Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
    • CME
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
    • CME
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Cancer Therapy: Clinical

CD8+ Enriched “Young” Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes Can Mediate Regression of Metastatic Melanoma

Mark E. Dudley, Colin A. Gross, Michelle M. Langhan, Marcos R. Garcia, Richard M. Sherry, James C. Yang, Giao Q. Phan, Udai S. Kammula, Marybeth S. Hughes, Deborah E. Citrin, Nicholas P. Restifo, John R. Wunderlich, Peter A. Prieto, Jenny J. Hong, Russell C. Langan, Daniel A. Zlott, Kathleen E. Morton, Donald E. White, Carolyn M. Laurencot and Steven A. Rosenberg
Mark E. Dudley
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Colin A. Gross
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michelle M. Langhan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marcos R. Garcia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard M. Sherry
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James C. Yang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Giao Q. Phan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Udai S. Kammula
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marybeth S. Hughes
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Deborah E. Citrin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicholas P. Restifo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John R. Wunderlich
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter A. Prieto
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jenny J. Hong
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Russell C. Langan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel A. Zlott
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kathleen E. Morton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Donald E. White
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carolyn M. Laurencot
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven A. Rosenberg
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1297 Published December 2010
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Purpose: Tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) and interleukin (IL)-2 administered following lymphodepletion can cause the durable complete regression of bulky metastatic melanoma in patients refractory to approved treatments. However, the generation of a unique tumor-reactive TIL culture for each patient may be prohibitively difficult. We therefore investigated the clinical and immunologic impact of unscreened, CD8+ enriched “young” TIL.

Experimental Design: Methods were developed for generating TIL that minimized the time in culture and eliminated the individualized tumor-reactivity screening step. Thirty-three patients were treated with these CD8+ enriched young TIL and IL-2 following nonmyeloablative lymphodepletion (NMA). Twenty-three additional patients were treated with CD8+ enriched young TIL and IL-2 after lymphodepletion with NMA and 6 Gy of total body irradiation.

Results: Young TIL cultures for therapy were successfully established from 83% of 122 consecutive melanoma patients. Nineteen of 33 patients (58%) treated with CD8+ enriched young TIL and NMA had an objective response (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) including 3 complete responders. Eleven of 23 patients (48%) treated with TIL and 6 Gy total body irradiation had an objective response including 2 complete responders. At 1 month after TIL infusion the absolute CD8+ cell numbers in the periphery were highly correlated with response.

Conclusions: This study shows that a rapid and simplified method can be used to reliably generate CD8+ enriched young TIL for administration as an individualized therapy for advanced melanoma, and may allow this potentially effective treatment to be applied at other institutions and to reach additional patients. Clin Cancer Res; 16(24); 6122–31. ©2010 AACR.

This article is featured in Highlights of This Issue, p. 5915

Translational Relevance

Cell-based immunotherapy using autologous, tumorreactive lymphocytes can mediate the regression of bulky, established cancer in animal models and human patients. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) selected for tumor recognition and highly expanded in vitro have been especially effective for treating melanoma patients, but there are logistic and technical difficulties associated with generating an individualized tumor-reactive therapy for each patient. In this report we use simple, reliable methods of generating individual, autologous TIL products and test them for the first time in a 2-arm, phase II clinical trial. Our results support a wider application of individualized cell therapies based on TIL and define correlates of clinical treatment and response for improvement of future therapies.

Patients with metastatic melanoma have limited treatment options, and only 2 of these treatments have received Food and Drug Administration approval. Interleukin (IL)-2 can mediate durable complete responses in 3% to 5% of treated patients, with an overall response rate of about 13% to 16% (1); decarbazine results in a 15% response rate with rare durable responses (2). Other promising experimental treatments being evaluated in randomized trials for efficacy and toxicity include inhibitors of the dominant BRAFV600E mutation (3) and an anti-CTLA-4 antibody (4, 5). Despite these recent advances, a pressing need remains for effective treatments.

Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) combines lymphodepletion with a patient's own tumor reactive tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) to generate an individualized therapy (6). A total of 93 refractory melanoma patients were treated at our institution with TIL selected for tumor recognition following 1 of 3 different lymphodepleting regimens (7). Forty-three patients received nonmyeloablative chemotherapy (NMA) alone, 25 patients received NMA with 2 Gy of total body irradiation (TBI), and 25 patients received NMA plus 12 Gy TBI. The objective response rates [Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)] for these sequential trials were 48%, 52%, and 72%, respectively, including 15 patients who had complete responses, all but 1 of which are ongoing at 31 to 89 months. Despite these promising clinical results, the extensive effort, cost, and time required to generate the individual TIL cultures limited the application of this promising therapy to only a few institutions.

