Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

CCR Translations

Toward a Better Understanding of Race and Cancer

Otis W. Brawley
Otis W. Brawley
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2541 Published December 2010
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

A better understanding of breast cancer subtypes is allowing their use as prognostic markers. For some time, it has been documented that black women with breast cancer have a poorer prognosis than white women of the same stage. Advances in immunohistochemistry and the appreciation of breast cancer subtypes are enabling investigators to study the distribution of these subtypes among populations. Clin Cancer Res; 16(24); 5920–2. ©2010 AACR.

Commentary on O'Brien et al., p. 6100

In this issue of Clinical Cancer Research, O'Brien and colleagues (1) use the North Carolina Breast Cancer Study to assess distributions of breast cancer subtypes among black and white women. This is an extremely valuable cohort study having a median follow-up of 9 years. The authors use relatively simple immunohistochemical staining to categorize tumors into subtypes. They correlate these subtypes with outcomes and demonstrate that tumor subtype is a legitimate prognostic marker. Unlike previous studies, this one assesses not only estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 status but also HER1 and CK5/6 status. This allows for classification of tumors as

  • luminal A (ER+ and/or PR+,HER2−),

  • luminal B (ER+ and/or PR+, HER2+),

  • HER2+, ER−, PR−,

  • basal-like (ER−, PR−, HER2−, HER1+, and/or CK 5/6+), and

  • unclassified, negative for all five markers.

The study also confirms that there are differences in the distribution of breast cancer subtypes by self-declared race. The authors found that 64% of whites had luminal A tumors compared with 48% of blacks. Luminal B disease was found in 11% of whites compared with 8% of blacks. Basal-like tumors were found in 11% of whites and 22% of blacks. HER2+/ER− tumors were seen in 5% of whites and 7% of blacks.

This well-designed study confirms that basal-like breast cancer is associated with a very poor prognosis. In an era before the availability of a drug specific to HER2+ disease, they show that HER2+, ER−, PR− disease was also of similar poor-prognosis.

Although O'Brien et al. report a higher prevalence of basal-like breast cancer in black patients, and especially young black patients, basal-like breast cancer does not appear to be an inherently more aggressive disease in black women compared with white women.

These findings can help us better understand the role of race in breast cancer outcomes. Even though whites historically have had a higher breast cancer incidence rate compared with blacks, breast cancer mortality rates were essentially equal throughout the 1970s. A disparity in mortality was first noted in 1981 (2), with blacks having a higher death rate, and this disparity has been widening ever since (Fig. 1). There was even a small, still unexplained increase in death rate among blacks in the early 1980s. Potential explanations for this black–white disparity include differences in the quality of treatment received by race, and differences in biology by race. Indeed, both likely contribute. Of note, both black and white death rates have been declining since the early 1990s. This is attributed to screening, early detection, and improvements in treatment.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

U.S. SEER Program breast cancer mortality trends from 1975 to 2007 for African- Americans and whites. Data from Altekruse et al. (6).

The population-based databases that provided the data in Fig. 1 have not consistently collected tumor marker data. It is known that the beginning of the racial disparities coincided with the availability of tamoxifen, which is active in what is now referred to as luminal A and luminal B disease. The study by O'Brien et al. tells us that these subtypes are more common among white patients.

Many people are not fully comfortable with the use of race in health statistics. The anthropology community insists that race is a sociopolitical and not a biological categorization. In this study, race may be more of a categorization by geographic area of origin. There are known differences in genetic markers among populations as defined by their geographic area of origin. For example, the sickle cell mutation is found in people originating in a contiguous area surrounding the Mediterranean, including Spain, Italy, Greece, the Middle East, and sub-Saharan Africa. There is a higher prevalence of the mutation in sub-Saharan Africa, but it is also prevalent among people who would be considered white from Spain, Italy, and Greece. This example shows that geographic area of origin can be distinctly different from race (3).

This study goes a long way toward helping us appropriately define pertinent scientific questions. Although it shows that people of African origin have a higher prevalence of the worst kinds of breast cancer, it also shows that the marker's aggressiveness is more important than race in terms of prognosis. In other words, breast cancer is not a more malignant disease in black women, but a higher proportion of black women get the worst kinds of breast cancer.

