Advertisement
CCR Focus

Antibody-Radionuclide Conjugates for Cancer Therapy: Historical Considerations and New Trends

Martina Steiner and Dario Neri
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0483 Published October 2011

Abstract

When delivered at a sufficient dose and dose rate to a neoplastic mass, radiation can kill tumor cells. Because cancer frequently presents as a disseminated disease, it is imperative to deliver cytotoxic radiation not only to the primary tumor but also to distant metastases, while reducing exposure of healthy organs as much as possible. Monoclonal antibodies and their fragments, labeled with therapeutic radionuclides, have been used for many years in the development of anticancer strategies, with the aim of concentrating radioactivity at the tumor site and sparing normal tissues. This review surveys important milestones in the development and clinical implementation of radioimmunotherapy and critically examines new trends for the antibody-mediated targeted delivery of radionuclides to sites of cancer. Clin Cancer Res; 17(20); 6406–16. ©2011 AACR.

Introduction

In 1975, the invention of hybridoma technology by Köhler and Milstein (1) enabled for the first time the production of rodent antibodies of single specificity (monoclonal antibodies). Antibodies recognize the cognate antigen with exquisite specificity, and this property triggered an intense development of preclinical and clinical projects based on the use of monoclonal antibodies as delivery vehicles for radionuclides (typically β-emitters), with the aim to achieve better imaging and therapy of cancer. These early approaches, which are summarized in many reviews (e.g., refs. 2–4), illustrate the unique theranostic (i.e., therapy + diagnostic) potential of radioimmunoconjugates, which is still valid today. In the ideal case, a cancer patient would first receive a diagnostic dose of an antibody labeled with a radionuclide compatible with imaging procedures [e.g., single photon emission computed tomography or positron emission tomography (PET); refs. 5, 6]. If adequate antibody localization at the site of disease is achieved, the patient could receive a therapeutic dose of the same antibody labeled with a radionuclide capable of inducing curative effects. Unfortunately, the majority of early clinical developments of radioimmunoconjugates failed to make an impact on cancer therapy. The problems were in part associated with the murine origin of monoclonal antibodies, which are immunogenic in humans and thus prevent repeated administration to patients [this limitation was subsequently overcome by the advent of chimeric, humanized, and fully human antibodies (7)]. Of more importance, most radioimmunotherapy approaches for the treatment of solid tumors failed because the radiation dose delivered to neoplastic masses was insufficient to induce objective responses and cures. Radioimmunotherapy represents one of the few areas of pharmacological intervention in which therapeutic performance can largely be predicted based on pharmacokinetic considerations (i.e., by analysis of the radiation dose delivered to tumors compared with the radiation dose delivered to normal tissues). These quantities are directly related to the area under the curve in graphs depicting the percent injected dose per gram (%ID/g) of tissue versus time, weighted with an exponential function that corrects for the radioactive decay of the therapeutic nuclide (Fig. 1). As far as toxicity is concerned, the total radiation dose delivered to normal organs can be used to calculate the maximum tolerated dose (8). However, the bone marrow reserve may vary among patients, making the precise prediction of hematological toxicity difficult (9).

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Schematic representation of antibody formats (A) and pretargeting strategies (B) for radioimmunotherapy applications. Targeting results are often expressed as % ID/g of tissue versus time; the curves show the relative accumulation of an antibody or antibody fragment in the tumor, excreting organs, and blood. The area under the curve for the tumor and normal organs is directly related to the dose of radioactivity delivered in a radioimmunotherapy procedure. In pretargeting strategies, the therapeutically relevant radioactivity dose is related to the one delivered by the small ligand (e.g., a radiometal chelator, schematically represented as a star), which is injected once the multifunctional antibody (dashed line) has reached adequate tumor/organ and tumor/blood ratios (2).

Ideally, antibodies would rapidly accumulate at neoplastic sites and rapidly clear from the body; however, intact antibodies typically exhibit long circulation times in blood (which contributes to bone marrow toxicity) and a reduced diffusion into the tumoral mass, and may accumulate in critical organs, such as the liver (10, 11). The choice of the radionuclide largely depends on the size of the tumor to be treated, with high-energy β-emitters (e.g., 90Y) being suitable for the therapy of larger tumors, and medium-energy β-emitters (e.g., 131I and 177Lu) being more effective for the treatment of smaller tumors (2). One of the main attractive features of radioimmunotherapy is the crossfire effect, i.e., the ability to damage cells in close proximity to the site of antibody localization. In most cases, antibody radiolabeling is accomplished either by iodination of tyrosines or by conjugation of metal chelators [diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) or 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA)] to the antibody molecule (12).

The intrinsic radiosensitivity of tumor cells is a major determinant of a tumor's response to radiation (13). This may be a reason why the only 2 radioimmunoconjugates that have been approved and are commercially available (Table 1) are used for the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma—lymphoma cells are inherently sensitive to radiotherapy (14). 131I-tositumomab (Bexxar) and 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin) are both based on murine antibodies specific to CD20, an antigen that is present on normal B-cells and certain B-cell lymphomas. Although 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan exhibited favorable results in the consolidation of first remission advanced-stage follicular lymphoma [prolonging progression-free survival by 2 years (15)], the superiority of radiolabeled drugs has not yet been shown in a clinical head-to-head comparison with rituximab-based protocols. This fact, together with challenges related to the use of radioactivity and the coordination between oncologists and nuclear medicine departments, may explain why the nonlabeled anti-CD20 antibody rituximab continues to be more widely used than Bexxar and Zevalin. Furthermore, other strategies for arming antibodies with active payloads have been pursued in the recent past (16–21).

