Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
    • CME
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
    • CME
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Human Cancer Biology

Rab25 Regulates Invasion and Metastasis in Head and Neck Cancer

Panomwat Amornphimoltham, Kamil Rechache, Jamie Thompson, Andrius Masedunskas, Kantima Leelahavanichkul, Vyomesh Patel, Alfredo Molinolo, J. Silvio Gutkind and Roberto Weigert
Panomwat Amornphimoltham
1Intracellular Membrane Trafficking Unit, and 2Molecular Carcinogenesis Unit, Oral and Pharyngeal Cancer Branch, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kamil Rechache
1Intracellular Membrane Trafficking Unit, and 2Molecular Carcinogenesis Unit, Oral and Pharyngeal Cancer Branch, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jamie Thompson
1Intracellular Membrane Trafficking Unit, and 2Molecular Carcinogenesis Unit, Oral and Pharyngeal Cancer Branch, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrius Masedunskas
1Intracellular Membrane Trafficking Unit, and 2Molecular Carcinogenesis Unit, Oral and Pharyngeal Cancer Branch, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kantima Leelahavanichkul
1Intracellular Membrane Trafficking Unit, and 2Molecular Carcinogenesis Unit, Oral and Pharyngeal Cancer Branch, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vyomesh Patel
1Intracellular Membrane Trafficking Unit, and 2Molecular Carcinogenesis Unit, Oral and Pharyngeal Cancer Branch, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alfredo Molinolo
1Intracellular Membrane Trafficking Unit, and 2Molecular Carcinogenesis Unit, Oral and Pharyngeal Cancer Branch, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Silvio Gutkind
1Intracellular Membrane Trafficking Unit, and 2Molecular Carcinogenesis Unit, Oral and Pharyngeal Cancer Branch, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roberto Weigert
1Intracellular Membrane Trafficking Unit, and 2Molecular Carcinogenesis Unit, Oral and Pharyngeal Cancer Branch, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2858 Published March 2013
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Purpose: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is one of the 10 most common cancers with a 50% five-year survival rate, which has remained unchanged for the past three decades. One of the major reasons for the aggressiveness of this cancer is that HNSCCs readily metastasize to cervical lymph nodes that are abundant in the head and neck region. Hence, discovering new molecules controlling the metastatic process as well as understanding their regulation at the molecular level are essential for effective therapeutic strategies.

Experimental Design: Rab25 expression level was analyzed in HNSCC tissue microarray. We used a combination of intravital microscopy in live animals and immunofluorescence in an in vitro invasion assay to study the role of Rab25 in tumor cell migration and invasion.

Results: In this study, we identified the small GTPase Rab25 as a key regulator of HNSCC metastasis. We observed that Rab25 is downregulated in HNSCC patients. Next, we determined that reexpression of Rab25 in a metastatic cell line is sufficient to block invasion in a three-dimensional collagen matrix and metastasis to cervical lymph nodes in a mouse model for oral cancer. Specifically, Rab25 affects the organization of F-actin at the cell surface, rather than cell proliferation, apoptosis, or tumor angiogenesis.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that Rab25 plays an important role in tumor migration and metastasis, and that understanding its function may lead to the development of new strategies to prevent metastasis in oral cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res; 19(6); 1375–88. ©2013 AACR.

Translational Relevance

In this study, we identified the small GTPase Rab25 as a key player in the invasion and metastasis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Prompted by the observation that Rab25 is downregulated at the protein level in HNSCC patients, we exploited a recently developed xenograft model in the tongue of immunocompromised mice to further elucidate its role in HNSCC. Strikingly, we observed that reexpression of Rab25 is sufficient to block invasion and metastasis to locoregional lymph nodes. Moreover, by using high-resolution intravital microscopy and immunofluorescence in a three-dimensional model, we determined that Rab25 expression affects cell migration by altering the actin cytoskeleton arrangement at the cell surface, rather than affecting cell proliferation, apoptosis, or tumor angiogenesis.

These findings indicate that Rab25 may be a promising therapeutic target and that unraveling its function may lead to the development of new strategies to prevent metastasis in oral cancer patients.

Introduction

The term head and neck cancer encompasses a series of cancers that arise from the oral and nasal cavity, salivary glands, paranasal sinuses, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx. More than 90% of these cancers are squamous cell carcinomas (SCC), which originate from the squamous mucosa lining the upper aerodigestive tract (1). Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is very aggressive and often invades the cervical lymph nodes and metastasizes to distant sites. Distant metastasis can adversely impact survival and significantly affect treatment planning. The combination of conventional surgery or radiotherapy and chemotherapy is still the treatment of choice for HNSCC patients (2). However, the 5-year survival rate (50%) of these patients has not improved in the past 3 decades (3). Advancing our understanding of the molecular mechanisms regulating tumor invasion and metastasis for HNSCC may lead to more effective treatment options.

Invasion and metastasis are the result of a complex interplay of multiple processes including: angiogenesis of lymphatic and blood vessels, loss of cell polarity, loss of cell–cell contact, extracellular matrix breakdown mediated by specific metalloproteases, remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton, and tumor proliferation at the secondary sites (4, 5). Recent studies have shown that molecules involved in intracellular membrane trafficking steps, endocytosis in particular, control some of these processes (6, 7). Among these molecules, members of the Rab family are deregulated in various cancers (8). Rab proteins are considered master regulators of membrane trafficking. With at least 70 members in the human genome, they constitute the largest family of small GTPases. However, Rabs share limited homology to each other (40%) and individual Rab family members play distinct biologic roles (9, 10). Rabs regulate both endocytic and secretory pathways where they control different events including protein sorting, membrane lipid composition, organelle biogenesis, interaction with cytoskeletal elements, and membrane fission (11). Rab molecules that regulate the secretory pathway are elevated in different cancer types, such as Rab1 in human tongue cancer (12), Rab3 in cancers of the nervous system and neuroendocrine cells, Rab22b/31 in breast cancer (13), and Rab23 in hepatic and gastric cancer (14, 15). Endocytic Rabs are also deregulated in cancer. For example, Rab5a is elevated in hepatocellular carcinoma and thyroid adenoma (16, 17), Rab5b is decreased in metastatic melanoma, and Rab7 and Rab20 are upregulated in thyroid adenoma and pancreatic carcinoma, respectively (13).

Recently, more attention has been directed toward Rab25, a member of the Rab11 subfamily, which is exclusively expressed in epithelial cells. Rab25 has been proposed to regulate the recycling of proteins from the endosomes to the plasma membrane (18). However, the association between Rab25 deregulation and cancer is still a matter of debate. For example, Rab25 expression is elevated and correlated to poor prognosis in prostate and ovarian cancer. On the other hand, Rab25 has also been reported to be both up- and downregulated in breast cancer (19–21). More recently, loss of Rab25 has been shown to promote intestinal neoplasia in mice and to correlate with human colorectal adenocarcinomas (22). These evidences indicate an important role of Rab25 in tumor progression and aggressiveness. Several mechanisms have been proposed to define the role of Rab25 in cancer. Cheng and colleagues reported that overexpression of Rab25 inhibits apoptosis and autophagy by increasing cellular bioenergetics (23). Others have suggested that Rab25, together with the chloride intracellular channel 3 (CLIC3), regulates tumor invasiveness and mediates recycling of α5β1-integrin to the plasma membrane from a late endosomal compartment (5). Although the mechanism remains unclear, these pieces of evidence strongly implicate Rab25 in tumor development, progression, and aggressiveness.