Tumor‐reactive TIL used in prior studies required an extended duration of multiple microcultures and an individualized assay to identify tumor recognition. Analysis of demographic and biological factors that correlated with TIL function indicated that the size of the lesion and the degree of lymphocyte infiltration impacted TIL generation (8). However, many patients underwent procurement of metastatic tissue for TIL generation but were not ultimately eligible for treatment because their TIL failed the test for tumor recognition, or rapid disease progression occurred during TIL establishment (8). Thus, the complex TIL production process was a substantial limitation to patient therapy. We have now simplified and standardized the TIL production process by generating “young” TIL for therapy (9). These minimally manipulated young TIL cultures consisted of bulk lymphocytes rather than microcultures, and the batch-specific assay for tumor recognition was eliminated. Young TIL have attributes associated with improved persistence and response in vivo including long telomeres and high expression of CD27 and CD28 (10–13). In a small clinical trial, young TIL were shown to be capable of mediating objective clinical responses in some patients (14, 15). We have now developed a simplified procedure to enrich for tumor‐reactive CD8+ cells, eliminate nonspecific CD4+ T cells, and deplete T regulatory cells (16).

We report here the first clinical trial with CD8+ enriched young TIL administered to patients following lymphodepletion. CD8+ enriched young TIL were effective for the treatment of some patients with metastatic melanoma. The simplified methods of TIL production allowed rapid accrual to this clinical trial using methods more easily adaptable to laboratories in multiple centers. Here we analyze the clinical and immunologic features of this individualized patient therapy.

Methods

Patients, clinical samples, and trial design

Patients eligible for this study were aged 18 years or older with measurable metastatic melanoma had at least 1 lesion resectable for TIL; had good clinical performance, adequate liver and kidney function tests, and blood counts near the normal range; were free from active systemic infections, coagulation disorders, cardiovascular disease, or immunodeficiency; were negative for HIV antibody and hepatitis B and C; and had a life expectancy of more than 3 months. All patients signed an informed consent approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Cancer Institute.

One group of 33 patients received NMA consisting of 60 mg/kg/day cyclophosphamide for 2 days followed by 5 days of 25 mg/m2/day fludarabine. A second cohort of 23 patients received 2 days of 60 mg/kg of cyclophosphamide overlapping the first 2 of 5 days of 25 mg/m2/day fludarabine. On the final day of fludarabine, patients received 2 fractions of 2‐Gy TBI separated by at least 6 hours, and the following day they received 1 fraction of 2‐Gy TBI. On the day following chemotherapy or radiation all patients received a bolus intravenous infusion of CD8+ enriched young TIL and started high-dose IL-2 therapy (720,000 IU/kg intravenously every 8 hours to tolerance). One day after TIL infusion, patients who received 6‐Gy TBI received a minimum of 2 × 106/kg autologous purified (Miltenyi) CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells from a granulocyte colony-stimulating factor ± plerixafor mobilized pheresis.

Patients received trimethoprim, sulfamethoxazole, and fungal prophylaxis following therapy; herpes virus seropositive patients also received valacyclovir. Platelets and packed red blood cells were administered as needed during hematopoietic recovery, and empiric antibiotics were initiated for neutropenic fevers (38.3°C once or for 2 temperatures of 38.0°C at least 1 hour apart and absolute neutrophil count < 500). Patient response was assessed using standard radiographic studies and physical examination at approximately 4 weeks following TIL administration and at regular intervals thereafter. The RECIST guidelines were followed and patients were categorized into complete, partial, or nonresponding categories. Complete blood counts (CBC) were obtained at least once per day while patients were in the hospital and differential counts were obtained when CBC was over 200 cells/μL.

Generation and characterization of CD8+ enriched young TIL

Patients with metastatic melanoma underwent biopsy and as much of the sample as possible was processed to a single cell suspension for generation of young TIL as previously described (9, 17) and detailed in Supplementary Methods. The single cell suspension was evaluated on a hemacytometer with lymphocytes and tumor cells determined on the basis of size and morphology and viability determined by Trypan blue staining. After minimum time in culture, successfully initiated “bulk” young TIL were CD8+ enriched (Miltenyi CliniMACS; ref. 16) and rapidly expanded to clinical cell numbers (18, 19). Aliquots of infused samples were evaluated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis and cytokine release assays to determine lymphocyte phenotype and antigen specificity respectively using standard techniques (18).

