Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
    • CME
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
    • CME
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Molecular Pathways

New Insights into Checkpoint Kinase 1 in the DNA Damage Response Signaling Network

Yun Dai and Steven Grant
Yun Dai
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven Grant
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1029 Published January 2010
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The DNA damage response (DDR) represents a complex network of multiple signaling pathways involving cell cycle checkpoints, DNA repair, transcriptional programs, and apoptosis, through which cells maintain genomic integrity following various endogenous (metabolic) or environmental stresses. In cancer treatment, the DDR occurs in response to various genotoxic insults by diverse cytotoxic agents and radiation, representing an important mechanism limiting chemotherapeutic and radiotherapeutic efficacy. This has prompted the development of agents targeting DDR signaling pathways, particularly checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1), which contributes to all currently defined cell cycle checkpoints, including G1/S, intra-S-phase, G2/M, and the mitotic spindle checkpoint. Although numerous agents have been developed with the primary goal of enhancing the activity of DNA-damaging agents or radiation, the therapeutic outcome of this strategy remains to be determined. Recently, new insights into DDR signaling pathways support the notion that Chk1 represents a core component central to the entire DDR, including direct involvement in DNA repair and apoptotic events in addition to checkpoint regulation. Together, these new insights into the role of Chk1 in the DDR machinery could provide an opportunity for novel approaches to the development of Chk1 inhibitor strategies. Clin Cancer Res; 16(2); 376–83

The DNA damage response (DDR) represents a signaling network involving multiple pathways, including checkpoints, DNA repair, transcriptional regulation, and apoptosis (1). Various endogenous/metabolic insults (e.g., reactive oxygen species, stalled replication forks) or environmental insults [e.g., UV, ionizing radiation, genotoxic agents (2)] cause DNA damage [e.g., single-strand breaks (SSBs), double-strand breaks (DSBs), chemical adducts, mismatches] (3). When damage occurs, distinct, albeit overlapping and cooperating, checkpoint pathways are activated, which block S-phase entry (the G1/S-phase checkpoint), delay S-phase progression (the intra-S- or S-phase checkpoint), or prevent mitotic entry (the G2/M-phase checkpoint; ref. 4). These events direct phase-specific repair mechanisms (e.g., base excision repair, nucleotide excision repair, mismatch repair, or DSB repair including homologous recombination and nonhomologous end joining) through repair-specific gene transcription. For example, DSBs are repaired predominantly via nonhomologous end joining in G1-phase, but via homologous recombination in S-phase and G2-phase (3). If repair fails, checkpoints trigger p53-dependent or -independent apoptosis. Thus, checkpoints represent central orchestrators of the DDR network ranging from damage sensing to repair or apoptosis. Significantly, checkpoints are characteristically defective in transformed cells (5). This review summarizes recent insights into checkpoint signaling pathways, focusing on checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) and opportunities to exploit alternative strategies for Chk1 inhibitor development.

Checkpoint Signaling Cascades

Checkpoint signaling pathways are classified as sensors, mediators, transducers, and effectors (2). Following DNA damage, sensor multiprotein complexes (e.g., the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1/MRN complex for ATM; the Rad17 and Rad9-Rad1-Hus1/9-1-1 complex for ATR) recognize damage, and recruit proximal transducers (ATM and ATR) to lesions where they are initially activated. ATM and ATR transduce signals to distal transducer checkpoint kinases (i.e., Chk1 and Chk2). Generally, ATM activates Chk2, whereas ATR primarily activates Chk1, although considerable cross-talk between ATM and ATR occurs. MAPKAP kinase 2, a downstream target of the stress-response p38 MAPK pathway, may represent third distal transducer (Chk3?).

ATM/ATR activation and ATM/ATR-mediated phosphorylation of sensors recruit and phosphorylate mediators (e.g., 53BP1, BRAC1, MDC1, SMC1, FANCD2, Claspin, TopBP1, Timeless, Tipin, and H2A.X, etc.). Once activated, these mediators remain at the site of damage, while Chk1/Chk2 are released to activate soluble targets. Mediator activation facilitates ATM/ATR-induced Chk1/Chk2 activation.

Activated distal transducers phosphorylate and promote degradation or sequestration of effector Cdc25s (e.g., Cdc25A, B, and C), specialized phosphatases that activate cyclin-dependent kinases (e.g., Cdk1/cdc2 and Cdk2) through inhibitory site (Tyr15 and Thr14) dephosphorylation. Chk1/Chk2 and ATM/ATR also phosphorylate the effector p53, increasing its stability. Cdc25 inactivation and p53 accumulation halt cell cycle progression at specific phases.

Chk1 Activation Upstream Signals

Whereas Chk2 activation is largely restricted to DSBs [e.g., by ionizing radiation (IR)] via ATM, Chk1 is activated by a diverse stimuli (e.g., UV, replication stresses, DNA-damaging agents) via both ATR and ATM. Generally, Chk1 activation is initiated by single-strand DNA (ssDNA) breaks.

Stalled replication forks

The genome is particularly vulnerable during DNA replication. In S phase, endogenous/exogenous insults hinder replication fork progression, resulting in stalled forks that are unstable and breakage-prone (6). When a fork encounters a lesion, DNA polymerase stalls while helicase unwinds DNA, generating a large stretch of ssDNA. ssDNA lesions are then coated by replication protein A (RPA), recruiting ATR/ATRIP (ATR-interacting protein) complexes via recognition and association of RPA-ssDNA by ATRIP. ATR/ATRIP activation requires Rad17/9-1-1 complex loading, which is also essential for ATR-mediated Chk1 activation.