In this study, we investigated the role of Rab25 and its regulation in HNSCC. First, we determined the Rab25 status in normal oral mucosa and HNSCC tissues of differing grade and stage. Next, we used a lentiviral expression system to modify Rab25 expression in SCC cells to study pathologic functions of tumor cells. Finally, we investigated the role of Rab25 in tumor development and progression by using a combination of intravital two-photon microscopy (TPM) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) in a mouse model of oral cancer.

Materials and Methods

Cell lines

Human cancer cell lines HN12, HeLa-O3, Cal27, UMCCC2, and UMSCC17B maintained as previously described (24) in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% FBS, at 37°C in 95% air/5% CO2. ORL48 (25) and ORL150 were kindly gifts from Dr. Cheong Sok Ching, CARIF, Malaysia. HeLa-A, SiHa, HaCaT, C33A, and A549 cell lines were obtained from American Type Culture Collection and HeLa-J (kindly gift from Dr. Julie Donaldson, NHLBI, NIH) maintained according to the company instruction. Human immortalized normal oral keratinocytes (HNOK) were established as described (26). All above cell lines underwent short tandem repeat DNA authentication (Genetica DNA Laboratories, Inc.) before the described experiments to ensure consistency in cell identity.

Plasmids constructs

Human Rab25 and Rab11a full-length cDNA clones were obtained from Mammalian Gene Collection (MGC, NIH) and subcloned into pENTRsfiI intermediate plasmid by fusing it with venus or red fluorescent protein (RFP) sequence at the C-terminal. The C-terminal hypervariable regions of Rab25 (amino acid 171-213) and Rab11 (amino acid 170-216) were generated by PCR-cloning and fused with the N-terminal regions of Rab11 (amino acid 1-169) and Rab25 (amino acid 1-170), respectively. Lifeact GFP was a gift from Tamas Balla (NICHD, NIH). Histone-GFP fusion (H2B-GFP) was obtained from Addgene (#11680; ref. 27).

Antibodies and reagents

The following antibodies were used in this study: rabbit polyclonal anti-Rab25 and cleaved-caspase-3 (Cell Signaling Technology), rabbit polyclonal anti-Rab25 (recognized amino acid residues 131-145, Sigma -Aldrich), rabbit polyclonal antisera against EGF receptor (EGFR) and tubulin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), rabbit polyclonal anti-GFP and Lyve1 (Abcam), rabbit polyclonal anti-Ki67 (Nova Castra, Leica microsystems), rat monoclonal anti-CD31 (BD Pharmingen). All antibodies were used for Western blot analysis or IHC at a dilution of 1:1000 or 1:100, respectively. AlexaFluor 488, 594, and 647 conjugated secondary antibodies for immunofluorescence were purchased from Invitrogen. EGF, Latrunculin A, and Cytochalasin D were obtained from Sigma.

Lentiviral expression system

cDNAs encoding for TagRFP, H2B-GFP, venus, venus-Rab25, venus-Rab25-11, venus-Rab11-25, RFP-Rab25, and Lifeact GFP were subcloned into the intermediate vector pENTRsfiI and transferred to the lentiviral expression vector pLESIP (28). Short hairpin RNAs (shRNA) targeting nonsilencing scramble sequence (pGIPZ sh-scramble) and 3 different sequences of Rab25 (pGIPZ sh-Rab25; clone ID V2LHS_38594, V3LHS_362078, V3LHS_362078) were obtained from Open Biosystem (Thermo Scientific). Lentiviral stocks were prepared and titrated with HEK-293T cells as packaging cells. Tumor cells were infected with the virus for 16 hours. After, cells were returned to normal growth medium and infected cells were isolated with fluorescent-activated cell sorting (FACS) and maintained under puromycin (1 μg/mL) selection.

Tissue arrays immunohistochemistry

Oral cavity SCC and normal tissues high-density tissue microarray with grade and tumor–node–metastasis (TNM; stage; 69 cases/208 cores, #OR 208) were purchased from US BioMax Inc. and used for IHC. The formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue array slides were first deparaffinized in 100% xylene. The slides were hydrated through a series of graded alcohols (100%, 95%, 80%, and 70%) for 5 minutes each, washed once in H2O for 5 minutes, incubated in sodium citrate buffer (pH6.0) for 2 minutes in microwave at full power, and then for 20 minutes at 10% power to unmask the antigen. The slides were then incubated in: (i) 3% hydrogen peroxide at room temperature for 10 minutes to quench endogenous peroxidase activity; (ii) blocking serum (2% bovine serum albumin in PBS-1% Tween 20) for 1 hour; and (iii) primary antibody in blocking buffer overnight at 4°C. The slides were washed in PBS 3 times, incubated with a biotin-conjugated secondary antibody (1:400 dilution) at room temperature for 30 minutes followed by the avidin-biotin complex (Vector Stain Elite, ABC kit, Vector Laboratories) for 30 minutes at room temperature. The slides were washed and developed in 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (Sigma FASTDAB tablet, Sigma Chemical) under microscopic observation. The reaction was stopped in tap water and the tissues were counterstained with Mayer's hematoxylin, dehydrated, and mounted. The images were taken using Scanscope (Aperio). The evaluation of the IHC was conducted blindly by A. Molinolo and P. Amornphimoltham. The whole tissue array slides were examined and classified based on the staining intensity (1, weak staining; 2, moderate staining; and 3, strong staining) and the percentage of positive cells quantified as previously described (0, <10% of stained cells; 1, 10%–25%; 2, 25%–50%; 3, 50–75%; and 4, 75–100% of cells stained; refs. 28, 29).

Three-dimensional collagen-matrix invasion assay

Collagen gels (rat tail collagen type I, BD Bioscience) were prepared in serum-free DMEM at a final concentration of 2.0 mg/mL and added (500 μL volume) to transwell inserts (0.4 μm polycarbonated membrane) of 12-well plates (Costar). Collagen was allowed to polymerize and equilibrate in culture incubator for 2 hours. After, 200 μL of serum-free media containing 0.4 × 106 tumor cells were added to each well. Serum-containing, serum-free media without or with 10 ng/mL EGF were added into the bottom wells. When needed, inhibitors of the actin cytoskeleton were added in the transwell insert at the beginning of assay (1 μmol/L Latrunculin A and 10 μmol/L Cytochalasin D). Cells were allowed to invade in the three-dimensional (3D) collagen gels for 8 hours. Culture media was removed and the gels containing the tumor cells were fixed in 4% formaldehyde in PBS for 30 minutes. Z stack images were obtained using an inverted confocal Olympus microscope (water objective XLUMPFL20XW, numerical aperture (NA) 0.95). Fluorescent-labeled polystyrene microspheres (15 μm; Invitrogen) were used to mark the top of the gel. To quantify tumor cells invasion, 8 random fields per condition in at least 2 independent experiments were scanned and the distance of the invading cells from the top of the gel was measured. Data are reported as mean distance of invading cell (±SD).

Tongue tumor xenograft in athymic nu/nu or SCID mice

All the experiments were approved by the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research Animal Care and Use Committee (NIH). Female athymic (nu/nu) nude mice (Harlan Sprague Dawley) and female severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice (National Cancer Institute at Frederick) 5–6 weeks old and 20–25 g, were used in the study. The mice were housed in appropriate sterile filter-capped cages, fed and watered ad libitum. Half a million of HN12 or HeLa-O3 cells were submucosally injected in the lateral anterior of the tongue. Animals were fed with soft dough diet from the day of injection. The tumor growth was monitored on a weekly basis. For each experiment, tumor-bearing animals were randomly divided into groups of 10 animals. All experiments were done in triplicate. At the indicated time points, animals were euthanized and tissues were collected. Tissues were lysed in protein lysis buffer for Western blot analysis. Alternatively, they were fixed and embedded in paraffin, or frozen and embedded in optimal cutting temperature compound (OCT; Tissue-Tek, Sakura Finetek) for histopathologic assessment and IHC study.