Statistical analysis

Standard statistical methods are cited in the text, and all P values are 2-tailed assuming unequal variance with P < 0.05 considered significant.

Results

CD8+ enriched young TIL mediated antitumor responses

The safety and efficacy of therapy using CD8+ enriched young TIL following lymphodepletion was investigated in 2 cohorts of patients with metastatic melanoma. Thirty-three patients received CD8+ enriched TIL with NMA, and 23 patients received CD8+ enriched young TIL following NMA plus 6 Gy of TBI. The demographic characteristics of these patients and the treatments administered are shown in Table 1. Sixty-four percent of patients had received prior IL-2. Median follow-up as of April 1, 2010 in the NMA and 6‐Gy TBI cohorts was 14 months and 7 months, respectively.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Demographics of patients and characteristics of treatments administered

Nineteen of the 33 patients (58%) in the NMA cohort exhibited an objective tumor regression by RECIST criteria, including 16 partial responders (48%) and 3 complete responders (9%). Eleven of 23 patients (48%) in the 6‐Gy TBI cohort achieved an objective response, including 2 complete responders (9%). Illustrative examples of clinical tumor regression are shown in Figure 1. Fifteen of 24 patients with M1a or M1b melanoma and 15 of 32 patients with M1c disease responded to therapy. As reported previously (7, 18), all patients experienced transient hematologic toxicities from the lymphodepleting conditioning and received platelet and red blood cell transfusions as medically indicated. Patients were also treated for symptoms associated with high‐dose IL-2 therapy. All toxicities typically returned to baseline within a few days. All nonhematologic grade 3 and 4 toxicities not attributable to IL-2 are listed in Table 2. There were no grade 3 or 4 toxicities directly attributable to the infused cells. There were 2 treatment-related mortalities, 1 in each cohort, that resulted from acute sepsis during the neutropenic period associated with lymphodepletion about 5 days after TIL infusion.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

CD8+ enriched young TIL caused regression of bulky melanoma lesions at multiple sites. A, computed tomography (CT) scans of metastatic melanoma lesions (arrows) before CD8+ enriched young TIL therapy in the sacrum and ilium (top left), lung (middle left), and spleen (lower left). All lesions showed regression at 2 months (right) with visible signs of recalcification of prior metastatic sites in the sacrum and ilium. B, subcutaneous melanoma around the ear and in the auditory canal caused complete hearing loss (left); 11 days after CD8+ enriched young TIL infusion, gross necrosis of the melanoma was visible (middle); at 76 days after treatment the patient experienced a partial response at all sites including liver and subcutaneous lesions (right). Tumor was absent from the auditory canal and the patient's hearing returned to normal. C, CT scans show mediastinal, lung, nodal, and subcutaneous metastatic deposits before (left) and 1 month after (right) treatment with CD8+ enriched young TIL, demonstrating the rapid initial pace of tumor regression in a patient who eventually achieved a complete response.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Responses and toxicities to CD8+ enriched young TIL therapya

Generation of young TIL for treatment was reliable and rapid

During the period of this study (August 2008 through September 2009), 176 tumors from 122 patients were processed to establish young TIL cultures. TIL were successfully grown (>50 × 106 cells within 5 weeks) from 124 of the 176 lesions (70%), comprising 101 of the 122 patients (83%). A striking correlation was observed between the success of establishing TIL and the initial proportion of lymphocytes in the single cell suspension (Fig. 2A). Tumors that successfully yielded TIL had an initial median of 52% lymphocytes whereas tumors that failed to grow TIL cultures in vitro had a median of 8% lymphocytes (P = 5 × 10−8). Among these 122 patients, 53 were treated (3 additional patients received cryopreserved TIL from prior resections), 21 had samples that failed to grow TIL cultures, 20 developed rapidly progressive disease that prevented treatment, 13 were resected free of evaluable disease (although 9 patients recurred and received TIL treatment subsequently), 9 received other treatments including 1 complete responder to high dose IL-2 therapy, and 6 experienced individual laboratory or clinical issues, including 1 patient whose CD8+ TIL failed to expand during the rapid expansion protocol.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Process improvements for the young TIL protocol resulted in predictable, simpler TIL generation. A, the percentage of lymphocytes in the initial single cell suspension correlated with TIL growth. Specimens from 122 sequential patients who were eligible for TIL therapy were processed to single cell suspensions. The fraction of lymphocytes among viable cells was determined by morphologic criteria after Trypan blue staining. The samples were plotted on the basis of whether sufficient TIL grew to use for treatment (>5 × 107 cells in 28 days, R x TIL) or whether growth was insufficient for treatment (No growth). Black bars indicate median values of the populations. B, process improvements in TIL generation led to significantly younger cells administered to patients. Prior protocols required all TIL to undergo individualized testing for tumor reactivity (specific TIL, n = 92). TIL from nonresponding patients (n = 40, NR) spent significantly longer time in culture prior to administration than TIL from objective responders (n = 52, OR). There was no difference (NS) between the time spent in culture of CD8+ enriched young TIL (young TIL) administered to nonresponding patients (n = 26) or responders (n = 30). Standard error bars are shown.

