16(12); 3253–9. ©2010 AACR.

Translational Relevance

Recently, we found that DNA methylation of Reprimo could be a potential noninvasive marker for the early detection of gastric cancer (Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:6264-9). However, early detection also requires risk assessment of premalignant conditions at tissue level. Histologic criteria for risk assessment are not well defined. Tissue markers, such as overexpressed proteins, have been recently explored as candidates for high-risk gastritis. Here, we have identified that among eight tissue markers (BRCA1, HSP90, STAT1, FHIT, EGFR, p73, p53, and p16INK4a), p73 was overexpressed in tumor and nontumor adjacent mucosa at a similar level in early gastric cancer cases in comparison with chronic gastritis cases (P < 0.0001). Integration of histologic features and tissue markers showed that overexpression of p73 and Operative Link on Gastritis Assessment (OLGA) stage 4 were the most relevant features in nontumor adjacent mucosa. Our data suggest that overexpression of p73 might have a role in the assessment of high-risk gastritis for gastric cancer development.

Gastric cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths and the fourth most common malignancy worldwide (1). The incidence of gastric cancer shows considerable geographic variation. The East Asia, Eastern\Europe, and Latin American regions still remain highly prevalent areas, whereas mortality from gastric cancer is declining globally (2). In spite of convincing evidence that gastric cancer is causally linked to Helicobacter pylori and consensus conference recommended population-based screening and treatment in highly prevalent areas (3), screening tests for the early detection of gastric cancer are needed. We recently found that DNA methylation of Reprimo was present in 90% (pair tumor and plasma samples) of gastric cancer cases but only in 10% of plasma from healthy donors (4). These findings support the idea that DNA methylation of Reprimo could be a potential noninvasive marker for the early detection of gastric cancer. However, early detection of this malignancy also requires histologic assessment of premalignant conditions. In spite of that the histologic features of noninvasive neoplasia (formerly dysplasia) are well defined (5), whereas criteria for risk assessments of premalignant conditions such as chronic gastritis are not (6, 7). In this scenario tissue markers, such as overexpressed proteins, have recently been explored as candidates for risk assessment (8). However, integration with the histologic features of premalignant conditions will be required to assess the potential clinical impact of these tissue markers. In this study, we have identified the overexpression of p73, intestinal metaplasia, and severe atrophy assessed by the Sydney and Operative Link on Gastritis Assessment (OLGA) staging systems as being associated with high-risk chronic gastritis.

Materials and Methods

Clinical samples

Between 1984 and 2005, 91 surgically resected early gastric cancer cases from the Department of Pathology–Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (PUC) and the Instituto Chileno Japones de Enfermedades Digestivas–Hospital Clinico San Borja Arriaran (ICHJED-HCSBA), Santiago, Chile, and from Hospital Max Peralta-Cartago, Costa Rica were collected. All cases were surgically resected by total gastrectomy and were classified as early gastric cancer in accordance with the depth of invasion as proposed by the Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer (9). A total of 148 cases with history of symptomatic chronic gastritis were used as controls. These control cases were obtained from PUC, and mucosal biopsies were sampled according to the Updated Sydney System protocol of biopsy sampling of the stomach (10). Gender distribution (male/female) was 63(69.2%)/28(30.8%) for early gastric cancer cases and 87(58.8%)/61(41.2%) for chronic gastritis controls The average age was 58 years (range, 26-89 years) for early gastric cancer cases and 54 years (range, 25-80 years) for controls, with no differences according to gender (data not shown). The Institutional Review Boards of PUC, ICHJED-HCSBA, and Hospital Max Peralta approved this study, and all patients gave informed consent.