Immunofluorescence

For immunofluorescence staining, OCT-embedded frozen tissues were cut (15 μm) and put onto silanated glass slides, air-dried, and stored at −80°C. Cryosections were thawed at room temperature, hydrated, washed with PBS, and incubated in blocking solution (10% heated-inactivated FBS in 0.01% saponin PBS) for 1 hour followed by incubation with the first primary antibody diluted in blocking solutions at 4°C, overnight. After washing, slides were sequentially incubated with the appropriate fluorescent-conjugated secondary antibody (dilution, 1:750) for 30 minutes. The slides were washed and incubated for 10 minutes in Hoechst 33342 (Invitrogen) to label nuclei, and mounted in Fluoromount G (Southern Biotech). Images were acquired and analyzed using a confocal microscope, as described below.

Tongue tumor imaging with two-photon and confocal microscopy

Mice were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injections of ketamine (10 mg/kg) and xylazine (100 mg/kg). The animals were placed on a preheated stage with the mouth open and the tongue gently retracted using nontooth forceps. The tongue was hold in a custom-made holder, secured with a glass coverslip (Fig. 4A). The preheated stage was moved close to the objective of a TPM and the body temperature was maintained at 37°C–38°C with a heated pad (Kent Scientific).

An inverted confocal microscope (model IX81, Olympus America) was modified to conduct TPM, as previously described (30). As a laser source, a tunable Ti:sapphire femtosecond laser (Chameleon Ultra II, Coherent Laser Group) was used, and the power was modulated using a combination of neutral density filters (Chroma Technology). A beam expander (LSM Technologies) was used to modulate the size of the beam that was then directed into a scanning head (Fluoview 1000, Olympus America). The emitted signal was aimed into a custom-made set of 3 nondescanned detectors (LSM Technologies). Two dichroic mirrors and the barrier filters were purchased from Chroma Technology, and 3 cooled photo multipliers (PMT) were purchased from Hamamatsu. The first PMT (510-nm dichroic mirror, 400- to 480-nm barrier filter) detected the endogenous fluorescence and the second harmonic signal. GFP, venus, and Alexa 488 signal were detected with the second PMT (570-nm dichroic mirror, 505- to 560-nm barrier filter). TagRFP and Alexa 594 were detected on the third PMT (590- to 650-nm barrier filter). For time-lapse imaging of the live animals, the acquisition speed was set to 0.3 frames per second. All images and movies were acquired using a UPLSAPO ×60, NA 1.2, a XLUMPFL20XW ×20, NA 0.95, and a XLPlanN ×25, NA 1.05 water immersion objectives (Olympus America).

Image processing

The image background noise was reduced by applying a 2 × 2 pixel low-pass filter to each image for 1 or 2 rounds using Metamorph software (Molecular Devices). Brightness, contrast, and gamma correction were applied. For the movies, the alignment of each frame was adjusted using ImageJ (W. Rasband, NIH) with Stackreg plug-in. Volume rendering was conducted using Imaris 7.4 64-bit (Bitplane). The final preparation of the images was managed with Adobe Photoshop CS. Movies were assembled with Metamorph and compressed with Quicktime Pro.

Western blotting

Cells or small pieces of tissues were rinsed with PBS and rapidly lysed with protein lysis buffer (62.5 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), 2% SDS, 10% glycerol, 50 mmol/L dithiothreitol), and transferred immediately to microcentrifuge tubes and sonicated for 20 seconds. Protein yield was quantified using the Quick start Bradford protein assay (Bio-Rad). Equivalent amounts protein (80–100 μg) were separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, and immunodetection conducted with tubulin as loading control.

In vitro wound scratch assay

Tumor cells were seeded uniformly (2 × 105 cells/well) onto a silicone culture insert (Ibidi) and grown to 100% confluence as described by the manufacturer. After 24 hours, the inserts were removed. Images of the wounds were acquired 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 hours after the onset by a microscope (Olympus), equipped with a charged-coupled device camera. The wound closure distance was measured and reported.

Cell-cycle analysis

Cell-cycle analysis was conducted as described (24). Briefly, cells were harvested in DMEM with 1% FBS, fixed in 70% ethanol, and stained with 50 μg/mL of propidium iodide and 0.1 μg/mL of RNaseA in PBS. DNA content of cells was quantified on a Becton Dickinson FACScan and analyzed using Cell Quest software (Immunocytometry system; Becton Dickinson).

Tumor microvessel density analysis

Tumor microvessels were identified by CD31 and Lyve1 immunofluorescent staining of blood and lymphatic vessels, respectively. Images were captured from random areas in each section and morphometric analysis was conducted using the MetaMorph 4.0 Imaging system (Molecular Devices Corporation). Microvessel density was calculated by dividing the total perimeter of microvessels by the number area counted. Values reported for each experimental condition correspond to the average values obtained from 8 random field images in 2 independent experiments.

Immunofluorescence analysis for tumor cell proliferation and apoptosis

Tumor cell proliferation and apoptosis was estimated by using anti-Ki67 and cleaved-caspase-3 antibody, respectively. Images were captured from at least 5 different areas in each tissue slide. After adjusting the fluorescent signal–noise threshold of the images, the total area presenting fluorescent signal was measured using ImageJ (NIH). Values reported correspond to the mean ± SE of values obtained from 4 samples for each experimental condition.

Analysis of F-actin levels at the plasma membrane in vivo

The levels of F-actin at the plasma membrane were evaluated in 2 experimental conditions. First, in cryosections from xenografts of either Hela-O3-v or Hela-O3-vRab25 those were labeled with Alexa 594-phalloidin. Alternatively, in xenograft of Hela-O3 cells expressing RFP-lifeact and either venus or vRab25. Images of individual cells were acquired using confocal microscope as described above. The shape of the cells was determined by the expression of venus or vRab25. A region of interest was delineated around the cell surface (approximately 1 μm from each side of the cell border) and the integrated fluorescence intensity was calculated by using Image J. At least 8–10 cells per experimental conditions were evaluated.

Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis was conducted using Prism 5 (GraphPad Software). For each experiment, the statistical tests were indicated in the result sections. Unpaired t-test (2-tailed) and one-way ANOVA were used to analyze the IHC staining scores and the 3D invasion assays. Fisher's exact test and χ2 test were used for the tongue cancer metastasis in vivo. Statistical significance was calculated at a 95% confidence level.

Results

Rab25 is downregulated in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Genetic evidence supports the role of Rab25 in the development and progression of various cancers in human and mouse models including ovarian, breast, and prostate cancers (20, 21, 23, 31, 32). Recently, loss of Rab25 was reported to increase the incidence of colorectal carcinoma in mice (33). Therefore, we conducted IHC on human HNSCC tissue arrays to determine whether Rab25 was abnormally expressed. In healthy individuals, we found that the staining intensity of Rab25 correlated with the degree of cell differentiation. Indeed, there is stronger immunoreaction of Rab25 in the upper mucosal layers (more differentiated cells, Fig. 1, asterisk) than in the basal and suprabasal layers (less differentiated cells, Fig. 1, arrowhead). Moreover, we found that Rab25 expression was significantly lower in both advanced and metastatic tumors when compared with tissues from healthy individuals (Fig. 1A and B). However, Rab25 expression was not significantly different among TNM stages. Moreover, we determined the expression of CLIC3, a protein linked to Rab25 in pancreatic cancer (32). Surprisingly, we found high levels of CLIC3 expression in tumors and normal tissue regardless of the Rab25 expression (Supplementary Fig. S1A). These findings suggest that Rab25 may operate in HNSCC through a different mechanism from those proposed for other tumors. Finally, we found that Rab25 expression was downregulated in cervical cancer in a similar fashion to HNSCC tissues (Supplementary Fig. S1B).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Rab25 expression in human HNSCC. A, representative core tissues from a human oral cancer tissue array stained using an antibody directed against human Rab25. Tissues were grouped according to the TNM classification (T1, T2, T3, T4, and Met). Rab25 immunoreaction in more differentiated (asterisk) and less differentiated (arrowhead) cells. Met, metastasis. The insets show higher magnification of the staining pattern of cancer cells. B, quantitative analysis of Rab25 expression from human normal and oral cancer tissue array. ***, P < 0.0001; one-way ANOVA, n = number of tissue cores.

