Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
    • CME
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
    • CME
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Molecular Pathways

Molecular Pathways: ROS1 Fusion Proteins in Cancer

Kurtis D. Davies and Robert C. Doebele
Kurtis D. Davies
Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado – Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert C. Doebele
Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado – Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2851 Published August 2013
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Genetic alterations that lead to constitutive activation of kinases are frequently observed in cancer. In many cases, the growth and survival of tumor cells rely upon an activated kinase such that inhibition of its activity is an effective anticancer therapy. ROS1 is a receptor tyrosine kinase that has recently been shown to undergo genetic rearrangements in a variety of human cancers, including glioblastoma, non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), cholangiocarcinoma, ovarian cancer, gastric adenocarcinoma, colorectal cancer, inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor, angiosarcoma, and epithelioid hemangioendothelioma. These rearrangements create fusion proteins in which the kinase domain of ROS1 becomes constitutively active and drives cellular proliferation. Targeting ROS1 fusion proteins with the small-molecule inhibitor crizotinib is showing promise as an effective therapy in patients with NSCLC whose tumors are positive for these genetic abnormalities. This review discusses the recent preclinical and clinical findings on ROS1 gene fusions in cancer. Clin Cancer Res; 19(15); 4040–5. ©2013 AACR.

Background

Wild-type ROS1

The human ROS1 gene was initially discovered as the homolog of the chicken c-ros, which is the proto-oncogene for v-ros, the transforming sequence of the UR2 avian sarcoma virus (1, 2). ROS1 encodes a receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) that is closely related to the ALK and LTK human RTKs (3). It is arranged as a single-pass transmembrane protein with an intracellular C-terminal tyrosine kinase domain and a large extracellular N-terminal domain. Interestingly, the extracellular domain contains sequences that are analogous to sequences found in cell adhesion molecules and extracellular matrix proteins (4). ROS1 protein expression in adult humans is highest in the kidney but is also found in the cerebellum, peripheral neural tissue, stomach, small intestine, and colon, with lower expression in several other tissues (5). Notably, ROS1 protein expression has been reported to be absent in normal human lung tissue (5).

Very little is currently known about the function of wild-type (WT) ROS1 (4, 6). Mice that lack the receptor appear to be relatively healthy, although they display an abnormality in the epididymis of males that prevents normal reproduction (7). In addition, a ligand for the receptor has not been found, although the structure of the extracellular domain has led to speculation that cellular attachment may play a role in ROS1 activation (4). The lack of a known ligand has impeded examination of downstream signaling that is activated by WT ROS1. However, several studies have been conducted using chimeric receptors that contain the ROS1 kinase domain fused to the ligand-binding domain of EGF receptor (EGFR) or TRKA. When cells expressing these chimeras were stimulated with the cognate ligand, activation of various combinations of PLCγ, phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT, STAT3, VAV3, and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)/extracellular signal–regulated kinase (ERK) signaling components was observed (8–12).

Discovery of ROS1 gene fusions

The first evidence that gene fusions involving the ROS1 kinase domain have transforming capability came from a study in which DNA from MCF-7 human mammary carcinoma cells was transferred to NIH-3T3 cells, which were then implanted into mice (2). It was discovered that a DNA fragment containing the ROS1 3′ region (that encodes the kinase domain) fused to an unidentified sequence was able to promote tumorigenicity. However, it was determined that the rearrangement in the DNA occurred experimentally because a corresponding sequence was not found in the MCF-7 cell line. The first discovery of a naturally occurring rearrangement involving ROS1 came from the human glioblastoma cell line U118MG, in which a deletion on chromosome 6 resulted in fusion of the 3′ region of ROS1 to the 5′ region of the FIG (GOPC) gene (13, 14). The FIG–ROS1 gene fusion has also been found in cholangiocarcinoma, ovarian cancer, and non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patient samples (5, 15–17). In addition, SLC34A2–, CD74–, TPM3–, SDC4–, EZR–, LRIG3–, KDELR2–, and CCDC6–ROS1 gene fusions have been found in NSCLC samples (18–21). The SLC34A2–ROS1 fusion has also been observed in gastric adenocarcinoma samples and a colorectal cancer sample, YWHAE– and TFG–ROS1 gene fusions have been found in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors, and the CEP85L–ROS1 fusion has been discovered in an angiosarcoma patient sample (22–25). Owing to the apparent promiscuity of ROS1 rearrangement, the list of fusion partners is likely to grow as more samples are examined. In all of the known fusion genes, the ROS1 kinase domain is fully retained. Furthermore, the junction point on ROS1 at the mRNA level invariably occurs at the 5′ end of exons 32, 34, 35, or 36.