Histologic variables

Paraffin blocks were cut and stained with H&E and Giemsa stains for histologic evaluation and H. pylori detection. Early gastric cancer cases were classified by histologic type (intestinal or diffuse) according to Lauren classification (11) and location. Chronic inflammation, polymorphonuclear activity, atrophic gastritis, intestinal metaplasia, and the presence of H. pylori were evaluated in nontumor adjacent mucosa (NTAM) from early gastric cancer and chronic gastritis controls according to the Updated Sydney System (10). For atrophy risk assessment, we also applied the new histological staging system, OLGA, proposed by Rugge et al. (12–14). The evaluation was made by two double-blinded independent pathologists who were unaware of clinical data and histologic diagnoses.

Tissue microarray construction

Tissue microarrays (TMA) were done by using a Manual Tissue Array II instrument (Beecher Instruments) as previously described (15). In brief, paraffin blocks from 91 paired tumor/NTAM and from 148 endoscopic gastric biopsies were selected, cut, and stained with H&E for the best histologic area. After whole-section glass slide evaluation, tissue area was selected for placement into the TMA by a circling on the glass slide and was identified in the corresponding paraffin block. A 1-mm stylet in the inner diameter was used to take two cylindrical core biopsies from each tissue block (donor block), with subsequent arraying into a new recipient paraffin block. In this way, all paired tumor and NTAM from early gastric cancer and endoscopic gastric biopsies from control cases were held in seven recipient blocks. An adequate case was defined as a tumor occupying >10% of the core area. Each case was in duplicate to avoid the loss of tissue during the cutting of the block. Slides (4 μm) were cut from each tissue array block, deparaffinized, and dehydrated for H&E and immunohistochemical staining.

Immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization

Eight biomarkers were selected based on genes whose alterations in gastric carcinoma play a significant role in the promotion of chronic gastritis (STAT1; ref. 16), gastric epithelial cell response to H. pylori infection (p73; ref. 17), prognosis (FHIT, p16INK4a; refs. 18–21), early onset (BRCA1; ref. 15), and emerging molecular target for therapy (HSP90, EGFR; refs. 22, 23). In addition, the tumor suppressor gene p53 was also included because it is the most common genetic abnormality in gastric cancer (24). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was done on 4-μm-thick section TMA blocks as previously described (15). Antibodies used in this study were STAT-1 (clone Rbx, Abcam), p73 protein α (clone 24, Novocastra), FHIT (clone SMP472, LabVision), p16 (clone 6H12, Novocastra), BRCA1 (clone SG-11, Zymed), HSP90 (clone JPBZ4, Vision Biosystems/Novocastra), EGFR (clone 31G7, Zymed), and p53 (clone BP53-12-1, Biogenex). The results of the immunostaining were considered to be positive if ≥10% of the cells were stained in the nucleus (BRCA1 and p53), cytoplasm (HSP90, STAT1, and FHIT), and nuclear/cytoplasm (p16, p73) or cell membrane (EGFR). Immunohistochemical staining against H. pylori (rabbit polyclonal; clone CH-20 429, Novocastra) was also done using a similar protocol as described with a slight modification in the antigen retrieval method (Pepsin, 10 minutes at 37°C). In situ hybridization analysis for EBV was done using flourescein-labeled peptide nucleic acid probe specific for EBER-1 and the DAKO hybridization kit according to the manufacturer's instructions. Evaluation was made by two double-blinded independent observers who were unaware of clinical data and histologic diagnoses.

Statistical analysis and integration approaches

Histologic and tissue marker data were evaluated by contingency (2 × 2) table using Fisher's exact test for categorical variables to determine differences between tumor and NTAM from early gastric cancer cases and control cases. All of the values were two-tailed, and statistical significance was defined as P < 0.001. Integration of histologic and tissue markers was done by Serial Analysis for Microarray (SAM), a multiple testing approach method that has been extensively applied in genomic research (25). Although SAM was originally designed for continuous variables, here we adapted it to dichotomous variables (0 or 1), so we were able to combine histologic and tissue marker variables. Data found by SAM were confirmed by logistic regression, a multivariate method for analysis of binominal-distributed variables (26). Finally, we carried out an unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis (HCA) to explore the reliability of self-classification of early gastric cancer/NTAM and control cases, using the previous integrated histologic and tissue marker analysis. HCA is another genomic method previously used in TMA/IHC studies including gastric cancer (27–29). Both SAM and clustering analysis were done by using MultiExperiment Viewer 4.4 software (http://www.tm4.org/mev/; refs. 30–32).