Rab25 downregulation promotes cell invasion in a 3D microenvironment

To investigate the role of Rab25 downregulation in HNSCC, we screened a panel of human oral squamous carcinoma cell lines for Rab25 expression (Fig. 2A). All the tested cell lines expressed Rab25 at levels comparable to normal oral keratinocytes (Fig. 2A). Therefore, we engineered HN12 cells to stably expressed 3 different shRNAs targeting Rab25 (HN12-shRab25) or a scrambled shRNA (HN12-shScramb) as a control (Fig. 2B). This cell line was chosen because it forms tumors in orthotopic models of oral cancer (28). Downregulation of Rab25 did not affect either cell proliferation or motility when cultured on different substrates in two-dimension (2D; data not shown). However, HN12-shRab25 invaded a 3D collagen matrix in the presence of EGF, whereas HN12-shScramb and HN12 parental line did not (Fig. 2B). To further characterize this finding, we screened additional human cancer cell lines for the expression of Rab25 (Fig. 2A). Among the cell lines that did not express Rab25, we selected HeLa-O3 cells, which are highly metastatic when injected into floor of the mouth of immunocompromised mice [this is a variant of HeLa adenocarcinoma cells formerly mistaken for an oral cancer cell line (OSCC3; ref. 34)]. This cell line also expressed high EGFR level, which is commonly upregulated in HNSCC (Fig. 2A; ref. 35). HeLa-O3 cells were engineered to stably express either Rab25 fused with the fluorescent protein Venus (HeLa-O3-vRab25) or Venus alone (HeLa-O3-v; Fig. 2C). Notably, we observed that HeLa-O3-v cells migrated through a 3D collagen matrix when stimulated by either serum or EGF without effecting cell proliferation, whereas HeLa-O3-vRab25 did not (Fig. 2C). Rab25 and Rab11a share significant sequence homology with the exception of the c-terminal hypervariable region, which contains the targeting information for the Rab proteins (6, 9, 10). To confirm that this effect is specific for Rab25, we constructed 2 chimeras fused with venus: one, in which the c-terminus of Rab25 was replaced with Rab11a c-terminus (vRab25-11), and the other, in which the c-terminus of Rab11a was replaced with Rab25 c-terminus (vRab11-25; Fig. 2D). Notably, cells expressing vRab11-25 (Hela-O3-vRab11-25) were impaired to migrate through the 3D collagen matrix, whereas cells expressing vRab25-11 (Hela-O3 v-Rab25-11) were not (Fig. 2D). These results suggest that altering Rab25 expression is sufficient to change the invasive behavior of tumor cells in an in vitro 3D microenvironment.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Rab25 controls tumor cell invasion in a 3D in vitro model. A, the protein levels of RAB25 and EGFR were determined by Western blot analysis in a cancer cells panel using human normal oral keratinocytes (HNOK) as control. Tubulin was used as loading control. B and C, invasion assay in collagen type I matrix. HN12 cells were engineered to stably express shRNA for RAB25 (sh-Rab25) or control scramble shRNA (sh-Scramb; B, left, Western blot analysis), whereas Hela-O3 cells were engineered to express venus-RAB25 (v-Rab25) or venus (v) as control (C, left, Western blot analysis). D, Western blot analysis and collagen matrix invasion assay of Hela-O3 cells expressing v, v-Rab25, vRab25-11, and vRab11-25. EGF (10 ng/mL) or serum was used as chemoattractants. The volume rendering from Z-stacks was conducted using Imaris (Bitplane). The extent of invasion was assessed by measuring the distance of the cell front from the top of the matrix that was marked by fluorescent beads. Data represent mean ± SEM from 8 random fields. ns, not statistically significant; *, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.0001; one-way ANOVA in B and D; unpaired t-test in C; scale bars, 20 μm.

Rab25 reexpression inhibits metastasis to cervical lymph nodes in a mouse model for oral cancer

To assess whether Rab25 is involved in the development and progression of SCC in vivo, we used a previously established tumor xenograft model in which tumor cells are injected into the tongue of immunocompromised mice (36). HN12 cells formed primary tumors but did not invade lymph nodes even after 60 days (Fig. 3A). On the other hand, HeLa-O3 cells formed a visible tumor mass within 7–10 days (Fig. 3B, top) and invaded the cervical lymph nodes in more than 80% of the mice within 3 weeks (Fig. 3B, bottom). When these cells were injected into the flank of immunocompromised mice, tumor formation occurred but they did not invade or metastasize (data not shown). Interestingly, other variants of HeLa cells did not metastasize when transplanted into the tongue (Fig. 3B) or in other areas, such as the flank or the cervix (data not shown).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Rab25 controls tongue cancer metastases in vivo—tumor cell lines (HN12 in A; HeLa-O3 and HeLa-A in B; HeLa-O3-v and HeLa-O3-vRab25 in C, and Hela-O3-v, -v-Rab25, -v-Rab25-11, and -v-Rab11-25 in D) were transplanted into the lateral tongues of immunocompromised mice. Mice were euthanized after 60 days. Tongue primary tumors and cervical lymph nodes were removed for histopathologic evaluation. Histology of whole tongue tumors and metastasis in cervical lymph node are depicted from representative tissue for each tumor cell (A, HN12; B, HeLa-O3; and C, HeLa-O3-v). Broken lines indicate the tumor mass border. High magnification insets are in the right panels. Quantitative data represent percentage of mice with tumor burden or cervical lymph nodes metastasis. LN Met, lymph nodes metastasis; n = number of mice. Quantitative analysis of tumor burden and LN Met are shown in graphs. ns, not statistically significant; **, P < 0.001; ***, P < 0.0001; Fisher exact test in A, B, and C; χ2 test in D.

Next, we transplanted HeLa-O3-vRab25 or HeLa-O3-v cells into the mouse tongue to investigate whether Rab25 has a role in the observed cervical lymph nodes metastasis. The expression of Venus or Venus-Rab25 did not affect the ability of HeLa-O3 cells to form primary tumors in the tongues of immunocompromised mice (Fig. 3C). Strikingly, the metastasis incidence in HeLa-O3-vRab25 tumors was significantly reduced compared with the incidence in HeLa-O3-v tumors (Fig. 3C). This reduction was not because of differences in tumor growth (assessed by tumor weight and volume), cell proliferation (assessed by Ki67 staining), or apoptosis (assessed by cleaved-caspase-3 staining; Supplementary Fig. S2A and S2C, respectively). Moreover, the expression of Rab25 did not affect the formation of blood and lymphatic vessels, in contrast to a previous report in breast cancer (Supplementary Fig. S2B; ref. 19). The effects from Rab25 were specific, as shown by the transplantation of Hela-O3-vRab11-25 and Hela-O3-vRab25-11. Indeed, the expression of vRab11-25 reduced the metastatic incidence in the tongue xenograft tumor, whereas the expression of vRab25-11 recuperated the cervical metastasis incidence in nearly 50% of the mice (Fig. 3D).

