Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Molecular Pathways

Molecular Pathways: The Complex Roles of Inflammation Pathways in the Development and Treatment of Liver Cancer

Kostas Nikolaou, Michalis Sarris and Iannis Talianidis
Kostas Nikolaou
Biomedical Sciences Research Center Alexander Fleming, Vari, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michalis Sarris
Biomedical Sciences Research Center Alexander Fleming, Vari, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Iannis Talianidis
Biomedical Sciences Research Center Alexander Fleming, Vari, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-1961 Published June 2013
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Inflammatory signals from the surrounding microenvironment play important roles in tumor promotion. Key inflammatory mediators and pathways that induce and sustain tumorigenesis have recently been identified in many different cancers. Hepatocellular carcinoma is a paradigm for inflammation-induced cancer, as it most frequently develops in the setting of chronic hepatitis, consecutive cellular damage, and compensatory regeneration. Recent studies revealed that liver damage–mediated inflammation and carcinogenesis are triggered by a complex cross-talk between NF-κB, c-jun-NH2-kinase, and STAT3 signaling pathways. Molecular dissection of the mechanisms involved in the interplay between these pathways identified promising new targets for therapeutic intervention. Targeting different components of the signaling cascades may provide efficient means for blocking the apparently irreversible sequence of events initiated by chronic liver inflammation and culminating in liver cancer. Clin Cancer Res; 19(11); 2810–6. ©2013 AACR.

Background

Most malignant tumors contain somatic mutations in genes involved directly or indirectly in the regulation of cell growth or cell death. Epidemiologic studies suggest that these mutations are likely generated by different external factors including radiation, exposure to environmental pollutants or infectious agents, tobacco use, or diet (1). Besides inducing directly uncontrolled proliferation, these factors also trigger the activation of several immune cell types, which infiltrate the affected tissue and foster tumor development. Although the link between inflammation and carcinogenesis was first raised by Virchow in the 19th century, mechanistic insights into the process were obtained only during the past decade.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the third most common cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide (2), is the most extensively investigated inflammation-based carcinogenic process. More than 90% of HCC cases are associated with chronic inflammation, which arises from hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, hemochromatosis, and alcoholic or nonalcoholic steatosis (3). Recent studies on mouse models provided important mechanistic insights into the pathogenesis by revealing the role of multiple signaling pathways that link chronic inflammation to HCC. These include the NF-κB, the stress-responsive mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and the STAT pathways. Importantly, it was shown that these signaling pathways are linked to each other in a highly regulated manner, forming a highly complex signaling network that allows quality control and extensive communication between inflammatory cells and hepatocytes.

Interplay between NF-κB and JNK signaling pathway

The NF-κB family consists of 5 transcription factors—p50, p52, p65, cRel, and RelB—which share an N-terminal Rel-homology DNA-binding and dimerization domain (4). NF-κB homodimers and heterodimers are sequestered in the cytoplasm via noncovalent interactions with IκB proteins (Fig. 1, red symbols and arrows). Upon stimulation, IκB is phosphorylated by the inhibitor of IκB kinase (IKK) complex, which consists of the IKK-α and -β catalytic and the IKK-γ/NEMO regulatory subunit (4, 5). Phosphorylation of IκBs results in their K48-linked ubiquitination and subsequent degradation by the 26S proteasome complex (6). The free NF-κB dimers can then translocate to the nucleus and activate the transcription of genes encoding cytokines, chemokines, and antiapoptotic factors that promote cell growth and survival (7). NF-κB is also a potent inducer of the caspase-8 homolog FLICE-interacting protein (cFLIP) a repressor of death receptor–induced apoptosis (Fig. 1, red arrows; ref. 8).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Regulation of cell death and proliferation by the NF-κB and JNK pathways. Complexes assembled on ligand-bound TNF or TLR and IL-1 receptors mediate TAK1 activation, whose activity is modulated by Cyld. TAK1 phosphorylates IKK-β, which in turn phosphorylates IκB, leading to its ubiquitin-proteosome–mediated degradation and release of NF-κB (p50–p65) factors, which translocate to the nucleus to activate the transcription of prosurvival genes. NF-κB also induces the expression of cFLIP and SOD2, which inhibit apoptosis and reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation. TAK1 also phosphorylates MKK4/7, which activates JNK1/2. Short-term JNK activation induces the expression of genes involved in proliferation control, via the phosphorylation-mediated activation of JUN transcription factors. Sustained JNK activation induces the expression of proapoptotic genes, and stabilizes p53 and the Bax/Bak-dependent apoptotic pathway. NF-κB feedback regulates its own activation via modulating Cyld expression and the activation of JNK via activating Gadd45β expression, which inhibits MKK4/7. JNK activation is also modulated by ROS accumulation through dual-specificity phosphatase 1 (DUSP1) phosphatase activity. CASP-3/8, caspase-3/8.