The CD8+ enrichment was highly effective for reducing the fraction of CD4+ cells in the infused TIL (Table 1 and Supplementary Table S1). The CD4 cell component comprised an average of 22% of the cells in bulk young TIL prior to CD8 enrichment, and natural killer cells comprised 21% (Supplementary Table S1). TIL from prior protocols administered without CD8 enrichment after NMA conditioning also contained about 21% CD4+ cells. Following CD8+ enrichment and expansion, CD4+ cells were reduced to an average of 2% of the infused young TIL.

The age of TIL was compared for patients who received CD8+ enriched TIL and patients on prior TIL protocols at our institution (Fig. 2B). Microculture generated, tumor-selected TIL administered to responding patients were significantly younger than TIL given to patients who did not respond. In the cohorts treated in this report, there was no difference between the age of CD8+ enriched young TIL cultures for responding and nonresponding patients but these cultures were significantly younger than TIL cultures administered on prior protocols (P = 3 × 10−7).

CD8+ enriched young TIL frequently exhibited tumor recognition

We retrospectively evaluated the ability of the administered CD8+ enriched TIL to recognize tumor and looked for any correlation with clinical efficacy. Recognition of autologous or HLA-matched tumor was evaluated by cytokine release assay (Fig. 3). Twenty-three of the 33 NMA patients had autologous tumor available (18 with cryopreserved tumor digest and 5 with a tumor cell line). Eight of 10 nonresponding patients and 8 of 13 objective responders demonstrated autologous tumor recognition. Four additional objective responding patients recognized HLA-A–matched tumor cell lines. Nineteen of 23 patients treated with 6‐Gy TBI had autologous tumor available (15 with fresh frozen tumor and 4 with a cell line). Eight of 11 nonresponding patients and 5 of 8 responding patients demonstrated specific tumor recognition. In addition, 3 patients' TIL recognized HLA-matched tumor cell lines, including 1 nonresponding patient (patient SA, Fig. 6B), whose TIL failed to recognize autologous tumor. In total, 29 of 42 evaluable CD8+ enriched young TIL samples (69%) demonstrated specific autologous tumor recognition and 36 of 56 (64%) patients demonstrated specific recognition in all. Strikingly, 11 of 30 objective responses were mediated by CD8+ enriched young TIL with no evidence of specific tumor recognition as defined in prior TIL clinical protocols.

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

CD8+ enriched young TIL administered to patients were highly tumor reactive. TIL from cryopreserved aliquots of each infused treatment were thawed and rested overnight in IL-2, then washed and incubated at a 1:1 ratio with autologous, HLA-matched, or HLA-mismatched tumors. IFN-γ secreted in the coculture supernatant was quantified by ELISA. The data from each separate coculture assay were aggregated and plotted. Patients with specific tumor recognition (greater than 200 pg/mL IFN-γ and 2 × HLA-mismatched tumor) are boxed. Off scale > 5,000 pg/mL. A, CD8+ enriched young TIL administered to patients after NMA conditioning. B, CD8+ enriched young TIL administered to patients after 6‐Gy TBI conditioning.

CD8+ enriched young TIL influenced lymphocyte reconstitution of the host

The average absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) for all patients who received CD8+ enriched young TIL after NMA or 6‐Gy TBI lymphodepletion is plotted in Figs. 4A and B, respectively. For comparison, lymphocyte reconstitution from patients who received antigen‐selected TIL derived from microculture expansions after NMA or 12‐Gy TBI (7) lymphodepletion are also shown. Interestingly, patients who received CD8+ enriched young TIL demonstrated higher peak ALCs suggesting that CD8+ enriched young TIL have increased capacity for in vivo expansion compared with selected TIL.