Oncogenicity of ROS1 fusion proteins

The transforming potential of these cancer-related ROS1 fusion proteins is well established. Expression of the known fusion variants (with the exception of KDELR2–, CCDC6–, YWHAE–, TFG–, and CEP85L–ROS1 fusions, which to date have not been tested) in fibroblasts was shown to result in anchorage-independent growth, foci formation, and tumorigenicity (15, 19, 26, 27). In addition, expression of the FIG–ROS1 and SDC4–ROS1 fusions in murine Ba/F3 cells has been shown to result in interleukin 3–independent proliferation, and this proliferation was sensitive to treatment with small-molecule ROS1 inhibitors (5, 15, 28). In mice, the FIG–ROS1 fusion gene has been shown to promote the formation of astrocytomas when ectopically expressed in the basal ganglia, and the EZR–ROS1 fusion gene has been shown to promote lung adenocarcinoma when ectopically expressed in lung epithelium (29, 30). Unfortunately, only three published cell lines have been found to naturally express ROS1 fusion genes: the U118MG glioblastoma line described above, U138MG (which was derived from the same patient as U118MG and expresses the same FIG–ROS1 fusion), and the HCC78 NSCLC line that expresses the SLC34A2–ROS1 fusion (13, 14, 18). We have found the U118MG line to be relatively insensitive to ROS1 inhibition in proliferation assays, suggesting that the FIG–ROS1 fusion protein is not the sole oncogenic driver in these cells (unpublished observations). On the contrary, multiple studies have shown that proliferation of HCC78 cells is sensitive to pharmacologic ROS1 inhibition as well as RNA interference-mediated ROS1 knockdown (18, 28, 31–34). Interestingly, treatment with the EGFR inhibitor gefitinib was shown to enhance sensitivity to ROS1 inhibition in HCC78 cells, suggesting that ROS1 cooperates with EGFR to promote proliferation in this line (28).

ROS1 fusion protein activation and signaling

The mechanism by which ROS1 fusion proteins become constitutively active is currently unknown. For other cancer-related RTK fusions, such as ALK, the fusion partner provides a dimerization domain that induces constitutive oligomerization and thus activation of the kinase (35). However, for ROS1, it is unclear whether dimerization is involved in activation of the WT receptor. Furthermore, the v-ros product of the UR2 avian sarcoma virus and the FIG–ROS1 fusion protein have been shown to exist only as monomers (26, 36). In agreement with this, many of the known ROS1 fusion partners to do not contain dimerization domains (19). Localization of the FIG–ROS1 fusion protein at the Golgi apparatus has been shown to be critical for transforming ability (but not kinase activity; ref. 26). However, the localization of other ROS1 fusion variants seems to vary, with cytoplasmic, plasma membrane, and perinuclear patterns being reported (5, 15, 18, 27, 37).