Results

Histologic characteristics of NTAM from early gastric cancer and chronic gastritis control cases

According to Lauren classification, 72 early gastric cancers were intestinal type and 19 were diffused type. Table 1 details the histologic characteristics of NTAM and controls cases. NTAM has moderate to severe atrophy, intestinal metaplasia, and chronic inflammation in comparison with controls. These differences were highly significant (P < 0.001). Polymorphonuclear activity was predominantly negative or mild in both groups (85.7% versus 91.2%, respectively). Twenty (58.8%) of 34 NTAM but only 1 (1.3%) of 75 chronic gastritis cases were OLGA stages 3 to 4 (P < 0.001). No differences were found according to Lauren histologic classification and/or tumor location. The prevalence of H. pylori infection was similar in both groups.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Histologic characteristic of NTAM from early gastric cancer cases and chronic gastritis controls

Tissue marker expression in tumor and NTAM from early gastric cancer and chronic gastritis control cases

Seven array blocks containing 660 cores and representing 91 early gastric cancers (91 paired tumors and NTAMs) and 148 chronic gastritis control cases were built and tested by IHC for eight tissue markers. A total of 646 (98%) cores were correctly evaluated by H&E examination. Missing cores were usually caused by exhaustion of tissue material. Table 2 shows a comparison of tissue marker expression among tumor and NTAM from early gastric cancer cases and chronic gastritis control cases. Figure 1 shows representative examples of positive and negative immunostainings of tumor/NTAM and control cases. In early gastric cancers a similar tissue marker profile was found between tumor and NTAM with the exception of p53, which was significantly overexpressed in tumors (P < 0.001). The comparison of tissue marker profile between NTAM and chronic gastritis control samples shows significant differences in p73 protein expression (50.5% versus 10.8%). These differences were highly significant (P < 0.0001). Comparisons of tissue marker profiles were not associated with location or tumor histology (data not shown). Sensitivity and specificity for association between p73 protein expression and early gastric cancer were 74.2% and 74.6%, respectively. EBV detection by EBER1 expression was found only in tumor tissue from 5 (5.5%) of early gastric cancer cases.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Tissue marker expression in tumor and NTAM from early gastric cancer cases and superficial gastritis mucosa from control cases

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

A, representative examples of positive and negative immunostaining for eight tissue markers and EBER-1 expression by in situ hybridization (×100) in tumor and NTAM from early gastric cancer cases and chronic gastritis controls. B, high magnification (×400) of (a) BRCA1- and (b) p73-positive controls, (c) p73-positive NTAM, (d) FHIT-negative control, (e) FHIT-negative NTAM, (f) p16-positive NTAM, (g) p16-positive tumor, and (h) positive EBV staining. No cases of chronic gastritis cases were positive for p16, p53, and EBER by in situ hybridization.

Integration of histologic variables and tissue markers

To integrate histologic variables and tissue markers we applied SAM, a popular method for expression profile analysis that can be adapted to other types of experimental data such as survival time or tumor stage (25). As seen in Fig. 2, SAM shows, in a graphical representation, that the chronic gastritis control group is characterized only by histologic features such as the lack of intestinal metaplasia, atrophy, and chronic inflammation. However, NTAM is characterized by overexpression of p73 and OLGA stages 3 and 4 intermingled with severe atrophy, intestinal metaplasia, and chronic inflammation according to the Sydney System. These data were confirmed by logistic regression analysis (data not shown).

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

SAM of NTAM and chronic gastritis controls. NTAM group is significantly characterized by the overexpression of p73, OLGA stages 3 to 4, and severe atrophy (ATR-3), intestinal metaplasia (IM-3), and chronic inflammation (CI-3) according to the Sydney System. Control group cases were significantly characterized by lack of intestinal metaplasia (IM-0), atrophy (ATR-0), and chronic inflammation (CI-0). False discovery rate = 0.