Double-strand breaks

Following DSBs, MRN complexes interact with DSB lesions to recruit/activate ATM, leading to Chk2 activation (7). Meanwhile, MRN and ATM also mediate DSB resection, resulting in ssDNA formation as a DNA repair intermediate structure, which promotes slower activation of Chk1 via the RPA-ATR/ATRIP process.

Single strand breaks

As described above, RPA bound to ssDNA presenting at SSBs (1) or gaps recruits Rad17/9-1-1 and ATR/ATRIP complexes, triggering Chk1 phosphorylation.

Current Models for Chk1 Activation Mechanisms

Recruitment/activation of ATM/ATR and “sensor” proteins recruits Chk1/Chk2 at damage sites, where the latter are activated. Chk1 and Chk2 are structurally unrelated kinases and are activated through different processes. ATM predominantly phosphorylates Chk2 at Thr68, promoting homodimerization and activation via intramolecular trans-autophosphorylation at Thr383/387. In contrast, Chk1 activation does not require dimerization or trans-autophosphorylation. ATR (predominantly) or ATM (to a lesser extent) phosphorylates Chk1 at Ser317/345, directly leading to activation. Chk1 activation by ATR also requires 9-1-1 complex loading by the Rad17-RFC complex as well as several essential mediators. For example, Claspin directly binds to Chk1 and increases the stability of both. Claspin phosphorylation promotes BRCA1 recruitment and phosphorylation, followed by recruitment of Chk1 to ATR. TopBP1 directly activates ATR/ATRIP and promotes ATR-mediated Chk1 phosphorylation (8). Timeless (Tim/Tim1; ref. 9) and Tipin (10) form stable complexes associated with chromatin via binding of Tipin to RPA, an event critical for chromatin association of Claspin and S317/345 phosphorylation of Chk1.

Currently, there are two models of Chk1 activation: phosphorylations at the C-terminal residues (e.g., S317/S345) block intramolecular interactions, uncovering the N-terminal kinase domain (11); and S317/S345 phosphorylation results in release of Chk1 (inactive) from chromatin to accumulate at the centrosome, where it prevents Cdk1 activation and mitotic entry (12). Notably, whereas S345 is essential for kinase activation and function, S317 plays only a contributory role (13, 14). Moreover, different phosphorylation sites also play disparate roles in essential cell survival (S345) or nonessential checkpoint activation (S317) functions.

Chk1 in DNA Damage Checkpoints

DNA damage checkpoints are generally mediated by two pathways (15, 16): the ATM/ATR-Chk1/Chk2-Cdc25s pathway (for fast, reversible responses), and the p53-dependent pathway (for slower, irreversible responses). Whereas Chk1 is the key distal transducer in the former, Chk1/Chk2, along with ATM/ATR, phosphorylate either p53 or its ligase Mdm2, promoting p53 stabilization. Moreover, these transducers also phosphorylate multiple other effectors involved in checkpoints (e.g., FancD2, SMC1, Rad9, Rad17, and Plk3), as well as other DDR mechanisms (e.g., transcriptional regulation [e.g., E2F1, BRAC1, p53], DNA repair [e.g., Nbs1, Artemis, H2A.X, BLM1, BRAC1, p53], apoptosis [e.g., p53, Mdm2, E2F1, Che1, and Pml1], and chromatin remodeling [e.g., Tlk1/2]). A model summarizing the diverse roles of Chk1 in the DDR is depicted in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Chk1 in the DDR signaling network. DNA damage (e.g., DSBs, SSBs, and stalled replication forks) generates ssDNA that initiates ATR-mediated Chk1 activation. In this context, the ATR/ATPIP complex is recruited to ssDNA lesions via binding of ATRIP with RPA that recognizes and coats ssDNA. In conjunction with recruited/activated sensors and mediators, ATR phosphorylates Chk1 at two canonical sites (Ser345 and S317), directly leading to its activation without the homodimerization and intramolecular trans-autophosphorylation that is required for Chk2 activation. Activated Chk1 then phosphorylates diverse downstream effectors, which in turn are involved in cell cycle checkpoints (i.e., intra-S-phase, G2/M-phase, and G1/S-phase checkpoints), the DNA replication checkpoint, and the mitotic spindle checkpoint, as well as DNA repair, apoptosis, and transcription. Consequently, Chk1 is a kinase central for the DDR signaling network, thereby representing a particularly attractive target in anticancer therapeutics.

S-phase checkpoint

At least two pathways are involved in the S-phase checkpoint: the ATM/ATR-Chk1/Chk2-Cdc25A-Cdk2 pathway and the Nbs1-dependent pathway, which includes the ATM/Nbs1/Smc1 and the ATM/Nbs1/FANCD2 pathways (17). Chk1 activation via ATR plays a dominant role in response to replication stresses (the replication checkpoint). Chk1 is also required for amplification of DSB-initiated Cdc25A signaling mediated by ATM/Chk2. Moreover, Chk1 directly phosphorylates essential S-phase kinases (Cdc7 and Tlk1). Cdc7 phosphorylation/activation is required for initiation of DNA replication via the Mcm2–7 complex, which with Cdk2 mediates efficient loading of Cdc45 to replication origins (18). Tlk1 phosphorylation by Chk1 leads to inhibition of Tlk1 activity, which is required for chromatin assembly. Furthermore, Chk1 activation impairs elongation during DNA replication and is required for inhibition of mRNA elongation of p53 target genes (e.g., p21) when DNA replication is blocked (19).

