Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Cancer Therapy: Preclinical

Discordant In Vitro and In Vivo Chemopotentiating Effects of the PARP Inhibitor Veliparib in Temozolomide-Sensitive versus -Resistant Glioblastoma Multiforme Xenografts

Shiv K. Gupta, Ann C. Mladek, Brett L. Carlson, Felix Boakye-Agyeman, Katrina K. Bakken, Sani H. Kizilbash, Mark A. Schroeder, Joel Reid and Jann N. Sarkaria
Shiv K. Gupta
Departments of 1Radiation Oncology, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ann C. Mladek
Departments of 1Radiation Oncology, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brett L. Carlson
Departments of 1Radiation Oncology, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Felix Boakye-Agyeman
2Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katrina K. Bakken
Departments of 1Radiation Oncology, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sani H. Kizilbash
Departments of 1Radiation Oncology, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark A. Schroeder
Departments of 1Radiation Oncology, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joel Reid
2Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jann N. Sarkaria
Departments of 1Radiation Oncology, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sarkaria.jann@mayo.edu
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-3446 Published July 2014
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Veliparib sensitizes GBM cell lines to TMZ in vitro. A, veliparib dose–response: T98G cells were pretreated with the indicated concentrations of veliparib and stimulated with 100 μmol/L H2O2 or incubated with 100 μmol/L TMZ. Immunoblotting for PAR and total PARP1 on the same membrane are shown. B, cytotoxicity assay: T98G cells were incubated with graded concentrations of veliparib and TMZ for 6 days and then analyzed in a CyQuant assay. Results shown are relative fluorescence for treated versus untreated cells. C, similar TMZ-sensitizing studies were performed for U251 and U251TMZ cells and results for all three lines at selected concentrations of drugs are shown. D, DNA-damage signaling: U251, U251TMZ, and T98G cells were treated as indicated for 24 or 72 hours and processed for immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. Results for A and D are representative of three independent experiments, and in B and C, data plotted represent the mean ± SEM from a minimum of three independent experiments; *, P < 0.05; MW, molecular weight.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Veliparib promotes TMZ-induced γH2AX and RPA foci formation in GBM cell lines. U251 (A), U251TMZ (B), and T98G (C) cells cultured on glass cover slips were treated with DMSO, 10 μmol/L veliparib for 30 minutes and subsequently with or without 100 μmol/L TMZ for 24 or 72 hours and immunostained for RPA32 and γH2AX and counterstained with DAPI. Top, representative images (bar, 10 μm), and graphs depicted below present the mean ± SEM from three independent experiments for the percentage of cells with >20 foci/nuclei for each treatment; *, P ≤ 0.05.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Veliparib sensitizes GBM12 derivative TMZ-resistant xenograft lines in vitro. A and B, cytotoxicity assay: The sensitive GBM12 and derivative TMZ-resistant sublines, GBM12TMZ-mgmtLow and GBM12TMZ-mgmtHigh were analyzed for neurosphere growth following treatment with graded concentrations of veliparib and/or TMZ. A, the relative neurosphere counts for the indicated treatments are graphed as the mean ± SEM from three independent experiments. B, the calculated IC50 value for TMZ at different concentrations of veliparib is plotted as the mean ± SD from three independent experiments. C, DNA-damage signaling: GBM12 and derivative sublines were treated for 24 hours with the indicated doses of veliparib and/or TMZ and then processed for immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. D, cells were analyzed for γH2AX foci as in Fig. 2 after drug treatment for 24 hours. Results are plotted as the mean ± SEM from a minimum of three independent experiments; *, P ≤ 0.05; NS, P > 0.05; MW, molecular weight.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Veliparib enhances the efficacy of TMZ in vivo in GBM12 but not in TMZ-resistant sublines. A, tumor regrowth analysis: Mice with established flank tumor xenografts were randomized into groups of 10 mice each and treated for three cycles with the indicated drugs. Time for reaching critical tumor volume of 1,500 mm3 is shown as endpoint for each group as Kaplan–Meier plots. B, pharmacodynamic analysis: Mice with GBM12 or GBM12TMZ-mgmtHigh xenografts were treated for 5 days and euthanized either 2 or 72 hours after the last dose of TMZ/veliparib. Three tumors were processed for each treatment/time point, and equal amounts of protein from these tumors were pooled for analysis in any given lane. All samples were run on the same gel, but two unloaded intervening lanes have been cropped from the images; MW, molecular weight. C, the pharmacokinetic profile of veliparib in tumor tissue: Groups of mice with flank xenografts were treated for 5 days with TMZ/veliparib and euthanized at time points ranging from 0 to 6 hours after the last dose of veliparib. The values plotted are the mean ± SD veliparib concentrations in five tumors at each time point.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    PARP1 knockdown facilitates TMZ efficacy in U251TMZ in vitro and in vivo. A, PARP1 knockdown: U251TMZ cells and derivative stable transductants expressing PARP1-specific shRNA (D2, F6, and F10) or nontargeted shRNA (shRNA-NT) were treated with DMSO or veliparib and subsequently stimulated with H2O2 for 10 minutes. Samples were processed for immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies; MW, molecular weight. B, TMZ-sensitizing effects: Parental and shRNA-expressing U251TMZ cells were treated with TMZ and/or veliparib, and cell growth was compared using a CyQuant assay. Data plotted, mean ± SEM from a minimum of three independent experiments; *, P ≤0.05; NS, P > 0.05. C and D, the indicated cells were used to establish orthotopic tumors and groups of 10 mice with established tumors were randomized to therapy as indicated. Survival for mice in each treatment group is plotted in the Kaplan–Meier graphs and differences evaluated using the log-rank test.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Supplementary Material, Supplementary Figures S1-S6

