Advertisement
Molecular Pathways

Stem Cell Quiescence

Ling Li and Ravi Bhatia
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1499 Published August 2011

Abstract

Adult stem cells are maintained in a quiescent state but are able to exit quiescence and rapidly expand and differentiate in response to stress. The quiescent state appears to be necessary for preserving the self-renewal of stem cells and is a critical factor in the resistance of cancer stem cells (CSCs) to chemotherapy and targeted therapies. Limited knowledge about quiescence mechanisms has prevented significant advances in targeting of drug-resistant quiescent CSCs populations in the clinic. Thus, an improved understanding of the molecular mechanisms of quiescence in adult stem cells is critical for the development of molecularly targeted therapies against quiescent CSCs in different cancers. Recent studies have provided a better understanding of the intrinsic and extrinsic regulatory mechanisms that control stem cell quiescence. It is now appreciated that the p53 gene plays a critical role in regulating stem cell quiescence. Other intrinsic regulatory mechanisms include the FoxO, HIF-1α, and NFATc1 transcription factors and signaling through ATM and mTOR. Extrinsic microenvironmental regulatory mechanisms include angiopoietin-1, TGF-β, bone morphogenic protein, thrombopoietin, N-cadherin, and integrin adhesion receptors; Wnt/β-catenin signaling; and osteopontin. In this article, we review current advances in understanding normal stem cell quiescence, their significance for CSC quiescence and drug resistance, and the potential clinical applications of these findings. Clin Cancer Res; 17(15); 4936–41. ©2011 AACR.

Background

Adult stem cells are rare populations of cells that are able to regenerate the multiple differentiated cell types of the organ in which they reside and renew themselves (1). In contrast to germline stem cells of invertebrates, which are constantly cycling (2), mammalian adult stem cells are predominantly in a quiescent, nondividing G0-state (3). Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are among the best-studied adult stem cell populations. The quiescence of HSCs has been linked to their long-term reconstituting capacity and is critical for long-term maintenance of the stem cell compartment (1). In order to maintain a supply of mature blood cells throughout the lifetime of an individual without exhausting the HSC pool, most HSCs remain quiescent under steady state, and only a small number of them enter the cell cycle (4). However, HSCs can exit quiescence and rapidly expand and differentiate to regenerate hematopoiesis in response to stresses such as blood loss (4). Defects in the regulation of quiescence can lead to premature exhaustion of the HSC pool, causing hematological failure (3, 5). Stem cell quiescence is also closely associated with protection from myelotoxic insults (5). Similar to the role of tissue stem cells in normal tissues, several cancers are also propagated by small populations of cancer stem cells (CSCs) (6). Stem cell quiescence is highly relevant for cancer therapy because quiescent CSCs are often resistant to both conventional chemotherapy and targeted therapies, and are retained and contribute to relapse following discontinuation of therapy (6). Therefore, improved understanding of the mechanisms of stem cell quiescence is important not only to enable direct manipulation of normal stem cell function but also to develop approaches to therapeutically target quiescent CSCs.

Stem cell quiescence is controlled by both intrinsic regulatory mechanisms and extrinsic signals from the microenvironment, as shown in Fig. 1 (7). Several transcription factors play key roles in stem cell fate decisions (8). On the other hand, interactions of stem cells with the niche are critical for the long-term maintenance of HSC quiescence (9). Here, we review recent progress made in understanding the mechanisms of quiescence of stem cells, and the potential applications of these findings to cancer treatment.

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Pathways to stem cell quiescence. Stem cell quiescence is controlled by both intrinsic regulatory mechanisms and extrinsic signals from the microenvironment. Several transcription factors play key roles in promoting stem cell quiescence. The transcription factor p53 is a critical regulator of quiescence in the steady state. ROS in stem cells regulate expression of the transcription factors FoxO and ATM, which in turn act to regulate ROS levels in stem cells and maintain stem cell quiescence. A role for HIF-1α and NFATc in regulating stem cell quiescence has also been shown. Factors that inhibit mTOR also contribute to stem cell quiescence. Interactions of stem cells with microenvironmental supportive cells are critical for the long-term maintenance of HSC quiescence. TGF-β and BMPs produced by microenvironmental cells are important regulators of stem cell quiescence. Interactions of TPO with its receptor MPL and Ang-1 with its receptor Tie-2 also promote stem cell quiescence and enhance adhesion to the microenvironment through integrin and cadherin receptors. Opn from the microenvironment is also reported to mediate stem cell quiescence. Wnt signaling has complex effects on stem cells, but there is evidence that Wnt signaling in the microenvironment plays an essential role in maintaining HSCs in a quiescent state. In the future, targeting of the molecular mechanisms that underlie quiescence may allow the sensitization of quiescent CSCs to therapeutic agents.