Chk1 has recently been implicated in translesion DNA synthesis mediated by ubiquitinated proliferating cell nuclear antigen (20). Whereas ATR/Chk1 is critical for stabilizing stressed replication forks, translesion DNA synthesis allows replication forks to progress through certain DNA lesions. Both are important for continuous replication of damaged DNA and avoidance of fork collapse. Chk1 is required for efficient proliferating cell nuclear antigen ubiquitination mediated by the E2/E3 complex of Rad6 and Rad18.

G2/M phase checkpoint

Cdk1/cdc2 governs mitotic entry and exit. Cdk1/cdc2 activation involves Tyr15/Thr14 dephosphorylation, regulated by Wee1- and Myt1-mediated phosphorylation and Cdc25C-mediated dephosphorylation. Cdc25A may also be involved in Cdk1 dephosphorylation in the G2/M-phase checkpoint (21). Chk1 is a major kinase phosphorylating Cdc25A (Ser76/124) and Cdc25C (Ser216), leading to Cdc25A ubiquitination (via ubiquitin ligases APC/C and Skp1/Cullin/F-box proteins/SCF) and proteasomal degradation or Cdc25C nuclear exclusion/cytoplasmic sequestration via binding to 14-3-3 proteins (Rad24 and Rad25). Chk1 also phosphorylates and stabilizes Wee1. Long-term Cdk1/cyclin B silencing for a sustained G2/M-phase checkpoint requires transcriptional induction of endogenous Cdk1 inhibitors (e.g., p21, Gadd45, and 14-3-3σ) via p53-dependent or p53-independent (e.g., via BRAC1) mechanisms that also involve Chk1.

G1/S phase checkpoint

Cdk2-cyclin E/A is inactivated via Cdc25A-mediated dephosphorylation (Tyr15/Thr14; fast and reversible) or p53-induced p21 (slow and sustained), causing G1 arrest and preventing S-phase entry following DNA damage (22). Whereas these events are primarily mediated by Chk2, basal Chk1 activity is required for constitutive Cdc25A turnover in unperturbed cells.

Other Chk1 Functions

Mitotic spindle checkpoint

The spindle checkpoint delays anaphase onset in cells with mitotic spindle defects. Following spindle toxin (e.g., taxol) exposure, Chk1 associates with kinetochores and is phosphorylated at noncanonical sites, thereby phosphorylating Aurora-B and enhancing its catalytic activity. This event in turn mediates phosphorylation and kinetochore localization of BubR1 (23). Abrogation of Chk1 induces multiple mitotic defects and mislocalized Aurora B (24). In addition, Chk1 also negatively regulates another important mitotic substrate, Plk1 (25).

DNA damage/repair

Chk1 is involved in DNA repair by targeting repair kinases (e.g., DNA-PK), which, together with Ku70-Ku80 (designed the DNA-PK complex), are important for DSB repair (26). Moreover, Chk1-dependent phosphorylation of Rad51 is required for DNA damage-induced homologous recombination (27). Lastly, Chk1-mediated FANCE phosphorylation is critical for the Fanconi Anemia/BRCA-mediated DNA repair pathway (28, 29). Conversely, abrogation of Chk1 by either inhibitors or siRNA causes ssDNA formation and DNA strand breaks (30).

Apoptosis

p53 is a central downstream checkpoint signaling protein responsible for apoptotic responses. However, ATR/Chk1 signaling is essential for suppression of a caspase-3-dependent apoptotic response following replication stress (31). Moreover, Chk1, but not Chk2, also blocks a caspase-2-dependent apoptotic response independently of p53, Bcl-2, and caspase-3 (32). Interestingly, caspase-mediated Chk1 cleavage (Asp299/Asp351) promotes its activation (33), raising the possibility of unexplored, direct links between Chk1 and apoptotic signaling.

Transcription

Chk1 phosphorylates histone H3 (Thr11), responsible for DNA damage-induced transcriptional repression of cell cycle-regulatory genes (e.g., cyclin B1 and Cdk1) through loss of histone acetylation (34).