The NF-κB pathway is activated by various stimuli including lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α and interleukin (IL)-1, which elicit their effects through binding to Toll-like receptors (TLR) and to the TNF or IL-1 receptors (TNFR-1 or IL-1R), respectively (4, 9). These cytokines are produced by inflammatory cells, which accumulate in the liver upon virus infection–induced hepatitis or through the action of other causative agents of inflammation. Upon stimulation by the corresponding ligands, rapid assembly of complexes containing TNFR-associated death domain (TRADD), TNFR-associated factor (TRAF), and receptor-interacting protein 1 (RIP1) proteins occur at the TLR/IL-R or TNFR, which recruit and activate TGF-β–activated kinase 1 (TAK1) through TRAF6 or TRAF2, respectively. TAK1 subsequently phosphorylates IKK-β and MAPK kinase 4/7 (MKK4/7), which in turn activate NF-κB and c-jun-NH2-kinase (JNK), respectively (refs. 10–12; Fig. 1). The assembly step of activated receptor complexes involves TRAF2 and cellular inhibitor of apoptosis protein 1/2 (cIAP1/2)–mediated K63-linked ubiquitination of several of the components, including TRAF2, TRAF6, TAK1, RIP1, and NF-κB essential modulator (NEMO), which facilitates protein–protein interactions and the assembly of the signaling complexes (10–14). The main enzyme that removes polyubiquitin chains from the above proteins is the cylindromatosis tumor suppressor cylindromatosis deubiquitinase (Cyld; refs. 15–20). As a result of Cyld-mediated deubiquitination of TAK1 and other components of the complex, NF-κB signaling is inhibited. Importantly, the Cyld gene is transcriptionally activated by NF-κB, which provides a negative feedback regulatory loop that could function in balancing activated NF-κB levels (ref. 21; Fig. 1).

Although NF-κB activation has prosurvival, antiapoptotic effects, JNK signaling (Fig. 1, green symbols and arrows) has been implicated in the induction of either cell proliferation or apoptosis (22–24). JNK can phosphorylate various substrates, including c-Jun, JunB, JunD ATF2, p53, Bcl2, Bcl-xL, Bid, Bad, and Bax proteins, which regulate cell growth and death (25). One mechanism by which JNK contributes to cell survival involves JunD phosphorylation, which transcriptionally activates antiapoptotic genes (Fig. 1). For example, the potent apoptosis repressor gene cIAP2 contains a composite promoter with tandem AP1 and NF-κB–binding sites, through which JunD/Fos and NF-κB dimers cooperate and activate transcription in a synergistic manner (26). This generates a positive feedback regulatory circuit: NF-κB– and JNK-activated JunD induces cIAP expression, which promotes K63-linked polyubiquitination of upstream signaling molecules, leading to TAK1 activation. TAK1 in turn phosphorylates IKK-β and MKK4/7 to activate NF-κB and JNK (Fig. 1).

Although the initial TNFR1-mediated JNK activation is transient and promotes cell survival and proliferation, the opposite effect is seen when JNK activation is sustained for a prolonged period. Chronic JNK activation induces a Bax/Bak-dependent apoptotic pathway, via mitochondrial release of cytochrome c, which in turn activates Apaf1 and various caspases (Fig. 1; refs. 27, 28). The proapoptotic effect of JNK is also exerted through transcriptional activation of apoptosis-inducing genes such as TNF-α, Fas-L, or Bak, or by phosphorylation of the tumor suppressor p53 and via phosphorylation of the E3 ubiquitin ligase Itch homolog (29–32). Itch facilitates cell death by promoting degradation of the NF-κB–induced antiapoptotic caspase-8 inhibitor cFLIP (32).

In most conditions, an inverse correlation exists between activation of the NF-κB and JNK signaling axes, which is at odds with the finding that both pathways are induced by the same upstream kinase, TAK1. The negative cross-regulation is mainly achieved by NF-κB–dependent transcriptional activation of the Gadd45β gene, which represses MKK4/7-mediated phosphorylation of JNK1/2 (Fig. 1; refs. 33, 34). In conditions when ROS accumulate, the opposite regulation of the 2 pathways is elicited by a complex negative feedback circuit, which involves NF-κB–mediated induction of the ROS-metabolizing enzyme, superoxide dismutase 2 (SOD2; ref. 35). This regulatory axis prevents ROS accumulation, which otherwise causes chronic JNK activation via inhibiting JNK phosphatases (Fig. 1; ref. 36).