Several studies have examined the signaling pathways that are activated by ROS1 fusion proteins. Expression of the FIG–ROS1, CD74–ROS1, or SDC4–ROS1 fusions in fibroblasts or Ba/F3 cells has been shown to result in autophosphorylation of ROS1 and phosphorylation of SHP-2, MAP–ERK kinase, ERK, STAT3, and AKT, and these effects were blocked by pharmacologic inhibition of ROS1 (15, 27–29). ROS1 inhibitors also led to reductions in phosphorylated ROS1, SHP-2, AKT, and ERK in HCC78 cells (28, 33). Interestingly, a recent report suggested that downstream signaling may differ depending on the fusion partner of ROS1 (27). It was observed that CD74–ROS1 but not FIG–ROS1 led to phosphorylation of E-Syt1, and that this differential signaling activity led to a more invasive phenotype of CD74–ROS1-transduced cells (27). Overall, the signaling activated by ROS1 fusions seems to mainly involve common growth and survival pathways that are also activated by other RTKs (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Schematic of ROS1 fusion proteins and activation of downstream signaling pathways. FIG–ROS1 fusions have been found to be localized to the Golgi apparatus, whereas other ROS1 fusion variants have been reported to be plasma membrane associated or cytosolic. ROS1 fusion proteins activate growth and survival signaling pathways common to other RTKs. ESYT1 activation may be a fusion variant–specific downstream signaling component that influences invasion and metastasis.

Clinical–Translational Advances

Although several studies have shown aberrant/overexpression of WT ROS1 in various cancers, the clinical relevance of this expression has not been completely examined (4, 6, 37). Likewise, the clinical significance of ROS1 rearrangement and fusion protein expression in most cancers where it has been found has been largely unexplored. What is clear from the minimal data available is that rearrangement of ROS1 is a relatively uncommon event, occurring in cell lines and/or patient samples at the following rates: 8.7% (2/23) in cholangiocarcinomas, 0.5% (1/200) in ovarian cancers, 0.6% (3/495) in gastric adenocarcinomas, 0.8% (2/236) in colorectal cancers, 7.7% (2/26) in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors, 2.9% (1/34) in angiosarcomas, and 5% (1/20) in epithelioid hemangioendotheliomas (15, 16, 22–25). Although ROS1 rearrangement has been observed in two cell lines that were derived from a single glioblastoma patient, there have been no published reports of rearrangements being found in clinical specimens from this disease, and therefore no accurate estimation of prevalence can be given.

Prevalence of ROS1 rearrangement in NSCLC

In contrast with the above cancers, a great deal of information has been published about ROS1 rearrangement in NSCLC. Several studies have attempted to determine the prevalence of rearrangement by screening large (>100) numbers of patient samples. The first such study screened 202 lung adenocarcinoma samples from East Asian never-smoker patients by reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) using primers that would detect CD74–ROS1 and SLC34A2–ROS1 fusions (38). Two out of 202 samples were found to be positive for the CD74–ROS1 fusion gene (no SLC34A2–ROS1 fusions were found). However, because the screening method was limited to only two of the known fusion partners, it is possible that other ROS1 rearrangement–positive samples existed in this panel (38). Three subsequent studies used “break-apart” FISH to screen large sample panels. In this assay, the separation of differentially labeled FISH probes that span the common ROS1 breakpoint is used to determine whether rearrangement has occurred, meaning that the assay should detect ROS1 gene rearrangements regardless of the fusion partner. These unbiased studies found that 18 of 1,073 (1.7%), 13 of 1,476 (0.9%), and 5 of 428 (1.2%) patients with NSCLC had undergone ROS1 rearrangement in their tumors (19, 28, 32). When histology was taken into account, it was found that 18 of 694 (2.6%), 13 of 1,116 (1.2%), and 3 of 244 (1.2%) of adenocarcinomas were positive, whereas 0 of 200 (0%), 0 of 233 (0%), and 2 of 138 (1.4%) squamous cell carcinomas were positive (19, 28, 32). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) with a ROS1-specific antibody has also been used to determine prevalence of rearrangement (5). In this study, 9 of 556 (1.6%) NSCLC samples [8/246 (3.3%) adenocarcinomas and 1/20 (5%) large cell carcinomas] were found to stain positive, and in all of these cases where FISH analysis was possible, FISH confirmed ROS1 rearrangement (5). Overall, the above studies strongly suggest that the prevalence of ROS1 rearrangement in NSCLC is 1% to 2%, with the majority of cases being of adenocarcinoma histology. Although this is a seemingly low number, it equates to potentially 20,000 or more patients per year worldwide who will present with this specific disease (39).