View this table:
Table 1.

Radioimmunoconjugates in clinical trials for therapeutic applications under active development according to the Thomson Reuters Integrity database

Role of the Antibody Format

The use of antibodies in immunoglobulin G (IgG) format for radioimmunotherapy is typically associated with high bone marrow toxicity (due to the long circulatory half-life of intact immunoglobulins) and high uptake in the liver (due to hepatobiliary clearance and FcRn-mediated recycling of these molecules). After early attempts to use proteolytically produced Fab or F(ab′)2 antibody fragments (16), the advent of recombinant DNA technology enabled investigators to perform comparative evaluations of the biodistribution properties of a particular antibody in different formats, including monomeric scFv fragments, diabodies, mini-antibodies [or small immunoproteins (SIP)], and IgGs (refs. 17–20; Fig. 1). The general observation was that smaller antibody fragments (e.g., scFvs and diabodies) exhibit a rapid clearance via the renal route, whereas larger antibodies (e.g., SIPs and IgGs) are eliminated via the hepatobiliary route (6, 17, 19). It appears that the slow extravasation of the antibody molecule into tissue may limit the efficiency of tumor targeting, and that a rapid diffusion of binding molecules into the neoplastic mass may only be achieved by the use of much smaller compounds [probably <2000 Dalton (21, 22)].

Pretargeting

Pretargeting is a promising approach to increase the therapeutic index of radioimmunotherapy strategies (2, 3, 23). In a pretargeted setup, the radionuclide is administered separately from the antibody vehicle and displays more favorable tumor-targeting properties. Most pretargeting approaches have so far relied on 1 of the 2 following approaches:

  1. The use of radioactive biotin derivatives for selective localization on antibody-streptavidin conjugates (24, 25) or noncovalent biotinylated antibody-streptavidin complexes, termed 3-step pretargeting (26).

  2. The use of chelators of radioactive metals for selective localization on multispecific antibodies that are capable of simultaneously binding to a tumor-associated antigen and the metal chelator (27, 28).

Both approaches rely on the fact that an artificial tumor-associated antigen is created upon binding of the antibody derivative at the tumor site, and on the favorable pharmacokinetic properties associated with the small size of the radiolabeled compound, which rapidly distributes in the neoplastic mass while being rapidly eliminated from the rest of the body via the urinary excretion route (ref. 23; Fig. 1). Indeed, in spite of the short time needed for excretion, the kidneys may become the dose-limiting organ for toxicity, as is often the case for peptide-based radiopharmaceuticals (29).

Antibody-based pretargeting strategies have produced spectacular biodistribution results in tumor-bearing animals [with tumor uptake as high as 278 ± 130%ID/g and tumor/blood ratios > 30 at 1 hour postinjection (30)] and promising results in cancer patients (31, 32).

It could be argued that pretargeting approaches would not be needed if medicinal chemistry were more efficient in finding low-molecular-weight binders for tumor-associated antigens, making targeting proteins obsolete.

Considerations Regarding the Choice of the Radionuclide

To date, the majority of radioimmunotherapy clinical development programs have involved the use of β-emitting radionuclides. A discussion about the relative merits of different isotopes for therapeutic purposes is beyond the scope of this article and has been reviewed elsewhere (2). The choice of a β-emitting radionuclide for radioimmunotherapy involves considerations about the physical properties and availability of the radionuclide, the labeling methods used, the possibility of imaging, and the safety of the patient (either with the same nuclide or with chemically related nuclides). β-emitters such as 131I, 177Lu, and 90Y can deposit their energy within 1–10 mm depending on their physical properties, and thus may compensate for heterogeneous antibody uptake within the tumor mass (ref. 33; Figs. 1 and 2). Auger electron emitters, such as 111In and 125I, have been shown to be suitable for radioimmunotherapy of small solid tumors. 111In- and 125I-labeled antibodies have both been shown to significantly increase survival rates in xenograft experiments compared with unlabeled antibodies (34–36). In Auger electron emission, most of the energy is delivered within a sphere of several nanometers around the decay site, and thus dosimetry is limited in accuracy due to heterogeneity of the tumor tissue and radiation delivery (34). This strategy appears to be ideally suited for internalizing antibodies, because cells expressing a tumor-associated antigen on their surface would receive the most damage from this radioimmunotherapy approach; however, experimental data suggest that Auger electron emitters may also be used for noninternalizing antibodies (34).

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

A vascular targeting antibody deposits energy in different tumor locations depending on the type of radionuclide used. An α-emitting radionuclide (e.g., 211At) has a higher energy than β-emitting radionuclides and a tissue penetration range of only 50–80 μm, confining the toxic effects to a volume of a few cell diameters, i.e., to the tumor vasculature (37). In this case, vessel/blood radioactivity ratios may be predictive of the relative damage caused by α particles to endothelial cells and blood cells.

Up to now, Auger electron emitters have not been widely used, possibly due to the large radioactivity doses that are required and the resulting costs for radioprotection and radioactive waste disposal.