Signal transduction pathways establish communication between different cell types during hepatocarcinogenesis

The importance of NF-κB and JNK signaling in the development of inflammation-associated HCC has been shown by recent studies using relevant animal models. NF-κB seems to have a protumorigenic effect in Mdr2−/− mice, which exhibit low-grade chronic inflammation and spontaneous development of HCC (37). Inhibition of the NF-κB pathway by the expression of nondegradable IκB mutant prevented HCC formation and increased apoptosis of premalignant hepatocytes (38). Similar protective effects were observed after the administration of anti-inflammatory or anti-TNF drugs to Mdr2-deficient mice. Transgenic mice expressing lymphotoxins α and β (Ltαβ) in the liver display inflammation and fibrosis, and develop HCC (39). In this model, the occurrence of inflammation and HCC depends on IKK-β expression in hepatocytes but is independent of TNFR1 function (39).

In sharp contrast to the above protumorigenic effects, NF-κB signaling exhibits a tumor suppressor function in situations when liver inflammation is mainly driven by hepatocyte damage. For example, mice lacking IKK-β in hepatocytes exhibit a marked increase in hepatocarcinogenesis after diethylnitrosamine (DEN) treatment (40–42). In this experimental condition, hepatocyte-specific IKK-β depletion enhanced ROS production and induced JNK activation and hepatocyte death, which augmented compensatory proliferation of surviving hepatocytes. Hepatocyte death–mediated accumulation of inflammatory cells, including the activation of resident macrophages (Kupffer cells), was necessary for the carcinogenesis process (40). This requirement was revealed by the observation of decreased hepatocarcinogenesis in mice in which IKK-β was deleted in both hepatocytes and Kupffer cells (40). Because Kupffer cell activation could not take place in the absence of NF-κB, the above results suggest that the NF-κB pathway coordinates the inflammatory cross-talk between hepatocytes and Kupffer cells (Fig. 2). Hepatocyte-specific inactivation of NEMO (IKK-γ) or TAK1, the upstream activators of NF-κB, resulted in spontaneous hepatocyte death, liver inflammation, and fibrosis, as well as the development of HCC (43–45). Interestingly, constitutive hyperactivation of TAK1 in Cyld-deficient hepatocytes displayed similar effects (46). Taken together, the above studies reinforced the established view that NF-κB signaling plays a central role in linking chronic inflammation to tumorigenesis.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Mechanism of cell death–mediated inflammation, fibrosis, and carcinogenesis. Sustained JNK activation causes hepatocyte death. Dying hepatocytes release alarmins/damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMP), which leads to the recruitment of Kupffer cells. NF-κB pathway activation in Kupffer cells leads to the expression and secretion of TGF-β, TNF-α, and IL-6 cytokines. TGF-β activates hepatic stellate cells, resulting in fibrogenesis. TNF-α induces apoptosis in the neighboring hepatocytes. Hepatocytes that escape or do not complete cell death may respond to IL-6 via activation of STAT3, which induces compensatory hepatocyte proliferation. IL-6R, IL-6 receptor.

A common mechanistic feature observed in all of the above models is the chronic activation of JNK, which triggers hepatocyte death. JNK activation in the NF-κB–deficient models is elicited by decreased growth-arrest DNA damage-45 protein β (Gadd45β)–mediated inhibition of MKK4/7 and by ROS-mediated inactivation of JNK phosphatases (Fig. 1; refs. 33, 34, 36). In the case of Cyld deficiency, JNK activation is mediated by the constitutively active TAK1 (46). In all cases, prolonged activation of JNK induces hepatocyte death, which facilitates the activation of Kupffer cells and other inflammatory cells (Fig. 2). Upon activation, Kupffer cells produce various cytokines including TGF-β, TNF-α, and IL-6 (47). In response to TGF-β, hepatic stellate cells proliferate and transdifferentiate to myofibroblasts, producing a network of extracellular matrix, the hallmark of the fibrotic scar (48). Elevated local levels of TNF-α cause activation of death receptor signaling in neighboring hepatocytes, which initiates a vicious circle of intercellular signaling between hepatocytes and Kupffer cells, leading to the amplification of hepatocyte death (ref. 46; Fig. 2). Hepatocytes that escape TNF-mediated death may respond to IL-6 and related cytokines via activation of STAT3 signaling (42). Binding of IL-6 to its receptor displaces Janus-activated kinase (JAK), which phosphorylates STAT3 (Fig. 2, blue symbols). Phospho-STAT3 translocates to the nucleus and activates numerous oncogenic genes, resulting in enhanced hepatocyte proliferation (Fig. 2; refs. 42, 49). In human HCC samples, an inverse correlation exists between NF-κB and STAT3 signaling (42, 50, 51). The underlying mechanism involves feedback inhibition of STAT3 activation via tyrosine phosphatases, such as src homology–containing phosphatase 1/2 (SHP1/2) and suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 (SOCS3). In this pathway, elevated ROS levels generated by NF-κB inhibition oxidize SHP1/2. Oxidized SHP1/2 lose their enzymatic activity toward JAK2 substrate, which leads to constitutive activation of the JAK–STAT3 pathway (ref. 52; Fig. 2).