In the cohort followed in this study, 29% of black women with premenopausal breast cancer had basal-like disease compared with 15% of white premenopausal women. Why do women of African origin with breast cancer have a higher prevalence of basal cancer? is a very legitimate scientific question. Another interesting question is, Why do a higher proportion of white women have lumina A (ER+) cancer? What is the relationship of these markers with sociopolitical influences such as poverty, diet, body mass index, birthing habits, oral contraceptive use, and postmenopausal hormone replacement?

The role of extrinsic influences on these pathologic markers needs to be further explored. Geographic area of origin can also relate to cultural, social, and economic influences that may influence breast cancer presentation. Indeed, in a study of an all-white cohort in Scotland, Thomson and colleagues (4) suggested that a lifelong history of poverty is correlated with a higher risk of estrogen receptor–negative breast cancer. Gordon (5) reported a similar finding in a United States population.

The article by O'Brien et al. also helps us better understand that there are various kinds of breast cancer. It is very likely that more markers of biological behavior and more targets for treatment will be found in the near future. This will allow for the development of therapies tailored to specific patients. Eventually, we may see genomic definitions for specific cancers with diverse prognoses; indeed, this is the promise of personalized medicine.

In this study, the authors were unable to assess socioeconomic status, body mass index, or treatment patterns. Although this is unfortunate, the article gives us a tremendous amount of information about breast cancer and disparities in the United States. Race can be used as a factor in a sort of benevolent “medical racial profiling,” predicting for a higher risk of a worse-prognosis breast cancer. However, once the status of the five markers has been established, race in and of itself should matter little in terms of prognosis.

As we learn to categorize tumors using biological markers, we are also learning that no population has a monopoly on any specific subtype.

Although race should not matter after diagnosis, as the authors appropriately note, race does matter. Issues involving racial differences in breast cancer treatment and access to care continue to drive many of the disparities in outcome.

  • Received October 6, 2010.
  • Accepted October 29, 2010.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. O'Brien KM,
    2. Cole SR,
    3. Tse C,
    4. et al.
    Intrinsic breast tumor subtypes, race, and long-term survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. Clin Cancer Res 2010;16:6100–10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Goldson A,
    2. Henschke U,
    3. Leffall LD,
    4. Schneider RL
    . Is there a genetic basis for the differences in cancer incidence between Afro-Americans and Euro-Americans? J Natl Med Assoc 1981;73:701–6.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Brawley OW
    . Population categorization and cancer statistics. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2003;22:11–19. Brawley OW. Some perspective on black-white cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2002;52:322–5.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Thomson CS,
    2. Hole DJ,
    3. Twelves CJ,
    4. Brewster DH,
    5. Black RJ
    Scottish Cancer Therapy Network. Prognostic factors in women with breast cancer: distribution by socioeconomic status and effect on differences in survival. J Epidemiol Community Health 2001;55:308–15.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Gordon NH
    . Socioeconomic factors and breast cancer in black and white Americans. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2003;22:55–65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Altekruse SF,
    2. Kosary CL,
    3. Krapcho M,
    4. Neyman N,
    5. Aminou R,
    6. Waldron W
    . SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2007, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; 2010 [cited 2010 Oct 6]. Available from: http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2007/.
PreviousNext
Back to top
Clinical Cancer Research: 16 (24)
December 2010
Volume 16, Issue 24
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Clinical Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Toward a Better Understanding of Race and Cancer
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Clinical Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Toward a Better Understanding of Race and Cancer
Otis W. Brawley
Clin Cancer Res December 15 2010 (16) (24) 5920-5922; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2541

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Toward a Better Understanding of Race and Cancer
Otis W. Brawley
Clin Cancer Res December 15 2010 (16) (24) 5920-5922; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2541
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Targeting Nucleotide Excision Repair Deficiency in Cancer
  • PIPAC: From Promise to Proof
  • Genomic ctDNA analysis in high grade serous ovarian cancer
Show more CCR Translations
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • CCR Focus Archive
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Clinical Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Clinical Cancer Research
eISSN: 1557-3265
ISSN: 1078-0432

Advertisement