Patient characteristics

Although the number of published ROS1 rearrangement–positive clinical cases remains fairly low, patterns are beginning to emerge in regard to patient characteristics. In general, ROS1 rearrangement occurs in the absence of other known oncogenic drivers (EGFR mutations, KRAS, mutations, ALK rearrangements). However, exceptions to this rule have been reported, specifically with the finding of patients who are positive for ROS1 rearrangement concurrent with an EGFR mutation (5). In addition, ROS1 rearrangement–positive patients tend to be younger and never-smokers (19, 32). Interestingly, this pattern of patient characteristics mirrors that of ALK rearrangement–positive NSCLC (40). Despite these trends, it is important to take into account that many patients who are positive for rearrangements do not fit this pattern, so these characteristics should not be used for patient screening.

Clinical detection

Several methods are available for detecting the presence of ROS1 rearrangements in patient tumor samples. As mentioned above, RT-PCR has been used to successfully identify positive cases (30, 38, 41). However, as the list of fusion partners for ROS1 is relatively large and still growing, using a fusion partner-specific assay like RT-PCR is likely to miss some positive cases. The FISH assay, also described above, will detect rearrangement regardless of fusion partner, and this is the diagnostic that has been used in the phase I clinical trial of crizotinib to identify positive patients (42). However, FISH can be more technically demanding compared with other clinical diagnostics and this limits its use. IHC is a common clinical assay that can be used to detect aberrant ROS1 expression in tumor samples (5). Importantly, the ability of this assay to specifically identify ROS1 rearrangement–positive cases relies upon the absence of WT ROS1 expression in rearrangement-negative NSCLC tumors. This issue remains controversial, with some studies reporting WT ROS1 expression in normal lung and nonrearranged NSCLC samples and others not (4, 5, 37). A different expression-based approach to identify ROS1 rearrangement uses the fact that the 3′ region of the gene (that is included in the fusion gene) should have higher mRNA expression levels than the 5′ region. This principle was applied in a recent study that used “NanoString” probes to show rearrangement in a patient with NSCLC who was subsequently found to be positive for the FIG–ROS1 fusion (17). Finally, next-generation sequencing has emerged as a powerful approach to look for genetic abnormalities in tumor samples in an unbiased fashion, and this technique has identified five novel ROS1 fusion variants (20, 21, 24, 25). In this method, genetic rearrangements that create fusion genes can be identified either using the aforementioned “unbalanced” expression concept (if the transcriptome is sequenced) or by sequencing of fragments that span the fusion point (25). Importantly, next-generation sequencing can be used to simultaneously test for multiple oncogenic drivers (including activating mutations and rearrangements), making it a very attractive option for streamlined diagnostic analysis.

Treatment of tumors with ROS1rearrangements

The strategy of oncogene-directed therapy in lung cancer has led to significant clinical benefit in ALK rearrangement–positive and EGFR mutation–positive patients treated with crizotinib or EGFR kinase inhibitors, respectively, with remarkable overall response rates, progression-free survival times, and superiority compared with standard chemotherapy (40, 43). Therefore, it is of great interest to determine whether ROS1 rearrangement–positive NSCLC patients benefit from ROS1-targeted therapy. Fortuitously, crizotinib, which has now been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for use in ALK rearrangement–positive NSCLC, is also a potent ROS1 inhibitor (34). Initial results from a phase I trial of crizotinib, 250 mg twice daily, in ROS1 FISH-positive NSCLC patients have been very encouraging, with a reported objective response rate of 57% and a disease control rate at 8 weeks of 79%, results that are very similar to those observed for crizotinib in ALK FISH-positive lung cancer (42, 44). Other kinase inhibitor drugs, such as AP26113, are reported as ROS1 inhibitors, and clinical trials have planned to enroll ROS1 rearrangement–positive patients (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01449461; ref. 45). In addition, similar to ALK fusion-positive cells, preclinical data suggest that HSP90 inhibition is antiproliferative in ROS1 fusion–positive cells (46). Consequently, a clinical trial of the HSP90 inhibitor AT13387 is recruiting patients who are positive for ROS1 rearrangement, and results are eagerly awaited (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01712217).