Collectively, the above findings establish the view of a complex interplay between different signaling pathways that regulate distinct phases during the pathogenesis of inflammation-associated HCC. This “interpathway cross-talk” is accomplished through various feed-forward, feedback, and autoregulatory loops that operate not only within individual cells but also between inflammatory cells and hepatocytes.

Clinical–Translational Advances

Because of the impaired liver function of patients with HCC, classic anticancer chemotherapeutics are toxic and ineffective. The recently introduced sorafenib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, targeting multiple molecular pathways. Although its superior efficacy over conventional chemotherapy has been established by 2 large-scale clinical trials, its overall value is considered low, as it improves median life expectancy by only 3 months over placebo (53, 54). Although a combination of sorafenib with cytotoxic (e.g., doxorubicin) or antiangiogenic (e.g., VEGF inhibitors) agents is being evaluated, to date no evidence has come to light for the potential of the currently used therapeutics to shrink cancerous lesions or to prevent cancer formation. This fact lends emphasis to the urgent demand for alternative approaches.

The main translational benefit of studies that established an unambiguous connection between chronic inflammation and HCC is the recognition of an increased repertoire of promising new targets for the development of effective systemic therapies for HCC. An important preventive approach is treatment with antiviral drugs against HBV and HCV, which would eliminate the main circumstance in which HCC develops. Unfortunately, despite extensive efforts using antiviral therapies, it is currently not possible to cure chronic viral hepatitis. The use of other anti-inflammatory drugs (e.g., nonsteroidal compounds, such as aspirin) has proven effective in other cancer types but has not been evaluated in HCC.

Targeting the NF-κB pathway emerges as an alternative concept for curing HCC, given its central position in the regulation of inflammatory processes. Several observations in different mouse models that can be recapitulated in human HCCs point to the feasibility of pharmacologic targeting of NF-κB and NF-κB–linked signaling pathways. In the majority of human subjects, in whom HCC was preceded by chronic HBV- or HCV-mediated inflammation, the mechanism of disease progression resembles that described in Mdr2 knockout (KO) mice or Ltα/β transgenic mice, in which NF-κB function is absolutely required (37–39). In these cases blocking the NF-κB pathway (e.g., by IKK-β inhibitors) may have beneficial effects. In cases in which HCC develops as a result of hepatocyte damage (e.g., in alcoholic or nonalcoholic steatohepatitis or after chronic toxic assaults), the situation is more complex. Interpreting data from the animal models where HCC is initiated by hepatocyte death raises arguments against the feasibility of using IKK-β inhibitors for treatment, because inactivation of different components in the pathway (IKK-β, NEMO, or TAK1) actually promotes carcinogenesis (see above). Importantly, however, HCC development is halted when IKK-β is simultaneously ablated in hepatocytes and Kupffer cells, a situation that is more likely mimicked by systemic inhibitor treatment (40). On this conceptual basis, IKK-β inhibitors can be considered good candidates for HCC treatment and definitely warrant additional studies. In this regard, we note that the extent of inhibition of the individual components should be taken into account, as they may greatly affect the final outcome. In genetic models, the inhibition of the pathway is nearly complete, whereas in the case of treatment with pharmacologic inhibitors the extent of blockage is partial and in most cases adjustable.

Because of the dichotomous nature of their function, other players in the pathway, such as TAK1 or Cyld, cannot be considered promising targets. Either inactivation or hyperactivation of TAK1 leads to hepatocyte death, inflammation, fibrosis, and HCC development, suggesting that balanced levels of TAK1 activity are necessary for the maintenance of physiologic liver homeostasis (46). Additional studies on its ubiquitination-mediated regulation would be important to learn more about this enzyme, as, in addition to NF-κB, it can also activate the JNK pathway, which seems to represent a highly promising target for anticancer therapy.

