Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Human Cancer Biology

Heterogeneity for Stem Cell–Related Markers According to Tumor Subtype and Histologic Stage in Breast Cancer

So Yeon Park, Hee Eun Lee, Hailun Li, Michail Shipitsin, Rebecca Gelman and Kornelia Polyak
So Yeon Park
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hee Eun Lee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hailun Li
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michail Shipitsin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rebecca Gelman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kornelia Polyak
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1532 Published February 2010
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Immunohistochemical analyses of CD44, CD24, and ALDH1 in breast cancer. A, immunohistochemical staining patterns in normal breast tissue. CD24 and CD44 displayed uniform luminal and basal cell-specific pattern, respectively, whereas ALDH1 expression varied depending on the area of the tissue. B, representative examples of immunohistochemical analyses of IDC and DCIS according to tumor subtype using the indicated antibodies. In luminal A subtype, tumor cells positive for CD44 and CD24 (apical membranous pattern) can be seen whereas ALDH1 was not detected. HER2+ tumor is negative for CD44, and is positive for CD24 (membrano-cytoplasmic pattern) and ALDH1. In basal-like subtype, tumor cells are positive for CD44 and ALDH1, but negative for CD24. C, representative examples of double IHC for CD44 (brown) and CD24 (red) in IDC and in DCIS.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Immunohistochemical analyses of genes differentially expressed between CD44+ and CD24+ breast cancer cells. A, representative examples of immunohistochemical staining patterns observed in invasive breast tumors using antibodies against the indicated proteins. A subset of markers that were highly expressed in CD44+ compared with CD24+ breast cancer cells based on our prior study are expressed only in basal-like tumors (vimentin, osteonectin, and caveolin 1), whereas Connexin 43 is expressed both in luminal A and basal-like subtypes. Markers more abundantly expressed in CD24+ compared with CD44+ breast cancer cells (Keratin 18, MUC1, and GATA3) are expressed in luminal A tumors. B, representative examples of immunohistochemical staining patterns observed in DCIS using antibodies against the indicated proteins. Vimentin is expressed in basal-like but not in luminal A DCIS. Strong vimentin staining is detected in stromal cells in both tumor subtypes. In contrast, GATA3 is expressed in luminal A but not in basal-like DCIS. C, immunohistochemical analyses of the expression of markers between invasive (red asterisk) and in situ (black asterisk) components of the same tumor. CD44 is expressed in both invasive and in situ components of luminal A subtype. HER2+ tumors are negative for CD44; only stromal staining is detected. In basal-like IDC, keratin 18 is expressed only in the in situ component whereas vimentin is expressed in both invasive and in situ areas.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
  • Table 1.

    Distributions of the tumors in the four histologic groups

    SubtypeLuminal ALuminal BHER2+Basal-likeTotal
    IDC alone3575%12%511%613%47
    IDC with DCIS8563%1612%1813%1612%135
    DCIS with microinvasion1131%617%1440%411%35
    Pure DCIS4171%712%916%12%58
    Total17263%3011%4617%2710%275

    NOTE: Number of patients (and raw percentage) in each of the histologic groups who had each of these tumor subtypes.

  • Table 2.

    CD24 and CD44 expression pattern defined based on immunohistochemical analyses of adjacent sections for the two markers according to tumor subtype and histologic groups

    Histologic groupsPatternTumor subtypesTotal
    Luminal ALuminal BHER2+Basal-like
    P = 0.001P = NSP = NSP = NSP = 0.0001
    IDC alone* P = NSCD44 and CD247 (20)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)7 (15)
    CD44 only9 (26)1 (100)3 (60)5 (83)18 (38)
    CD24 only4 (11)0 (0)1 (20)0 (0)5 (11)
    Lack of both15 (43)0 (0)1 (20)1 (17)17 (36)
    Total35 (100)1 (100)5 (100)6 (100)47 (100)
    IDC with DCIS P = NSCD44 and CD2424 (28)3 (19)4 (22)2 (13)33 (24)
    CD44 only30 (35)6 (37)2 (11)10 (63)48 (36)
    CD24 only10 (12)4 (25)5 (28)0 (0)19 (14)
    Lack of both21 (25)3 (19)7 (39)4 (25)35 (26)
    Total85 (100)16 (100)18 (100)16 (100)135 (100)
    DCIS with microinvasion P = NSAACD44 and CD244 (36)3 (50)3 (21)0 (0)10 (29)
    CD44 only5 (46)2 (33)1 (7)4 (100)12 (34)
    CD24 only2 (18)1 (17)7 (50)0 (0)10 (29)
    Lack of both0 (0)0 (0)3 (21)0 (0)3 (9)
    Total11 (100)6 (100)14 (100)4 (100)35 (100)
    Pure DCIS† P = NSCD44 and CD2415 (37)3 (43)3 (33)1 (100)22 (38)
    CD44 only21 (51)3 (43)4 (44)0 (0)28 (48)
    CD24 only4 (10)1 (14)0 (0)0 (0)5 (9)
    Lack of both1 (2)0 (0)2 (22)0 (0)3 (5)
    Total41 (100)7 (100)9 (100)1 (100)58 (100)
    Total P = 0.0006CD44 and CD2450 (29)9 (30)10 (22)3 (11)72 (26)
    CD44 only65 (38)12 (40)10 (22)19 (70)106 (39)
    CD24 only20 (12)6 (20)13 (28)0 (0)39 (14)
    Lack of both37 (22)3 (10)13 (28)5 (19)58 (21)
    Total172 (100)30 (100)46 (100)27 (100)275 (100)