Self-classification of cases by clustering analysis

Next, to explore the possibility that this integrated approach was also able to self-classify NTAM and chronic gastritis, we carried out an unsupervised clustering analysis. This widely used method in cDNA microarray analysis has also been used in TMA/IHC in several tumors including gastric cancer (27, 28). Thus, as shown in Fig. 3, this analysis produced a dendrogram that successfully self-classified NTAM versus chronic gastritis cases (P < 0.0001).

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Unsupervised multivariate hierarchical clustering analysis (Euclidean distance and complete linkage) of 91 NTAM and 148 chronic gastritis cases were based on integration of histology and tissue marker expression. Two groups were formed: group A composed of 75 NTAM and 21 chronic gastritis controls, and group B composed of 127 gastritis and 16 NTAM. CI, chronic inflammation; ACT, polymorphonuclear activity; ATR, atrophy; IM, intestinal metaplasia; 0, negative; 1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe.

Discussion

In this study we have found differences in histologic features such as atrophy, intestinal metaplasia, and chronic inflammation between NTAM and chronic gastritis by the Sydney System. The new OLGA staging system for atrophy risk assessment successfully assigned stages 3 and 4 to NTAM cases.

Although differences in expression of p73 have been described between tumor and chronic gastritis (33, 34), the most important and novel finding in this study is that the expression of p73 in NTAM is significantly higher than that in chronic gastritis. Because atrophy is considered a preneoplastic field for gastric carcinoma development, overexpression of p73 could be useful for risk assessment in cases of severe atrophy as shown by the OLGA staging system. Besides gastric carcinoma, overexpression of p73 has been described in other neoplasm such as prostate, lung, bladder, and renal carcinoma. In these malignancies, however, it has to be shown at tissue level, as we have shown here, that such overexpression occurs in a preneoplastic lesion at the same frequency as that in tumors. Therefore, p73 overexpression might emerge as a tissue marker not only for gastric carcinoma but also for other malignancies. We have also found differences in accumulation of p53 in tumor versus NTAM as has been described previously (35, 36). This finding supports the concept that inactivation of p53 occurs at early stages of gastric carcinoma.

Having found that p73 is a potential marker for risk assessment of chronic gastritis and that the new OLGA staging system successfully assigned stages 3 and 4 to NTAM cases, we attempted to integrate histologic features and tissue markers by using a systems pathology approach (37–41). To this end we applied SAM, a multiple testing approach that has been used mostly in genomic research (37). Therefore, SAM shows the admixture of the classical Sydney System and the new OLGA staging system for atrophy risk assessment. Furthermore, this novel approach confirms that overexpression of p73 might become the most significant feature that identifies high-risk chronic gastritis in cases of severe atrophy. These data can be obtained by logistic regression, a multivariate method of analysis of binominal-distributed variables (26). One of the main advantages of SAM, however, is that it gives a sequence of all tested variables and graphical representation showing the strength of variables from each group. Similarly, unsupervised HCA was also able to self-classify NTAM and control cases.

In summary, our findings have shown that integration of histologic and tissue marker variables is possible. The overexpression of p73, being present mostly in NTAM from early gastric cancer, but rarely in chronic gastritis controls, suggests a potential role of p73 as a tissue marker of high-risk gastritis for development of gastric cancer. Finally, the goal of systems pathology is to present the data in an integrated way, which might be useful in switching from an interpretive and subjective morphologically oriented approach to a more objective, evidence-based tissue marker approach (39–41).

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Claudia Bustamante and Dr. Ivan Gallegos for H. pylori evaluation, Sabina L. Magedson for tissue microarray construction and immunohistochemistry experiments, and Camila Malta for premium editing and proofreading of the manuscript.

