Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Cancer Therapy: Preclinical

PI3K/mTOR Inhibition Markedly Potentiates HDAC Inhibitor Activity in NHL Cells through BIM- and MCL-1–Dependent Mechanisms In Vitro and In Vivo

Mohamed Rahmani, Mandy Mayo Aust, Elisa C. Benson, LaShanale Wallace, Jonathan Friedberg and Steven Grant
Mohamed Rahmani
1Department of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: stgrant@vcu.edu mrahmani@vcu.edu
Mandy Mayo Aust
1Department of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elisa C. Benson
1Department of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
LaShanale Wallace
1Department of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jonathan Friedberg
2James T. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven Grant
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: stgrant@vcu.edu mrahmani@vcu.edu
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0034 Published September 2014
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to explore the efficacy and define mechanisms of action of coadministration of the PI3K/mTOR inhibitor BEZ235 and pan-HDAC inhibitor panobinostat in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) cells.

Experimental Design: Various DLBCL cells were exposed to panobinostat and BEZ235 alone or together after which apoptosis and signaling/survival pathway perturbations were monitored by flow cytometry and Western blot analysis. Genetic strategies defined the functional significance of such changes, and xenograft mouse models were used to assess tumor growth and animal survival.

Results: Panobinostat and BEZ235 interacted synergistically in ABC-, GC-, and double-hit DLBCL cells and MCL cells but not in normal CD34+ cells. Synergism was associated with pronounced AKT dephosphorylation, GSK3 dephosphorylation/activation, Mcl-1 downregulation, Bim upregulation, increased Bcl-2/Bcl-xL binding, diminished Bax/Bak binding to Bcl-2/Bcl-xL/Mcl-1, increased γH2A.X phosphorylation and histone H3/H4 acetylation, and abrogation of p21CIP1 induction. BEZ235/panobinostat lethality was not susceptible to stromal/microenvironmental forms of resistance. Genetic strategies confirmed significant functional roles for AKT inactivation, Mcl-1 downregulation, Bim upregulation, and Bax/Bak in synergism. Finally, coadministration of BEZ235 with panobinostat in immunocompromised mice bearing SU-DHL4–derived tumors significantly reduced tumor growth in association with similar signaling changes observed in vitro, and combined treatment increased animal survival compared with single agents.

Conclusions: BEZ235/panobinostat exhibits potent anti-DLBCL activity, including in poor-prognosis ABC- and double-hit subtypes, but not in normal CD34+ cells. Synergism is most likely multifactorial, involving AKT inactivation/GSK3 activation, Bim upregulation, Mcl-1 downregulation, enhanced DNA damage, and is operative in vivo. Combined PI3K/mTOR and HDAC inhibition warrants further attention in DLBCL. Clin Cancer Res; 20(18); 4849–60. ©2014 AACR.

See related commentary by Bianchi and Ghobrial, Clin Cancer Res;20(23) December 1, 2014;5863–5

Translational Relevance

Despite recent advances in the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), certain subtypes (for example, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL)-ABC subtype and double-hit DLBCL) continue to exhibit poor prognoses. The present study demonstrates that combined treatment with the dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor BEZ235 and the histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACI) panobinostat exhibits potent preclinical activity both in vitro and in vivo in DLBCL, including subtypes associated with poor outcomes such as ABC-DLBCL and double-hit DLBCL with overexpression of Bcl-2 and c-MYC. This strategy was also highly effective in other NHL lymphoma subtypes. Significantly, interactions were observed at extremely low drug concentrations, substantially lower than clinically achievable maximum plasma levels, highlighting the therapeutic potential of this approach. The present study also provides a molecular framework for identifying pharmacodynamic markers of patient responses.

Introduction

Recent evidence indicates that epigenetic changes affecting chromatin remodeling and gene expression, for example, histone acetylation or methylation, and DNA methylation, play critical roles in tumorigenesis (1). Genes implicated in these processes are frequently mutated in various cancers, including non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL; refs. 2, 3), providing a rationale for targeting epigenetic aberrations in cancer therapy. In this context, histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACI) have been used to reverse aberrant epigenetic changes and to restore normal gene expression programs, culminating in the approval of the HDACIs vorinostat and romidepsin for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma and peripheral T-cell lymphoma, respectively (4, 5). Moreover, a number of other novel HDACIs, particularly panobinostat (LBH-589), are currently under evaluation in NHL with promising preliminary results (6, 7) HDACIs exert antitumor activity through multiple mechanisms. In addition to their histone hyperacetylation effects, they also modulate activity of various nonhistone proteins (e.g., p53, STAT, Bcl-6, and Hsp90; refs. 8–10), induce reactive oxygen species and ceramide (11), death receptors (12), and modulate expression of Bcl-2 family members, for example, upregulation of the proapoptotic Bim through a mechanism involving E2F1 (13).

PI3K/AKT/mTOR is one of the most frequently dysregulated survival signaling pathways in cancer (14). In NHL, aberrant activation of this pathway involves diverse mechanisms, including pTEN loss, decreased expression, or mutation, PI3Kα mutations, PI3Kδ overexpression/activation, and BCR receptor activation (15–17). PI3K activation leads to activation of multiple downstream effectors, among which AKT–mTOR axis plays a critical role in diverse cell processes, including growth, survival, metabolism, and autophagy (18). Other important PI3K downstream signaling pathways involve PDK1, GSK3, Mcl-1, Bim, Bad, and p53, among others (18). In this regard, we have recently shown in a leukemia model that PI3K/AKT inhibition leads to Mcl-1 downregulation which, in conjunction with Bim, plays critical roles in cell death mediated by regimen incorporating BH3 mimetics (19, 20). Recently, multiple inhibitors of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway have been developed (21), of which several (e.g., CAL-101, BEZ235, and SF1126) are currently undergoing clinical evaluation in diverse tumor types, including NHL (22, 23).

We have previously reported that combined treatment with PI3K/AKT and HDAC inhibitors exhibits potent antileukemic activity (11, 24). Similar findings were subsequently described in diverse solid tumors (25, 26). However, little is known about whether this approach could be effective in NHL, particularly in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), including the poor prognosis ABC and MYC/Bcl-2 double-hit subtypes, or mantle cell lymphoma. These considerations, in conjunction with recent evidence indicating frequent mutations in histone modifying proteins (2, 3), and dysregulation of the PI3K pathway (15–17) in DLBCL prompted us to investigate whether this strategy would be effective in these diseases and to elucidate mechanism of antitumor actions. Notably, coadministration of clinically achievable concentrations of the HDACIs panobinostat and the dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor BEZ235 (6, 22), interacted synergistically to induce apoptosis, reduce growth and viability, and circumvent resistance mediated by stromal cells in various NHL cell lines, including the poor prognosis ABC and MYC/Bcl-2 double-hit subtypes, while exhibiting little toxicity toward normal CD34+ cells. Furthermore, in a subcutaneous xenograft mouse model, combined treatment was well tolerated, and effectively reduced tumor growth and enhanced animal survival.