    NOTE: Numbers in parentheses indicate column percentage. P values were calculated using Fisher's exact tests.

    Abbreviations: NS, not significant (crude, unadjusted P > 0.05); NSAA, not significant after adjustment (using Holm's method).

    • ↵*Luminal B subtype was omitted when calculating the P values, except for Total.

    • ↵†Basal-like subtype was omitted when calculating the P values, except for Total.

  • Table 3.

    Presence of CD44+/CD24− and CD44−/CD24+ cells defined by double IHC according to tumor subtypes and histologic groups

    Cell stainingTumor subtypesTotal
    CD44+/CD24 CD24− cellsCD44−/CD24+ cellsLuminal ALuminal BHER2+Basal-likeP < 0.0001
    P = 0.0009P = NSP = NSP = NS
    IDC alone* P = NSPositivePositive1 (3)0 (0)0 (0)1 (17)2 (4)
    PositiveNegative19 (54)1 (100)3 (60)5 (83)28 (60)
    NegativePositive6 (17)0 (0)1 (20)0 (0)7 (15)
    NegativeNegative9 (26)0 (0)1 (20)0 (0)10 (21)
    Total35 (100)1 (100)5 (100)6 (100)47 (100)
    IDC with DCIS P < 0.0001PositivePositive10 (12)2 (13)2 (11)1 (6)15 (11)
    PositiveNegative43 (51)8 (50)5 (28)15 (94)71 (53)
    NegativePositive16 (19)6 (38)8 (44)0 (0)30 (22)
    NegativeNegative16 (19)0 (0)3 (17)0 (0)19 (14)
    Total85 (100)16 (100)18 (100)16 (100)135 (100)
    DCIS with microinvasion P = NSPositivePositive6 (55)3 (50)3 (21)1 (25)13 (37)
    PositiveNegative4 (36)2 (33)4 (29)3 (75)13 (37)
    NegativePositive1 (9)1 (17)7 (50)0 (0)9 (26)
    NegativeNegative0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
    Total11 (100)6 (100)14 (100)4 (100)35 (100)
    Pure DCIS† P = NSPositivePositive12 (29)2 (29)2 (22)0 (0)16 (28)
    PositiveNegative23 (56)3 (43)5 (56)1 (100)32 (55)
    NegativePositive4 (10)0 (0)1 (11)0 (0)5 (9)
    NegativeNegative2 (5)2 (29)1 (11)0 (0)5 (9)
    Total41 (100)7 (100)9 (100)1 (100)58 (100)
    Total P = 0.0006PositivePositive29 (17)7 (23)7 (15)3 (11)46 (17)
    PositiveNegative89 (52)14 (47)17 (37)24 (89)144 (52)
    NegativePositive27 (16)7 (23)17 (37)0 (0)51 (19)
    NegativeNegative27 (16)2 (7)5 (11)0 (0)34 (12)
    Total172 (100)30 (100)46 (100)27 (100)275 (100)

    NOTE: Numbers in parentheses indicate column percentage. P values were calculated using Fisher's exact tests.

    • ↵*Luminal B subtype was omitted when calculating the P values, except for Total.

    • ↵†Basal-like subtype was omitted when calculating the P values, except for Total.

  • Table 4.

    Comparison of the expression of 12 proteins between tumor subtypes in each of the four histologic groups