Clinical-Translational Advances

Chk1 versus Chk2 as anticancer targets

Proximal (i.e., ATM/ATR) and distal (i.e., Chk1/Chk2) transducers comprise the core of DDR signaling networks. Theoretically, inhibition of each could improve chemotherapeutic or radiotherapeutic efficacy. Currently, no ATR-specific inhibitor has been developed. ATM is a rational candidate, but ATM inhibitors [e.g., KU-55933 and KU-60019 (35); Kudos] are at early preclinical stages of development. Therefore, whether the targeting of ATM, ATR, or both will be effective strategies remains to be determined. Despite similarities in substrate phosphorylation, Chk1 and Chk2 functions in cell survival and checkpoint regulation differ strikingly. Chk2 function is time- and cell type-dependent and is generally limited to DSB-induced checkpoints (by IR). Chk1 is involved in checkpoints induced by diverse stimuli (e.g., UV and numerous DNA-damaging agents), as well as DNA replication stresses (even in unperturbed cells). Thus, Chk1 is an extremely attractive target for multiple reasons: first, it is associated with all checkpoints (e.g., G2/M, G1/S, S, and most recently, the mitotic spindle checkpoint); second, it is essential for maintenance of genomic integrity, whereas Chk2 is conditional; third, Chk2 function is to some extent replaceable by Chk1 (or other kinases), but the reverse is not true; fourth, Chk1 plays a central role in DNA replication checkpoints (e.g., by exposure to agents that target replication, such as nucleoside analogs); and finally, Chk1 is involved in other critical functions (e.g., DNA repair and apoptotic inhibition). Therefore, Chk1 has been viewed as the workhorse kinase, whereas Chk2 is the amplifier kinase (36). Consequently, Chk1 currently represents one of the most important targets for anticancer therapeutics directed at the DDR network.

Novel checkpoint abrogators

The clinical use of UCN-01, the first Chk1 inhibitor evaluated in humans, is limited by its prolonged plasma half-life due to extensive plasma binding to α1-acidic glycoprotein and off-target actions (e.g., inhibition of multiple other kinases) resulting in toxicity (e.g., hyperglycemia; ref. 37). These have prompted extensive efforts to develop a new generation of more specific and less toxic inhibitors targeting checkpoint kinases. However, as in the case of UCN-01, the major goal in developing these new agents continues to involve disrupting DNA damage checkpoint responses to genotoxic agents or radiation. Whether strategies combining newer checkpoint abrogators and cytotoxic agents will result in improved therapeutic activity or selectivity is currently the subject of intense interest. Nevertheless, numerous clinical trials involving checkpoint abrogators are ongoing based on this rationale. In such studies, phosphorylation of Chk1 (e.g., S345 or S296 [autophosphorylation]), histone H3 (e.g., Ser10), Cdc25C (e.g., Ser216), and histone H2A.X (Ser139, designated γH2A.X) currently serve as potential biomarkers for Chk1 inhibition (38).

A brief summary of newer checkpoint abrogators, including those at early stages of clinical development (Table 1), or at the preclinical development stage, follows below.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Checkpoint abrogators in clinical trials

AZD7762 (AstraZeneca)

A potent, selective Chk1 inhibitor binds to the ATP-binding site of Chk1 and in vitro inhibits Chk1-mediated phosphorylation of the Cdc25C peptide (IC50, 5 nM; ref. 39). AZD7762 is equally potent against Chk2 in vitro. AZD7762 abrogates the S-phase checkpoint (via the Cdc25A/Cdk2 pathway) by gemcitabine or the G2/M-phase checkpoint (via the Cdc25C/Cdk1 pathway) by irinotecan (SN38), resulting in enhanced activity in solid tumor cell lines (particularly p53 mutant cells) and murine xenografts.

LY2603618 (Lilly)

This inhibitor binds to and blocks Chk1 activity, thereby potentiating the efficacy of various chemotherapeutic agents, possibly by interfering with DNA repair. Preclinical data involving LY2603618 has not been published.

CBP501 (CanBas)

A peptide corresponding to aa 211–221 of Cdc25C inhibits Chk1 (IC50, 3.4 μM) and Chk2 (IC50, 6.5 μM) in vitro (40). CBP501 diminishes Cdc25C Ser216 phosphorylation, accompanied by Cdk1/cdc2 Tyr15 dephosphorylation and increased histone H3 Ser10 phosphorylation, leading to G2/M checkpoint abrogation and enhanced cytotoxicity of bleomycin or cisplatin (CDDP) in vitro and in murine xenografts.

PF-00477736 (Pfizer)

A selective, potent ATP-competitive Chk1 inhibitor, derived from PF-00394691, inhibits Chk1 (Ki, 0.49 nM) and Chk2 (Ki, 47 nM) in vitro. PF-00477736 abrogates both G2/M-phase (e.g., by camptothecin) and S-phase checkpoints (e.g., by gemcitabine; ref. 41). The latter enhances gemcitabine cytotoxicity in p53-defective tumor cells and in murine xenografts. PF-00477736 also significantly enhances docetaxel efficacy in vitro and in vivo, in association with decreased Cdc25C cytoplasmic phosphorylation (Ser216) and histone H3 phosphorylation (Ser10; ref. 42).

SCH-900776 (Schering-Plough)

This compound specifically binds to and inhibits Chk1, abrogating the S-phase or G2/M-phase checkpoints, thereby sensitizing tumor cells to IR and alkylating agents. These preclinical data have not yet been published.

XL844 (Exelixis)

A potent ATP-competitive inhibitor of Chk1 (Ki, 2.2 nM) and Chk2 (Ki, 0.07 nM; ref. 43), XL844 blocks Cdc25A degradation, abrogates the S-phase checkpoints, increases DNA damage in response to gemcitabine, and potentiates gemcitabine activity in vitro and in xenografts.