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

CD8+ enriched young TIL impacted lymphocyte reconstitution in the peripheral blood of reconstituting patients. A, CD8+ enriched young TIL quickly repopulated patient peripheral blood to high levels after NMA conditioning. Patient ALCs were determined daily and average ALC is plotted. Arrows, IL-2 therapy. Filled square, average of all patients who received CD8+ enriched young TIL with NMA (n = 33). Open square, (historic control) average of all patients who received extensively expanded, tumor selected TIL with NMA as their first treatment (n = 33). Not all patients had ALC determined every day. B, CD8+ enriched young TIL quickly repopulated patient peripheral blood to high levels after 6‐Gy TBI conditioning. Arrows, IL-2 therapy; Filled triangles, average of all patients who received CD8+ enriched young TIL with 6‐Gy TBI (n = 23). Open triangles, (historic control) average of all patients who received extensively expanded, tumor selected TIL with 12‐Gy TBI (n = 25). Vertical bars, standard error. C and D, CD8+ ALC 1 month after TIL infusion correlated with response. CD4+ and CD8+ ALC was determined in a blinded manner by the Clinical Center Core Immunology Laboratory for 47 of 56 patients treated with CD8+ enriched young TIL at approximately 1 month after TIL infusion. C, CD8+ ALC plotted for each patient. D, CD4+ ALC plotted for each patient. NR, nonresponder; OR, objective responder. Black bars, mean ALC for the population.

Peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) from 47 of the 56 patients who received CD8+ enriched young TIL were sampled at approximately 1 month after cell infusion. ALC and absolute CD3+CD8+ and CD3+CD4+ cell numbers were assessed by FACS analysis in a blinded manner. The treatment resulted in low CD4+ counts at 1 month in most patients (average: 109 CD4+ cells/μL), with no difference between responding and nonresponding patients (P = 0.5; Fig. 4D). Patients in prior clinical trials who received TIL that contained CD4+ lymphocytes had higher peripheral CD4+ cell counts at 1 month after TIL infusion (average: 187 cells/μL). In contrast to CD4+ cells, CD8+ ALC for most patients treated with CD8+ enriched young TIL was in the normal range at 1 month, and there was a significant increase in CD8+ ALC in responding patient compared with nonresponders (P = 0.002; Fig. 4C). Patients who responded had CD8+ ALC about 2-fold higher than nonresponders (1,504 versus 696 cells/μL). In prior clinical trials the average CD8+ cell count was 652 CD8+ cells/μL at 1 month after TIL infusion. Infused TIL were examined by FACS for expression of additional markers including CD27, CD28, CD62L, and CCR7, but none correlated with clinical response.

Discussion

Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) can mediate durable objective regression (including durable complete responses) in patients with metastatic melanoma refractory to other treatments. The complexity of preparation of cell products unique for each patient has limited the widespread use of this method. In this study we developed a simplified method for cell preparation that may allow wider application of this effective treatment.

Previously, 93 patients were treated over 84 months using highly expanded TIL selected for specific tumor recognition (7). This corresponds to about 1 treatment per month and about 27% of resected patients who finally received a TIL product (8). In the current report 56 additional patients were treated with CD8+ enriched young TIL over 14 months, corresponding to about 3 to 4 patients treated per month, with 53% of eligible patients who underwent resection able to receive TIL therapy. With both methods, clinical response rates were about 55%, but strikingly 11 of 30 objective responders in this study had TIL that would have been ineligible for the prior study. Although comparisons of sequential clinical trials should be made with caution, the changes in the CD8+ enriched young TIL methods were apparently effective for improving delivery of individualized TIL therapy to eligible patients without compromising therapeutic efficacy.

Prior clinical trials with TIL in our institution (7) and preclinical mouse models (20–22) suggested that increased lymphodepletion improves ACT. This study comparing 2 cohorts of patients treated with different conditioning regimens found similar objective response rates and toxicity profiles. This outcome could result from relatively small patient numbers, sequential cohort enrollment, and short follow-up. Alternately, 6 Gy of TBI delivered in fractionated doses may only minimally impact host mechanisms that support the transferred CD8+ cells compared with 12 Gy of TBI (23).