Intrinsic mechanisms regulating stem cell quiescence

p53 signaling.

Recent studies have shown that in addition to its important role in the cellular response to DNA damage, p53 plays a critical role in regulating HSC quiescence in steady-state conditions (8, 10). p53 is preferentially expressed in HSCs compared with more-committed progenitor cells, and promotes HSC quiescence (8). The transcription factor MEF/ELF4 modulates p53 expression and facilitates the entry of quiescent HSCs into the cell cycle (10). MEFnull HSCs display increased quiescence that is p53 dependent, and are resistant to the myelosuppressive effects of chemotherapy and radiation. Although earlier studies suggested a role for the p53 target gene p21 in restricting HSC entry into the cell cycle and regulating the HSC pool size under stress (11), subsequent studies indicated that p21 plays a minimal role in regulating HSC quiescence under steady-state conditions (12). Two other p53 target genes, Gfi-1 and Necdin, have been identified as important regulators of quiescence (8, 13).

Reactive oxygen species: FoxOs and ATM.

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) play an important role in regulating stem cell maintenance (14, 15). The FoxO group of human forkhead proteins includes 4 members (FoxO1, FoxO3a, FoxO4, and FoxO6) with both distinct and overlapping functions. FoxO proteins are activated in response to oxidative stress (16, 17), and up-regulate genes involved in ROS detoxification and cell-cycle arrest (16). HSCs from FoxO1, FoxO3, and FoxO4 triple knockout mice exhibit increased levels of ROS, increased cycling, apoptosis, and defective long-term repopulating activity (15). The HSC defect resulting from loss of FoxOs can be rescued by antioxidant administration. ATM, a cell-cycle checkpoint regulator activated after DNA damage, also regulates ROS levels in HSCs (14). ATM is preferentially expressed in cycling HSCs, and ATM-deficient mice show elevated ROS levels, lack quiescent HSCs, and show progressive bone marrow (BM) failure (14). Treatment with antioxidants restores the quiescence and BM reconstitutive capacity of ATM−/− HSC.

Hypoxia inducible factor-1α.

The transcription factor hypoxia inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) is stabilized under low-oxygen conditions, such as are present in the BM environment (18, 19). HIF-1α levels are elevated in HSCs and regulate HSC metabolism (18). HSCs from HIF-1α–deficient mice show reduced quiescence and decreased numbers following transplantation, myelosuppression, or aging (19). Overall, these data indicate that precise regulation of HIF-1α levels is required for maintenance of HSC quiescence.

Nuclear factor of activated T cells c1.

The hair follicle has also proved to be a good model system for studying stem cell quiescence. Stem cells are localized in the bulge region of the follicle (20, 21). The transcription factor nuclear factor of activated T cells c1 (NFATc1) is preferentially expressed in the bulge relative to proliferative basal cells in the epidermis (20). Both pharmacological suppression of NFATc1 and gene ablation have revealed that it plays a role in regulating HSC quiescence (21). NFATc1 expression is activated by bone morphogenic protein (BMP) and acts to repress CDK4 transcription. NFATc1 is down-regulated when stem cells become activated during hair growth, relieving CDK4 repression and activating proliferation (21).

Negative regulators of mTOR: Fbw7, PTEN, and PML.

Several reports have indicated that negative regulators of mTOR, including Fbxw7 (22), PTEN (23, 24), and PML (25), can maintain stem cell quiescence. Deletion of these genes in mice leads to strikingly similar phenotypes of stem cell hyperproliferation and subsequent exhaustion, and a defective repopulating potential.

Extrinsic mechanisms regulating stem cell quiescence

Stem cells are localized to niches formed by cells that provide a microenvironment that supports their growth and regulates their fate (9, 26). Interaction of stem cells with the niche is crucial for the long-term maintenance of quiescence.

Tie2/angiopoietin-1.