Materials and Methods

Cells

Human NHL SU-DHL4 and SU-DHL16 (DLBCL GC subtype), HBL-1 and TMD8 (DLBCL ABC subtype), OCI-LY18 and CARNAVAL (DLBCL MYC/Bcl-2 double-hit), Jeko-1 (mantle cells lymphoma) cell lines and genetically modified lines are described in details in Supplementary Methods. SU-DHL4, SU-DHL16, OCI-LY18, CARNAVAL, and Jeko-1 cells were authenticated by American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Basic STR Profiling).

Stromal cells

Human bone marrow stromal HS-5 cells were purchased from ATCC and cultured as above. HS-5–conditioned media was prepared by culturing HS-5 cells to 70% confluence, after which media was removed and replaced with fresh media. After 24 hours of incubation, HS-5–conditionned media was collected and debris was removed by centrifugation. Lymphoma cells were incubated in HS-5–conditioned media for 24 hours before treatment. For coculture studies, lymphoma cells were incubated with HS-5 cells for 24 hours, then treated for 24 hours, after which cells were photographed using an Olympus microscope.

Normal CD34+ cells

Normal bone marrow CD34+ cells were obtained with informed consent from patients undergoing routine diagnostic procedures for non-myeloid hematopoietic disorders as before (20). These studies have been sanctioned by Virginia Commonwealth University Investigational Review Board.

Reagents

The dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor BEZ235 and the HDACI panobinostat were provided by Novartis. Idelalisib (CAL-101) and IPI-145 were purchased from ChemieTeck. The GSK3 inhibitor IX (2′Z,3′E)-6-bromoindirubin-3′-oxime (BIO), its inactive analogue MeBIO, and SBHA were purchased from Calbiochem. CHIR-98014 was purchased from Sellek chemicals.

Assessment of apoptosis

Apoptosis was routinely assessed by Annexin V/PI analysis as previously described (20).

Cell growth and viability

Cell growth and viability were assessed by the CellTiter-Glo Luminescent Assay (Promega; ref. 20).

Clonogenicity

Colony-formation assays were performed in methylcellulose as previously described (27).

Immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting

Immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting were performed as previously described (27). Primary antibodies used in these studies are described in Supplementary Methods.

Subcellular fractionation

Cytosolic and membrane fractions were separated as previously described (11).

Bax and Bak conformational change

Bax and Bak conformational change was assessed as previously described (27).

In vivo studies

Animal studies were conducted under an approved protocol by the Virginia Commonwealth University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Female beige nude mice (Charles River Laboratories) were inoculated subcutaneously in the flank with 10 × 106 luciferase-expressing SU-DHL4 cells. Once tumors became apparent, mice were randomly separated into four groups and treated with 50 mg/kg BEZ235 (intraperitoneally), and 15 mg/kg panobinostat (by oral gavage) alone or in combination, or vehicle (controls) once daily 5 days per week. Panobinostat was dissolved in D5W at a concentration of 2 mg/mL; BEZ235 was dissolved in NMP 10% (1-methyl-2-pyrrolidone)/PEG300 90%. Tumor volumes were calculated using the formula (length × width2)/2, and when tumor length reached 1.7 cm, mice were euthanized. In some cases, mice were monitored for tumor growth using the IVIS 200 imaging system (Xenogen Corporation) as previously described (20). For tumor analysis, mice were treated twice over a 24-hour interval (at 0 hours and at 18 hours), after which tumors were excised, lysed, and subjected to Western blot analysis.

Statistical analysis

The significance of differences between experimental conditions was determined using the Student t test for unpaired observations. Survival rates were analyzed by Kaplan–Meier and comparisons of survival curves and median survival were analyzed by log-rank test.

Results

AKT activation opposes panobinostat lethality

To determine whether AKT activation status had an impact on the activity of the clinically relevant HDAC inhibitor panobinostat in DLBCL, stable ectopic expression of constitutively active AKT (AKT-CA) was performed in SU-DHL16 cell line. Dose-response studies revealed that AKT-CA–expressing cells exhibited significant resistance to panobinostat-mediated cell death compared with empty vector cells (Fig. 1A). These cells were also less sensitive to panobinostat-mediated growth inhibition and viability reduction (Fig. 1B). Similar results were observed in SU-DHL4 cells (Supplementary Fig. S1). Panobinostat induced dose-dependent dephosphorylation of AKT at both residues threonine 308 and serine 473 in parental cells, in association with a clear dephosphorylation of the AKT substrate PRAS40 (Fig. 1C). Notably, these effects were attenuated by ectopic expression of AKT-CA. These findings indicate that PI3K/AKT activation status represents an important factor determining panobinostat activity in DLBCL and raise the possibility that PI3K/AKT pathway inhibition might potentiate panobinostat activity in NHL cells.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Disruption of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway markedly potentiates panobinostat lethality in various NHL cell lines. A–C, SU-DHL16 cells ectopically expressing a constitutively active AKT construct (A, inset) were exposed to increasing panobinostat concentrations for 24 hours, after which the extent of cell death was assessed using Annexin V/PI staining assay (A) and cell growth and viability were evaluated using the CellTiter-Glo Luminescent assay (B). Alternatively, Western blot analysis was performed following 4-hour treatment (C). D and E, cells were exposed to BEZ235 (25 nmol/L for SU-DHL16 and 200 nmol/L for the remaining cell lines) and panobinostat (7.5 nmol/L for SU-DHL16; 10 nmol/L for HBL-1, TMD8, OCI-LY18, CARNAVAL; and Jeko-1; and 15 nmol/L for SU-DHL4, and OCI-LY7) alone or together for 24 hours for all cell lines with the exception of CARNAVAL cells (48 hours), after which cell death or cell growth and viability were assessed as in A and B. F and G, Western blot analysis on cytosolic fractions (F) or whole-cell lysates (G) in various NHL cell lines following 24-hour treatment with BEZ235 and panobinostat as in D. For A, B, D, and E, error bars, SD for three independent experiments; *, P < 0.02. C-PARP, cleaved PARP.