There is a strong rationale for the antibody-based pharmacodelivery of α-emitting radionuclides to well-defined tumor-associated structures (e.g., individual leukemia cells in blood or vascular structures within the neoplastic mass), in consideration of the high-energy and short path length of α radiation associated with radionuclides such as 211At, 213Bi, 225Ac, and 227Th. Fig. 2 schematically illustrates the implications of using β-emitters or α-emitters for antibody-based targeting of the tumor neovasculature (37). With the use of a β-emitting radionuclide, it should be possible to irradiate tumor cells that are not adjacent to the tumor blood vessels with a crossfire effect spanning several millimeters. However, the efficacy of this therapeutic modality may be limited by the fact that new blood vessels represent only a small percentage of the total tumor mass. By contrast, the high energy and short tissue penetration of α-emitters concentrate tissue damage around tumor blood vessels, leading to a highly selective killing of tumor endothelial cells (37, 38). There is growing evidence that a selective destruction of the tumor neovasculature may lead to an avalanche of tumor cell death (39–41).

Vascular Tumor Targeting

Blood vessels represent the most accessible structure within the tumor for pharmaceutical agents coming from the blood stream. The formation of new blood vessels is a rare event in the healthy adult [largely confined to the female reproductive system (42, 43)] but a characteristic feature of many aggressive cancer types. Therefore, the use of antibodies specific to tumor neovascular antigens represents an attractive avenue for the selective delivery of therapeutic payloads to the tumor site (ref. 42; Fig. 3). Also, unlike antibodies that are specific to antigens expressed on the surface of tumor cells, vascular tumor-targeting antibodies could be used for many different tumor types. Over the years, vascular tumor antigens have been discovered by serendipity (i.e., analyzing antibodies by immunohistochemistry), transcriptomic studies, in vivo phage library panning (44), and perfusion-based mass spectrometry–assisted techniques (45–47).

Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Schematic representation of the 4 basic steps in the implementation of a vascular targeting strategy for the therapy of cancer. The immunohistochemical picture corresponds to a section containing both glioblastoma multiforme and normal brain, in which only the tumor blood vessels were selectively stained in red by an antibody specific to the EDB domain of fibronectin. In general, the identification of markers that are specifically expressed on tumor blood vessels represents the starting point for the development of an antibody-based vascular targeting strategy.

We have developed human monoclonal antibodies (L19, F8, and F16) specific to splice isoforms of fibronectin and tenascin-C, which represent some of the most extensively characterized markers of tumor angiogenesis known so far (42). The tumor-targeting properties of several derivatives of the L19, F8, and F16 antibodies have been studied by quantitative biodistribution analysis, revealing promising in vivo tumor targeting results for a variety of different tumors (18, 48, 49). Some of these antibody derivatives have been moved to clinical trials, mainly as radionuclide conjugates or cytokine-based fusion proteins. These agents include the L19 and F16 antibodies labeled with 131I for radioimmunotherapy applications (50) or with 124I for immuno-PET (6).

Of interest, it was recently discovered that fibronectin and tenascin-C isoforms are abundant not only in the majority of solid tumors but also around the neovasculature of most lymphoma types (47, 50, 51). The L19 antibody in SIP format and labeled with 131I has shown promising results for the radioimmunotherapy of refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma patients, and more than 100 cancer patients have already been treated with this agent (Fig. 4).

Figure 4.
Figure 4.

Response observed in a patient with Hodgkin's lymphoma after treatment with SIP(L19) labeled with 131I. A, fluorodeoxyglucose PET analysis of the patient at presentation [courtesy of Prof. G. Mariani and Dr. P. Erba; adapted from Sauer et al. (50)] and 1 year after treatment with the radioimmunotherapeutic drug (at higher sensitivity). B, computed tomography analysis of a pulmonary lesion responding to treatment.

Vascular targeting applications may extend to leukemia, in consideration of the fact that extensive formation of new blood vessels has been documented in the bone marrow of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (52).

Locoregional Approaches

Some tumors (e.g., astrocytomas, liver, head, and neck) tend to grow in a defined compartment and are therefore suitable for locoregional administration of radiolabeled antibodies.

Pemtumomab (Theragyn), a murine monoclonal antibody (HMFG1) that is specific to an epitope of the MUC1 gene product and labeled with 90Y, was developed as a product for the locoregional treatment of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Although promising results were obtained in phase II clinical trials, the product failed to extend survival or time to relapse in a trial of 447 patients with a negative second-look laparoscopy (53).

Riva and colleagues (54) treated >200 glioblastoma patients by administering a 131I-labeled antibody specific to tenascin-C into the postoperative cavity, with the aim of sterilizing tumor cells in the immediate surroundings of the original tumor mass and, ideally, distant tumor cells. Similar approaches have been implemented for the pharmaceutical development of Neuradiab (another radiolabeled antibody specific to tenascin-C) by Reardon and colleagues (55), Zalutsky and colleagues (56), and Bradmer Pharmaceuticals (57), but phase III clinical trials have been suspended.

Another approach for locoregional treatment is the intravesical administration of radiolabeled antibodies, which may provide a benefit to patients with bladder cancer by taking advantage of the natural access to the bladder via the urethra (58).