Osteoblasts within the BM provide a niche that promotes the maintenance of quiescent HSCs (27). Osteoblasts are a source of angiopoietin-1 (Ang-1), the ligand for the receptor tyrosine kinase Tie2, which is specifically expressed in HSCs. Tie2/Ang-1 signaling activates β1-integrin and N-cadherin in HSCs, promoting interactions with the extracellular matrix and cellular components of the niche (3). Genetic mouse models indicate that Tie2 interactions maintain quiescence and enhance the survival of HSCs by preventing cell division (28). In humans, Ang-1 is expressed in mesenchymal stem cells (29), suggesting that these cells may provide a niche for quiescent human HSCs.

TGF-β and bone morphogenic proteins.

TGF-β and related molecules play an important role in maintaining quiescence. TGF-β is a potent inhibitor of stem cell growth and cycling in vitro (30), and is hypothesized to be a cardinal regulator of stem cell quiescence in vivo. Disruption of BMP signaling through conditional knockout of Bmpr1a in osteoblasts resulted in increased HSC numbers (31). Conditional ablation of Bmpr1a also activated quiescent hair follicle stem cells to proliferate (32). Quiescent SOX2+ neural stem cells in the subgranular zone are depleted by genetic deletion of Bmpr1a or infusion of the BMP antagonist Noggin (33).

Thrombopoietin.

Mice deficient in the MPL receptor or its ligand, thrombopoietin (TPO), have fewer HSCs in the BM (34). MPL-positive HSCs in close contact with TPO-producing osteoblastic cells at the endosteal surface are quiescent (35, 36). Inhibition of TPO-MPL interactions with a neutralizing antibody reduced the number of quiescent HSCs, and TPO treatment increased the expression of p57Kip2, which is specifically expressed in quiescent HSC populations (35).

N-cadherin and integrins.

The adhesion molecules N-cadherin and β1-integrin are required not only for HSC anchoring to the niche but also for regulation of HSC cycling (31). N-cadherin is present at the interface between HSCs and osteoblastic cells (31). Tie2/Ang-1 signaling induces β1-integrin and N-cadherin–dependent HSC adhesion (3). MPL/TPO signaling also up-regulates β1-integrin in HSCs (36). Therefore, β1-integrin and N-cadherin may be key downstream targets of Tie2/Ang-1 and MPL/TPO signaling in HSCs.

Osteopontin.

Osteopontin (Opn) expressed in osteoblasts negatively regulates HSC number in the BM niche (37). Opn-deficient mice show an increase in HSC number, suggesting that Opn inhibits HSC proliferation in vivo (38, 39). Normal HSCs demonstrate a long-term engraftment defect in an Opn−/− microenvironment (39).

Wnt/β-catenin signaling.

Wnt signaling plays a vital role in cellular proliferation, movement, and polarity, and in stem cell maintenance (1). Constitutively active nuclear β-catenin signaling reduces HSC quiescence and blocks HSC differentiation (40). On the other hand, osteoblast-specific expression of Dickkopf1 (Dkk1), an inhibitor of canonical Wnt signaling, results in increased HSC cycling and reduced regenerative capacity (41). These findings suggest that Wnt pathway activation in the niche limits HSC proliferation and preserves self-renewal (41). Other studies have shown that microenvironmental β-catenin plays an important role in the long-term maintenance of HSC (42). These observations suggest that fine-tuning of Wnt/β-catenin activity in the microenvironment is crucial for maintaining stem cell quiescence.

Clinical-Translational Advances

Malignant stem cells in cancer are characteristically quiescent, and the dormancy of these small populations protects them from elimination following cancer treatment, contributing to cancer relapse (1). In several malignancies, including breast and colon cancer, relapse can occur more than a decade after the initial treatment. These late relapses can be explained by the survival and long-term persistence of dormant CSCs (6). As with solid tumors, several leukemias, such as acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), contain heterogeneous cell populations with a small percentage of quiescent leukemia stem cells (LSCs) responsible for propagation of the leukemia (6). Recent studies using xenogeneic models indicate that AML LSCs are localized to the BM endosteal region, are noncycling, and resist elimination by chemotherapy (43). CD34+ cells from patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) also contain quiescent cells that are resistant to BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as imatinib mesylate (44). Primitive LSCs persist in the BM of CML patients in cytogenetic remission on imatinib treatment (44), and stopping treatment frequently leads to disease relapse even in patients in whom BCR-ABL transcripts are no longer detectable by PCR (45). It is likely that overcoming LSC dormancy will be a critical step toward attaining a cure for this and other CSC-driven cancers. Targeting of quiescent CSCs is a difficult challenge because most conventional and targeted anti-cancer agents are ineffective at killing this population. Recently, there has been increased interest in developing approaches based either on activating quiescent CSCs, inducing their cell-cycle entry and increasing their sensitivity to other treatments, or identifying agents that are capable of directly targeting quiescent CSCs.