Coadministration of panobinostat and BEZ235 markedly inhibits cell growth and viability and induces apoptosis in NHL cells

Effects of combined treatment with panobinostat and the dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor BEZ235 were examined in diverse DLBCL subtypes, including GC (SU-DHL4, SU-DHL16, and OCI-LY7) and ABC (HBL-1 and TMD8), MYC/Bcl-2 double-hit (OCI-LY18 and CARNAVAL), as well as MCL (Jeko-1) cell lines. Notably, combined treatment with very low, clinically relevant concentrations (6, 22) of panobinostat (7.5–15 nmol/L) and BEZ235 (25–200 nmol/L) resulted in a marked induction of cell death (Fig. 1D) in association with a sharp decline in cell growth and viability (Fig. 1E) in each cell line tested. In contrast, agents administered individually had only minimal effects. Coadministration of the HDACI SBHA and the PI3Kδ inhibitor CAL-101 or the PI3Kδ/γ inhibitor IPI-145 also led to enhanced lethality in multiple DLBCL lines, although effects were somewhat less pronounced than those observed with BEZ235/panobinostat (Supplementary Fig. S2A). Significantly, median dose effect analysis performed in several cell lines, including SU-DHL4, SU-DHL16, HBL-1, OCI-LY18, and Jeko-1, demonstrated highly synergistic interactions between BEZ235 and panobinostat (Supplementary Fig. S2B–S2F). Subcellular localization analysis in SU-DHL4 and HBL-1 cells revealed a pronounced release of cytochrome c and apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF) into the cytosol following combined, but not individual, treatment (Fig. 1F). These effects were associated with pronounced increases in caspase-3 and PARP cleavage in SU-DHL4, SU-DHL16, Jeko-1, and HBL-1 cells (Fig. 1G). Similar results were obtained in OCI-LY18 cells (data not shown). In sharp contrast, combined treatment with BEZ235 and panobinostat only minimally induced apoptosis in or reduced the colony-forming capacity of normal CD34+ progenitor cells (Fig. 2A and B, respectively).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Treatment with BEZ235/panobinostat is not toxic to normal human CD34+ cells and is associated with a marked increase in histone H3 and H4 acetylation, induction of DNA damage, and abrogation of p21CIP1 induction. Annexin V/PI analysis at 24 hours (A), or colony-formation assay (B) on normal human CD34+ cells. C, Western blot analysis following 4- to 8-hour cell exposure to BEZ235 ± panobinostat.

Together, these findings indicate that coadministration of low concentrations of the HDACI panobinostat and the dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor BEZ235 sharply induces cell death in various NHL cells, including ABC-, GC-, and double-hit DLBCL and MCL cells, but not in normal CD34+ progenitor cells, raising the possibility of therapeutic selectivity.

Treatment with BEZ235/panobinostat is associated with a profound increase in histone H3 and H4 acetylation, marked DNA-damage induction, and abrogation of p21CIP1 upregulation in DLBCL cells

As the primary action of panobinostat, like other HDACIs, is to increase acetylation of histones and other proteins, we sought to determine whether this effect might be potentiated by PI3K inhibition. As shown in Fig. 2C and Supplementary Fig. S3, combined treatment with panobinostat and BEZ235 resulted in a pronounced increase in acetylation of histones H3 and H4 in SU-DHL4, SU-DHL16, HBL-1, OCI-LY18, as well as OCI-LY7 cells. Similarly, a marked induction of γH2A.X phosphorylation, an indicator of DNA double-strand breaks (28), was observed with combined treatment (Fig. 2C and Supplementary Fig. S3). Notably, agents administered individually had only minor effects. In studies involving human leukemia cells (24), PI3K/AKT inhibition abrogated HDACI-mediated p21CIP1/WAF1 upregulation, which we and others have shown to promote cell death (24, 29, 30). Interestingly, BEZ235 completely abrogated panobinostat-induced p21CIP1 upregulation in various lymphoma cell lines, including SU-DHL4, SU-DHL16, HBL-1, and OCI-LY18 (Fig. 2C and Supplementary Fig. S3). These findings were associated with a pronounced dephosphorylation of AKT by BEZ235, particularly when combined with panobinostat, whereas AKT protein levels were largely unaffected. Of note, panobinostat also induced a modest but discernible reduction in AKT phosphorylation without affecting AKT protein levels. Together, these findings indicate that combined HDAC and PI3K/mTOR inhibition triggers enhanced histone acetylation, DNA damage, and abrogation of p21CIP1 induction in diverse DLBCL cells.

BEZ235/panobinostat lethality involves Mcl-1 downregulation

Consistent with previous reports by our and other groups involving other tumor types (20, 27, 31), BEZ235 significantly reduced Mcl-1 protein levels in SU-DHL4, HBL-1, and OCI-LY18, effects that persisted following combined treatment (Fig. 3A). Identical results were obtained in SU-DHL16 cells (Supplementary Fig. S4A). Combined treatment also induced modest but discernible increases in Bim protein levels. In contrast, no major changes in expression of other antiapoptotic family members (e.g., Bcl-2 or Bcl-xL) or the proapoptotic proteins Bax or Bak were observed (Fig. 3A). However, robust changes in Bax and Bak conformation were observed with combined treatment, whereas individual agents had minimal effects (Fig. 3B). To test whether Mcl-1 downregulation plays a functional role in BEZ235/panobinostat–mediated lethality, studies using siRNA against Mcl-1 were performed. Downregulation of Mcl-1 with siRNA significantly increased sensitivity to panobinostat in SU-DHL4 and in SU-DHL16 (Fig. 3C) arguing that Mcl-1 downregulation plays a functional role in BEZ235/panobinostat–mediated cell death.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

BEZ235/panobinostat lethality involves Mcl-1 downregulation and perturbations in Bim, Bax, and Bak. A, Western blot analysis on cells treated for 8 hours with BEZ235 (200 nmol/L) ± panobinostat (10 nmol/L for HBL-1 and OCI-LY18; 15 nmol/L for SU-DHL4). B, Bax and Bak conformational changes in SU-DHL4 cells following 16-hour treatment as in A. C, cell growth and viability in SU-DHL4 and SU-DHL16 transiently transfected with siRNA against Mcl-1 (si-Mcl-1), or nonsilencing siRNA (si-NS), and exposed to panobinostat for 16 hours. Error bars, SD of three independent experiments; *, P < 0.05. D, SU-DHL4 and SU-DHL16 cells in which Bim was knocked down using lentiviral particles carrying shRNA constructs against Bim or nonsilencing shRNA (sh-NS) were exposed to BEZ235 (200 nmol/L for SUDHL4 and 25 nmol/L for SU-DHL16) ± panobinostat (15 nmol/L for SU-DHL4 and 7.5 nmol/L for SU-DHL16) for 24 hours after which the extent of cell death was determined using Annexin V/PI assay. Error bars, SD of three separate experiments; *, P < 0.01 for SU-DHL16 and P < 0.02 for SU-DHL4. E, Annexin V/PI assay in SU-DHL4 cells stably transfected with shRNA constructs against Bax (shBax), Bak (shBak), or nonsilencing shRNA (sh-NS) following 24-hour treatment with 200 nmol/L BEZ235 ± 15 nmol/L panobinostat. Inset, Western blot analysis on nontreated cells. Each sample was run twice. Error bars, SD of three separate experiments; *, P < 0.05.