Grant Support: Grants-in-Aid for Fondo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (FONDECYT) #1080563 to A.H. Corvalan from the Government of Chile.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Footnotes

    • Received October 26, 2009.
    • Revision received March 15, 2010.
    • Accepted April 9, 2010.

    References

    1. ↵
      1. Parkin DM,
      2. Bray F,
      3. Ferlay J,
      4. Pisani P
      . Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2005;55:74–108.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    2. ↵
      1. Parkin DM
      . International variation. Oncogene 2004;23:6329–40.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    3. ↵
      1. Talley NJ,
      2. Fock KM,
      3. Moayyedi P
      . Gastric Cancer Consensus conference recommends Helicobacter pylori screening and treatment in asymptomatic persons from high-risk populations to prevent gastric cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2008;103:510–4.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    4. ↵
      1. Bernal C,
      2. Aguayo F,
      3. Villarroel C,
      4. et al
      . Reprimo as a potential biomarker for early detection in gastric cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2008;14:6264–9.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    5. ↵
      1. Rugge M,
      2. Correa P,
      3. Dixon MF,
      4. et al
      . Gastric dysplasia: the Padova international classification. Am J Surg Pathol 2000;24:167–76.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    6. ↵
      1. Vieth M,
      2. Stolte M
      . Elevated risk for gastric adenocarcinoma can be predicted from histomorphology. World J Gastroenterol 2006;12:6109–14.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    7. ↵
      1. Tan YK,
      2. Fielding JW
      . Early diagnosis of early gastric cancer. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006;18:821–9.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    8. ↵
      1. Li M,
      2. Liu L,
      3. Wang Z,
      4. et al
      . Overexpression of hMSH2 and hMLH1 protein in certain gastric cancers and their surrounding mucosae. Oncol Rep 2008;19:401–6.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    9. ↵
      Cancer JRSoG. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma. 1st English ed Tokyo: Kanehara; 1995.
    10. ↵
      1. Dixon MF,
      2. Genta RM,
      3. Yardley JH,
      4. Correa P
      . Classification and grading of gastritis. The updated Sydney System. International Workshop on the Histopathology of Gastritis, Houston 1994. Am J Surg Pathol 1996;20:1161–81.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    11. ↵
      1. Lauren P
      . The two histological main types of gastric carcinoma: diffuse and so-called intestinal-type carcinoma. An attempt at a histo-clinical classification. APMIS 1965;64:31–49.
      OpenUrl
    12. ↵
      1. Rugge M,
      2. Kim JG,
      3. Mahachai V,
      4. et al
      . OLGA gastritis staging in young adults and country-specific gastric cancer risk. Int J Surg Pathol 2008;16:150–4.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Rugge M,
      2. Correa P,
      3. Di Mario F,
      4. et al
      . OLGA staging for gastritis: a tutorial. Dig Liver Dis 2008;40:650–8.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    13. ↵
      1. Rugge M,
      2. Meggio A,
      3. Pennelli G,
      4. et al
      . Gastritis staging in clinical practice: the OLGA staging system. Gut 2007;56:631–6.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    14. ↵
      1. Bernal C,
      2. Vargas M,
      3. Ossandon F,
      4. et al
      . DNA methylation profile in diffuse type gastric cancer: evidence for hypermethylation of the BRCA1 promoter region in early-onset gastric carcinogenesis. Biol Res 2008;41:303–15.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    15. ↵
      1. Ernst M,
      2. Najdovska M,
      3. Grail D,
      4. et al
      . STAT3 and STAT1 mediate IL-11-dependent and inflammation-associated gastric tumorigenesis in gp130 receptor mutant mice. J Clin Invest 2008;118:1727–38.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    16. ↵
      1. Wei J,
      2. O'Brien D,
      3. Vilgelm A,
      4. et al
      . Interaction of Helicobacter pylori with gastric epithelial cells is mediated by the p53 protein family. Gastroenterology 2008;134:1412–23.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    17. ↵
      1. Zavala GL,
      2. Luengo JV,
      3. Ossandon CF,
      4. et al
      . [Hierarchical clustering analysis to detect associations between clinical and pathological features of gastric tumors and hypermethylation of suppressor genes]. Rev Med Chil 2007;135:17–25.
      OpenUrlPubMed
      1. Pekarsky Y,
      2. Zanesi N,
      3. Palamarchuk A,
      4. Huebner K,
      5. Croce CM
      . FHIT: from gene discovery to cancer treatment and prevention. Lancet Oncol 2002;3:748–54.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Zhao P,
      2. Liu W,
      3. Lu YL
      . Clinicopathological significance of FHIT protein expression in gastric adenocarcinoma patients. World J Gastroenterol 2005;11:5735–8.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    18. ↵
      1. Kishimoto I,
      2. Mitomi H,
      3. Ohkura Y,
      4. Kanazawa H,
      5. Fukui N,
      6. Watanabe M
      . Abnormal expression of p16(INK4a), cyclin D1, cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and retinoblastoma protein in gastric carcinomas. J Surg Oncol 2008;98:60–6.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    19. ↵