Combination Therapy

Radioimmunotherapy can confer a clinical benefit to cancer patients even when administered as a single agent. However, cancer pharmacotherapy mostly makes an impact when a combination of multiple therapeutic agents is used. The combination of radiolabeled antibodies with cytotoxic drugs has been studied preclinically and clinically (59, 60), but may ultimately suffer from the fact that both therapeutic modalities are often associated with substantial bone marrow toxicity. However, clinical and preclinical studies indicate that certain compound classes (e.g., vascular disrupting agents and cytotoxic agents with favorable myelotoxicity profiles) may indeed potentiate radioimmunotherapy (61).

Ideally, radiolabeled antibodies should be combined with pharmaceutical agents that display nonoverlapping toxicities. For example, the combination of radioimmunotherapy with intact immunoglobulins (such as the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor cetuximab) has exhibited promising results in animal models (20).

The combination of external beam radiation and radioimmunotherapy has been proposed for more than a decade. This therapeutic strategy is particularly appealing in the context of brain malignancies, in consideration of the fact that external beam irradiation of the brain typically should not exceed 30 Gy, and monoclonal antibodies exhibit extremely low uptake in the healthy portion of the brain as a result of the blood-brain barrier function. Vascular tumor-targeting antibodies may efficiently target high-grade astrocytomas in vivo (62, 63). The 131I-labeled antibody L19, which is specific to the alternatively spliced EDB domain of fibronectin, is currently being investigated in combination with whole-brain external beam radiation for the treatment of patients with brain metastases, with encouraging results.

Conclusions

After many years of intense research activities, the opportunities and challenges associated with the development of radiolabeled antibodies for cancer therapy strategies are beginning to be better understood. Undoubtedly, the marketing authorization of Zevalin and Bexxar for the therapy of patients with certain types of lymphoma represents a success for the field. However, the limited number of approved products and the limited market penetration of these products indicate that radioimmunotherapy still needs to make an impact on cancer therapy.

Technical and logistical challenges associated with the use of radioimmunotherapy (e.g., antibody radiolabeling, logistics, radioprotection issues, and disposal of radioactivity) have contributed to preventing a broader use of this therapeutic approach. However, these reasons alone do not justify the limited use of radiolabeled antibodies. Indeed, one could argue that central labeling procedures could dramatically simplify the implementation of radionuclide-based therapies, and that other logistical problems could be solved if the therapeutic performance were comparable to that observed in patients with thyroid cancer, in whom radiometabolic therapy with 131I has been practiced for decades with excellent safety and activity (64).

From the patients'; perspective, radioimmunotherapy has often been described as a “walk in the park,” because treatment is typically not associated with the discomfort and side effects that are characteristic of conventional chemotherapy. Obviously, excessive radiation to critical organs [e.g., the bone marrow, due to its intrinsic radiosensitivity and the rapid equilibration of radiolabeled antibodies within its extracellular fluid volume (65)] may give rise to substantial toxicity, which may not always be managed by growth factors and transfusions (e.g., platelets), or may require reinfusion of peripheral blood stem cells. However, what ultimately matters most is the fine balance between the quality of life during and after treatment and the therapeutic effect (e.g., as measured in terms of survival benefit).

The success of radioimmunotherapy in lymphoma is largely related to the intrinsic radiosensitivity of hematological malignancies. Indeed, dramatic results from the use of Bexxar and Zevalin in other lymphoma types [e.g., CD20-positive Hodgkin's lymphomas (66)] have been reported, although regulatory approval has not been sought to date.

For the treatment of solid tumors, it appears that only the advent of breakthrough technologies (e.g., better tumor targeting with novel antibody formats, different radionuclides, more accessible targets, and/or innovative pretargeting strategies) may lead to a sufficient improvement in the tumor radiation dose in comparison with normal organs. Investments in this field will crucially rely on clinical and industrial success. In the absence of positive results, a vicious (rather than virtuous) circle is likely to continue delaying innovation in radionuclide-based treatment strategies.

How often can radioimmunotherapy be administered to patients? When fully human antibodies are used, treatment can be repeated without immunogenicity concerns. In such cases, the risk-benefit analysis must take into consideration the cumulative damage to critical organs (e.g., bone marrow, liver, and kidney) and the probability of developing secondary tumors years after treatment (19) [in analogy to the slightly increased risk of secondary primary malignancies in patients treated with radioactive iodine for thyroid cancer (67)]. The myelotoxicity induced by radioimmunotherapy treatment and the subsequent slow recovery from the nadir in platelet and leukocyte counts may prevent the administration of alternative therapeutic agents (e.g., cytotoxic drugs) for a substantial period of time (i.e., 2–3 months).