Bim, Bax, and Bak play important functional roles in BEZ235/panobinostat–mediated anti-DLBCL activity

To determine whether Bim plays a functional role in BEZ235/panobinostat–mediated lethality, transduction of SU-DHL4 and SU-DHL16 with lentiviruses carrying a shRNA construct against Bim was performed. As shown in Supplementary Figs. S4B and S4C, dose-response studies revealed that Bim knockdown rendered cells significantly more resistant to either BEZ235 or panobinostat. Notably, Bim knockdown also rendered cells significantly less susceptible to the lethal action of BEZ235/panobinostat coadministration (Fig. 3D and Supplementary Fig. S4D). These effects were associated with pronounced diminution in caspase-3 and PARP cleavage (Supplementary Fig. S4E). Parallel studies involving immunoprecipitation analysis revealed that exposure to BEZ235 alone, or in combination with panobinostat, markedly increased Bim binding to Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL, an effect that correlates with significant reductions in Bak binding to all major antiapoptotic bcl-2 members (e.g., Mcl-1, Bcl-2, and Bcl-xL) as well as a decrease in Bax binding to Mcl-1 and Bcl-2 (Supplementary Fig. S5). Of note, reductions in Bak or Bax binding to Mcl-1/Bcl-2/Bcl-xL were also observed with panobinostat or BEZ235 alone.

To examine whether Bax and Bak play a functional role in BEZ235/panobinostat anti-DLBCL activity, stable knockdown experiments using shRNA against Bax or Bak were conducted. Dose-response studies revealed that knockdown of Bax or Bak rendered cells significantly more resistant to either BEZ235 or panobinostat (Supplementary Fig. S6A–S6D). In addition, these cells were significantly less susceptible to BEZ235/panobinostat lethality compared with the control cells (Fig. 3E). Together, these findings demonstrate that coadministration of BEZ235 and panobinostat leads to increased binding of Bim to Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL, accompanied by release of Bak and Bax from the major neutralizing molecules Bcl-2, Bcl-xL. They also indicate that perturbations in Mcl-1, Bim, Bax, and Bak play functional roles in BEZ235/panobinostat anti-DLBCL activity.

AKT and GSK3 contribute functionally to the anti-DLBCL activity of the BEZ235/panobinostat regimen

To assess the role of AKT inactivation in BEZ235/panobinostat lethality, AKT-CA–expressing SU-DHL16 cells were used. Notably, AKT-CA–expressing cells displayed significant resistance to BEZ235/panobinostat lethality, reflected by decreased caspase-3 and PARP cleavage (Fig. 4A), diminished Annexin V/PI positivity (Fig. 4B), and marked reduction in the decline in cell growth and viability (Fig. 4C). Significantly, ectopic expression of AKT-CA also markedly decreased γH2A.X phosphorylation mediated by BEZ235/panobinostat (Fig. 4A), suggesting that AKT inactivation is required for BEZ235/panobinostat–induced DNA damage.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Ectopic expression of constitutively active AKT or inhibition of GSK3 diminishes BEZ235/panobinostat lethality. A, Western blot analysis on constitutively active Myc-tagged AKT-expressing SU-DHL16 cells following 24-hour exposure to 25 nmol/L BEZ235 ± 7.5 nmol/L panobinostat. Alternatively, the extent of cell death (B) or cell growth and viability (C) were assessed at 24 hours as in Fig. 1A and B. Error bars, SD of 3 independent experiments; *, P < 0.02. D, SU-DHL4, SU-DHL16, HBL-1, and OCI-LY18 cells were treated with BEZ235 (200 nmol/L for SU-DHL4, HBL-1, and OCI-LY18; 25 nmol/L for SU-DHL16) ± panobinostat (7.5 nmol/L for SU-DHL16; 10 nmol/L for HBL-1, and OCI-LY18; 15 nmol/L for SU-DHL4) for 8 hours, and then cells were lysed and Western blot analysis was performed using the indicated antibodies. E, SU-DHL4 and HBL-1 cells were exposed to combined treatment with BEZ235 and panobinostat as in D in the presence or the absence of BIO, MeBIO, or CHIR-98014 (2 μmol/L each). Twenty-four hours after treatment, cell growth and viability were assessed using the CellTiter-Glo Luminescent assay. *, significantly greater than values obtained in the absence of BIO or CHIR-98014 (P < 0.05).

In view of the important role that GSK3 plays in AKT signaling, additional studies were conducted to determine whether this kinase plays a role in cell death mediated by coexposure to BEZ235 and panobinostat. Western blot analysis revealed that exposure to BEZ235, alone or in combination, led to diminished GSK3 phosphorylation at inhibitory serine 9/21 sites in multiple cell lines, including SU-DHL4, SU-DHL16, HBL-1, and OCI-LY18 (Fig. 4D). This was accompanied by a significant decline in β-catenin protein levels, a well-established GSK3 substrate, indicating GSK3 activation. In fact, phosphorylation of β-catenin by GSK3 leads to its ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. Of note, panobinostat alone also triggered a decrease in GSK3 phosphorylation in SU-DHL4 and SU-DHL16, but not in HBL-1 or OCI-LY18 cells. Notably, c-Myc, another GSK3 target which we and others have shown to be downregulated by BEZ235 or panobinostat (19, 32), was also markedly downregulated by these agents alone as well as together (Fig. 4D). Additional studies revealed that pretreatment with the GSK3α/β inhibitors BIO or CHIR-98014 diminished the inhibitory effects of BEZ235/panobinostat on cell growth and viability (Fig. 4E). In contrast, the Bio inactive analogue MeBIO had no effect on BEZ235/panobinostat activities. These findings argue that GSK3 activation contributes functionally to the anti-DLBCL activity of the BEZ235/panobinostat regimen.

BEZ235/panobinostat circumvents environmental forms of resistance mediated by stromal cells

Stromal cells have been increasingly associated with lymphomagenesis and resistance to chemotherapy (33–35). To test whether stromal cells confer resistance to BEZ235/panobinostat in SU-DHL4, HBL-1, or OCI-LY18, studies were performed in the presence of human bone marrow stromal cell HS-5–conditioned media. Notably, the BEZ235/panobinostat regimen was equally effective in inducing caspase-3 and PARP cleavage, increasing γH2A.X phosphorylation (Fig. 5A), promoting cell death (Fig. 5B), and reducing growth and viability (Supplementary Fig. S7A) in HS-5–conditioned media compared with regular media. In contrast, cell susceptibility to doxorubicin was significantly attenuated in the presence of HS-5–conditioned media (Supplementary Fig. S7B). Coculture with HS-5 cells also failed to protect SU-DHL4 or OCI-LY18 cells from BEZ235/panobinostat lethality (Fig. 5C). Notably, Western blot analysis revealed a discernible increase in Mcl-1 and decrease in Bim protein levels in cells cultured in the presence of HS-5–conditioned media compared with controls (Fig. 5D). However, treatment with BEZ235 or BEZ235/panobinostat abrogated AKT phosphorylation and p21CIP1 induction, attenuated GSK3 phosphorylation, downregulated Mcl-1, upregulated Bim, and increased H3 and H4 acetylation in the presence of HS-5–conditionned media, similar to effects in regular media (Fig. 5D).