Future directions

It is now clear that ROS1 rearrangement–positive NSCLC is a clinically relevant subclass of this disease. Given the apparent success of treating these patients with crizotinib, it will be interesting to see whether ROS1 inhibition will be examined in other cancer types in which rearrangement has been observed. Furthermore, because this genetic event is not confined to a specific cancer type, large-scale studies that screen patient samples should be conducted in all major cancer indications that thus far have not been examined.

Unfortunately, kinase inhibitor drugs are rarely (if ever) curative due to the emergence of acquired resistance. It should be fully expected that ROS1 rearrangement–positive patients who respond to crizotinib will eventually experience disease progression despite continued treatment. Much has been learned recently in regard to resistance mechanisms to targeted therapy in EGFR-mutant and ALK rearrangement–positive NSCLC (35, 47). It will be imperative to use these studies as a guide to understand acquired resistance to ROS1 inhibition so that rational therapeutic strategies will someday be available for these patients.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

R.C. Doebele has commercial research grants from Pfizer, Eli Lilly, and ImClone, has received an honorarium for serving on the speakers' bureau for Abbott Molecular, and is a consultant/advisory board member of Boehringer Ingelheim and Pfizer. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed by the other authors.

Authors' Contributions

Conception and design: K.D. Davies, R.C. Doebele

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: K.D. Davies, R.C. Doebele

Study supervision: R.C. Doebele

Grant Support

This work was supported by Cancer League of Colorado Research grant to K.D. Davies, Boettcher Foundation's Webb-Waring Biomedical Research Program, and University of Colorado Lung Cancer SPORE grant (P50CA058187) to R.C. Doebele.