Despite methodologic improvements, 21 of the 123 patients (17%) had TIL that failed to grow in culture. On average, these melanoma lesions started with a median of only 8% lymphocytes (Fig. 2A). In the future, changing the lymphocyte/tumor ratio in vitro could improve the generation of TIL for some tumors. Additionally, some studies have noted a correlation between good prognosis and T-cell infiltration for nonmelanoma cancers including colon cancer (24), breast cancer (25), ovarian cancer (26), and non–small cell lung cancer (27), suggesting that CD8+ enriched young TIL from metastatic lesions from nonmelanoma histologies may be therapeutically active in ACT treatments.

The enrichment of CD8+ cells prior to rapid expansion has practical benefits for TIL generation (16) but the enrichment process is expensive, and depletion of CD4+ cells raises questions about lymphocyte persistence, tumor regression, and treatment toxicity. CD4+ T helper cells are involved in generating and maintaining CD8+ T memory cells in mice (28, 29) and a CD4+ clone was associated with melanoma regression in a patient (30). However, CD4+ T regulatory cells may block CD8+ cell function in tumor immunity (20, 31). The impact of CD4+ cells on the persistence and function of CD8 TIL in vivo is not known. In this study, the CD8+ enriched young TIL repopulated peripheral blood and persisted at high levels for over a month. Furthermore, the objective response rate of 54% reported here is comparable to the 56% objective response rate observed in prior trials with CD4+ replete TIL. These data suggest that elimination of the CD4+ cells was beneficial to the therapy. More study is needed to understand the role of CD4+, CD25+ and FoxP3+ cells in the regulation of TIL responses after infusion and CD4+ T helper cells in the duration of responses. To directly address the impact of CD4+ cells in young TIL therapy, we have initiated a randomized clinical trial where one arm receives unselected young TIL that contain both CD4+ and CD8+ cells, whereas a second arm receives CD8+ enriched young TIL.

This study presents data from 2 cohorts of patients treated with autologous TIL following lymphodepletion for metastatic melanoma. The production process for CD8+ young TIL was relatively rapid and reliable, and the manufactured product was capable of generating tumor regression and objective responses in patients. The minimally manipulated CD8+ cell product had a high frequency of autologous tumor reactivity, and repopulated the host PBL compartment rapidly. Persistently high CD8+ cell numbers were correlated with tumor regression in treated patients. This method for the generation of CD8+ enriched young TIL represents a major simplification in the application of therapeutically effective TIL because of the ease of cell production (one culture versus many microcultures) and the elimination of testing for antitumor specificity. These simplifications can serve to extend the ability to apply this treatment approach to additional institutions.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Footnotes

  • Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Clinical Cancer Research Online (http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/).