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is used in the clinic to treat neutropenia and mobilize HSCs to the circulation (46). G-CSF has also been used to enhance the sensitivity of leukemia cells to cytotoxic agents (47). G-CSF treatment induces proteolytic enzyme release in the BM, leading to degradation of the adhesion molecules CXCL12 and CXCR4. G-CSF treatment significantly enhanced inhibition of CML LSC by imatinib in vitro. However, a clinical pilot study failed to confirm that combined G-CSF and imatinib treatment can eliminate LSC in CML patients (48). Recently, G-CSF treatment was shown to efficiently activate dormant human AML stem cells in the endosteal niches, and to enhance their elimination by cytarabine without enhancing the sensitivity of normal HSCs (43). Thus, these protocols may prove to be effective after further improvement and optimization (48).

Interferon.

Type I interferons (IFN-α and -β) play a critical role in resistance to viral infections and innate and acquired immune responses (49). IFNs also have antiproliferative properties in many cell types in vitro. However, recent observations suggest that IFN-α can stimulate the proliferation of HSCs in vivo (50, 51). How IFN-α signals are perceived differently in HSCs compared with other cell types in which IFN-α normally suppresses proliferation is unclear. The proliferative effects of IFN on HSCs appear to be direct and are transient. Because increased proliferation is only seen in vivo, alterations in niche interactions may play a role. Two recent randomized studies showed a greater reduction in BCR-ABL levels when IFN-α was combined with imatinib for treatment of CML (52, 53). The clinical value of IFN-α in CML treatment may be related to stimulation of quiescent LSCs to proliferate, increasing the sensitivity to imatinib.

CXC motif receptor-4 antagonists.

CXCL12 [stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1)] binding to receptor CXC motif receptor-4 (CXCR4) plays an important role in HSC localization to the niche (54). AMD3100 is a bicyclam molecule that selectively and reversibly antagonizes CXCL12-CXCR4 interactions, with subsequent dislodgement of HSCs from the niche (54). AMD3100 rapidly mobilizes HSCs and is approved for stem cell mobilization in combination with G-CSF. AMD3100 also disrupts interaction between AML blasts and the BM stroma, mobilizing blasts to the peripheral blood and sensitizing them to chemotherapy (55). Clinical trials testing AMD3100 as a strategy to sensitize leukemic cells to chemotherapy are under way in patients with AML (54).

Histone deacetylase inhibitors.

Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) have shown promise as a therapy for several cancers (56). In contrast to most other proapoptotic agents that preferentially target dividing cells, HDACi can induce apoptosis in nonproliferating cancer cell lines (56). The combination of HDACi and imatinib induced apoptosis in quiescent CML LSCs that were resistant to elimination with imatinib alone (57). HDACi have pleiotropic effects on cells; however, potential mechanisms involved in CML LSC inhibition include alteration of gene expression related to LSC self-renewal and survival, and microenvironmental interactions. A clinical trial of HDACi in combination with imatinib in patients with CML in cytogenetic remission is under way (58).

Wnt inhibitors.

Studies have shown that Wnt signaling in the microenvironment has a role in maintaining quiescent HSCs (41, 42), suggesting that inhibition of Wnt may impair the dormancy of CSCs. The small-molecule drug ICG001, which selectively inhibits β-catenin binding to the transcriptional cofactor cyclic AMP response element binding protein (CREB), has been approved for phase 1 trial (59, 60). Several polyphenols, including quercetin, epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), curcumin, and resveratrol, have been implicated as inhibitors of Wnt/β-catenin signaling and are being considered for clinical trials, although the specificity of these agents is unclear (60). Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies against Wnt-1 and Wnt-2 have been shown to inhibit Wnt signaling and suppress tumor growth in vivo (60). However, when using this approach, the potential directly antiproliferative effects of Wnt inhibition on stem cells also need to be considered.