  • Received March 27, 2013.
  • Revision received May 3, 2013.
  • Accepted May 6, 2013.
  • ©2013 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Matsushime H,
    2. Wang LH,
    3. Shibuya M
    . Human c-ros-1 gene homologous to the v-ros sequence of UR2 sarcoma virus encodes for a transmembrane receptorlike molecule. Mol Cell Biol 1986;6:3000–4.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Birchmeier C,
    2. Birnbaum D,
    3. Waitches G,
    4. Fasano O,
    5. Wigler M
    . Characterization of an activated human ros gene. Mol Cell Biol 1986;6:3109–16.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Robinson DR,
    2. Wu YM,
    3. Lin SF
    . The protein tyrosine kinase family of the human genome. Oncogene 2000;19:5548–57.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Acquaviva J,
    2. Wong R,
    3. Charest A
    . The multifaceted roles of the receptor tyrosine kinase ROS in development and cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta 2009;1795:37–52.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Rimkunas VM,
    2. Crosby KE,
    3. Li D,
    4. Hu Y,
    5. Kelly ME,
    6. Gu TL,
    7. et al.
    Analysis of receptor tyrosine kinase ROS1-positive tumors in non-small cell lung cancer: identification of a FIG-ROS1 fusion. Clin Cancer Res 2012;18:4449–57.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. El-Deeb IM,
    2. Yoo KH,
    3. Lee SH
    . ROS receptor tyrosine kinase: a new potential target for anticancer drugs. Med Res Rev 2010;31:794–818.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. Sonnenberg-Riethmacher E,
    2. Walter B,
    3. Riethmacher D,
    4. Godecke S,
    5. Birchmeier C
    . The c-ros tyrosine kinase receptor controls regionalization and differentiation of epithelial cells in the epididymis. Genes Dev 1996;10:1184–93.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Xiong Q,
    2. Chan JL,
    3. Zong CS,
    4. Wang LH
    . Two chimeric receptors of epidermal growth factor receptor and c-Ros that differ in their transmembrane domains have opposite effects on cell growth. Mol Cell Biol 1996;16:1509–18.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Zong CS,
    2. Zeng L,
    3. Jiang Y,
    4. Sadowski HB,
    5. Wang LH
    . Stat3 plays an important role in oncogenic Ros- and insulin-like growth factor I receptor-induced anchorage-independent growth. J Biol Chem 1998;273:28065–72.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Zeng L,
    2. Sachdev P,
    3. Yan L,
    4. Chan JL,
    5. Trenkle T,
    6. McClelland M,
    7. et al.
    Vav3 mediates receptor protein tyrosine kinase signaling, regulates GTPase activity, modulates cell morphology, and induces cell transformation. Mol Cell Biol 2000;20:9212–24.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Biskup C,
    2. Bohmer A,
    3. Pusch R,
    4. Kelbauskas L,
    5. Gorshokov A,
    6. Majoul I,
    7. et al.
    Visualization of SHP-1-target interaction. J Cell Sci 2004;117:5165–78.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Nguyen KT,
    2. Zong CS,
    3. Uttamsingh S,
    4. Sachdev P,
    5. Bhanot M,
    6. Le MT,
    7. et al.
    The role of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, rho family GTPases, and STAT3 in Ros-induced cell transformation. J Biol Chem 2002;277:11107–15.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Birchmeier C,
    2. Sharma S,
    3. Wigler M
    . Expression and rearrangement of the ROS1 gene in human glioblastoma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1987;84:9270–4.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Charest A,
    2. Lane K,
    3. McMahon K,
    4. Park J,
    5. Preisinger E,
    6. Conroy H,
    7. et al.
    Fusion of FIG to the receptor tyrosine kinase ROS in a glioblastoma with an interstitial del(6)(q21q21). Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2003;37:58–71.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Gu TL,
    2. Deng X,
    3. Huang F,
    4. Tucker M,
    5. Crosby K,
    6. Rimkunas V,
    7. et al.
    Survey of tyrosine kinase signaling reveals ROS kinase fusions in human cholangiocarcinoma. PLoS ONE 2011;6:e15640.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Birch AH,
    2. Arcand SL,
    3. Oros KK,
    4. Rahimi K,
    5. Watters AK,
    6. Provencher D,
    7. et al.
    Chromosome 3 anomalies investigated by genome wide SNP analysis of benign, low malignant potential and low grade ovarian serous tumours. PLoS ONE 2011;6:e28250.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Suehara Y,
    2. Arcila M,
    3. Wang L,
    4. Hasanovic A,
    5. Ang D,
    6. Ito T,
    7. et al.
    Identification of KIF5B-RET and GOPC-ROS1 fusions in lung adenocarcinomas through a comprehensive mRNA-based screen for tyrosine kinase fusions. Clin Cancer Res 2012;18:6599–608.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Rikova K,
    2. Guo A,
    3. Zeng Q,