      1. Lang SA,
      2. Klein D,
      3. Moser C,
      4. et al
      . Inhibition of heat shock protein 90 impairs epidermal growth factor-mediated signaling in gastric cancer cells and reduces tumor growth and vascularization in vivo. Mol Cancer Ther 2007;6:1123–32.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    20. ↵
      1. Lieto E,
      2. Ferraraccio F,
      3. Orditura M,
      4. et al
      . Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is an independent prognostic indicator of worse outcome in gastric cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2008;15:69–79.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    21. ↵
      1. Kountouras J,
      2. Zavos C,
      3. Chatzopoulos D,
      4. Katsinelos P
      . New aspects of Helicobacter pylori infection involvement in gastric oncogenesis. J Surg Res 2008;146:149–58.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    22. ↵
      1. Tusher VG,
      2. Tibshirani R,
      3. Chu G
      . Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001;98:5116–21.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    23. ↵
      1. Nick TG,
      2. Campbell KM
      . Logistic regression. Methods Mol Biol 2007;404:273–301.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    24. ↵
      1. Makretsov NA,
      2. Huntsman DG,
      3. Nielsen TO,
      4. et al
      . Hierarchical clustering analysis of tissue microarray immunostaining data identifies prognostically significant groups of breast carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:6143–51.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    25. ↵
      1. Camp RL,
      2. Neumeister V,
      3. Rimm DL
      . A decade of tissue microarrays: progress in the discovery and validation of cancer biomarkers. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:5630–7.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    26. ↵
      1. Park ES,
      2. Do IG,
      3. Park CK,
      4. et al
      . Cyclooxygenase-2 is an independent prognostic factor in gastric carcinoma patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy and is not associated with EBV infection. Clin Cancer Res 2009;15:291–8.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    27. ↵
      1. Saeed AI,
      2. Sharov V,
      3. White J,
      4. et al
      . TM4: a free, open-source system for microarray data management and analysis. Biotechniques 2003;34:374–8.
      OpenUrlPubMed
      1. Saeed AI,
      2. Bhagabati NK,
      3. Braisted JC,
      4. et al
      . TM4 microarray software suite. Methods Enzymol 2006;411:134–93.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    28. ↵
      1. Dudoit S,
      2. Gentleman RC,
      3. Quackenbush J
      . Open source software for the analysis of microarray data. Biotechniques 2003;Suppl:45–51.
      OpenUrl
    29. ↵
      1. Kang MJ,
      2. Park BJ,
      3. Byun DS,
      4. et al
      . Loss of imprinting and elevated expression of wild-type p73 in human gastric adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2000;6:1767–71.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    30. ↵
      1. Tomkova K,
      2. Belkhiri A,
      3. El-Rifai W,
      4. Zaika AI
      . p73 isoforms can induce T-cell factor-dependent transcription in gastrointestinal cells. Cancer Res 2004;64:6390–3.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    31. ↵
      1. Kim SH,
      2. Lee SH,
      3. Choi YL,
      4. Wang LH,
      5. Park CK,
      6. Shin YK
      . Extensive alteration in the expression profiles of TGFB pathway signaling components and TP53 is observed along the gastric dysplasia-carcinoma sequence. Histol Histopathol 2008;23:1439–52.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    32. ↵
      1. Pinto-de-Sousa J,
      2. Silva F,
      3. David L,
      4. et al
      . Clinicopathological significance and survival influence of p53 protein expression in gastric carcinoma. Histopathology 2004;44:323–31.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    33. ↵
      1. Ossandon FJ,
      2. Villarroel C,
      3. Aguayo F,
      4. et al
      . In silico analysis of gastric carcinoma Serial Analysis of Gene Expression libraries reveals different profiles associated with ethnicity. Mol Cancer 2008;7:22.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Pass HI,
      2. Liu Z,
      3. Wali A,
      4. et al
      . Gene expression profiles predict survival and progression of pleural mesothelioma. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:849–59.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    34. ↵
      1. Dietel M,
      2. Schafer R
      . Systems pathology-or how to solve the complex problem of predictive pathology. Virchows Arch 2008;453:309–12.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Donovan MJ,
      2. Costa J,
      3. Cordon-Cardo C
      . Systems pathology: a paradigm shift in the practice of diagnostic and predictive pathology. Cancer 2009;115:3078–84.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    35. ↵
      1. Faratian D,
      2. Clyde RG,
      3. Crawford JW,
      4. Harrison DJ
      . Systems pathology-taking molecular pathology into a new dimension. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2009.
    PreviousNext
    Back to top
    Clinical Cancer Research: 16 (12)
    June 2010
    Volume 16, Issue 12
    • Table of Contents
    • Table of Contents (PDF)
    • About the Cover