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

BEZ235/panobinostat treatment is effective in the presence of a protective stromal microenvironment. A, SU-DHL4 cells were treated with 200 nmol/L BEZ235 ± 15 nmol/L panobinostat in the presence of HS-5–conditioned media (HS-5 CM) or regular media (RM) for 24 hours after which cells were lysed and subjected to Western blot analysis. B, Annexin V/PI assays in SU-DHL4, HBL-1, and OCI-LY18 cells following 24-hour treatment with BEZ235 (200 nmol/L) ± panobinostat (10 nmol/L for HBL-1 and OCI-LY18; 15 nmol/L for SU-DHL4). C, SU-DHL4 and OCI-LY18 cells were cocultured with HS-5 cells for 24 hours, and then exposed to BEZ235 ± panobinostat for 24 hours as in B after which cells were photographed using an Olympus microscope. D, Western blot analysis of SU-DHL4 cells treated as in A for 8 hours.

Coadministration of BEZ235 and panobinostat significantly inhibits tumor growth and prolongs survival in an in vivo lymphoma xenograft model

To determine whether inhibition of PI3K/mTOR enhances panobinostat lethality in vivo, a subcutaneous xenograft mouse model using SU-DHL4 cells was used. Interestingly, combined treatment with panobinostat and BEZ235 significantly reduced tumor growth. In contrast, individual agents had only modest effects (Fig. 6A and B). Furthermore, Western blot analysis performed on tumor tissue excised from animals treated twice over a 24-hour interval revealed identical results to those observed in vitro. Specifically, combined treatment led to a pronounced increase in Bim protein level, histone H3 and H4 acetylation, and γH2A.X phosphorylation, as well as a decrease in AKT phosphorylation (Fig. 6C). Consistent with tumor growth inhibition, Kaplan–Meier analysis (Fig. 6D) revealed that combined treatment significantly prolonged mouse survival compared with either agent alone (P = 0.001 and 0.0386 for combined treatment vs. panobinostat or BEZ235, respectively; log-rank test). Of note, while BEZ235 led to a modest prolongation in survival, panobinostat was ineffective in this regard. Significantly, combined treatment, like the agents alone, did not induce major changes in mouse weights (e.g., >10%; Supplementary Fig. S8). Together, these findings indicate that combined treatment with BEZ235 and panobinostat significantly inhibits tumor growth in vivo and prolongs survival of mice bearing lymphoma xenografts.

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

BEZ235/panobinostat significantly inhibits tumor growth and prolongs survival in a xenograft mouse model. Tumor growth in beige nude mice (7 mice/condition) bearing luciferase-expressing SU-DHL4–derived tumors treated 5 days a week with BEZ235 (50 mg/kg) and panobinostat (15 mg/kg) alone or in combination. Mice were also imaged before and 3 weeks after treatment using an IVIS 200 imager (B). C, xenograft-bearing mice were treated as in A twice over a 24-hour interval after which tumors were excised, lysed, and subjected to Western blot analysis. D, Kaplan–Meier plot involving 7 mice/condition treated as in A. The median survival was prolonged from 34 to 51 days for mice exposed to the combined treatment. The survival curves differed significantly between combined treatment and other treatments (P = 0.001 for BEZ235/panobinostat vs. panobinostat; P = 0.0386 for BEZ235/panobinostat vs. BEZ235; log-rank test).

Discussion

Components of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway as well as chromatin modifier–related proteins are frequently mutated in various cancer types, particularly those of lymphoid origin (2, 3, 15, 16). Such considerations provided a strong rationale for targeting these protein classes in cancer. In fact, preclinical and clinical studies have demonstrated promising activity of PI3K inhibitors, such as BEZ235, or HDACis, such as panobinostat, in diverse tumor types, including those of lymphoid origin (6, 7, 21). We previously reported that nonclinically relevant PI3K inhibitors (e.g., LY294002) interacted synergistically with HDACIs in myeloid leukemia cells (11, 24), and subsequent studies demonstrated analogous interactions in epithelial tumor cells (25, 26). The present report demonstrates that DLBCL cells may be particularly vulnerable to this strategy.

The findings that ectopic expression of constitutively active AKT renders lymphoma cells resistant to panobinostat lethality indicate that PI3K/AKT pathway activation status plays a critical role in determining panobinostat activity, and suggest that PI3K/AKT inhibition might potentiate panobinostat toxicity in lymphoma cells. Indeed, coadministration of very low (nanomolar) concentrations of panobinostat and the dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor BEZ235 synergistically induced apoptosis in diverse DLBCL cell lines, including both GC-, ABC-, poor prognosis MYC/Bcl-2 double-hit DLBCL, as well as mantle cell lymphoma cells, but not in normal hematopoietic CD34+ cells, highlighting the potential for therapeutic selectivity. This selectivity may reflect the frequent addiction of DLBCL cells to PI3K/AKT activation (36) and the well-established preferential toxicity of HDACIs toward malignant vs. normal cells (12, 37, 38). Importantly, the BEZ235 and panobinostat concentrations used were well below clinically achievable maximum plasma concentration (Cmax; refs. 6, 22). It should be noted that we did not observe a clear correlation between AKT phosphorylation level and panobinostat sensitivity in multiple lymphoma cell lines (data not shown). These findings could reflect the fact that AKT phosphorylation is not the sole determinant of lymphoma cell responsiveness to panobinostat, and/or the possibility that high basal AKT activation may reflect enhanced reliance on this pathway for survival.

Recently, it has become apparent that Mcl-1 plays a critical role in the survival of many tumor cell types, including malignant hematopoietic cells (20). Significantly, and consistent with recent studies in acute myeloid leukemia (20), BEZ235 effectively decreased Mcl-1 protein level in DLBCL cells, arguing for a functional role for Mcl-1 downregulation in BEZ235/panobinostat lethality in DLBCL. However, it is important to note that despite downregulating Mcl-1, BEZ235 alone was not a potent inducer of cell death at the concentrations used. Nevertheless, the finding that Mcl-1 knockdown significantly enhanced panobinostat lethality suggests that Mcl-1 downregulation cooperates with other panobinostat actions to trigger cell death. It is also likely that other Mcl-1–independent BEZ235 actions contribute to synergistic interactions with panobinostat. For example, PI3K inhibition induces activation of FOXO3, a transcription factor that generally plays a proapoptotic role (18). Although the mechanism by which BEZ235/panobinostat exerts its antilymphoma activities is likely to be multifactorial, the present observations support a model in which BEZ235/panobinostat downregulates Mcl-1, increases Bim protein levels and binding to Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL, leading to Bax and Bak release from these antiapoptotic proteins and promotion of cell death. This notion is supported by the marked changes in Bax and Bak conformation/activation and the ability of Bim, Bax, or Bak knockdown to render cells resistant to BEZ235/panobinostat lethality.