    4. Possemato A,
    5. Yu J,
    6. Haack H,
    7. et al.
    Global survey of phosphotyrosine signaling identifies oncogenic kinases in lung cancer. Cell 2007;131:1190–203.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Takeuchi K,
    2. Soda M,
    3. Togashi Y,
    4. Suzuki R,
    5. Sakata S,
    6. Hatano S,
    7. et al.
    RET, ROS1 and ALK fusions in lung cancer. Nat Med 2012;18:378–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Govindan R,
    2. Ding L,
    3. Griffith M,
    4. Subramanian J,
    5. Dees ND,
    6. Kanchi KL,
    7. et al.
    Genomic landscape of non-small cell lung cancer in smokers and never-smokers. Cell 2012;150:1121–34.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Seo JS,
    2. Ju YS,
    3. Lee WC,
    4. Shin JY,
    5. Lee JK,
    6. Bleazard T,
    7. et al.
    The transcriptional landscape and mutational profile of lung adenocarcinoma. Genome Res 2012;22:2109–19.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Lee J,
    2. Lee SE,
    3. Kang SY,
    4. Do IG,
    5. Lee S,
    6. Ha SY,
    7. et al.
    Identification of ROS1 rearrangement in gastric adenocarcinoma. Cancer 2013;119:1627–35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Weickhardt AJ,
    2. Nguyen TT,
    3. Paskulin DD,
    4. Le AT,
    5. Aisner D,
    6. Schulte N,
    7. et al.
    ALK and ROS gene rearrangements detected in colorectal cancer (CRC) by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). J Clin Oncol 31, 2013 (suppl; abstr 3545).
  24. 24.↵
    1. Lovly CM,
    2. Lipson D,
    3. Otto G,
    4. Brennan T,
    5. Sankar S,
    6. Stephens PJ,
    7. et al.
    Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors harbor multiple potentially actionable kinase fusions. J Clin Oncol 31, 2013 (suppl; abstr 10513).
  25. 25.↵
    1. Giacomini CP,
    2. Sun S,
    3. Varma S,
    4. Shain AH,
    5. Giacomini MM,
    6. Balagtas J,
    7. et al.
    Breakpoint analysis of transcriptional and genomic profiles uncovers novel gene fusions spanning multiple human cancer types. PLoS Genet 2013;9:e1003464.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Charest A,
    2. Kheifets V,
    3. Park J,
    4. Lane K,
    5. McMahon K,
    6. Nutt CL,
    7. et al.
    Oncogenic targeting of an activated tyrosine kinase to the Golgi apparatus in a glioblastoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100:916–21.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Jun HJ,
    2. Johnson H,
    3. Bronson RT,
    4. de Feraudy S,
    5. White F,
    6. Charest A
    . The oncogenic lung cancer fusion kinase CD74-ROS activates a novel invasiveness pathway through E-Syt1 phosphorylation. Cancer Res 2012;72:3764–74.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Davies KD,
    2. Le AT,
    3. Theodoro MF,
    4. Skokan MC,
    5. Aisner DL,
    6. Berge EM,
    7. et al.
    Identifying and targeting ROS1 gene fusions in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2012;18:4570–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Charest A,
    2. Wilker EW,
    3. McLaughlin ME,
    4. Lane K,
    5. Gowda R,
    6. Coven S,
    7. et al.
    ROS fusion tyrosine kinase activates a SH2 domain-containing phosphatase-2/phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin signaling axis to form glioblastoma in mice. Cancer Res 2006;66:7473–81.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Arai Y,
    2. Totoki Y,
    3. Takahashi H,
    4. Nakamura H,
    5. Hama N,
    6. Kohno T,
    7. et al.
    Mouse model for ROS1-rearranged lung cancer. PLoS ONE 2013;8:e56010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. McDermott U,
    2. Iafrate AJ,
    3. Gray NS,
    4. Shioda T,
    5. Classon M,
    6. Maheswaran S,
    7. et al.
    Genomic alterations of anaplastic lymphoma kinase may sensitize tumors to anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors. Cancer Res 2008;68:3389–95.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. Bergethon K,
    2. Shaw AT,
    3. Ou SH,
    4. Katayama R,
    5. Lovly CM,
    6. McDonald NT,
    7. et al.
    ROS1 rearrangements define a unique molecular class of lung cancers. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:863–70.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Yasuda H,
    2. de Figueiredo-Pontes LL,
    3. Kobayashi S,
    4. Costa DB
    . Preclinical rationale for use of the clinically available multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor crizotinib in ROS1-translocated lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2012;7:1086–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Lovly CM,
    2. Heuckmann JM,
    3. de Stanchina E,
    4. Chen H,
    5. Thomas RK,
    6. Liang C,
    7. et al.
    Insights into ALK-driven cancers revealed through development of novel ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Cancer Res 2011;71:4920–31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Camidge DR,