  • Received May 13, 2010.
  • Revision received July 1, 2010.
  • Accepted July 10, 2010.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Smith FO,
    2. Downey SG,
    3. Klapper JA,
    4. Yang JC,
    5. Sherry RM,
    6. Royal RE,
    7. et al.
    Treatment of metastatic melanoma using interleukin-2 alone or in conjunction with vaccines. Clin Cancer Res 2008;14(17):5610–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Tawbi HA,
    2. Kirkwood JM
    . Management of metastatic melanoma. Semin Oncol 2007;34:532–45.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Poulikakos PI,
    2. Zhang C,
    3. Bollag G,
    4. Shokat KM,
    5. Rosen N
    . RAF inhibitors transactivate RAF dimers and ERK signalling in cells with wild-type BRAF. Nature 2010;464:427–30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Phan GQ,
    2. Yang JC,
    3. Sherry RM,
    4. Hwu P,
    5. Topalian SL,
    6. Schwartzentruber DJ,
    7. et al.
    Cancer regression and autoimmunity induced by cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 blockade in patients with metastatic melanoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100:8372–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Hodi FS,
    2. O'Day SJ,
    3. McDermott DF,
    4. Weber RW,
    5. Sosman JA,
    6. Haanen JB,
    7. et al.
    Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med 2010;363:711–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Rosenberg SA,
    2. Restifo NP,
    3. Yang JC,
    4. Morgan RA,
    5. Dudley ME
    . Adoptive cell transfer: a clinical path to effective cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer 2008;8:299–308.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Dudley ME,
    2. Yang JC,
    3. Sherry R,
    4. Hughes MS,
    5. Royal R,
    6. Kammula U,
    7. et al.
    Adoptive cell therapy for patients with metastatic melanoma: evaluation of intensive myeloablative chemoradiation preparative regimens. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:5233–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Goff SL,
    2. Smith FO,
    3. Klapper JA,
    4. Yang JC,
    5. Sherry R,
    6. Wunderlich JR,
    7. et al.
    Tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapy for metastatic melanoma: analysis of tumors resected for TIL. J Immunother 2010;33:840–7.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    1. Tran KQ,
    2. Zhou J,
    3. Durflinger KH,
    4. Langhan MM,
    5. Shelton TE,
    6. Wunderlich JR,
    7. et al.
    Minimally cultured tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes display optimal characteristics for adoptive cell therapy. J Immunother 2008;31:742–51.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Zhou J,
    2. Shen X,
    3. Huang J,
    4. Hodes RJ,
    5. Rosenberg SA,
    6. Robbins PF
    . Telomere length of transferred lymphocytes correlates with in vivo persistence and tumor regression in melanoma patients receiving cell transfer therapy. J Immunol 2005;175:7046–52.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Huang J,
    2. Khong HT,
    3. Dudley ME,
    4. el Gamil M,
    5. Li YF,
    6. Rosenberg SA,
    7. et al.
    Survival, persistence, and progressive differentiation of adoptively transferred tumor-reactive T cells associated with tumor regression. J Immunother 2005;28:258–67.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Huang J,
    2. Kerstann KW,
    3. Ahmadzadeh M,
    4. Li YF,
    5. el Gamil M,
    6. Rosenberg SA,
    7. et al.
    Modulation by IL-2 of CD70 and CD27 expression on CD8+ T cells: importance for the therapeutic effectiveness of cell transfer immunotherapy. J Immunol 2006;176:7726–35.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Zhou J,
    2. Dudley ME,
    3. Rosenberg SA,
    4. Robbins PF
    . Persistence of multiple tumor-specific T-cell clones is associated with complete tumor regression in a melanoma patient receiving adoptive cell transfer therapy. J Immunother 2005;28:53–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Besser MJ,
    2. Shapira-Frommer R,
    3. Treves AJ,
    4. Zippel D,
    5. Itzhaki O,
    6. Schallmach E,
    7. et al.
    Minimally cultured or selected autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes after a lympho-depleting chemotherapy regimen in metastatic melanoma patients. J Immunother 2009;32:415–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Besser MJ,
    2. Shapira-Frommer R,
    3. Treves AJ,
    4. Zippel D,
    5. Itzhaki O,
    6. Hershkovitz L,
    7. et al.
    Clinical responses in a phase II study using adoptive transfer of short-term cultured tumor infiltration lymphocytes in metastatic melanoma patients. Clin Cancer Res 2010;16:2646–55.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Prieto PA,
    2. Durflinger KH,
    3. Wunderlich JR,
    4. Rosenberg SA,
    5. Dudley ME
    . Enrichment of CD8 +cells from melanoma tumor infiltrating lymphocyte cultures reveals tumor reactivity for use in adoptive cell therapy. J Immunother 2010;33:547–56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Dudley ME,
    2. Wunderlich JR,
    3. Shelton TE,
    4. Even J,
    5. Rosenberg SA
    . Generation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte cultures for use in adoptive transfer therapy for melanoma patients. J Immunother 2003;26:332–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Dudley ME,
    2. Wunderlich JR,
    3. Yang JC,
    4. Sherry RM,
    5. Topalian SL,
    6. Restifo NP,
    7. et al.
    Adoptive cell transfer therapy following non-myeloablative but lymphodepleting chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with refractory metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:2346–57.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Riddell SR,
    2. Greenberg PD