Previous studies have shown that HDACIs, among numerous actions, can inactivate the AKT pathway (39). Although panobinostat also decreased AKT phosphorylation in DLBCL cells in a dose-dependent manner, these effects were modest at low concentrations, and may not have been sufficient to lower the apoptotic threshold for other panobinostat actions. It is also possible that other PI3K/mTOR–dependent AKT-independent effects of BEZ235 contributed to increased panobinostat-mediated lethality. Other potential downstream PI3K targets that may contribute to BEZ235–panobinostat interactions include PDK1, which promotes cell survival in an AKT-dependent as well as an AKT-independent manner (40). In addition, one of the mechanisms by which AKT increases cell survival is by phosphorylating the serine/threonine protein kinase GSK3 at serine 9/21, an event that leads to its cytoplasmic sequestration and inhibition (41). The observations that GSK3 was dephosphorylated in cells treated with BEZ235/panobinostat along with downregulation of the GSK3 downstream target β-catenin and c-Myc proteins level indicate GSK3 inactivation. Moreover, the findings that GSK3 inhibitors BIO or CHIR-98014 significantly diminished BEZ235/panobinostat lethality argue for a functional role for GSK3 in cell death mediated by this regimen. GSK3 proapoptotic activity involves multiple mechanisms, including perturbations in Mcl-1, Bim, FOXO3, β-catenin, c-Myc, and cyclin D1, among others (42, 43). However, the mechanism(s) involved in the present studies remain to be determined.

Induction of DNA damage and inhibition of DNA repair have been implicated in the antitumor activity of both HDACs as well as PI3K inhibitors (28, 37, 44). The observation that cotreatment with BEZ235/panobinostat led to a sharp increase in γH2A.X phosphorylation, and the early onset of this phenomenon (4–8 hours), that is, before significant cell death was observed, suggest that DNA damage contributed to combined treatment toxicity. Moreover, in view of the role of p21CIP1 in the DNA-damage response (45), abrogation of panobinostat-mediated p21CIP1 induction by BEZ235 may have enhanced DNA damage and ultimately potentiated cell death. Indeed, studies by our group and others groups have shown that p21CIP1 plays an antiapoptotic role in malignant cells exposed to HDACIs (24, 29, 30). The mechanism by which PI3K inhibitors diminish p21CIP1 protein levels is unclear; however, Rössig and colleagues (46) have shown that GSK3 phosphorylates the p21CIP1 protein at threonine 57, leading to its destabilization. Whether GSK3 activation by BEZ235 was responsible for p21CIP1 abrogation in lymphoma cells remains to be determined.

Another notable observation was the pronounced increase in H3 and H4 acetylation, which may reflect combined inhibition of histone deacetylation (by panobinostat) and increased histone acetylation by histone acetyl transferase CREB binding protein (CBP; by BEZ235). In this regard, Liu and colleagues (47) have shown that AKT inhibits CBP activity. It is recognized that the mechanism and the functional significance of this finding are uncertain, and efforts to address these issues are under way.

Microenvironmental factors, for example, stroma, mediate resistance to chemotherapy in multiple systems, including lymphoid malignancies (33–35). Significantly, the ability of BEZ235/panobinostat to kill DLBCL cells in the presence of HS-5 cells or HS-5–conditioned media argues that this regimen can circumvent certain forms of microenvironmental resistance. Stromal factor-related resistance has been attributed to diverse mechanisms, including AKT activation, Bim downregulation, and Mcl-1 upregulation, among others (48). Significantly, HS-5–conditioned media did not reverse BEZ235/panobinostat–mediated AKT inactivation or Mcl-1 downregulation, although Mcl-1 protein levels in nontreated cells were slightly higher in the presence of HS-5–conditioned media compared with regular media. Notably, Bim was downregulated in the presence of HS-5–conditioned media, in agreement with previous studies (48). However, exposure to BEZ235 alone or in combination, restored Bim protein levels similar to those observed in cells cultured in regular media, suggesting that this action may have contributed to restoration of sensitivity.

Finally, in vivo studies using a murine xenograft model demonstrated that coadministration of BEZ235 and panobinostat exhibited potent anti-DLBCL activity. Specifically, BEZ235/panobinostat, administered at well-tolerated doses, significantly inhibited tumor growth and enhanced murine survival. Notably, several of the changes observed in vitro, for example, AKT dephosphorylation/inactivation, Mcl-1 downregulation, Bim upregulation, enhanced histone H3 and H4 acetylation, and γH2A.X phosphorylation, were recapitulated in tumor tissues following in vivo drug treatment, suggesting that similar mechanisms of antitumor efficacy may be operative in intact animals. Such findings raise the possibility that these changes might serve as pharmacodynamic response determinants in future trials.

In summary, the present studies indicate that the BEZ235/panobinostat regimen effectively induces cell death in various DLBCL lines, including poor prognosis subtypes (e.g., ABC- and double-hit DLBCL). Importantly, it is also active in the presence of a protective microenvironment conferred by bone marrow–derived HS-5 stromal cells, and in the in vivo setting. The present findings also suggest that underlying mechanisms are likely to be multifactorial, for example, downregulation of Mcl-1, upregulation of Bim, increased binding of Bim to Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL, and activation of GSK3. Of note, Mcl-1 and Bim may also play important roles in determining lymphoma cell sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents, for example, doxorubicin or dexamethasone (49, 50). In conjunction with evidence implicating aberrations in histone acetylation and the PI3K pathway in lymphoma (2, 3, 15, 16), these findings raise the possibility that combining PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors, such as BEZ235, and HDACIs, such as panobinostat, may represent a novel and effective strategy against various NHL subtypes, including poor prognosis ABC-DLBCL, MYC/Bcl-2 double-hit, as well as MCL, and possibly other hematologic malignancies. Accordingly, plans to test this concept are currently under way.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Authors' Contributions

Conception and design: M. Rahmani, J. Friedberg, S. Grant

Development of methodology: M. Rahmani, S. Grant

Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): M.M. Aust, E.C. Benson, L. Wallace

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): M. Rahmani, M.M. Aust, J. Friedberg, S. Grant

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: M. Rahmani, J. Friedberg, S. Grant

Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases): M. Rahmani, L. Wallace

Study supervision: M. Rahmani

Grant Support

These studies were supported by awards CA093738, CA167708, P50CA142509, P50CA130805, R21CA137823, and P30 CA16059 from the National Institutes of Health and award 6181-10 from the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society of America.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Footnotes

  • Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Clinical Cancer Research Online (http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/).