Unfortunately, we could not use HN12-shRab25 cells in vivo, because Rab25 protein expression returned back to its level after injection into the tongue in spite of stable expression of the shRNA (data not shown).

Next, we determined whether Rab25 would affect invasion and metastasis in vivo, similar to what we observed in an in vitro 3D assay. To this aim, we used intravital microscopy, which enables imaging the dynamics of biologic processes in live animals (37). In addition to the other cell lines, we generated HN12 and HeLa-O3 cells stably expressing histone 2B fused with GFP (H2B-GFP) for a better visualization of the tumor mass. Moreover, we developed a tongue-holder device to image tumors daily and to minimize the motion artifacts from the heartbeat and respiration (Fig. 4A). This approach has 2 main advantages: first, it does not require invasive surgical procedures, thus making possible to conduct longitudinal studies, and second, it facilitates repeated imaging in the same area. We acquired images of primary tumors located 100–200 μm below the tongue surface by using a combination of TPM and second harmonic generation (Fig. 4B; Supplementary Movies S1 and S2). The tumors edges were imaged once a day for 15–25 consecutive days. Both the depth and the orientation of the tumors were determined by reference to collagen fibers (Fig. 4B), which have a very slow turnover and their pattern is maintained over the monitoring period (38; Fig. 5A, arrows). Interestingly, we observed the tumors expanding in size and individual cells departing from the tumor mass (Fig. 5A, arrowheads). To catch the movement of these cells, the tumors edges were imaged by consecutive Z-scans at 5 minutes intervals (Fig. 5B). Strikingly, we observed some cells moving away from the edges of the tumors at a speed of approximately 1–2 μm per minutes (Fig. 5B, arrowheads, and Supplementary Movie S3), whereas the majority of the cells did not migrate within the observation period. Later, these tumor cells were either found near or inside lymphatic vessels, as revealed by intraorgan injections of fluorescent dextran (Fig. 5C and D; ref. 39). Later, tumor cells were either completely encapsulated once they reached and colonized the cervical lymph nodes (Fig. 5E) or they scattered near large blood vessels (Fig. 5F).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Intravital imaging of the tongue cancer model. A, schematic drawings of the tongue holding device, animal set up for intravital imaging, and primary tumor mass growing in the tongue. B, intravital microscopy of tongue cancer at the primary site. Hela-O3 cells expressing H2B-GFP were transplanted into the tongue submucosa. Before imaging, a 70 kDa dextran was injected systemically to reveal stromal cells. A Z-scan was conducted by using TPM (60× water immersion lens, NA 1.2, Olympus). The same area was imaged using either 750 nm (top) or 930 nm (bottom) as excitation wavelengths. Both conditions revealed tumor cells (green) and stromal cells (red). However, the excitation at 750 nm revealed the tongue parenchyma (cyan), whereas the excitation at 930 nm revealed components of the extracellular matrix and myosin filaments from the muscle fibers (cyan). Scale bars, 20 μm.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Long-term imaging of the tongue cancer. A–F, Hela-O3 cells expressing either venus (A and B) or H2B-GFP (C–F) were transplanted into the tongue submucosa, as described in Materials and Methods. A, after 7 days from the injection, the edges of the tumor were imaged on a daily basis by using TPM (excitation wavelength of 930 nm) to reveal collagen fibers (red) and the tumor mass (green). Z-stacks were acquired at day 7 (D7), 8 (D8), and 9 (D9) by using a 25× water lens (NA 1.05, Olympus). 3D reconstructions (top, yz view) and maximal projections of the xy view were conducted by using Imaris (Bitplane; middle and bottom). The extracellular matrix at the surface of the tongue was used as a reference point (middle, arrows). Individual tumor cells were observed migrating from the tumor mass (arrowheads). Bar, 50 μm. B, after 14 days, the edge of the tumor was imaged as described above by conducting Z-stacks for 2 hours at 5 minutes interval. Individual cells were observed leaving the tumor mass (insets, red arrowheads). Bar, 20 μm. C and D, Texas Red-dextran (70 kDa) was injected in the tongue to map the lymphatic vessels, and Z-scan were conducted, as described above. Maximal projections show tumor cells expressing H2B-GFP (green) either in proximity (C) or inside lymphatic vessels (D). Note collagen fibers in C (cyan). E and F, dextran (70 kDa) was intravenously injected to label blood vessels and stromal cells, and cervical lymph nodes were exposed and imaged as described above. E, tumor cells (green) colonized a cervical lymph node: stromal cells (red) and collagen fibers (cyan). F, tumor cells (green) are in close proximity to a blood vessel (red). Bars, 50 μm.

To determine whether expression of Rab25 directly affected the motility of the tumor cells in vivo, we co-injected HeLa-O3 cells stably expressing the RFP (HeLa-O3-RFP) with HeLa-O3-vRab25 and imaged the tumor edge either on a daily basis or at shorter intervals (every 5 minutes). Both cell lines were equally distributed in the tumor mass in the early stage (Fig. 6A). However, HeLa-O3-RFP cells migrated from the primary sites, which became enriched in HeLa-O3-vRab25 cells at later time points (Fig. 6B). Moreover, we could not observe any HeLa-O3-vRab25 cells leave the primary site (data not shown). Consistent with this finding, HeLa-O3-RFP cells were the only cells that invaded the lymphatic system and metastasized to the cervical lymph nodes (Fig. 6C).

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

RAB25 expression inhibits lymphatic metastasis in tongue cancer—HeLa-O3 cells expressing RFP (red) or venus-Rab25 (green) were cotransplanted into the lateral tongue of immunocompromised mice. A and B, the edges of the tumor were imaged on a daily basis by intravital TPM, as described in Fig. 5. A, tumor mass after 9 days (D9). B, maximal projections of the tumor mass imaged at day 17 (D17), 18 (D18), and 19 (D19). Note that the tumor cells lacking Rab25 (red) migrate from the tumor mass that is mainly formed by cells expressing Rab25 (green). Bars, 50 μm. C, after 30 days, tumors and cervical lymph nodes were removed, fixed, and processed as described in Materials and Methods. Tissue cryosections were labeled with an antibody directed against Lyve-1, a marker for lymphatic vessels (cyan). Primary tumors are shown in the left and middle panels. Note that only cells lacking Rab25 are able to invade the lymphatic vessels (middle) and colonize the cervical lymph node (right).

Rab25 reexpression blocks the formation of actin-rich protrusive structures

As shown above, reexpression of Rab25 negatively regulates the ability of tumor cells to metastasize to the cervical lymph nodes in our mouse model of oral cancer. Our data also suggest that expression of Rab25 inhibits the motility of a subpopulation of tumor cells. To gain some insight on the machinery regulated by Rab25 we imaged both HeLa-O3-v and HeLa-O3-vRab25 tumors at higher resolution and faster acquisition speed. Rab25 was clearly localized in small and dynamic vesicles scattered in the cytoplasm, confirming that its expression did not elicit any toxic cellular effect (Fig. 7A, Supplementary Movie S4). Interestingly, HeLa-O3-v showed a series of dynamic cell protrusions that were not detected in HeLa-O3-vRab25 (Fig. 7A, Supplementary Movie S4). Because the actin cytoskeleton has been implicated in the formation of various plasma membrane structures involved in cell migration (5), we investigated whether F-actin associated with these protrusions. Indeed, actin was enriched at the plasma membrane, particularly in the protrusions, in both 3D collagen matrix and live animals (Fig. 7B and C, Supplementary Movie S5). Notably, cells expressing Rab25 had a substantial reduction in the levels of F-actin at the plasma membrane (Fig. 7B–E, Supplementary Movie S5). Moreover, we found that knocking down Rab25 in HN12 cells also resulted in the actin-enriched protrusion formation in 3D collagen matrix (data not shown). To address whether the actin cytoskeleton affected tumor cells invasion, we used 2 potent F-actin disrupting drugs (cytochalasin D and latrunculin A) in the 3D invasion assays. Both inhibitors significantly affected tumor cells invasion independently of the Rab25 levels (Fig. 7F). Interestingly, modulations of Rab25 levels in both HeLa-O3 and HN12 cells did not change the arrangement of the cytoskeleton when cells were grown in 2D substrates suggesting that the 3D architecture and the tissue microenvironment play a fundamental role in this process (data not shown).