    IDCIDC aloneIDC with DCIS
    Luminal A (n = 35)Basal-like (n = 6)HER2+ (n = 5)PLuminal A (n = 85)Basal-like (n = 16)HER2+ (n = 18)Luminal B (n = 16)P
    CD44+ cell genesVimentin7 (20)6 (100)2 (40)0.000310 (12)13 (81)2 (11)1 (6)<0.0001
    Osteonectin0 (0)3 (50)1 (20)0.0016 (7)4 (25)0 (0)1 (6)NS
    Connexin 4316 (46)2 (33)1 (20)NS35 (41)7 (44)0 (0)1 (6)0.0001
    ALDH10 (0)2 (33)0 (0)NSAA1 (1)3 (19)4 (22)0 (0)0.001
    Caveolin11 (3)3 (50)0 (0)NSAA0 (0)2 (12)0 (0)0 (0)NSAA
    CD4416 (46)5 (83)3 (60)NS54 (64)12 (75)6 (33)9 (56)NS
    CD44 median14 (40)5 (83)2 (40)NS44 (52)11 (69)5 (28)6 (38)NS
    EPCR1 (3)0 (0)1 (20)NS2 (2)1 (6)0 (0)1 (6)NS
    CD24+ cell genesHigh pos CK1822 (63)0 (0)0 (0)0.000249 (58)1 (6)9 (50)6 (38)0.0008
    GATA329 (83)0 (0)1 (20)<0.000178 (92)1 (6)6 (33)11 (69)<0.0001
    GATA3 median21 (60)0 (0)1 (20)0.00456 (66)0 (0)1 (6)6 (38)<0.0001
    High pos MUC123 (66)0 (0)0 (0)0.000234 (40)2 (13)6 (33)7 (44)NS
    Claudin79 (26)2 (33)0 (0)NS28 (33)2 (13)5 (28)6 (38)NS
    CD2411 (31)0 (0)1 (20)NS34 (40)2 (13)9 (50)7 (44)NS
    DCISDCIS with microinvasionPure DCIS
    Luminal A (n = 11)Luminal B (n = 6)HER2+ (n = 14)Basal-like (n = 4)PLuminal A (n = 41)Luminal B (n = 7)HER2+ (n = 9)P
    CD44+ cell genesVimentin2 (18)2 (33)1 (7)3 (75)NSAA4 (10)1 (14)4 (44)NSAA
    Osteonectin0 (0)2 (33)1 (7)1 (25)NS1 (2)1 (14)0 (0)NS
    Connexin 431 (9)0 (0)0 (0)1 (25)NS21 (51)1 (14)0 (0)0.003
    ALDH10 (0)0 (0)1 (7)0 (0)NS0 (0)1 (14)1 (11)NS
    CD449 (82)5 (83)4 (29)4 (100)NSAA36 (88)6 (86)7 (78)NS
    CD44 median4 (36)4 (67)4 (29)3 (75)NS24 (59)3 (43)4 (44)NS
    EPCR4 (36)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)NSAA4 (10)0 (0)0 (0)NS
    CD24+ cell genesHigh pos CK184 (36)3 (50)11 (79)0 (0)NSAA32 (78)5 (71)4 (44)NS
    GATA39 (82)3 (50)5 (36)0 (0)NSAA38 (93)5 (71)0 (0)<0.0001
    GATA3 median6 (55)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0.000829 (71)3 (43)0 (0)0.0001
    High pos MUC17 (64)3 (50)5 (36)0 (0)NS24 (59)3 (43)4 (44)NS
    Claudin75 (45)1 (17)1 (7)1 (25)NS22 (54)0 (0)2 (22)NSAA
    CD246 (55)4 (67)10 (71)0 (0)NS19 (46)4 (57)3 (33)NS

    NOTE: Numbers in parentheses indicate percentage of patients who were coded as positive for the binary marker variables (column percentage). P values were calculated using Fisher's exact tests. Significance levels were adjusted using Holm's method. Luminal B subtype was omitted in IDC alone group because there was only one case in this group. Basal-like subtype was omitted in pure DCIS group because there was only one case in this group. All DCIS tumors were negative for Caveolin1.

    Abbreviation: High pos, higly positive.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplementary Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplementary Data
PreviousNext
Back to top
Clinical Cancer Research: 16 (3)
February 2010
Volume 16, Issue 3
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Clinical Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Heterogeneity for Stem Cell–Related Markers According to Tumor Subtype and Histologic Stage in Breast Cancer
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Clinical Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Heterogeneity for Stem Cell–Related Markers According to Tumor Subtype and Histologic Stage in Breast Cancer
So Yeon Park, Hee Eun Lee, Hailun Li, Michail Shipitsin, Rebecca Gelman and Kornelia Polyak
Clin Cancer Res February 1 2010 (16) (3) 876-887; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1532

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Heterogeneity for Stem Cell–Related Markers According to Tumor Subtype and Histologic Stage in Breast Cancer
So Yeon Park, Hee Eun Lee, Hailun Li, Michail Shipitsin, Rebecca Gelman and Kornelia Polyak
Clin Cancer Res February 1 2010 (16) (3) 876-887; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1532
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • MET in Papillary RCC
  • Identification of T-cell Antigens by Minigene Screening
  • Sirt7 Promotes Colorectal Cancer Tumorigenesis
Show more Human Cancer Biology
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • CCR Focus Archive
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Clinical Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Clinical Cancer Research
eISSN: 1557-3265
ISSN: 1078-0432

Advertisement