Conclusions

The resistance of CSCs to chemotherapy may be explained by their state of dormancy. Recent studies have improved our understanding of the mechanisms that maintain stem cells in a quiescent state and suggested possible strategies to target these difficult-to-eliminate populations. Dormant CSCs may be activated by targeting the extrinsic or intrinsic mechanisms that maintain them in a quiescent state, potentially rendering them susceptible to targeted or conventional chemotherapy (61). The kinetics of CSC activation and sensitization need to be better understood for optimal design of such combinatorial approaches. Other strategies are aimed toward directly inhibiting survival or self-renewal of quiescent CSCs through means such as epigenetic modifications. The identification of molecular mechanisms that underlie the enhanced survival and drug resistance of quiescent CSCs will be very helpful in facilitating the development of such strategies in the future (57, 60). Evaluation of treatment approaches also requires the development of assays or biomarkers for quiescent CSCs that can be used for patient selection and assessment (62). The realization of these objectives may indeed make it possible to target and eliminate quiescent CSCs in the future, and enhance long-term cures for cancer patients.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

R. Bhatia is a consultant for Novartis and Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Grant Support

National Institutes of Health (grants R01 HL77847 and R01 CA95684), and Leukemia and Lymphoma Society (translational research grant to R.B.).

  • Received March 25, 2011.
  • Revision received April 18, 2011.
  • Accepted April 20, 2011.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Reya T,
    2. Morrison SJ,
    3. Clarke MF,
    4. Weissman IL
    . Stem cells, cancer, and cancer stem cells. Nature 2001;414:105–11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Song X,
    2. Call GB,
    3. Kirilly D,
    4. Xie T
    . Notch signaling controls germline stem cell niche formation in the Drosophila ovary. Development 2007;134:1071–80.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Arai F,
    2. Hirao A,
    3. Ohmura M,
    4. Sato H,
    5. Matsuoka S,
    6. Takubo K,
    7. et al.
    Tie2/angiopoietin-1 signaling regulates hematopoietic stem cell quiescence in the bone marrow niche. Cell 2004;118:149–61.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Enver T,
    2. Heyworth CM,
    3. Dexter TM
    . Do stem cells play dice? Blood 1998;92:348–51, discussion 352.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Cheshier SH,
    2. Morrison SJ,
    3. Liao X,
    4. Weissman IL
    . In vivo proliferation and cell cycle kinetics of long-term self-renewing hematopoietic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96:3120–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Dick JE
    . Stem cell concepts renew cancer research. Blood 2008;112:4793–807.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Wilson A,
    2. Trumpp A
    . Bone-marrow haematopoietic-stem-cell niches. Nat Rev Immunol 2006;6:93–106.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Liu Y,
    2. Elf SE,
    3. Miyata Y,
    4. Sashida G,
    5. Liu Y,
    6. Huang G,
    7. et al.
    p53 regulates hematopoietic stem cell quiescence. Cell Stem Cell 2009;4:37–48.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Spradling A,
    2. Drummond-Barbosa D,
    3. Kai T
    . Stem cells find their niche. Nature 2001;414:98–104.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Lacorazza HD,
    2. Yamada T,
    3. Liu Y,
    4. Miyata Y,
    5. Sivina M,
    6. Nunes J,
    7. et al.
    The transcription factor MEF/ELF4 regulates the quiescence of primitive hematopoietic cells. Cancer Cell 2006;9:175–87.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Cheng T,
    2. Rodrigues N,
    3. Shen H,
    4. Yang Y,
    5. Dombkowski D,
    6. Sykes M,
    7. et al.
    Hematopoietic stem cell quiescence maintained by p21cip1/waf1. Science 2000;287:1804–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. van Os R,
    2. Kamminga LM,
    3. Ausema A,
    4. Bystrykh LV,
    5. Draijer DP,
    6. van Pelt K,
    7. et al.
    A limited role for p21Cip1/Waf1 in maintaining normal hematopoietic stem cell functioning. Stem Cells 2007;25:836–43.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Hock H,
    2. Hamblen MJ,
    3. Rooke HM,
    4. Schindler JW,
    5. Saleque S,
    6. Fujiwara Y,
    7. et al.
    Gfi-1 restricts proliferation and preserves functional integrity of haematopoietic stem cells. Nature 2004;431:1002–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Ito K,
    2. Hirao A,