CEP-3891 (Cephalon)

This specific Chk1 inhibitor, currently at the preclinical development stage, potently inhibits Chk1 (IC50, 4 nM) as well as other kinases, including TrkA (IC50, 9 nM), MLK1 (IC50, 42 nM), and VEGFR2 (IC50, 164 nM) in vitro. CEP-3891 abrogates S-phase and G2/M-phase checkpoints induced by IR (44). The former event is likely related to delayed IR-induced Cdc25A phosphorylation (Ser123, a residue critical for protein stability). CEP-3891 also accelerates IR-induced mitotic nuclear fragmentation stemming from defective chromosome segregation, accompanied by enhanced lethality (45).

CHIR-124 (Chiron)

This potent, selective Chk1 inhibitor, which occupies the ATP-binding site, inhibits Chk1 (IC50, 0.3 nM) 2,000-fold more potently than Chk2 (IC50, 0.7 μM). In vitro, CHIR-124 also potently targets other kinases such as PDGFR (IC50, 6.6 nM) and FLT3 (IC50, 5.8 nM). CHIR-124 interacts synergistically with topoisomerase I poisons (e.g., camptothecin) in p53-mutant tumor cells and in an orthotopic breast cancer xenograft (46). CHIR-124 also abrogates SN38-induced S-phase (by restoring Cdc25A) and G2/M-phase (via Cdc25C hyperphosphorylation) checkpoints, triggering apoptosis. In addition, CHIR-124 also sensitizes p53−/− HCT116 cells to IR. CHIR-124 is currently in the preclinical development stage.

PD-321852 (Pfizer)

This compound catalytically inhibits Chk1, leading to Cdc25A stabilization and premature mitotic entry in response to gemcitabine. Inhibition of Chk1-mediated Rad51 responses to gemcitabine-induced replication stress also contributes to chemosensitization by PD-321852 (47). PD321852 is currently in preclinical development.

MK-1775 (Merck)

This Wee1 inhibitor (IC50, 5.2 nM) potentiates the activity of DNA-damaging agents (e.g., gemcitabine, cisplatin, carboplatin) in vitro and in vivo, particularly in p53-negative cancers (48, 49).

PD0166285 (Pfizer)

This potent, preclinical inhibitor of Wee1 (IC50, 24 nM) and Myt1 (IC50, 72 nM) inhibits Cdk1/cdc2 phosphorylation at inhibitory sites (i.e., Tyr15/Thr14), independently of p53 status. PD0166285 abrogates IR-induced G2/M-phase checkpoints and enhances p53-dependent cell killing (50). In addition, PD0166285 also stabilizes microtubules and down-regulates cyclin D (51).

17-AAG (Tanespimycin or KOS-953, Kosan)

Chk1, but not Chk2, is one of many client proteins of the molecular chaperone Hsp90. Exposure to the Hsp90 inhibitor 17-AAG down-regulates Chk1 (52), leading to Cdc25A stabilization and sensitization to gemcitabine, etoposide, and SN38, particularly in p53−/− cells (53). In addition to multiple trials involving 17-AAG that focus on other client proteins, one ongoing clinical trial is based on Chk1 down-regulation (54).

Alternative Strategies: An Example Emphasizing the Link between Chk1 Inhibitors and the Ras/MEK/ERK Survival Pathway

A requirement for ERK1/2 (extracellular-regulated kinase 1/2) activation in progression across the G2-M boundary and through mitosis (55), as well as functional roles for MEK1/2 (MAP kinase kinase 1/2)/ERK1/2 signaling in DNA damage checkpoint (56) and repair responses (57) to genotoxic stresses, have been documented. We reported that UCN-01 markedly activated MEK1/2/ERK1/2 in malignant hematopoietic cells, whereas blockade of this event by MEK1/2 inhibitors strikingly induced apoptosis (58). Subsequently, it was shown that targeting Ras (e.g., by farnesyltransferase inhibitors or HMG Co-A reductase inhibitors/statins) blocks UCN-01-induced ERK1/2 activation and dramatically increases lethality in vitro and in vivo (59, 60). Analogous phenomena have also been reported in breast and prostate cancers, and with newer, clinically relevant Chk1 inhibitors (Dai and Grant, unpublished observations). Notably, whereas the activity of Chk1 inhibitor/DNA-damaging agent regimens is largely p53-dependent, Chk1/Ras/MEK1/2 inhibitor strategies act independently of p53 status. These findings suggest that combining Chk1 (or potentially ATM/ATR) inhibitors with agents that disrupt compensatory activation of the Ras/MEK/ERK signaling cascade, rather than DNA-damaging agents, may represent a novel treatment paradigm.

Future challenges for the Chk1 inhibitor field include: exploiting rapidly emerging insights into DDR signaling networks, particularly those reflecting differences between normal and transformed cells; identifying intracellular signaling responses to DDR-targeting agents (e.g., Chk1 inhibitors), with the goal of inhibiting these responses to potentiate therapeutic activity; extending this strategy to include, in addition to DNA-damaging agents, newer survival signaling pathway antagonists; and developing agents that interrupt more upstream targets within DDR signaling cascades (e.g., ATM, ATR, and mediators), which may circumvent intranetwork compensatory responses to inhibition of a single distal transducer like Chk1. Although much work clearly lies ahead, the future of this field appears promising.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Acknowledgments

Grant Support: Grants CA63753, CA93738, and CA100866 from the National Institutes of Health; award 6181-10 from the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society of America; awards from the Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation and V Foundation; and Lymphoma SPORE award NCI/NIH 1P50 CA130805.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Footnotes