    2. Doebele RC
    . Treating ALK-positive lung cancer–early successes and future challenges. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2012;9:268–77.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Chan JL,
    2. Lai M,
    3. Wang LH
    . Effect of dimerization on signal transduction and biological function of oncogenic Ros, insulin, and insulin-like growth factor I receptors. J Biol Chem 1997;272:146–53.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    1. Lee HJ,
    2. Seol HS,
    3. Kim JY,
    4. Chun SM,
    5. Suh YA,
    6. Park YS,
    7. et al.
    ROS1 receptor tyrosine kinase, a druggable target, is frequently overexpressed in non-small cell lung carcinomas via genetic and epigenetic mechanisms. Ann Surg Oncol 2013;20:200–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Li C,
    2. Fang R,
    3. Sun Y,
    4. Han X,
    5. Li F,
    6. Gao B,
    7. et al.
    Spectrum of oncogenic driver mutations in lung adenocarcinomas from East Asian never smokers. PLoS ONE 2011;6:e28204.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Jemal A,
    2. Bray F,
    3. Center MM,
    4. Ferlay J,
    5. Ward E,
    6. Forman D
    . Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011;61:69–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Shaw AT,
    2. Solomon B
    . Targeting anaplastic lymphoma kinase in lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2011;17:2081–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Yoshida A,
    2. Kohno T,
    3. Tsuta K,
    4. Wakai S,
    5. Arai Y,
    6. Shimada Y,
    7. et al.
    ROS1-rearranged lung cancer: a clinicopathologic and molecular study of 15 surgical cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2013;37:554–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Ou SH,
    2. Camidge DR,
    3. Engelman J,
    4. Clark J,
    5. Tye L,
    6. Wilner K,
    7. et al.
    Clinical activity of crizotinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring ROS1 gene rearrangment. Ann Oncol 2012;23(Suppl 9):ix389.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. 43.↵
    1. Pao W,
    2. Chmielecki J
    . Rational, biologically based treatment of EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2010;10:760–74.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Camidge DR,
    2. Bang YJ,
    3. Kwak EL,
    4. Iafrate AJ,
    5. Varella-Garcia M,
    6. Fox SB,
    7. et al.
    Activity and safety of crizotinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: updated results from a phase 1 study. Lancet Oncol 2012;13:1011–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. Anjum R,
    2. Vodala S,
    3. Zhang S,
    4. Moran L,
    5. Keats J,
    6. Squillace R,
    7. et al.
    The dual ALK/EGFR inhibitor AP26113 also potently inhibits activated and gatekeeper mutant forms of ROS1. EORTC Annual Meeting 2012:abstract 164.
  46. 46.↵
    1. Sang J,
    2. Acquaviva J,
    3. Friedland JC,
    4. Smith DL,
    5. Sequeira M,
    6. Zhang C,
    7. et al.
    Targeted inhibition of the molecular chaperone Hsp90 overcomes ALK inhibitor resistance in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Discov 2013;3:430–43.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. 47.↵
    1. Hammerman PS,
    2. Janne PA,
    3. Johnson BE
    . Resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2009;15:7502–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Clinical Cancer Research: 19 (15)
August 2013
Volume 19, Issue 15
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Clinical Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Molecular Pathways: ROS1 Fusion Proteins in Cancer
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Clinical Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Molecular Pathways: ROS1 Fusion Proteins in Cancer
Kurtis D. Davies and Robert C. Doebele
Clin Cancer Res August 1 2013 (19) (15) 4040-4045; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2851

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Molecular Pathways: ROS1 Fusion Proteins in Cancer
Kurtis D. Davies and Robert C. Doebele
Clin Cancer Res August 1 2013 (19) (15) 4040-4045; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2851
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Background
    • Clinical–Translational Advances
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Authors' Contributions
    • Grant Support
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Therapeutic Targeting of the Liver Microenvironment
  • Targeting the Protein Kinase Wee1 in Cancer
  • Metabolic Control of Histone Methylation and Gene Expression
Show more Molecular Pathways
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • CCR Focus Archive
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Clinical Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Clinical Cancer Research
eISSN: 1557-3265
ISSN: 1078-0432

Advertisement