  • Received January 6, 2014.
  • Revision received June 5, 2014.
  • Accepted July 18, 2014.
  • ©2014 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Ellis L,
    2. Atadja PW,
    3. Johnstone RW
    . Epigenetics in cancer: targeting chromatin modifications. Mol Cancer Ther 2009;8:1409–20.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Morin RD,
    2. Mendez-Lago M,
    3. Mungall AJ,
    4. Goya R,
    5. Mungall KL,
    6. Corbett RD,
    7. et al.
    Frequent mutation of histone-modifying genes in non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Nature 2011;476:298–303.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Pasqualucci L,
    2. Dominguez-Sola D,
    3. Chiarenza A,
    4. Fabbri G,
    5. Grunn A,
    6. Trifonov V,
    7. et al.
    Inactivating mutations of acetyltransferase genes in B-cell lymphoma. Nature 2011;471:189–95.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Lemoine M,
    2. Younes A
    . Histone deacetylase inhibitors in the treatment of lymphoma. Discov Med 2010;10:462–70.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Dokmanovic M,
    2. Clarke C,
    3. Marks PA
    . Histone deacetylase inhibitors: overview and perspectives. Mol Cancer Res 2007;5:981–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. DeAngelo DJ,
    2. Spencer A,
    3. Bhalla KN,
    4. Prince HM,
    5. Fischer T,
    6. Kindler T,
    7. et al.
    Phase Ia/II, two-arm, open-label, dose-escalation study of oral panobinostat administered via two dosing schedules in patients with advanced hematologic malignancies. Leukemia 2013;27:1628–36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Duvic M,
    2. Dummer R,
    3. Becker JC,
    4. Poulalhon N,
    5. Ortiz Romero P,
    6. Grazia Bernengo M,
    7. et al.
    Panobinostat activity in both bexarotene-exposed and -naive patients with refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: results of a phase II trial. Eur J Cancer 2013;49:386–94.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Marks PA,
    2. Richon VM,
    3. Rifkind RA
    . Histone deacetylase inhibitors: inducers of differentiation or apoptosis of transformed cells. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:1210–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Bali P,
    2. Pranpat M,
    3. Bradner J,
    4. Balasis M,
    5. Fiskus W,
    6. Guo F,
    7. et al.
    Inhibition of histone deacetylase 6 acetylates and disrupts the chaperone function of heat shock protein 90: a novel basis for antileukemia activity of histone deacetylase inhibitors. J Biol Chem 2005;280:26729–34.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Bereshchenko OR,
    2. Gu W,
    3. Dalla-Favera R
    . Acetylation inactivates the transcriptional repressor BCL6. Nat Genet 2002;32:606–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Rahmani M,
    2. Reese E,
    3. Dai Y,
    4. Bauer C,
    5. Payne SG,
    6. Dent P,
    7. et al.
    Coadministration of histone deacetylase inhibitors and perifosine synergistically induces apoptosis in human leukemia cells through Akt and ERK1/2 inactivation and the generation of ceramide and reactive oxygen species. Cancer Res 2005;65:2422–32.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Insinga A,
    2. Monestiroli S,
    3. Ronzoni S,
    4. Gelmetti V,
    5. Marchesi F,
    6. Viale A,
    7. et al.
    Inhibitors of histone deacetylases induce tumor-selective apoptosis through activation of the death receptor pathway. Nat Med 2005;11:71–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Zhao Y,
    2. Tan J,
    3. Zhuang L,
    4. Jiang X,
    5. Liu ET,
    6. Yu Q
    . Inhibitors of histone deacetylases target the Rb-E2F1 pathway for apoptosis induction through activation of proapoptotic protein Bim. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005;102:16090–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Yuan TL,
    2. Cantley LC
    . PI3K pathway alterations in cancer: variations on a theme. Oncogene 2008;27:5497–510.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Abubaker J,
    2. Bavi PP,
    3. Al-Harbi S,
    4. Siraj AK,
    5. Al-Dayel F,
    6. Uddin S,
    7. et al.
    PIK3CA mutations are mutually exclusive with PTEN loss in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Leukemia 2007;21:2368–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Sakai A,
    2. Thieblemont C,
    3. Wellmann A,
    4. Jaffe ES,
    5. Raffeld M
    . PTEN gene alterations in lymphoid neoplasms. Blood 1998;92:3410–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Rickert RC
    . New insights into pre-BCR and BCR signalling with relevance to B cell malignancies. Nat Rev Immunol 2013;13:578–91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Manning BD,
    2. Cantley LC
    . AKT/PKB signaling: navigating downstream. Cell 2007;129:1261–74.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Rahmani M,
    2. Aust MM,
    3. Attkisson E,
    4. Williams DC Jr.,
    5. Ferreira-Gonzalez A,
    6. Grant S
    . Inhibition of Bcl-2 anti-apoptotic members by obatoclax potently enhances sorafenib-induced apoptosis in human myeloid leukemia cells through a Bim-dependent process. Blood 2012;119:6089–98.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Rahmani M,
    2. Aust MM,
    3. Attkisson E,
    4. Williams DC Jr.,
    5. Ferreira-Gonzalez A,
    6. Grant S
    . Dual inhibition of Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL strikingly enhances PI3K inhibition-induced apoptosis in human myeloid leukemia cells through a. Cancer Res 2013;73:1340–51.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Martini M,
    2. Ciraolo E,
    3. Gulluni F,
    4. Hirsch E
    . Targeting PI3K in Cancer: any good news? Front Oncol 2013;3:108.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Peyton JD,
    2. Ahnert JR,
    3. Burris H,
    4. Britten C,
    5. Chen LC,
    6. Tabernero J,
    7. et al.
    A dose-escalation study with the novel formulation of the oral pan-class I PI3K inhibitor BEZ235, solid dispersion system (SDS) sachet, in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 29: 2011 (suppl; abstr 3066).
  23. 23.↵
    1. Mahadevan D,
    2. Chiorean EG,
    3. Harris WB,
    4. Von Hoff DD,
    5. Stejskal-Barnett A,
    6. Qi W,
    7. et al.
    Phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of the pan-PI3K/mTORC vascular targeted pro-drug SF1126 in patients with advanced solid tumours and B-cell malignancies. Eur J Cancer 2012;48:3319–27.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Rahmani M,
    2. Yu C,
    3. Reese E,
    4. Ahmed W,
    5. Hirsch K,
    6. Dent P,
    7. et al.
    Inhibition of PI-3 kinase sensitizes human leukemic cells to histone deacetylase inhibitor-mediated apoptosis through p44/42 MAP kinase inactivation and abrogation of p21(CIP1/WAF1) induction rather than AKT inhibition. Oncogene 2003;22:6231–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Denlinger CE,
    2. Rundall BK,
    3. Jones DR
    . Inhibition of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt and histone deacetylase activity induces apoptosis in non-small cell lung cancer in vitro and in vivo . J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;130:1422–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Ellis L,
    2. Ku SY,
    3. Ramakrishnan S,
    4. Lasorsa E,
    5. Azabdaftari G,
    6. Godoy A,
    7. et al.
    Combinatorial antitumor effect of HDAC and the PI3K-Akt-mTOR pathway inhibition in a Pten defecient model of prostate cancer. Oncotarget 2013;4:2225–36.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Rahmani M,
    2. Anderson A,
    3. Habibi JR,
    4. Crabtree TR,
    5. Mayo M,
    6. Harada H,
    7. et al.