Figure 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 7.

RAB25 expression reduces actin-rich protrusion in tumor cells. A, intravital TPM of tongue tumors from HeLa-O3 expressing venus (left) or venus-Rab25 (right). Cells lacking Rab25 exhibit dynamics protrusions (arrowheads and Supplementary Movie S4). B, HeLa-O3 cells expressing venus (left) or venus-Rab25 (right) were allowed to invade a 3D collagen matrix, fixed, and labeled with phalloidin. In cells lacking Rab25, actin-rich protrusions are clearly visible at the cell surface. C, mouse tongue xenograft tissues from HeLa-O3 expressing venus (left) or venus-Rab25 (right) were stained with phalloidin (overlay) and phalloidin alone (bottom). Broken lines indicated the approximate tumor cell borders. Arrowheads indicate the thick actin structures at cell protrusions. D, intravital imaging of tumor cells expressing lifeactGFP in HeLa-O3 expressing RFP (left) or RFPRab25 (right) in tongue tumors. Arrowheads indicate the thick actin structures at cell protrusions. Scale bars, 20 μm. E, quantification of F-actin at the plasma membrane. Actin expression (phalloidin staining and Lifeact expression) from HeLa-O3 and HeLa-O3-Rab25 cells was analyzed by ImageJ software as described in Materials and Methods. The graphs represent the pixel intensity at the plasma membrane of each cell (mean ± SE). *, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.0001; unpaired t-test. F, collagen invasion assay of HeLa-O3-v cells stimulated with EGF (10 ng/mL) in the presented or absent of actin polymerization inhibitors (10 μmol/L of cytochalasin D-cytoD and 1 μmol/L of latrunculin A-latA). Cell invasion quantification was conducted as described in Fig. 2. Data represent mean ± SEM from 8 random fields. ns, not statistically significant; *, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.0001; one-way ANOVA.

Discussion

Several evidences suggest that deregulation of molecules involved in endocytosis plays a fundamental role in human diseases including cancer. Indeed, endocytosis coordinates multiple steps that may affect cancer progression, such as receptor-mediated signaling from the plasma membrane, cell-to-cell contact, and cell motility (7). Rab proteins are considered master regulators of endocytosis and often deregulated in various cancers. Among the Rab family members, Rab25 has been implicated in different cancers although its mechanism of action has been controversial. Indeed, both upregulation and downregulation of Rab25 have been associated with tumor growth, differentiation, and poor prognosis. Moreover, Rab25 has been involved in several cellular processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, angiogenesis, cell cycle, trafficking of adhesion molecules, and cell migration (19–21, 31, 40–43). In this study, we determine the role of Rab25 in HNSCC formation and metastasis. To this aim, we used a series of approaches, which include expression analysis of HNSCC patient tissues, analysis of cellular function in 3D microenvironments in vitro, and tumor cells dynamics in vivo using intravital microscopy in a tongue cancer model.

First, we found a significant reduction in Rab25 expression in HNSCC patient tissues, although without any correlation between Rab25 expression and tumor stage. These findings would favor a model in which Rab25 acts as a tumor suppressor, as suggested for other cancers (19, 22). However, loss of Rab25 alone may not be sufficient to initiate tumorigenesis because Rab25 knockout mice do not develop any spontaneous tumors (33). In addition, we detected high levels of CLIC3 expression in both normal and HNSCC tissues independent of Rab25 expression. This observation is in contrast to a report suggesting that CLIC3 and Rab25 synergistically drive tumor progression in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (32). Our data strongly suggests that Rab25 may operate in HNSCC differently from what was described for other cancers (19–21, 23, 31, 32, 40, 44, 45). Indeed, we found that Rab25 downregulation promotes cell invasion and metastasis in HNSCC. The main evidence comes from an invasion assay in a 3D collagen matrix and in a tongue cancer mouse model. We used 2 cancer cell lines; HN12 (Rab25 levels comparable to normal oral keratinocytes) and Hela-O3 (expression of Rab25 below the detection levels) that were engineered to knockdown Rab25 or express fluorescently tagged Rab25, respectively. Both cell lines were chosen as they form aggressive tumors when implanted in the tongue or the floor of mouth in immunodeficient mouse (34, 36). We found that alteration in Rab25 expression did not affect cell proliferation or apoptosis both in vitro and in vivo. However, cells lacking Rab25 migrated through 3D collagen matrix when stimulated by EGF or serum. Consistent with this finding, HeLa-O3 cells metastasized to cervical lymph nodes when transplanted in the tongue or in floor of mouth (34), whereas other HeLa variants, which lacked both Rab25 and EGFR, did not. This observation suggests a possible link between Rab25 and EGFR signaling in cell migration and metastasis. Moreover, we ruled out the roles of Rab25, in tumor growth or vascular angiogenesis regulation, as reported in breast cancer (19, 42).

To gain further insight on how Rab25 regulate invasion and metastasis in vivo, we used intravital microscopy. We observed that a subpopulation of cells lacking Rab25 migrated from the tumor mass, whereas Rab25-expressing cells were confined to the primary site. Consistent with this observation, only Rab25-depleted cells reached lymphatic vessels, intravasated, and spread to the distal lymph nodes. These observations suggest that tumor invasion occurs through single cell rather than collective migration in this model (46) and this process is facilitated by the lack of Rab25. Finally, we observed that reexpression of Rab25 induced significant changes in cell shape. During cell migration, the actin cytoskeleton is rearranged at the cell surface and forms a series of structures such as invadopodia, podosomes, lamellipodia, and ruffles that interact with the extracellular matrix components (46). Both in vivo and in a 3D matrix, cells lacking Rab25 displayed actin-rich protrusions, which has similar morphology to invadopodia (47, 48). Rab25 expression significantly reduced the number of actin-rich structures and the overall levels of F-actin at the plasma membrane, suggesting a possible involvement in actin dynamics regulation. Moreover, we found that the invasion of tumor cells in a 3D collagen assay is significantly inhibited by the pharmacologic disruption of the actin cytoskeleton. Thus, we can hypothesize that Rab25 may regulate trafficking of molecules that negatively regulate actin assembly (e.g., signaling molecules, integrin, or cholesterol-rich membranes; refs. 5, 47, 48), although we cannot rule out other mechanisms. This idea is supported by the role of FIP3, a protein that simultaneously interacts with the small GTPase Arf6 and Rab25/Rab11, which controls the motility of breast cancer cells by regulating Rac1 and actin dynamics (49). On the basis of the fact that Rab25 is localized in intracellular vesicles and that Rab25 has been implicated in endosomal recycling (50), we speculated that the lack of Rab25 might prevent these actin regulators from reaching the plasma membrane and divert them to degradation pathway. Indeed, a similar mechanism has been suggested in breast and pancreatic cancer (6, 32). However, in these models, overexpression of Rab25 enhanced cell migration and invasion by increasing the recycling of integrin β1 from a late endosomal compartment to the plasma membrane (6, 32). These differences in the modality of action of Rab25 may be explained by the fact that the trafficking of molecules involved in migration may occur through different pathways in which Rab25 may interact with a completely different set of molecules.