    • Received October 13, 2009.
    • Accepted October 15, 2009.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Bartek J,
    2. Lukas J
    . DNA damage checkpoints: from initiation to recovery or adaptation. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2007;19:238–45.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Zhou BB,
    2. Anderson HJ,
    3. Roberge M
    . Targeting DNA checkpoint kinases in cancer therapy. Cancer Biol Ther 2003;2 Suppl 1:S16–22.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Branzei D,
    2. Foiani M
    . Regulation of DNA repair throughout the cell cycle. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2008;9:297–308.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Lobrich M,
    2. Jeggo PA
    . The impact of a negligent G2/M checkpoint on genomic instability and cancer induction. Nat Rev Cancer 2007;7:861–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Kastan MB,
    2. Bartek J
    . Cell-cycle checkpoints and cancer. Nature 2004;432:316–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Gottifredi V,
    2. Prives C
    . The S phase checkpoint: when the crowd meets at the fork. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2005;16:355–68.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Jazayeri A,
    2. Falck J,
    3. Lukas C,
    4. et al
    . ATM- and cell cycle-dependent regulation of ATR in response to DNA double-strand breaks. Nat Cell Biol 2006;8:37–45.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Choi JH,
    2. Lindsey-Boltz LA,
    3. Sancar A
    . Reconstitution of a human ATR-mediated checkpoint response to damaged DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007;104:13301–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Chou DM,
    2. Elledge SJ
    . Tipin and Timeless form a mutually protective complex required for genotoxic stress resistance and checkpoint function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006;103:18143–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Yoshizawa-Sugata N,
    2. Masai H
    . Human Tim/Timeless-interacting protein, Tipin, is required for efficient progression of S phase and DNA replication checkpoint. J Biol Chem 2007;282:2729–40.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Tapia-Alveal C,
    2. Calonge TM,
    3. O'Connell MJ
    . Regulation of chk1. Cell Div 2009;4:8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Niida H,
    2. Katsuno Y,
    3. Banerjee B,
    4. Hande MP,
    5. Nakanishi M
    . Specific role of Chk1 phosphorylations in cell survival and checkpoint activation. Mol Cell Biol 2007;27:2572–81.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Walker M,
    2. Black EJ,
    3. Oehler V,
    4. Gillespie DA,
    5. Scott MT
    . Chk1 C-terminal regulatory phosphorylation mediates checkpoint activation by de-repression of Chk1 catalytic activity. Oncogene 2009;28:2314–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Wilsker D,
    2. Petermann E,
    3. Helleday T,
    4. Bunz F
    . Essential function of Chk1 can be uncoupled from DNA damage checkpoint and replication control. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008;105:20752–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Tse AN,
    2. Carvajal R,
    3. Schwartz GK
    . Targeting checkpoint kinase 1 in cancer therapeutics. Clin Cancer Res 2007;13:1955–60.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Ashwell S,
    2. Zabludoff S
    . DNA damage detection and repair pathways-recent advances with inhibitors of checkpoint kinases in cancer therapy. Clin Cancer Res 2008;14:4032–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Falck J,
    2. Petrini JH,
    3. Williams BR,
    4. Lukas J,
    5. Bartek J
    . The DNA damage-dependent intra-S phase checkpoint is regulated by parallel pathways. Nat Genet 2002;30:290–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Liu P,
    2. Barkley LR,
    3. Day T,
    4. et al
    . The Chk1-mediated S-phase checkpoint targets initiation factor Cdc45 via a Cdc25A/Cdk2-independent mechanism. J Biol Chem 2006;281:30631–44.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Beckerman R,
    2. Donner AJ,
    3. Mattia M,
    4. et al
    . A role for Chk1 in blocking transcriptional elongation of p21 RNA during the S-phase checkpoint. Genes Dev 2009;23:1364–77.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Yang XH,
    2. Zou L
    . Dual functions of DNA replication forks in checkpoint signaling and PCNA ubiquitination. Cell Cycle 2009;8:191–4.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Kuntz K,
    2. O'Connell MJ
    . The G(2) DNA damage checkpoint: could this ancient regulator be the achilles heel of cancer? Cancer Biol Ther 2009;8:1433–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. de Bruin RA,
    2. Wittenberg C
    . All eukaryotes: before turning off G1-S transcription, please check your DNA. Cell Cycle 2009;8:214–7.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Zachos G,
    2. Black EJ,
    3. Walker M,
    4. et al
    . Chk1 is required for spindle checkpoint function. Dev Cell 2007;12:247–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Peddibhotla S,
    2. Lam MH,
    3. Gonzalez-Rimbau M,
    4. Rosen JM
    . The DNA-damage effector checkpoint kinase 1 is essential for chromosome segregation and cytokinesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009;106:5159–64.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Tang J,
    2. Erikson RL,
    3. Liu X
    . Checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) is required for mitotic progression through negative regulation of polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006;103:11964–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Goudelock DM,
    2. Jiang K,