The role of sustained JNK activation in hepatocyte death and subsequent inflammation and carcinogenesis is recapitulated in most of the mouse genetic models (IKK-β-KO, NEMO-KO, TAK1-KO, and Cyld-KO) developing HCC (40–46). In addition, mice expressing HCV core protein activate JNK through ROS production (55). Importantly, JNK1 is phosphorylated in human HCC samples (56). Direct evidence for the idea that JNK could be a promising drug target was provided by the findings that administration of the JNK inhibitor SP600125 to Cyld-deficient mice or DEN-treated rats blocked the development of HCC (46, 57). SP600125 has also been shown to sensitize tumor cells, but not normal hepatocytes, to TRAIL, a major mediator of acquired immune tumor surveillance (58). Thus, JNK inhibitors that also sensitize TRAIL could be used in combination with TRAIL-targeting drugs to increase therapeutic efficiency.

The other potential target presented in this review is STAT3. In mice, prevention of STAT3 activation via inhibition of its upstream kinase JAK2 was found to be effective in blocking HCC development (42). STAT3 was detected in its activated form in more than 60% of human HCC samples, and phosphorylated STAT3 levels correlated with the aggressiveness of the tumors (42). Importantly, STAT3 deletion does not affect the survival of differentiated cells, but efficiently blocks cell proliferation, suggesting that STAT3 may be a safe target for cancer therapeutics.

Taken together, studies on mouse models have revealed a complex cross-talk between NF-κB, JNK, and STAT3 signaling pathways in inflammation-associated HCC. These studies have provided novel insights into the temporal order of regulated steps during pathogenesis, which raise the possibility of developing novel means to block the sequence of events that lead to HCC. Successful translation of the knowledge gained on NF-κB, JNK, and STAT3 signaling will depend on appropriate human studies that would motivate the development of safer and more effective cancer therapies.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Authors' Contributions

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: K. Nikolaou, M. Sarris, I. Talianidis

Grant Support

Work in the authors' laboratory is supported by European Research Council Advanced Investigator Grant (ERC-2011-AdG294464) and the Greek Operational Program “Education and Lifelong Learning” of the National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF), Thales (Thales 656).