    3. Arai F,
    4. Matsuoka S,
    5. Takubo K,
    6. Hamaguchi I,
    7. et al.
    Regulation of oxidative stress by ATM is required for self-renewal of haematopoietic stem cells. Nature 2004;431:997–1002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Tothova Z,
    2. Kollipara R,
    3. Huntly BJ,
    4. Lee BH,
    5. Castrillon DH,
    6. Cullen DE,
    7. et al.
    FoxOs are critical mediators of hematopoietic stem cell resistance to physiologic oxidative stress. Cell 2007;128:325–39.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Furukawa-Hibi Y,
    2. Yoshida-Araki K,
    3. Ohta T,
    4. Ikeda K,
    5. Motoyama N
    . FOXO forkhead transcription factors induce G(2)-M checkpoint in response to oxidative stress. J Biol Chem 2002;277:26729–32.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Brunet A,
    2. Sweeney LB,
    3. Sturgill JF,
    4. Chua KF,
    5. Greer PL,
    6. Lin Y,
    7. et al.
    Stress-dependent regulation of FOXO transcription factors by the SIRT1 deacetylase. Science 2004;303:2011–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Simsek T,
    2. Kocabas F,
    3. Zheng J,
    4. Deberardinis RJ,
    5. Mahmoud AI,
    6. Olson EN,
    7. et al.
    The distinct metabolic profile of hematopoietic stem cells reflects their location in a hypoxic niche. Cell Stem Cell 2010;7:380–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Takubo K,
    2. Goda N,
    3. Yamada W,
    4. Iriuchishima H,
    5. Ikeda E,
    6. Kubota Y,
    7. et al.
    Regulation of the HIF-1alpha level is essential for hematopoietic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2010;7:391–402.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Tumbar T,
    2. Guasch G,
    3. Greco V,
    4. Blanpain C,
    5. Lowry WE,
    6. Rendl M,
    7. et al.
    Defining the epithelial stem cell niche in skin. Science 2004;303:359–63.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Horsley V,
    2. Aliprantis AO,
    3. Polak L,
    4. Glimcher LH,
    5. Fuchs E
    . NFATc1 balances quiescence and proliferation of skin stem cells. Cell 2008;132:299–310.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Thompson BJ,
    2. Jankovic V,
    3. Gao J,
    4. Buonamici S,
    5. Vest A,
    6. Lee JM,
    7. et al.
    Control of hematopoietic stem cell quiescence by the E3 ubiquitin ligase Fbw7. J Exp Med 2008;205:1395–408.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Zhang J,
    2. Grindley JC,
    3. Yin T,
    4. Jayasinghe S,
    5. He XC,
    6. Ross JT,
    7. et al.
    PTEN maintains haematopoietic stem cells and acts in lineage choice and leukaemia prevention. Nature 2006;441:518–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Yilmaz OH,
    2. Valdez R,
    3. Theisen BK,
    4. Guo W,
    5. Ferguson DO,
    6. Wu H,
    7. et al.
    Pten dependence distinguishes haematopoietic stem cells from leukaemia-initiating cells. Nature 2006;441:475–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Ito K,
    2. Bernardi R,
    3. Morotti A,
    4. Matsuoka S,
    5. Saglio G,
    6. Ikeda Y,
    7. et al.
    PML targeting eradicates quiescent leukaemia-initiating cells. Nature 2008;453:1072–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Kopp HG,
    2. Avecilla ST,
    3. Hooper AT,
    4. Rafii S
    . The bone marrow vascular niche: home of HSC differentiation and mobilization. Physiology (Bethesda)2005;20:349–56.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Walkley CR,
    2. Olsen GH,
    3. Dworkin S,
    4. Fabb SA,
    5. Swann J,
    6. McArthur GA,
    7. et al.
    A microenvironment-induced myeloproliferative syndrome caused by retinoic acid receptor gamma deficiency. Cell 2007;129:1097–110.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Puri MC,
    2. Bernstein A
    . Requirement for the TIE family of receptor tyrosine kinases in adult but not fetal hematopoiesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:12753–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Sacchetti B,
    2. Funari A,
    3. Michienzi S,
    4. Di Cesare S,
    5. Piersanti S,
    6. Saggio I,
    7. et al.
    Self-renewing osteoprogenitors in bone marrow sinusoids can organize a hematopoietic microenvironment. Cell 2007;131:324–36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Blank U,
    2. Karlsson G,
    3. Karlsson S
    . Signaling pathways governing stem-cell fate. Blood 2008;111:492–503.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Zhang J,
    2. Niu C,
    3. Ye L,
    4. Huang H,
    5. He X,
    6. Tong WG,
    7. et al.
    Identification of the haematopoietic stem cell niche and control of the niche size. Nature 2003;425:836–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Kobielak K,