    . The use of anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 monoclonal antibodies to clone and expand human antigen-specific T cells. J Immunol Methods 1990;128:189–201.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Antony PA,
    2. Piccirillo CA,
    3. Akpinarli A,
    4. Finkelstein SE,
    5. Speiss PJ,
    6. Surman DR,
    7. et al.
    CD8+ T cell immunity against a tumor/self-antigen is augmented by CD4+ T helper cells and hindered by naturally occurring T regulatory cells. J Immunol 2005;174:2591–601.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Gattinoni L,
    2. Finkelstein SE,
    3. Klebanoff CA,
    4. Antony PA,
    5. Palmer DC,
    6. Spiess PJ,
    7. et al.
    Removal of homeostatic cytokine sinks by lymphodepletion enhances the efficacy of adoptively transferred tumor-specific CD8+ T cells. J Exp Med 2005;202:907–12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Paulos CM,
    2. Wrzesinski C,
    3. Kaiser A,
    4. Hinrichs CS,
    5. Chieppa M,
    6. Cassard L,
    7. et al.
    Microbial translocation augments the function of adoptively transferred self/tumor-specific CD8+ T cells via TLR4 signaling. J Clin Invest 2007;117:2197–204.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Wrzesinski C,
    2. Paulos CM,
    3. Kaiser A,
    4. Muranski P,
    5. Palmer DC,
    6. Gattinoni L,
    7. et al.
    Increased intensity lymphodepletion enhances tumor treatment efficacy of adoptively transferred tumor-specific T cells. J Immunother 2010;33:1–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Pages F,
    2. Berger A,
    3. Camus M,
    4. Sanchez-Cabo F,
    5. Costes A,
    6. Molidor R,
    7. et al.
    Effector memory T cells, early metastasis, and survival in colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2005;353:2654–66.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Denkert C,
    2. Loibl S,
    3. Noske A,
    4. Roller M,
    5. Muller BM,
    6. Komor M,
    7. et al.
    Tumor-associated lymphocytes as an independent predictor of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:105–13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Zhang L,
    2. Conejo-Garcia JR,
    3. Katsaros D,
    4. Gimotty PA,
    5. Massobrio M,
    6. Regnani G,
    7. et al.
    Intratumoral T cells, recurrence, and survival in epithelial ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 2003;348:203–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Kawai O,
    2. Ishii G,
    3. Kubota K,
    4. Murata Y,
    5. Naito Y,
    6. Mizuno T,
    7. et al.
    Predominant infiltration of macrophages and CD8(+) T Cells in cancer nests is a significant predictor of survival in stage IV nonsmall cell lung cancer. Cancer 2008;113:1387–95.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Shedlock DJ,
    2. Shen H
    . Requirement for CD4 T cell help in generating functional CD8 T cell memory. Science 2003;300(5617):337–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Sun JC,
    2. Bevan MJ
    . Defective CD8 T cell memory following acute infection without CD4 T cell help. Science 2003;300:339–42.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Hunder NN,
    2. Wallen H,
    3. Cao J,
    4. Hendricks DW,
    5. Reilly JZ,
    6. Rodmyre R,
    7. et al.
    Treatment of metastatic melanoma with autologous CD4+ T cells against NY-ESO-1. N Engl J Med 2008;358:2698–703.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Shimizu J,
    2. Yamazaki S,
    3. Sakaguchi S
    . Induction of tumor immunity by removing CD25+CD4+ T cells: a common basis between tumor immunity and autoimmunity. J Immunol 1999;163:5211–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Clinical Cancer Research: 16 (24)
December 2010
Volume 16, Issue 24
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Clinical Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
CD8+ Enriched “Young” Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes Can Mediate Regression of Metastatic Melanoma
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Clinical Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
CD8+ Enriched “Young” Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes Can Mediate Regression of Metastatic Melanoma
Mark E. Dudley, Colin A. Gross, Michelle M. Langhan, Marcos R. Garcia, Richard M. Sherry, James C. Yang, Giao Q. Phan, Udai S. Kammula, Marybeth S. Hughes, Deborah E. Citrin, Nicholas P. Restifo, John R. Wunderlich, Peter A. Prieto, Jenny J. Hong, Russell C. Langan, Daniel A. Zlott, Kathleen E. Morton, Donald E. White, Carolyn M. Laurencot and Steven A. Rosenberg
Clin Cancer Res December 15 2010 (16) (24) 6122-6131; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1297

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
CD8+ Enriched “Young” Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes Can Mediate Regression of Metastatic Melanoma
Mark E. Dudley, Colin A. Gross, Michelle M. Langhan, Marcos R. Garcia, Richard M. Sherry, James C. Yang, Giao Q. Phan, Udai S. Kammula, Marybeth S. Hughes, Deborah E. Citrin, Nicholas P. Restifo, John R. Wunderlich, Peter A. Prieto, Jenny J. Hong, Russell C. Langan, Daniel A. Zlott, Kathleen E. Morton, Donald E. White, Carolyn M. Laurencot and Steven A. Rosenberg
Clin Cancer Res December 15 2010 (16) (24) 6122-6131; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1297
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Biomarker Analysis from the BERIL-1 Study
  • Radiation and TGFβ Blockade in Metastatic Breast Cancer
  • Novel Intermediate Endpoint in Immunotherapy Studies
Show more Cancer Therapy: Clinical
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • CCR Focus Archive
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Clinical Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Clinical Cancer Research
eISSN: 1557-3265
ISSN: 1078-0432

Advertisement