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Data Supplement - Supplementary Material. Methods for analysis of apoptosis & pluripotency; and Figure Legends to the Supplementary Figures
    • Data Supplement - Supplementary Figure S1. Sustained PARP inhibition by single Veliparib treatment and the effect of repeated drug treatment on cell growth in vitro
    • Data Supplement - Supplementary Figure S2. Veliparib mediated enhancement of TMZ induced apoptosis in GBM cells
    • Data Supplement - Supplementary Figure S3. Evidence of pluripotency in cells of PDX line GBM12 and derivative sublines
    • Data Supplement - Supplementary Figure S4. Dose dependent increase in cytotoxic effects of veliparib, TMZ or their combination in multiple PDX GBM models of differential TMZ sensitivity
    • Data Supplement - Supplementary Figure S5. Effects of Veliparib on TMZ induced DNA damage signaling in undifferentiated or differentiated GBM12 cells
    • Data Supplement - Supplementary Figure S6. Measurements of tumor growth after treatment with veliparib, TMZ or their combination in TMZ-sensitive versus resistant GBM models in vivo.
PreviousNext
Back to top
Clinical Cancer Research: 20 (14)
July 2014
Volume 20, Issue 14
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Clinical Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Discordant In Vitro and In Vivo Chemopotentiating Effects of the PARP Inhibitor Veliparib in Temozolomide-Sensitive versus -Resistant Glioblastoma Multiforme Xenografts
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Clinical Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Discordant In Vitro and In Vivo Chemopotentiating Effects of the PARP Inhibitor Veliparib in Temozolomide-Sensitive versus -Resistant Glioblastoma Multiforme Xenografts
Shiv K. Gupta, Ann C. Mladek, Brett L. Carlson, Felix Boakye-Agyeman, Katrina K. Bakken, Sani H. Kizilbash, Mark A. Schroeder, Joel Reid and Jann N. Sarkaria
Clin Cancer Res July 15 2014 (20) (14) 3730-3741; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-3446

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Discordant In Vitro and In Vivo Chemopotentiating Effects of the PARP Inhibitor Veliparib in Temozolomide-Sensitive versus -Resistant Glioblastoma Multiforme Xenografts
Shiv K. Gupta, Ann C. Mladek, Brett L. Carlson, Felix Boakye-Agyeman, Katrina K. Bakken, Sani H. Kizilbash, Mark A. Schroeder, Joel Reid and Jann N. Sarkaria
Clin Cancer Res July 15 2014 (20) (14) 3730-3741; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-3446
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Authors' Contributions
    • Grant Support
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Targeting HER2 with Osimertinib in NSCLC
  • Combined VEGF/EGFR Inhibition
  • Radiotherapy with IDO1/PD-1 Blockade Treats Advanced GBM
Show more Cancer Therapy: Preclinical
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • CCR Focus Archive
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Clinical Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Clinical Cancer Research
eISSN: 1557-3265
ISSN: 1078-0432

Advertisement