The next few years will tell us whether the radiolabeled antibodies that have been approved for the treatment of lymphomas are more efficacious than nonradiolabeled anti-CD20 antibodies for the management of patients (a direct comparison in a realistic setting, such as consolidation therapy, is still lacking), and whether radioimmunotherapy can provide competitive advantages compared with other intervention modalities for patients with solid cancer. The excellent acceptance of radioimmunotherapy by patients, together with the opportunity to rationally develop products based on imaging and dosimetric data, suggests that there may be a second renaissance in the development of radiolabeled antibodies.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

D. Neri is a shareholder of and consultant for Philogen. M. Steiner disclosed no potential conflicts of interest.

  • Received April 8, 2011.
  • Revision received May 27, 2011.
  • Accepted June 14, 2011.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Köhler G,
    2. Milstein C
    . Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity. Nature 1975;256:495–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Koppe MJ,
    2. Postema EJ,
    3. Aarts F,
    4. Oyen WJ,
    5. Bleichrodt RP,
    6. Boerman OC
    . Antibody-guided radiation therapy of cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2005;24:539–67.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Sharkey RM,
    2. Goldenberg DM
    . Novel radioimmunopharmaceuticals for cancer imaging and therapy. Curr Opin Investig Drugs 2008;9:1302–16.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Sharkey RM,
    2. Goldenberg DM
    . Cancer radioimmunotherapy. Immunotherapy 2011;3:349–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. van Dongen GA,
    2. Vosjan MJ
    . Immuno-positron emission tomography: shedding light on clinical antibody therapy. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 2010;25:375–85.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Tijink BM,
    2. Perk LR,
    3. Budde M,
    4. Stigter-van Walsum M,
    5. Visser GW,
    6. Kloet RW,
    7. et al.
    (124)I-L19-SIP for immuno-PET imaging of tumour vasculature and guidance of (131)I-L19-SIP radioimmunotherapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2009;36:1235–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Winter G,
    2. Harris WJ
    . Humanized antibodies. Trends Pharmacol Sci 1993;14:139–43.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Paganelli G,
    2. Bartolomei M,
    3. Ferrari M,
    4. Cremonesi M,
    5. Broggi G,
    6. Maira G,
    7. et al.
    Pre-targeted locoregional radioimmunotherapy with 90Y-biotin in glioma patients: phase I study and preliminary therapeutic results. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 2001;16:227–35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Siegel JA
    . Establishing a clinically meaningful predictive model of hematologic toxicity in nonmyeloablative targeted radiotherapy: practical aspects and limitations of red marrow dosimetry. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 2005;20:126–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Rudnick SI,
    2. Adams GP
    . Affinity and avidity in antibody-based tumor targeting. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 2009;24:155–61.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Fujimori K,
    2. Covell DG,
    3. Fletcher JE,
    4. Weinstein JN
    . Modeling analysis of the global and microscopic distribution of immunoglobulin G, F(ab′)2, and Fab in tumors. Cancer Res 1989;49:5656–63.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Kukis DL,
    2. DeNardo GL,
    3. DeNardo SJ,
    4. Mirick GR,
    5. Miers LA,
    6. Greiner DP,
    7. et al.
    Effect of the extent of chelate substitution on the immunoreactivity and biodistribution of 2IT-BAT-Lym-1 immunoconjugates. Cancer Res 1995;55:878–84.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Gerweck LE,
    2. Vijayappa S,
    3. Kurimasa A,
    4. Ogawa K,
    5. Chen DJ
    . Tumor cell radiosensitivity is a major determinant of tumor response to radiation. Cancer Res 2006;66:8352–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Kersten MJ
    . Radioimmunotherapy in follicular lymphoma: some like it hot…. Transfus Apheresis Sci 2011;44:173–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Morschhauser F,
    2. Radford J,
    3. Van Hoof A,
    4. Vitolo U,
    5. Soubeyran P,
    6. Tilly H,
    7. et al.
    Phase III trial of consolidation therapy with yttrium-90-ibritumomab tiuxetan compared with no additional therapy after first remission in advanced follicular lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:5156–64.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Lane DM,
    2. Eagle KF,
    3. Begent RH,
    4. Hope-Stone LD,
    5. Green AJ,
    6. Casey JL,
    7. et al.
    Radioimmunotherapy of metastatic colorectal tumours with iodine-131-labelled antibody to carcinoembryonic antigen: phase I/II study with comparative biodistribution of intact and F(ab′)2 antibodies. Br J Cancer 1994;70:521–5.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Olafsen T,
    2. Kenanova VE,
    3. Sundaresan G,
    4. Anderson AL,
    5. Crow D,
    6. Yazaki PJ,
    7. et al.
    Optimizing radiolabeled engineered anti-p185HER2 antibody fragments for in vivo imaging. Cancer Res 2005;65:5907–16.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Borsi L,
    2. Balza E,
    3. Bestagno M,
    4. Castellani P,
    5. Carnemolla B,
    6. Biro A,
    7. et al.