In conclusion, we have shown that the downregulation of Rab25 plays a significant role in HNSCC and suggested that Rab25 may regulate tumor invasion and metastasis through actin remodeling at the plasma membrane. We believe that identification of the molecules interacting with Rab25 and elucidation of the molecular machinery underlying its action may provide new strategies to prevent metastasis in oral cancer patients.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Authors' Contributions

Conception and design: P. Amornphimoltham, J.S. Gutkind, R. Weigert

Development of methodology: P. Amornphimoltham, A. Masedunskas, K. Leelahavanichkul, V. Patel, R. Weigert

Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): P. Amornphimoltham, K. Rechache, J. Thompson, A. Masedunskas, K. Leelahavanichkul, A. Molinolo, R. Weigert

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): P. Amornphimoltham, K. Rechache, A. Masedunskas, R. Weigert

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: P. Amornphimoltham, K. Rechache, A. Molinolo, J.S. Gutkind, R. Weigert

Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases): P. Amornphimoltham, J.S. Gutkind, R. Weigert

Study supervision: P. Amornphimoltham, R. Weigert

Grant Support

This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, NIH.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Porat-Shliom and Mr. Mohibullah Tora for critical reading of the manuscript.

Footnotes

  • Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Clinical Cancer Research Online (http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/).

  • Received September 4, 2012.
  • Revision received December 20, 2012.
  • Accepted January 7, 2013.
  • ©2013 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Barnes L EJ,
    2. Reichart P,
    3. Sidransky D
    1. Gale N PB,
    2. Sidransky D,
    3. Westra W,
    4. Califano J
    . Tumours of the hypopharynx, larynx and trachea (Epithelial precursor lesions). In: Barnes L EJ, Reichart P, Sidransky D , editors. World Health Organization classification of tumours pathology & genetics head and neck tumours International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Lyon: IARC Press; 2005. p. 140–3.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Haddad RI,
    2. Shin DM
    . Recent advances in head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1143–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Siegel R,
    2. Naishadham D,
    3. Jemal A
    . Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 2012;62:10–29.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Valastyan S,
    2. Weinberg RA
    . Tumor metastasis: molecular insights and evolving paradigms. Cell 2011;147:275–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Ridley AJ
    . Life at the leading edge. Cell 2011;145:1012–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Caswell P,
    2. Norman J
    . Endocytic transport of integrins during cell migration and invasion. Trends Cell Biol 2008;18:257–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Mosesson Y,
    2. Mills GB,
    3. Yarden Y
    . Derailed endocytosis: an emerging feature of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2008;8:835–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Mitra S,
    2. Cheng KW,
    3. Mills GB
    . Rab GTPases implicated in inherited and acquired disorders. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2011;22:57–68.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Colicelli J
    . Human RAS superfamily proteins and related GTPases. Sci STKE 2004;2004:re13.
  10. 10.↵
    1. Pereira-Leal JB,
    2. Seabra MC
    . Evolution of the rab family of small GTP-binding proteins. J Mol Biol 2001;313:889–901.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Stenmark H
    . Rab GTPases as coordinators of vesicle traffic. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009;10:513–25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Shimada K,
    2. Uzawa K,
    3. Kato M,
    4. Endo Y,
    5. Shiiba M,
    6. Bukawa H,
    7. et al.
    Aberrant expression of RAB1A in human tongue cancer. Br J Cancer 2005;92:1915–21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Chia WJ,
    2. Tang BL
    . Emerging roles for Rab family GTPases in human cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta 2009;1795:110–6.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Hou Q,
    2. Wu YH,
    3. Grabsch H,
    4. Zhu Y,
    5. Leong SH,
    6. Ganesan K,
    7. et al.
    Integrative genomics identifies RAB23 as an invasion mediator gene in diffuse-type gastric cancer. Cancer Res 2008;68:4623–30.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Liu YJ,
    2. Wang Q,
    3. Li W,
    4. Huang XH,
    5. Zhen MC,
    6. Huang SH,
    7. et al.
    Rab23 is a potential biological target for treating hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2007;13:1010–7.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Fukui K,
    2. Tamura S,
    3. Wada A,
    4. Kamada Y,
    5. Igura T,
    6. Kiso S,
    7. et al.
    Expression of Rab5a in hepatocellular carcinoma: possible involvement in epidermal growth factor signaling. Hepatol Res 2007;37:957–65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Croizet-Berger K,
    2. Daumerie C,
    3. Couvreur M,
    4. Courtoy PJ,
    5. van den Hove M-F
    . The endocytic catalysts, Rab5a and Rab7, are tandem regulators of thyroid hormone production. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2002;99:8277–82.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Calhoun BC,
    2. Goldenring JR
    . Rab proteins in gastric parietal cells: evidence for the membrane recycling hypothesis. Yale J Biol Med 1996;69:1–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Cheng JM,
    2. Volk L,
    3. Janaki DK,
    4. Vyakaranam S,
    5. Ran S,
    6. Rao KA
    . Tumor suppressor function of Rab25 in triple-negative breast cancer. Int J Cancer 2010;126:2799–812.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Caswell PT,
    2. Spence HJ,
    3. Parsons M,
    4. White DP,
    5. Clark K,
    6. Cheng KW,
    7. et al.
    Rab25 associates with alpha5beta1 integrin to promote invasive migration in 3D microenvironments. Dev Cell 2007;13:496–510.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Cheng KW,
    2. Lu Y,
    3. Mills GB
    . Assay of Rab25 function in ovarian and breast cancers. Methods Enzymol 2005;403:202–15.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Goldenring JR,
    2. Nam KT
    . Rab25 as a tumour suppressor in colon carcinogenesis. Br J Cancer 2011;104:33–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Cheng KW,
    2. Agarwal R,
    3. Mitra S,
    4. Lee JS,
    5. Carey M,
    6. Gray JW,
    7. et al.
    Rab25 increases cellular ATP and glycogen stores protecting cancer cells from bioenergetic stress. EMBO Mol Med 2012;4:125–41.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Amornphimoltham P,
    2. Patel V,
    3. Sodhi A,
    4. Nikitakis NG,
    5. Sauk JJ,
    6. Sausville EA,
    7. et al.
    Mammalian target of rapamycin, a molecular target in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Cancer Res 2005;65:9953–61.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Hamid S,
    2. Lim KP,
    3. Zain RB,
    4. Ismail SM,
    5. Lau SH,
    6. Mustafa WM,
    7. et al.
    Establishment and characterization of Asian oral cancer cell lines as in vitro models to study a disease prevalent in Asia. Int J Mol Med 2007;19:453–60.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Rhim JS,
    2. Kremer R
    1. Patel V,
    2. Iglesias-Bartolome R,
    3. Siegele B,
    4. Marsh CA,
    5. Leelahavanichkul K,
    6. Molinolo AA,
    7. et al.
    Cellular systems for studying human oral squamous cell carcinomas human cell transformation. In: Rhim JS, Kremer R , editors. Advances in experimental medicine and biology: human cell transformation. New York: Springer; 2012. p. 27–38.
  27. 27.↵
    1. Kanda T,
    2. Sullivan KF,
    3. Wahl GM
    . Histone ÄìGFP fusion protein enables sensitive analysis of chromosome dynamics in living mammalian cells. Curr Biol 1998;8:377–85.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Amornphimoltham P,