    Sign up for alerts

    View this article with LENS

    Open full page PDF
    Article Alerts
    Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
    Email Article

    Thank you for sharing this Clinical Cancer Research article.

    NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Overexpression of p73 as a Tissue Marker for High-Risk Gastritis
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical Cancer Research
    (Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Clinical Cancer Research.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Citation Tools
    Overexpression of p73 as a Tissue Marker for High-Risk Gastritis
    Gonzalo Carrasco, Jose Diaz, Jose R. Valbuena, Paulina Ibanez, Paz Rodriguez, Gabriela Araya, Carolina Rodriguez, Javiera Torres, Ignacio Duarte, Edmundo Aravena, Fernando Mena, Carlos Barrientos and Alejandro H. Corvalan
    Clin Cancer Res June 15 2010 (16) (12) 3253-3259; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2491

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Share
    Overexpression of p73 as a Tissue Marker for High-Risk Gastritis
    Gonzalo Carrasco, Jose Diaz, Jose R. Valbuena, Paulina Ibanez, Paz Rodriguez, Gabriela Araya, Carolina Rodriguez, Javiera Torres, Ignacio Duarte, Edmundo Aravena, Fernando Mena, Carlos Barrientos and Alejandro H. Corvalan
    Clin Cancer Res June 15 2010 (16) (12) 3253-3259; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2491
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Jump to section

    • Article
      • Abstract
      • Materials and Methods
      • Results
      • Discussion
      • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
      • Acknowledgments
      • Footnotes
      • References
    • Figures & Data
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF
    Advertisement

    Related Articles

    Cited By...

    More in this TOC Section

    • FDOPA PET Survival Predictions for Glioma
    • In vivo Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging for Monitoring the Cancer Treatment
    • Variability in Assessing Response in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
    Show more Imaging, Diagnosis, Prognosis
    • Home
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Privacy Policy
    Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

    Articles

    • Online First
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts

    Info for

    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Librarians

    About Clinical Cancer Research

    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Submit a Manuscript
    AACR logo

    Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

    Clinical Cancer Research
    eISSN: 1557-3265
    ISSN: 1078-0432

    Advertisement