    Selective targeting of tumoral vasculature: comparison of different formats of an antibody (L19) to the ED-B domain of fibronectin. Int J Cancer 2002;102:75–85.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Berndorff D,
    2. Borkowski S,
    3. Sieger S,
    4. Rother A,
    5. Friebe M,
    6. Viti F,
    7. et al.
    Radioimmunotherapy of solid tumors by targeting extra domain B fibronectin: identification of the best-suited radioimmunoconjugate. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:7053s–63s.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Tijink BM,
    2. Neri D,
    3. Leemans CR,
    4. Budde M,
    5. Dinkelborg LM,
    6. Stigter-van Walsum M,
    7. et al.
    Radioimmunotherapy of head and neck cancer xenografts using 131I-labeled antibody L19-SIP for selective targeting of tumor vasculature. J Nucl Med 2006;47:1127–35.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Vlashi E,
    2. Sturgis JE,
    3. Thomas M,
    4. Low PS
    . Real time, noninvasive imaging and quantitation of the accumulation of ligand-targeted drugs into receptor-expressing solid tumors. Mol Pharm 2009;6:1868–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Boerman OC,
    2. Kranenborg MH,
    3. Oosterwijk E,
    4. Griffiths GL,
    5. McBride WJ,
    6. Oyen WJ,
    7. et al.
    Pretargeting of renal cell carcinoma: improved tumor targeting with a bivalent chelate. Cancer Res 1999;59:4400–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Kenanova V,
    2. Wu AM
    . Tailoring antibodies for radionuclide delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2006;3:53–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Su FM,
    2. Beaumier P,
    3. Axworthy D,
    4. Atcher R,
    5. Fritzberg A
    . Pretargeted radioimmunotherapy in tumored mice using an in vivo 212Pb/212Bi generator. Nucl Med Biol 2005;32:741–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Zhang M,
    2. Zhang Z,
    3. Garmestani K,
    4. Schultz J,
    5. Axworthy DB,
    6. Goldman CK,
    7. et al.
    Pretarget radiotherapy with an anti-CD25 antibody-streptavidin fusion protein was effective in therapy of leukemia/lymphoma xenografts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:1891–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Cremonesi M,
    2. Ferrari M,
    3. Chinol M,
    4. Stabin MG,
    5. Grana C,
    6. Prisco G,
    7. et al.
    Three-step radioimmunotherapy with yttrium-90 biotin: dosimetry and pharmacokinetics in cancer patients. Eur J Nucl Med 1999;26:110–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Le Doussal JM,
    2. Martin M,
    3. Gautherot E,
    4. Delaage M,
    5. Barbet J
    . In vitro and in vivo targeting of radiolabeled monovalent and divalent haptens with dual specificity monoclonal antibody conjugates: enhanced divalent hapten affinity for cell-bound antibody conjugate. J Nucl Med 1989;30:1358–66.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Chang CH,
    2. Sharkey RM,
    3. Rossi EA,
    4. Karacay H,
    5. McBride W,
    6. Hansen HJ,
    7. et al.
    Molecular advances in pretargeting radioimunotherapy with bispecific antibodies. Mol Cancer Ther 2002;1:553–63.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Bodei L,
    2. Cremonesi M,
    3. Ferrari M,
    4. Pacifici M,
    5. Grana CM,
    6. Bartolomei M,
    7. et al.
    Long-term evaluation of renal toxicity after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with 90Y-DOTATOC and 177Lu-DOTATATE: the role of associated risk factors. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2008;35:1847–56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. van Schaijk FG,
    2. Oosterwijk E,
    3. Molkenboer-Kuenen JD,
    4. Soede AC,
    5. McBride BJ,
    6. Goldenberg DM,
    7. et al.
    Pretargeting with bispecific anti-renal cell carcinoma x anti-DTPA(In) antibody in 3 RCC models. J Nucl Med 2005;46:495–501.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Kraeber-Bodéré F,
    2. Salaun PY,
    3. Oudoux A,
    4. Goldenberg DM,
    5. Chatal JF,
    6. Barbet J
    . Pretargeted radioimmunotherapy in rapidly progressing, metastatic, medullary thyroid cancer. Cancer 2010;116[Suppl]:1118–25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Sharkey RM,
    2. Karacay H,
    3. Johnson CR,
    4. Litwin S,
    5. Rossi EA,
    6. McBride WJ,
    7. et al.
    Pretargeted versus directly targeted radioimmunotherapy combined with anti-CD20 antibody consolidation therapy of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. J Nucl Med 2009;50:444–53.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Karagiannis TC
    . Comparison of different classes of radionuclides for potential use in radioimmunotherapy. Hell J Nucl Med 2007;10:82–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Santoro L,
    2. Boutaleb S,
    3. Garambois V,
    4. Bascoul-Mollevi C,
    5. Boudousq V,
    6. Kotzki PO,
    7. et al.
    Noninternalizing monoclonal antibodies are suitable candidates for 125I radioimmunotherapy of small-volume peritoneal carcinomatosis. J Nucl Med 2009;50:2033–41.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Costantini DL,
    2. McLarty K,
    3. Lee H,
    4. Done SJ,
    5. Vallis KA,
    6. Reilly RM
    . Antitumor effects and normal-tissue toxicity of 111In-nuclear localization sequence-trastuzumab in athymic mice bearing HER-positive human breast cancer xenografts. J Nucl Med 2010;51:1084–91.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Cornelissen B,
    2. Vallis KA
    . Targeting the nucleus: an overview of Auger-electron radionuclide therapy. Curr Drug Discov Technol 2010;7:263–79.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Demartis S,
    2. Tarli L,
    3. Borsi L,
    4. Zardi L,
    5. Neri D