    3. Pereira E,
    4. Russell B,
    5. Sanchez Y
    . Regulatory interactions between the checkpoint kinase Chk1 and the proteins of the DNA-dependent protein kinase complex. J Biol Chem 2003;278:29940–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Sorensen CS,
    2. Hansen LT,
    3. Dziegielewski J,
    4. et al
    . The cell-cycle checkpoint kinase Chk1 is required for mammalian homologous recombination repair. Nat Cell Biol 2005;7:195–201.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Chen CC,
    2. Kennedy RD,
    3. Sidi S,
    4. Look AT,
    5. D'Andrea A
    . CHK1 inhibition as a strategy for targeting Fanconi Anemia (FA) DNA repair pathway deficient tumors. Mol Cancer 2009;8:24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Wang X,
    2. Kennedy RD,
    3. Ray K,
    4. Stuckert P,
    5. Ellenberger T,
    6. D'Andrea AD
    . Chk1-mediated phosphorylation of FANCE is required for the Fanconi anemia/BRCA pathway. Mol Cell Biol 2007;27:3098–108.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Syljuasen RG,
    2. Sorensen CS,
    3. Hansen LT,
    4. et al
    . Inhibition of human Chk1 causes increased initiation of DNA replication, phosphorylation of ATR targets, and DNA breakage. Mol Cell Biol 2005;25:3553–62.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Myers K,
    2. Gagou ME,
    3. Zuazua-Villar P,
    4. Rodriguez R,
    5. Meuth M
    . ATR and Chk1 suppress a caspase-3-dependent apoptotic response following DNA replication stress. PLoS Genet 2009;5:e1000324.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Sidi S,
    2. Sanda T,
    3. Kennedy RD,
    4. et al
    . Chk1 suppresses a caspase-2 apoptotic response to DNA damage that bypasses p53, Bcl-2, and caspase-3. Cell 2008;133:864–77.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Matsuura K,
    2. Wakasugi M,
    3. Yamashita K,
    4. Matsunaga T
    . Cleavage-mediated activation of Chk1 during apoptosis. J Biol Chem 2008;283:25485–91.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Shimada M,
    2. Niida H,
    3. Zineldeen DH,
    4. et al
    . Chk1 is a histone H3 threonine 11 kinase that regulates DNA damage-induced transcriptional repression. Cell 2008;132:221–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Golding SE,
    2. Rosenberg E,
    3. Valerie N,
    4. et al
    . Improved ATM kinase inhibitor KU-60019 radiosensitizes glioma cells, compromises insulin, AKT and ERK prosurvival signaling, and inhibits migration and invasion. Mol Cancer Ther 2009;8:2894–902.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Bartek J,
    2. Lukas J
    . Chk1 and Chk2 kinases in checkpoint control and cancer. Cancer Cell 2003;3:421–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Kortmansky J,
    2. Shah MA,
    3. Kaubisch A,
    4. et al
    . Phase I trial of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor and protein kinase C inhibitor 7-hydroxystaurosporine in combination with Fluorouracil in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:1875–84.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Bucher N,
    2. Britten CD
    . G2 checkpoint abrogation and checkpoint kinase-1 targeting in the treatment of cancer. Br J Cancer 2008;98:523–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Zabludoff SD,
    2. Deng C,
    3. Grondine MR,
    4. et al
    . AZD7762, a novel checkpoint kinase inhibitor, drives checkpoint abrogation and potentiates DNA-targeted therapies. Mol Cancer Ther 2008;7:2955–66.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. Sha SK,
    2. Sato T,
    3. Kobayashi H,
    4. et al
    . Cell cycle phenotype-based optimization of G2-abrogating peptides yields CBP501 with a unique mechanism of action at the G2 checkpoint. Mol Cancer Ther 2007;6:147–53.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    1. Blasina A,
    2. Hallin J,
    3. Chen E,
    4. et al
    . Breaching the DNA damage checkpoint via PF-00477736, a novel small-molecule inhibitor of checkpoint kinase 1. Mol Cancer Ther 2008;7:2394–404.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    1. Zhang C,
    2. Yan Z,
    3. Painter CL,
    4. et al
    . PF-00477736 mediates checkpoint kinase 1 signaling pathway and potentiates docetaxel-induced efficacy in xenografts. Clin Cancer Res 2009;15:4630–40.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    1. Matthews DJ,
    2. Yakes FM,
    3. Chen J,
    4. et al
    . Pharmacological abrogation of S-phase checkpoint enhances the anti-tumor activity of gemcitabine in vivo. Cell Cycle 2007;6:104–10.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Sorensen CS,
    2. Syljuasen RG,
    3. Falck J,
    4. et al
    . Chk1 regulates the S phase checkpoint by coupling the physiological turnover and ionizing radiation-induced accelerated proteolysis of Cdc25A. Cancer Cell 2003;3:247–58.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Syljuasen RG,
    2. Sorensen CS,
    3. Nylandsted J,
    4. Lukas C,
    5. Lukas J,
    6. Bartek J
    . Inhibition of Chk1 by CEP-3891 accelerates mitotic nuclear fragmentation in response to ionizing Radiation. Cancer Res 2004;64:9035–40.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    1. Tse AN,
    2. Rendahl KG,
    3. Sheikh T,
    4. et al
    . CHIR-124, a novel potent inhibitor of Chk1, potentiates the cytotoxicity of topoisomerase I poisons in vitro and in vivo. Clin Cancer Res 2007;13:591–602.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    1. Parsels LA,
    2. Morgan MA,
    3. Tanska DM,
    4. et al
    . Gemcitabine sensitization by checkpoint kinase 1 inhibition correlates with inhibition of a Rad51 DNA damage response in pancreatic cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther 2009;8:45–54.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. ↵