    2. Stokes N,
    3. de la Cruz J,
    4. Polak L,
    5. Fuchs E
    . Loss of a quiescent niche but not follicle stem cells in the absence of bone morphogenetic protein signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007;104:10063–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Mira H,
    2. Andreu Z,
    3. Suh H,
    4. Lie DC,
    5. Jessberger S,
    6. Consiglio A,
    7. et al.
    Signaling through BMPR-IA regulates quiescence and long-term activity of neural stem cells in the adult hippocampus. Cell Stem Cell 2010;7:78–89.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Kimura S,
    2. Roberts AW,
    3. Metcalf D,
    4. Alexander WS
    . Hematopoietic stem cell deficiencies in mice lacking c-Mpl, the receptor for thrombopoietin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:1195–200.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Qian H,
    2. Buza-Vidas N,
    3. Hyland CD,
    4. Jensen CT,
    5. Antonchuk J,
    6. Månsson R,
    7. et al.
    Critical role of thrombopoietin in maintaining adult quiescent hematopoietic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2007;1:599–600.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Yoshihara H,
    2. Arai F,
    3. Hosokawa K,
    4. Hagiwara T,
    5. Takubo K,
    6. Nakamura Y,
    7. et al.
    Thrombopoietin/MPL signaling regulates hematopoietic stem cell quiescence and interaction with the osteoblastic niche. Cell Stem Cell 2007;1:685–97.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Reinholt FP,
    2. Hultenby K,
    3. Oldberg A,
    4. Heinegård D
    . Osteopontin—a possible anchor of osteoclasts to bone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990;87:4473–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. Stier S,
    2. Ko Y,
    3. Forkert R,
    4. Lutz C,
    5. Neuhaus T,
    6. Grünewald E,
    7. et al.
    Osteopontin is a hematopoietic stem cell niche component that negatively regulates stem cell pool size. J Exp Med 2005;201:1781–91.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Nilsson SK,
    2. Johnston HM,
    3. Whitty GA,
    4. Williams B,
    5. Webb RJ,
    6. Denhardt DT,
    7. et al.
    Osteopontin, a key component of the hematopoietic stem cell niche and regulator of primitive hematopoietic progenitor cells. Blood 2005;106:1232–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. Kirstetter P,
    2. Anderson K,
    3. Porse BT,
    4. Jacobsen SE,
    5. Nerlov C
    . Activation of the canonical Wnt pathway leads to loss of hematopoietic stem cell repopulation and multilineage differentiation block. Nat Immunol 2006;7:1048–56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Fleming HE,
    2. Janzen V,
    3. Lo Celso C,
    4. Guo J,
    5. Leahy KM,
    6. Kronenberg HM,
    7. et al.
    Wnt signaling in the niche enforces hematopoietic stem cell quiescence and is necessary to preserve self-renewal in vivo. Cell Stem Cell 2008;2:274–83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Nemeth MJ,
    2. Mak KK,
    3. Yang Y,
    4. Bodine DM
    . b-Catenin expression in the bone marrow microenvironment is required for long-term maintenance of primitive hematopoietic cells. Stem Cells 2009;27:1109–19.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Saito Y,
    2. Uchida N,
    3. Tanaka S,
    4. Suzuki N,
    5. Tomizawa-Murasawa M,
    6. Sone A,
    7. et al.
    Induction of cell cycle entry eliminates human leukemia stem cells in a mouse model of AML. Nat Biotechnol 2010;28:275–80.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Bhatia R,
    2. Holtz M,
    3. Niu N,
    4. Gray R,
    5. Snyder DS,
    6. Sawyers CL,
    7. et al.
    Persistence of malignant hematopoietic progenitors in chronic myelogenous leukemia patients in complete cytogenetic remission following imatinib mesylate treatment. Blood 2003;101:4701–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. 45.↵
    1. Goldman JM,
    2. Green AR,
    3. Holyoake T,
    4. Jamieson C,
    5. Mesa R,
    6. Mughal T,
    7. et al.
    Chronic myeloproliferative diseases with and without the Ph chromosome: some unresolved issues. Leukemia 2009;23:1708–15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    1. Morrison SJ,
    2. Wright DE,
    3. Weissman IL
    . Cyclophosphamide/granulocyte colony-stimulating factor induces hematopoietic stem cells to proliferate prior to mobilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997;94:1908–13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. 47.↵
    1. Beekman R,
    2. Touw IP
    . G-CSF and its receptor in myeloid malignancy. Blood 2010;115:5131–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. 48.↵