    . Selective targeting of tumour neovasculature by a radiohalogenated human antibody fragment specific for the ED-B domain of fibronectin. Eur J Nucl Med 2001;28:534–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Kennel SJ,
    2. Mirzadeh S
    . Vascular targeted radioimmunotherapy with 213Bi—an alpha-particle emitter. Nucl Med Biol 1998;25:241–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Nilsson F,
    2. Kosmehl H,
    3. Zardi L,
    4. Neri D
    . Targeted delivery of tissue factor to the ED-B domain of fibronectin, a marker of angiogenesis, mediates the infarction of solid tumors in mice. Cancer Res 2001;61:711–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. Palumbo A,
    2. Hauler F,
    3. Dziunycz P,
    4. Schwager K,
    5. Soltermann A,
    6. Pretto F,
    7. et al.
    A chemically modified antibody mediates complete eradication of tumours by selective disruption of tumour blood vessels. Br J Cancer 2011;104:1106–15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Thorpe PE
    . Vascular targeting agents as cancer therapeutics. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:415–27.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. Neri D,
    2. Bicknell R
    . Tumour vascular targeting. Nat Rev Cancer 2005;5:436–46.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Schwager K,
    2. Kaspar M,
    3. Bootz F,
    4. Marcolongo R,
    5. Paresce E,
    6. Neri D,
    7. et al.
    Preclinical characterization of DEKAVIL (F8-IL10), a novel clinical-stage immunocytokine which inhibits the progression of collagen-induced arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 2009;11:R142.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Laakkonen P,
    2. Zhang L,
    3. Ruoslahti E
    . Peptide targeting of tumor lymph vessels. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2008;1131:37–43.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. Oh P,
    2. Li Y,
    3. Yu J,
    4. Durr E,
    5. Krasinska KM,
    6. Carver LA,
    7. et al.
    Subtractive proteomic mapping of the endothelial surface in lung and solid tumours for tissue-specific therapy. Nature 2004;429:629–35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    1. Borgia B,
    2. Roesli C,
    3. Fugmann T,
    4. Schliemann C,
    5. Cesca M,
    6. Neri D,
    7. et al.
    A proteomic approach for the identification of vascular markers of liver metastasis. Cancer Res 2010;70:309–18.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. 47.↵
    1. Schliemann C,
    2. Roesli C,
    3. Kamada H,
    4. Borgia B,
    5. Fugmann T,
    6. Klapper W,
    7. et al.
    In vivo biotinylation of the vasculature in B-cell lymphoma identifies BST-2 as a target for antibody-based therapy. Blood 2010;115:736–44.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. 48.↵
    1. Villa A,
    2. Trachsel E,
    3. Kaspar M,
    4. Schliemann C,
    5. Sommavilla R,
    6. Rybak JN,
    7. et al.
    A high-affinity human monoclonal antibody specific to the alternatively spliced EDA domain of fibronectin efficiently targets tumor neo-vasculature in vivo. Int J Cancer 2008;122:2405–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    1. Brack SS,
    2. Silacci M,
    3. Birchler M,
    4. Neri D
    . Tumor-targeting properties of novel antibodies specific to the large isoform of tenascin-C. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12:3200–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. 50.↵
    1. Sauer S,
    2. Erba PA,
    3. Petrini M,
    4. Menrad A,
    5. Giovannoni L,
    6. Grana C,
    7. et al.
    Expression of the oncofetal ED-B-containing fibronectin isoform in hematologic tumors enables ED-B-targeted 131I-L19SIP radioimmunotherapy in Hodgkin lymphoma patients. Blood 2009;113:2265–74.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. 51.↵
    1. Schliemann C,
    2. Wiedmer A,
    3. Pedretti M,
    4. Szczepanowski M,
    5. Klapper W,
    6. Neri D
    . Three clinical-stage tumor targeting antibodies reveal differential expression of oncofetal fibronectin and tenascin-C isoforms in human lymphoma. Leuk Res 2009;33:1718–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. 52.↵
    1. Padró T,
    2. Ruiz S,
    3. Bieker R,
    4. Bürger H,
    5. Steins M,
    6. Kienast J,
    7. et al.
    Increased angiogenesis in the bone marrow of patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 2000;95:2637–44.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. 53.↵
    1. Verheijen RH,
    2. Massuger LF,
    3. Benigno BB,
    4. Epenetos AA,
    5. Lopes A,
    6. Soper JT,
    7. et al.
    Phase III trial of intraperitoneal therapy with yttrium-90-labeled HMFG1 murine monoclonal antibody in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer after a surgically defined complete remission. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:571–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. 54.↵
    1. Riva P,
    2. Franceschi G,
    3. Riva N,
    4. Casi M,
    5. Santimaria M,
    6. Adamo M
    . Role of nuclear medicine in the treatment of malignant gliomas: the locoregional radioimmunotherapy approach. Eur J Nucl Med 2000;27:601–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. 55.↵
    1. Reardon DA,
    2. Zalutsky MR,
    3. Akabani G,
    4. Coleman RE,
    5. Friedman AH,
    6. Herndon JE 2nd.,
    7. et al.
    A pilot study: 131I-antitenascin monoclonal antibody 81c6 to deliver a 44-Gy resection cavity boost. Neuro-oncol 2008;10:182–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. 56.↵
    1. Zalutsky MR,
    2. Reardon DA,
    3. Akabani G,
    4. Coleman RE,
    5. Friedman AH,
    6. Friedman HS,
    7. et al.