  • Received February 6, 2013.
  • Revision received March 19, 2013.
  • Accepted March 20, 2013.
  • ©2013 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Jemal A,
    2. Siegel R,
    3. Xu J,
    4. Ward E
    . Cancer statistics 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 2010;60:277–300.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. El-Serag HB
    . Hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2011;365:1118–27.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. El-Serag HB,
    2. Rudolph KL
    . Hepatocellular carcinoma: epidemiology and molecular carcinogenesis. Gastroenterology 2007;132:2557–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Oeckinghaus A,
    2. Hayden MS,
    3. Ghosh S
    . Crosstalk in NF-κB signaling pathways. Nat Immunol 2011;12:695–708.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Ghosh S,
    2. Karin M
    . Missing pieces in the NF-kappaB puzzle. Cell 2002;109(Suppl):S81–96.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Chen Z,
    2. Hagler J,
    3. Palombella VJ,
    4. Melandri F,
    5. Scherer D,
    6. Ballard D,
    7. et al.
    Signal-induced site-specific phosphorylation targets I kappa B alpha to the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Genes Dev 1995;9:1586–97.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Ben-Neriah Y,
    2. Karin M
    . Inflammation meets cancer, with NF-κB as the matchmaker. Nat Immunol 2011;12:715–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Kreuz S,
    2. Siegmund D,
    3. Scheurich P,
    4. Wajant H
    . NF-kappaB inducers upregulate cFLIP, a cycloheximide-sensitive inhibitor of death receptor signaling. Mol Cell Biol 2001;21:3964–73.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. West AP,
    2. Koblansky AA,
    3. Ghosh S
    . Recognition and signaling by toll-like receptors. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2006;22:409–37.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Li S,
    2. Wang L,
    3. Dorf ME
    . PKC phosphorylation of TRAF2 mediates IKKalpha/beta recruitment and K63-linked polyubiquitination. Mol Cell 2009;33:30–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Adhikari A,
    2. Xu M,
    3. Chen ZJ
    . Ubiquitin-mediated activation of TAK1 and IKK. Oncogene 2007;26:3214–26.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Hayden MS,
    2. Ghosh S
    . Shared principles in NF-kappaB signaling. Cell 2008;132:344–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Varfolomeev E,
    2. Goncharov T,
    3. Fedorova AV,
    4. Dynek JN,
    5. Zobel K,
    6. Deshayes K,
    7. et al.
    c-IAP1 and c-IAP2 are critical mediators of tumornecrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha)-induced NF-kappaB activation. J Biol Chem 2008;283:24295–99.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Wang G,
    2. Gao Y,
    3. Li L,
    4. Jin G,
    5. Cai Z,
    6. Chao JI,
    7. et al.
    K63-linked ubiquitination in kinase activation and cancer. Front Oncol 2012;2:5.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Trompouki E,
    2. Hatzivassiliou E,
    3. Tsichritzis T,
    4. Farmer H,
    5. Ashworth A,
    6. Mosialos G
    . CYLD is a deubiquitinating enzyme that negatively regulates NF-kappaB activation by TNFR family members. Nature 2003;424:793–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Brummelkamp TR,
    2. Nijman SM,
    3. Dirac AM,
    4. Bernards R
    . Loss of the cylindromatosis tumour suppressor inhibits apoptosis by activating NF-kappaB. Nature 2003;424:797–801.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Kovalenko A,
    2. Chable-Bessia C,
    3. Cantarella G,
    4. Israël A,
    5. Wallach D,
    6. Courtois G
    . The tumour suppressor CYLD negatively regulates NF-kappaB signalling by deubiquitination. Nature 2003;424:801–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Wright A,
    2. Reiley WW,
    3. Chang M,
    4. Jin W,
    5. Lee AJ,
    6. Zhang M,
    7. et al.
    Regulation of early wave of germ cell apoptosis and spermatogenesis by deubiquitinating enzyme CYLD. Dev Cell 2007;13:705–16.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Yoshida H,
    2. Jono H,
    3. Kai H,
    4. Li JD
    . The tumor suppressor cylindromatosis (CYLD) acts as a negative regulator for toll-like receptor 2 signaling via negative cross-talk with TRAF6 and TRAF7. J Biol Chem 2005;280:41111–21.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Sun SC
    . CYLD: a tumor suppressor deubiquitinase regulating NF-kappaB activation and diverse biological processes. Cell Death Differ 2010;17:25–34.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Jono H,
    2. Lim JH,
    3. Chen LF,
    4. Xu H,
    5. Trompouki E,
    6. Pan ZK,
    7. et al.
    NF-kappaB is essential for induction of CYLD, the negative regulator of NF-kappaB: evidence for a novel inducible autoregulatory feedback pathway. J Biol Chem 2004;279:36171–4.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Dhanasekaran DN,
    2. Reddy EP
    . JNK signaling in apoptosis. Oncogene 2008;27:6245–51.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Du L,
    2. Lyle CS,
    3. Obey TB,
    4. Gaarde WA,
    5. Muir JA,
    6. Bennett BL,
    7. et al.
    Inhibition of cell proliferation and cell cycle progression by specific inhibition of basal JNK activity: evidence that mitotic Bcl-2 phosphorylation is JNK-independent. J Biol Chem 2004;279:11957–66.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Gururajan M,
    2. Chui R,
    3. Karuppannan AK,
    4. Ke J,
    5. Jennings CD,
    6. Bondada S