    2. Leelahavanichkul K,
    3. Molinolo A,
    4. Patel V,
    5. Gutkind JS
    . Inhibition of mammalian target of rapamycin by rapamycin causes the regression of carcinogen-induced skin tumor lesions. Clin Cancer Res 2008;14:8094–101.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Charafe-Jauffret E,
    2. Tarpin C,
    3. Bardou VJ,
    4. Bertucci F,
    5. Ginestier C,
    6. Braud AC,
    7. et al.
    Immunophenotypic analysis of inflammatory breast cancers: identification of an ‘inflammatory signature'. J Pathol 2004;202:265–73.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Masedunskas A,
    2. Weigert R
    . Intravital two-photon microscopy for studying the uptake and trafficking of fluorescently conjugated molecules in live rodents. Traffic 2008;9:1801–10.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Cheng KW,
    2. Lahad JP,
    3. Kuo WL,
    4. Lapuk A,
    5. Yamada K,
    6. Auersperg N,
    7. et al.
    The RAB25 small GTPase determines aggressiveness of ovarian and breast cancers. Nat Med 2004;10:1251–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Dozynkiewicz MA,
    2. Jamieson NB,
    3. Macpherson I,
    4. Grindlay J,
    5. van den Berghe PV,
    6. von Thun A,
    7. et al.
    Rab25 and CLIC3 collaborate to promote integrin recycling from late endosomes/lysosomes and drive cancer progression. Dev Cell 2012;22:131–45.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Nam KT,
    2. Lee HJ,
    3. Smith JJ,
    4. Lapierre LA,
    5. Kamath VP,
    6. Chen X,
    7. et al.
    Loss of Rab25 promotes the development of intestinal neoplasia in mice and is associated with human colorectal adenocarcinomas. J Clin Invest 2010;120:840–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Henson B,
    2. Li F,
    3. Coatney DD,
    4. Carey TE,
    5. Mitra RS,
    6. Kirkwood KL,
    7. et al.
    An orthotopic floor-of-mouth model for locoregional growth and spread of human squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Pathol Med 2007;36:363–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Molinolo AA,
    2. Amornphimoltham P,
    3. Squarize CH,
    4. Castilho RM,
    5. Patel V,
    6. Gutkind JS
    . Dysregulated molecular networks in head and neck carcinogenesis. Oral Oncol 2009;45:324–34.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Patel V,
    2. Marsh CA,
    3. Dorsam RT,
    4. Mikelis CM,
    5. Masedunskas A,
    6. Amornphimoltham P,
    7. et al.
    Decreased lymphangiogenesis and lymph node metastasis by mTOR inhibition in head and neck cancer. Cancer Res 2011;71:7103–12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    1. Weigert R,
    2. Sramkova M,
    3. Parente L,
    4. Amornphimoltham P,
    5. Masedunskas A
    . Intravital microscopy: a novel tool to study cell biology in living animals. Histochem Cell Biol 2010;133:481–91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Brown E,
    2. McKee T,
    3. diTomaso E,
    4. Pluen A,
    5. Seed B,
    6. Boucher Y,
    7. et al.
    Dynamic imaging of collagen and its modulation in tumors in vivo using second-harmonic generation. Nat Med 2003;9:796–800.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Melancon MP,
    2. Wang Y,
    3. Wen X,
    4. Bankson JA,
    5. Stephens LC,
    6. Jasser S,
    7. et al.
    Development of a macromolecular dual-modality MR-optical imaging for sentinel lymph node mapping. Invest Radiol 2007;42:569–78.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Fan Y,
    2. Xin XY,
    3. Chen BL,
    4. Ma X
    . Knockdown of RAB25 expression by RNAi inhibits growth of human epithelial ovarian cancer cells in vitro and in vivo . Pathology 2006;38:561–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Bigelow RL,
    2. Williams BJ,
    3. Carroll JL,
    4. Daves LK,
    5. Cardelli JA
    . TIMP-1 overexpression promotes tumorigenesis of MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells and alters expression of a subset of cancer promoting genes in vivo distinct from those observed in vitro . Breast Cancer Res Treat 2009;117:31–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Yin Y,
    2. Shen F,
    3. Pei H,
    4. Ding Y,
    5. Zhao H,
    6. Zhao M,
    7. et al.
    Increased expression of Rab25 in breast cancer correlates with lymphatic metastasis. Tumor Biol 2012;33:1581–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  43. 43.↵
    1. Senga K,
    2. Mostov KE,
    3. Mitaka T,
    4. Miyajima A,
    5. Tanimizu N
    . Grainyhead-like 2 regulates epithelial morphogenesis by establishing functional tight junctions through the organization of a molecular network among claudin3, claudin4, and Rab25. Mol Biol Cell 2012;23:2845–55.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. 44.↵
    1. Cheng JM,
    2. Ding M,
    3. Aribi A,
    4. Shah P,
    5. Rao K
    . Loss of RAB25 expression in breast cancer. Int J Cancer 2006;118:2957–64.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. Cheng KW,
    2. Lahad JP,
    3. Gray JW,
    4. Mills GB
    . Emerging role of RAB GTPases in cancer and human disease. Cancer Res 2005;65:2516–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    1. Friedl P,
    2. Alexander S
    . Cancer invasion and the microenvironment: plasticity and reciprocity. Cell 2011;147:992–1009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    1. Murphy DA,
    2. Courtneidge SA
    . The ‘ins' and ‘outs’ of podosomes and invadopodia: characteristics, formation and function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2011;12:413–26.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. 48.↵
    1. Destaing O,
    2. Block MR,
    3. Planus E,
    4. Albiges-Rizo C
    . Invadosome regulation by adhesion signaling. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2011;23:597–606.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    1. Jing J,
    2. Tarbutton E,
    3. Wilson G,
    4. Prekeris R
    . Rab11-FIP3 is a Rab11-binding protein that regulates breast cancer cell motility by modulating the actin cytoskeleton. Eur J Cell Biol 2009;88:325–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. 50.↵
    1. Casanova JE,
    2. Wang X,
    3. Kumar R,
    4. Bhartur SG,
    5. Navarre J,
    6. Woodrum JE,
    7. et al.
    Association of Rab25 and Rab11a with the apical recycling system of polarized Madin-Darby canine kidney cells. Mol Biol Cell 1999;10:47–61.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Clinical Cancer Research: 19 (6)
March 2013
Volume 19, Issue 6
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Clinical Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Rab25 Regulates Invasion and Metastasis in Head and Neck Cancer
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Clinical Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Rab25 Regulates Invasion and Metastasis in Head and Neck Cancer
Panomwat Amornphimoltham, Kamil Rechache, Jamie Thompson, Andrius Masedunskas, Kantima Leelahavanichkul, Vyomesh Patel, Alfredo Molinolo, J. Silvio Gutkind and Roberto Weigert
Clin Cancer Res March 15 2013 (19) (6) 1375-1388; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2858

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Rab25 Regulates Invasion and Metastasis in Head and Neck Cancer
Panomwat Amornphimoltham, Kamil Rechache, Jamie Thompson, Andrius Masedunskas, Kantima Leelahavanichkul, Vyomesh Patel, Alfredo Molinolo, J. Silvio Gutkind and Roberto Weigert
Clin Cancer Res March 15 2013 (19) (6) 1375-1388; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2858
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Authors' Contributions
    • Grant Support
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Identification of T-cell Antigens by Minigene Screening
  • Sirt7 Promotes Colorectal Cancer Tumorigenesis
  • Contact Guidance Controls T-cell Migration in PDAC
Show more Human Cancer Biology
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • CCR Focus Archive
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Clinical Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Clinical Cancer Research
eISSN: 1557-3265
ISSN: 1078-0432

Advertisement