    Clinical exprience with alpha-particle emitting 211At: treatment of recurrent brain tumor patients with 211At-labeled chimeric antitenascin monoclonal antibody 81C6. J Nucl Med 2008;49:30–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. 57.↵
      Marketwire [homepage on the Internet]. Bradmer Pharmaceuticals Inc. announces proposed reverse take-over transaction with P1 Energy Corp. 2011[cited 2011 May 17]. Available from:http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/bradmer-pharmaceuticals-inc-announces-proposed-reverse-take-over-transaction-with-p1-tsx-venture-bmr.h-1393615.htm.
    1. 58.↵
      1. Hughes OD,
      2. Bishop MC,
      3. Perkins AC,
      4. Wastie ML,
      5. Denton G,
      6. Price MR,
      7. et al.
      Targeting superficial bladder cancer by the intravesical administration of copper-67-labeled anti-MUC1 mucin monoclonal antibody C595. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:363–70.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    2. 59.↵
      1. Karacay H,
      2. Sharkey RM,
      3. Gold DV,
      4. Ragland DR,
      5. McBride WJ,
      6. Rossi EA,
      7. et al.
      Pretargeted radioimmunotherapy of pancreatic cancer xenografts: TF10-90Y-IMP-288 alone and combined with gemcitabine. J Nucl Med 2009;50:2008–16.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    3. 60.↵
      1. Ocean AJ,
      2. Guarino MJG,
      3. Pennington KL,
      4. Montero AJ,
      5. Bekaii-Saab T,
      6. Gulec SA,
      7. et al.
      Activity of fractionated radioimmunotherapy with clivatuzumab tetraxetan combined with low-dose gemcitabine (Gem) in advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). J Clin Oncol 2011;29:(suppl 4) abstr 240.
    4. 61.↵
      1. Pedley RB,
      2. Hill SA,
      3. Boxer GM,
      4. Flynn AA,
      5. Boden R,
      6. Watson R,
      7. et al.
      Eradication of colorectal xenografts by combined radioimmunotherapy and combretastatin a-4 3-O-phosphate. Cancer Res 2001;61:4716–22.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    5. 62.↵
      1. Santimaria M,
      2. Moscatelli G,
      3. Viale GL,
      4. Giovannoni L,
      5. Neri G,
      6. Viti F,
      7. et al.
      Immunoscintigraphic detection of the ED-B domain of fibronectin, a marker of angiogenesis, in patients with cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2003;9:571–9.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    6. 63.↵
      1. De Santis R,
      2. Albertoni C,
      3. Petronzelli F,
      4. Campo S,
      5. D';Alessio V,
      6. Rosi A,
      7. et al.
      Low and high tenascin-expressing tumors are efficiently targeted by ST2146 monoclonal antibody. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12:2191–6.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    7. 64.↵
      1. Dottorini ME,
      2. Lomuscio G,
      3. Mazzucchelli L,
      4. Vignati A,
      5. Colombo L
      . Assessment of female fertility and carcinogenesis after iodine-131 therapy for differentiated thyroid carcinoma. J Nucl Med 1995;36:21–7.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    8. 65.↵
      1. Sgouros G
      . Bone marrow dosimetry for radioimmunotherapy: theoretical considerations. J Nucl Med 1993;34:689–94.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    9. 66.↵
      1. Schnell R,
      2. Dietlein M,
      3. Schomäcker K,
      4. Kobe C,
      5. Borchmann P,
      6. Schicha H,
      7. et al.
      Yttrium-90 ibritumomab tiuxetan-induced complete remission in a patient with classical lymphocyte-rich Hodgkin's lymphoma. Onkologie 2008;31:49–51.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    10. 67.↵
      1. Sawka AM,
      2. Thabane L,
      3. Parlea L,
      4. Ibrahim-Zada I,
      5. Tsang RW,
      6. Brierley JD,
      7. et al.
      Second primary malignancy risk after radioactive iodine treatment for thyroid cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thyroid 2009;19:451–7.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    11. 68.
      1. Witzig TE,
      2. Gordon LI,
      3. Cabanillas F,
      4. Czuczman MS,
      5. Emmanouilides C,
      6. Joyce R,
      7. et al.
      Randomized controlled trial of yttrium-90-labeled ibritumomab tiuxetan radioimmunotherapy versus rituximab immunotherapy for patients with relapsed or refractory low-grade, follicular, or transformed B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:2453–63.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    12. 69.
      1. Horning SJ,
      2. Younes A,
      3. Jain V,
      4. Kroll S,
      5. Lucas J,
      6. Podoloff D,
      7. et al.
      Efficacy and safety of tositumomab and iodine-131 tositumomab (Bexxar) in B-cell lymphoma, progressive after rituximab. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:712–9.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    13. 70.
      1. Kaminski MS,
      2. Tuck M,
      3. Estes J,
      4. Kolstad A,
      5. Ross CW,
      6. Zasadny K,
      7. et al.
      131I-tositumomab therapy as initial treatment for follicular lymphoma. N Engl J Med 2005;352:441–9.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    View Abstract
    Back to top
    Clinical Cancer Research: 17 (20)
    October 2011
    Volume 17, Issue 20

    Sign up for alerts

    View this article with LENS

    Open full page PDF
    Article Alerts
    Email Article
    Citation Tools
    Antibody-Radionuclide Conjugates for Cancer Therapy: Historical Considerations and New Trends
    Martina Steiner and Dario Neri
    Clin Cancer Res October 15 2011 (17) (20) 6406-6416; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0483
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

    Jump to section

    Advertisement