    . c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) is required for survival and proliferation of B-lymphoma cells. Blood 2005;106:1382–91.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Bogoyevitch MA,
    2. Kobe B
    . Uses for JNK: the many and varied substrates of the c-Jun N-terminal kinases. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2006;70:1061–95.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Lamb JA,
    2. Ventura JJ,
    3. Hess P,
    4. Flavell RA,
    5. Davis RJ
    . JunD mediates survival signaling by the JNK signal transduction pathway. Mol Cell 2003;11:1479–89.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Lei K,
    2. Nimnual A,
    3. Zong WX,
    4. Kennedy NJ,
    5. Flavell RA,
    6. Thompson CB,
    7. et al.
    The Bax subfamily of Bcl2-related proteins is essential for apoptotic signal transduction by c-Jun NH(2)-terminal kinase. Mol Cell Biol 2002;22:4929–42.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Tournier C,
    2. Hess P,
    3. Yang DD,
    4. Xu J,
    5. Turner TK,
    6. Nimnual A,
    7. et al.
    Requirement of JNK for stress-induced activation of the cytochrome c-mediated death pathway. Science 2000;288:870–4.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Fuchs SY,
    2. Adler V,
    3. Buschmann T,
    4. Yin Z,
    5. Wu X,
    6. Jones SN,
    7. et al.
    JNK targets p53 ubiquitination and degradation in nonstressed cells. Genes Dev 1998;12:2658–63.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Oleinik NV,
    2. Krupenko NI,
    3. Krupenko SA
    . Cooperation between JNK1 and JNK2 in activation of p53 apoptotic pathway. Oncogene 2007;26:7222–30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Fan M,
    2. Chambers TC
    . Role of mitogen-activated protein kinases in the response of tumor cells to chemotherapy. Drug Resist Updat 2001;4:253–67.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Chang L,
    2. Kamata H,
    3. Solinas G,
    4. Luo JL,
    5. Maeda S,
    6. Venuprasad K,
    7. et al.
    The E3 ubiquitin ligase itch couples JNK activation to TNFalpha-induced cell death by inducing c-FLIP(L) turnover. Cell 2006;124:601–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Papa S,
    2. Zazzeroni F,
    3. Bubici C,
    4. Jayawardena S,
    5. Alvarez K,
    6. Matsuda S,
    7. et al.
    Gadd45 beta mediates the NF-kappa B suppression of JNK signalling by targeting MKK7/JNKK2. Nat Cell Biol 2004;6:146–53.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. De Smaele E,
    2. Zazzeroni F,
    3. Papa S,
    4. Nguyen DU,
    5. Jin R,
    6. Jones J,
    7. et al.
    Induction of Gadd45beta by NF-kappaB downregulates pro-apoptotic JNK signalling. Nature 2001;414:308–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Jones PL,
    2. Ping D,
    3. Boss JM
    . Tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin-1beta regulate the murine manganese superoxide dismutase gene through a complex intronic enhancer involving C/EBP-beta and NF-kappaB. Mol Cell Biol 1997;17:6970–81.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Kamata H,
    2. Honda S,
    3. Maeda S,
    4. Chang L,
    5. Hirata H,
    6. Karin M
    . Reactive oxygen species promote TNFalpha-induced death and sustained JNK activation by inhibiting MAP kinase phosphatases. Cell 2005;120:649–61.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Mauad TH,
    2. van Nieuwkerk CM,
    3. Dingemans KP,
    4. Smit JJ,
    5. Schinkel AH,
    6. Notenboom RG,
    7. et al.
    Mice with homozygous disruption of the mdr2 P-glycoprotein gene. A novel animal model for studies of nonsuppurative inflammatory cholangitis and hepatocarcinogenesis. Am J Pathol 1994;145:1237–45.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Pikarsky E,
    2. Porat RM,
    3. Stein I,
    4. Abramovitch R,
    5. Amit S,
    6. Kasem S,
    7. et al.
    NF-kappaB functions as a tumour promoter in inflammation-associated cancer. Nature 2004;431:461–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Haybaeck J,
    2. Zeller N,
    3. Wolf MJ,
    4. Weber A,
    5. Wagner U,
    6. Kurrer MO,
    7. et al.
    A lymphotoxin-driven pathway to hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Cell 2009;16:295–308.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Maeda S,
    2. Kamata H,
    3. Luo JL,
    4. Leffert H,
    5. Karin M
    . IKKbeta couples hepatocyte death to cytokine-driven compensatory proliferation that promotes chemical hepatocarcinogenesis. Cell 2005;121:977–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Sakurai T,
    2. Maeda S,
    3. Chang L,
    4. Karin M
    . Loss of hepatic NF-kappa B activity enhances chemical hepatocarcinogenesis through sustained c-Jun N-terminal kinase 1 activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006;103:10544–51.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. He G,
    2. Yu GY,
    3. Temkin V,
    4. Ogata H,
    5. Kuntzen C,
    6. Sakurai T,
    7. et al.
    Hepatocyte IKKbeta/NF-kappaB inhibits tumor promotion and progression by preventing oxidative stress-driven STAT3 activation. Cancer Cell 2010;17:286–97.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Luedde T,
    2. Beraza N,
    3. Kotsikoris V,
    4. van Loo G,
    5. Nenci A,
    6. De Vos R,
    7. et al.
    Deletion of NEMO/IKKgamma in liver parenchymal cells causes steatohepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Cell 2007;11:119–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Inokuchi S,
    2. Aoyama T,
    3. Miura K,
    4. Osterreicher CH,
    5. Kodama Y,
    6. Miyai K,
    7. et al.
    Disruption of TAK1 in hepatocytes causes hepatic injury, inflammation, fibrosis and carcinogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010;107:844–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. 45.↵