    1. Schellens JH,
    2. Leijen S,
    3. Shapiro GI,
    4. et al
    . A phase I and pharmacological study of MK-1775, a Wee1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in both monotherapy and in combination with gemcitabine, cisplatin, or carboplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 2009;27 Suppl 15:3510.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    1. Mizuarai S,
    2. Yamanaka K,
    3. Itadani H,
    4. et al
    . Discovery of gene expression-based pharmacodynamic biomarker for a p53 context-specific anti-tumor drug Wee1 inhibitor. Mol Cancer 2009;8:34.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Wang Y,
    2. Li J,
    3. Booher RN,
    4. et al
    . Radiosensitization of p53 mutant cells by PD0166285, a novel G(2) checkpoint abrogator. Cancer Res 2001;61:8211–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. ↵
    1. Hashimoto O,
    2. Shinkawa M,
    3. Torimura T,
    4. et al
    . Cell cycle regulation by the Wee1 inhibitor PD0166285, pyrido [2,3-d] pyimidine, in the B16 mouse melanoma cell line. BMC Cancer 2006;6:292.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Arlander SJ,
    2. Eapen AK,
    3. Vroman BT,
    4. McDonald RJ,
    5. Toft DO,
    6. Karnitz LM
    . Hsp90 inhibition depletes Chk1 and sensitizes tumor cells to replication stress. J Biol Chem 2003;278:52572–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. ↵
    1. Tse AN,
    2. Sheikh TN,
    3. Alan H,
    4. Chou TC,
    5. Schwartz GK
    . 90-kDa heat shock protein inhibition abrogates the topoisomerase I poison-induced G2/M checkpoint in p53-null tumor cells by depleting Chk1 and Wee1. Mol Pharmacol 2009;75:124–33.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. ↵
    1. Tse AN,
    2. Klimstra DS,
    3. Gonen M,
    4. et al
    . A phase 1 dose-escalation study of irinotecan in combination with 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin in patients with solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res 2008;14:6704–11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. ↵
    1. Roberts EC,
    2. Shapiro PS,
    3. Nahreini TS,
    4. Pages G,
    5. Pouyssegur J,
    6. Ahn NG
    . Distinct cell cycle timing requirements for extracellular signal-regulated kinase and phosphoinositide 3-kinase signaling pathways in somatic cell mitosis. Mol Cell Biol 2002;22:7226–41.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. ↵
    1. Wu D,
    2. Chen B,
    3. Parihar K,
    4. et al
    . ERK activity facilitates activation of the S-phase DNA damage checkpoint by modulating ATR function. Oncogene 2006;25:1153–64.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. ↵
    1. Golding SE,
    2. Rosenberg E,
    3. Neill S,
    4. Dent P,
    5. Povirk LF,
    6. Valerie K
    . Extracellular signal-related kinase positively regulates ataxia telangiectasia mutated, homologous recombination repair, and the DNA damage response. Cancer Res 2007;67:1046–53.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. ↵
    1. Dai Y,
    2. Yu C,
    3. Singh V,
    4. et al
    . Pharmacological inhibitors of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) kinase/MAPK cascade interact synergistically with UCN-01 to induce mitochondrial dysfunction and apoptosis in human leukemia cells. Cancer Res 2001;61:5106–15.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  59. ↵
    1. Dai Y,
    2. Khanna P,
    3. Chen S,
    4. Pei XY,
    5. Dent P,
    6. Grant S
    . Statins synergistically potentiate 7-hydroxystaurosporine (UCN-01) lethality in human leukemia and myeloma cells by disrupting Ras farnesylation and activation. Blood 2007;109:4415–23.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  60. ↵
    1. Dai Y,
    2. Chen S,
    3. Pei XY,
    4. et al
    . Interruption of the Ras/MEK/ERK signaling cascade enhances Chk1 inhibitor-induced DNA damage in vitro and in vivo in human multiple myeloma cells. Blood 2008;112:2439–49.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Clinical Cancer Research: 16 (2)
January 2010
Volume 16, Issue 2
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Clinical Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
New Insights into Checkpoint Kinase 1 in the DNA Damage Response Signaling Network
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Clinical Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
New Insights into Checkpoint Kinase 1 in the DNA Damage Response Signaling Network
Yun Dai and Steven Grant
Clin Cancer Res January 15 2010 (16) (2) 376-383; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1029

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
New Insights into Checkpoint Kinase 1 in the DNA Damage Response Signaling Network
Yun Dai and Steven Grant
Clin Cancer Res January 15 2010 (16) (2) 376-383; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1029
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Checkpoint Signaling Cascades
    • Chk1 Activation Upstream Signals
    • Current Models for Chk1 Activation Mechanisms
    • Chk1 in DNA Damage Checkpoints
    • Other Chk1 Functions
    • Clinical-Translational Advances
    • Alternative Strategies: An Example Emphasizing the Link between Chk1 Inhibitors and the Ras/MEK/ERK Survival Pathway
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Therapeutic Targeting of the Liver Microenvironment
  • Targeting the Protein Kinase Wee1 in Cancer
  • Metabolic Control of Histone Methylation and Gene Expression
Show more Molecular Pathways
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • CCR Focus Archive
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Clinical Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Clinical Cancer Research
eISSN: 1557-3265
ISSN: 1078-0432

Advertisement