    1. Drummond MW,
    2. Heaney N,
    3. Kaeda J,
    4. Nicolini FE,
    5. Clark RE,
    6. Wilson G,
    7. et al.
    A pilot study of continuous imatinib vs pulsed imatinib with or without G-CSF in CML patients who have achieved a complete cytogenetic response. Leukemia 2009;23:1199–201.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    1. de Veer MJ,
    2. Holko M,
    3. Frevel M,
    4. Walker E,
    5. Der S,
    6. Paranjape JM,
    7. et al.
    Functional classification of interferon-stimulated genes identified using microarrays. J Leukoc Biol 2001;69:912–20.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. 50.↵
    1. Sato T,
    2. Onai N,
    3. Yoshihara H,
    4. Arai F,
    5. Suda T,
    6. Ohteki T
    . Interferon regulatory factor-2 protects quiescent hematopoietic stem cells from type I interferon-dependent exhaustion. Nat Med 2009;15:696–700.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. 51.↵
    1. Essers MA,
    2. Offner S,
    3. Blanco-Bose WE,
    4. Waibler Z,
    5. Kalinke U,
    6. Duchosal MA,
    7. et al.
    IFNalpha activates dormant haematopoietic stem cells in vivo. Nature 2009;458:904–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. 52.↵
    1. Alimena G,
    2. Breccia M,
    3. Luciano L,
    4. Quarantelli F,
    5. Diverio D,
    6. Izzo B,
    7. et al.
    Imatinib mesylate therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia patients in stable complete cytogenic response after interferon-alpha results in a very high complete molecular response rate. Leuk Res 2008;32:255–61.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. 53.↵
    1. Rousselot P,
    2. Huguet F,
    3. Rea D,
    4. Legros L,
    5. Cayuela JM,
    6. Maarek O,
    7. et al.
    Imatinib mesylate discontinuation in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia in complete molecular remission for more than 2 years. Blood 2007;109:58–60.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. 54.↵
    1. Konopleva MY,
    2. Jordan CT
    . Leukemia stem cells and microenvironment: biology and therapeutic targeting. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:591–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. 55.↵
    1. Nervi B,
    2. Ramirez P,
    3. Rettig MP,
    4. Uy GL,
    5. Holt MS,
    6. Ritchey JK,
    7. et al.
    Chemosensitization of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) following mobilization by the CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100. Blood 2009;113:6206–14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. 56.↵
    1. Burgess A,
    2. Ruefli A,
    3. Beamish H,
    4. Warrener R,
    5. Saunders N,
    6. Johnstone R,
    7. et al.
    Histone deacetylase inhibitors specifically kill nonproliferating tumour cells. Oncogene 2004;23:6693–701.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. 57.↵
    1. Zhang B,
    2. Strauss AC,
    3. Chu S,
    4. Li M,
    5. Ho Y,
    6. Shiang KD,
    7. et al.
    Effective targeting of quiescent chronic myelogenous leukemia stem cells by histone deacetylase inhibitors in combination with imatinib mesylate. Cancer Cell 2010;17:427–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. 58.↵
    1. Glaser KB
    . HDAC inhibitors: clinical update and mechanism-based potential. Biochem Pharmacol 2007;74:659–71.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. 59.↵
    1. Emami KH,
    2. Nguyen C,
    3. Ma H,
    4. Kim DH,
    5. Jeong KW,
    6. Eguchi M,
    7. et al.
    A small molecule inhibitor of beta-catenin/CREB-binding protein transcription [corrected]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:12682–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  60. 60.↵
    1. Takahashi-Yanaga F,
    2. Kahn M
    . Targeting Wnt signaling: can we safely eradicate cancer stem cells? Clin Cancer Res 2010;16:3153–62.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  61. 61.↵
    1. Roeder I,
    2. Horn M,
    3. Glauche I,
    4. Hochhaus A,
    5. Mueller MC,
    6. Loeffler M
    . Dynamic modeling of imatinib-treated chronic myeloid leukemia: functional insights and clinical implications. Nat Med 2006;12:1181–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. 62.↵
    1. Li J
    . Quiescence regulators for hematopoietic stem cell. Exp Hematol 2011;39:511–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
Back to top
Clinical Cancer Research: 17 (15)
August 2011
Volume 17, Issue 15

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Stem Cell Quiescence
Ling Li and Ravi Bhatia
Clin Cancer Res August 1 2011 (17) (15) 4936-4941; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1499
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section

Advertisement