    1. Bettermann K,
    2. Vucur M,
    3. Haybaeck J,
    4. Koppe C,
    5. Janssen J,
    6. Heymann F,
    7. et al.
    TAK1 suppresses a NEMO-dependent but NF-kappaB-independent pathway to liver cancer. Cancer Cell 2010;17:481–96.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    1. Nikolaou K,
    2. Tsagaratou A,
    3. Eftychi C,
    4. Kollias G,
    5. Mosialos G,
    6. Talianidis I
    . Inactivation of the deubiquitinase CYLD in hepatocytes causes apoptosis, inflammation, fibrosis and cancer. Cancer Cell 2012;21:738–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    1. Naito M,
    2. Hasegawa G,
    3. Ebe Y,
    4. Yamamoto T
    . Differentiation and function of Kupffer cells. Med Electron Microsc 2004;37:16–28.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. 48.↵
    1. Bataller R,
    2. Brenner DA
    . Liver fibrosis. J Clin Invest 2005;115:209–18.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    1. He G,
    2. Karin M
    . NF-κB and STAT3—key players in liver inflammation and cancer. Cell Res 2011;21:159–68.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. 50.↵
    1. Calvisi DF,
    2. Ladu S,
    3. Gorden A,
    4. Farina M,
    5. Conner EA,
    6. Lee JS,
    7. et al.
    Ubiquitous activation of Ras and Jak/Stat pathways in human HCC. Gastroenterology 2006;130:1117–28.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. 51.↵
    1. Lin L,
    2. Amin R,
    3. Gallicano GI,
    4. Glasgow E,
    5. Jogunoori W,
    6. Jessup JM,
    7. et al.
    The STAT3 inhibitor NSC 74859 is effective in hepatocellular cancers with disrupted TGF-beta signaling. Oncogene 2009;28:961–72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. 52.↵
    1. Kubo M,
    2. Hanada T,
    3. Yoshimura A
    . Suppressors of cytokine signaling and immunity. Nat Immunol 2003;4:1169–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. 53.↵
    1. Llovet JM,
    2. Ricci S,
    3. Mazzaferro V,
    4. Hilgard P,
    5. Gane E,
    6. Blanc JF,
    7. et al.
    Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2008;359:378–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. 54.↵
    1. Cheng AL,
    2. Kang YK,
    3. Chen Z,
    4. Tsao CJ,
    5. Qin S,
    6. Kim JS,
    7. et al.
    Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients in the Asia-Pacific region with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2009;10:25–34.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. 55.↵
    1. Machida K,
    2. Tsukamoto H,
    3. Liu JC,
    4. Han YP,
    5. Govindarajan S,
    6. Lai MM,
    7. et al.
    c-Jun mediates hepatitis C virus hepatocarcinogenesis through signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 and nitric oxide-dependent impairment of oxidative DNA repair. Hepatology 2010;52:480–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. 56.↵
    1. Chang Q,
    2. Chen J,
    3. Beezhold KJ,
    4. Castranova V,
    5. Shi X,
    6. Chen F
    . JNK1 activation predicts the prognostic outcome of the human hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Cancer 2009;8:64.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  57. 57.↵
    1. Nagata H,
    2. Hatano E,
    3. Tada M,
    4. Murata M,
    5. Kitamura K,
    6. Asechi H,
    7. et al.
    Inhibition of c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase switches Smad3 signaling from oncogenesis to tumor-suppression in rat hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2009;49:1944–53.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. 58.↵
    1. Mucha SR,
    2. Rizzani A,
    3. Gerbes AL,
    4. Camaj P,
    5. Thasler WE,
    6. Bruns CJ,
    7. et al.
    JNK inhibition sensitizes hepatocellular carcinoma cells but not normal hepatocytes to the TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand. Gut 2009;58:688–98.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Clinical Cancer Research: 19 (11)
June 2013
Volume 19, Issue 11
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Clinical Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Molecular Pathways: The Complex Roles of Inflammation Pathways in the Development and Treatment of Liver Cancer
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Clinical Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Molecular Pathways: The Complex Roles of Inflammation Pathways in the Development and Treatment of Liver Cancer
Kostas Nikolaou, Michalis Sarris and Iannis Talianidis
Clin Cancer Res June 1 2013 (19) (11) 2810-2816; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-1961

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Molecular Pathways: The Complex Roles of Inflammation Pathways in the Development and Treatment of Liver Cancer
Kostas Nikolaou, Michalis Sarris and Iannis Talianidis
Clin Cancer Res June 1 2013 (19) (11) 2810-2816; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-1961
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Background
    • Clinical–Translational Advances
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Authors' Contributions
    • Grant Support
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Therapeutic Targeting of the Liver Microenvironment
  • Targeting the Protein Kinase Wee1 in Cancer
  • Metabolic Control of Histone Methylation and Gene Expression
Show more Molecular Pathways
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • CCR Focus Archive
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Clinical Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Clinical Cancer Research
eISSN: 1557-3265
ISSN: 1078-0432

Advertisement