    The BH3-only protein Bim plays a critical role in leukemia cell death triggered by concomitant inhibition of the PI3K/Akt and MEK/ERK1/2 pathways. Blood 2009;114:4507–16.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Lee JH,
    2. Choy ML,
    3. Ngo L,
    4. Foster SS,
    5. Marks PA
    . Histone deacetylase inhibitor induces DNA damage, which normal but not transformed cells can repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010;107:14639–44.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Burgess AJ,
    2. Pavey S,
    3. Warrener R,
    4. Hunter LJ,
    5. Piva TJ,
    6. Musgrove EA,
    7. et al.
    Up-regulation of p21(WAF1/CIP1) by histone deacetylase inhibitors reduces their cytotoxicity. Mol Pharmacol 2001;60:828–37.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Rahmani M,
    2. Yu C,
    3. Dai Y,
    4. Reese E,
    5. Ahmed W,
    6. Dent P,
    7. et al.
    Coadministration of the heat shock protein 90 antagonist 17-allylamino- 17-demethoxygeldanamycin with suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid or sodium butyrate synergistically induces apoptosis in human leukemia cells. Cancer Res 2003;63:8420–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Bender A,
    2. Opel D,
    3. Naumann I,
    4. Kappler R,
    5. Friedman L,
    6. von Schweinitz D,
    7. et al.
    PI3K inhibitors prime neuroblastoma cells for chemotherapy by shifting the balance towards pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins and enhanced mitochondrial apoptosis. Oncogene 2011;30:494–503.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Scuto A,
    2. Kirschbaum M,
    3. Kowolik C,
    4. Kretzner L,
    5. Juhasz A,
    6. Atadja P,
    7. et al.
    The novel histone deacetylase inhibitor, LBH589, induces expression of DNA damage response genes and apoptosis in Ph- acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells. Blood 2008;111:5093–100.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Medina DJ,
    2. Goodell L,
    3. Glod J,
    4. Gelinas C,
    5. Rabson AB,
    6. Strair RK
    . Mesenchymal stromal cells protect mantle cell lymphoma cells from spontaneous and drug-induced apoptosis through secretion of B-cell activating factor and activation of the canonical and non-canonical nuclear factor kappaB pathways. Haematologica 2012;97:1255–63.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Meads MB,
    2. Hazlehurst LA,
    3. Dalton WS
    . The bone marrow microenvironment as a tumor sanctuary and contributor to drug resistance. Clin Cancer Res 2008;14:2519–26.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Mraz M,
    2. Zent CS,
    3. Church AK,
    4. Jelinek DF,
    5. Wu X,
    6. Pospisilova S,
    7. et al.
    Bone marrow stromal cells protect lymphoma B-cells from rituximab-induced apoptosis and targeting integrin alpha-4-beta-1 (VLA-4) with natalizumab can overcome this resistance. Br J Haematol 2011;155:53–64.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Pfeifer M,
    2. Grau M,
    3. Lenze D,
    4. Wenzel SS,
    5. Wolf A,
    6. Wollert-Wulf B,
    7. et al.
    PTEN loss defines a PI3K/AKT pathway-dependent germinal center subtype of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013;110:12420–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    1. Namdar M,
    2. Perez G,
    3. Ngo L,
    4. Marks PA
    . Selective inhibition of histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6) induces DNA damage and sensitizes transformed cells to anticancer agents. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010;107:20003–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. Bolden JE,
    2. Shi W,
    3. Jankowski K,
    4. Kan CY,
    5. Cluse L,
    6. Martin BP,
    7. et al.
    HDAC inhibitors induce tumor-cell-selective pro-apoptotic transcriptional responses. Cell Death Dis 2013;4:e519.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Dudakovic A,
    2. Evans JM,
    3. Li Y,
    4. Middha S,
    5. McGee-Lawrence ME,
    6. van Wijnen AJ,
    7. et al.
    Histone deacetylase inhibition promotes osteoblast maturation by altering the histone H4 epigenome and reduces Akt phosphorylation. J Biol Chem 2013;288:28783–91.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. Vasudevan KM,
    2. Barbie DA,
    3. Davies MA,
    4. Rabinovsky R,
    5. McNear CJ,
    6. Kim JJ,
    7. et al.
    AKT-independent signaling downstream of oncogenic PIK3CA mutations in human cancer. Cancer Cell 2009;16:21–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Martelli AM,
    2. Evangelisti C,
    3. Chiarini F,
    4. McCubrey JA
    . The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt/mTOR signaling network as a therapeutic target in acute myelogenous leukemia patients. Oncotarget 2010;1:89–103.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Spokoini R,
    2. Kfir-Erenfeld S,
    3. Yefenof E,
    4. Sionov RV
    . Glycogen synthase kinase-3 plays a central role in mediating glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis. Mol Endocrinol 2010;24:1136–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Kim L,
    2. Kimmel AR
    . GSK3, a master switch regulating cell-fate specification and tumorigenesis. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2000;10:508–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Juvekar A,
    2. Burga LN,
    3. Hu H,
    4. Lunsford EP,
    5. Ibrahim YH,
    6. Balmañà J,
    7. et al.
    Combining a PI3K inhibitor with a PARP inhibitor provides an effective therapy for BRCA1-related breast cancer. Cancer Discov 2012;2:1048–63.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. 45.↵
    1. Cazzalini O,
    2. Scovassi AI,
    3. Savio M,
    4. Stivala LA,
    5. Prosperi E
    . Multiple roles of the cell cycle inhibitor p21(CDKN1A) in the DNA damage response. Mutat Res 2010;704:12–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    1. Rossig L,
    2. Badorff C,
    3. Holzmann Y,
    4. Zeiher AM,
    5. Dimmeler S
    . Glycogen synthase kinase-3 couples AKT-dependent signaling to the regulation of p21Cip1 degradation. J Biol Chem 2002;277:9684–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. 47.↵
    1. Liu Y,
    2. Xing ZB,
    3. Zhang JH,
    4. Fang Y
    . Akt kinase targets the association of CBP with histone H3 to regulate the acetylation of lysine K18. FEBS Lett 2013;587:847–53.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. 48.↵
    1. Rosich L,
    2. Saborit-Villarroya I,
    3. Lopez-Guerra M,
    4. López-Guerra M,
    5. Xargay-Torrent S,
    6. Montraveta A,
    7. et al.
    The phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase inhibitor NVP-BKM120 overcomes resistance signals derived from microenvironment by regulating the Akt/FoxO3a/Bim axis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells. Haematologica 2013;98:1739–47.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. 49.↵
    1. Wenzel SS,
    2. Grau M,
    3. Mavis C,
    4. Hailfinger S,
    5. Wolf A,
    6. Madle H,
    7. et al.
    MCL1 is deregulated in subgroups of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Leukemia 2013;27:1381–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. 50.↵
    1. Bachmann PS,
    2. Piazza RG,
    3. Janes ME,
    4. Wong NC,
    5. Davies C,
    6. Mogavero A,
    7. et al.
    Epigenetic silencing of BIM in glucocorticoid poor-responsive pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and its reversal by histone deacetylase inhibition. Blood 2010;116:3013–22.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Clinical Cancer Research: 20 (18)
September 2014
Volume 20, Issue 18
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Clinical Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
PI3K/mTOR Inhibition Markedly Potentiates HDAC Inhibitor Activity in NHL Cells through BIM- and MCL-1–Dependent Mechanisms In Vitro and In Vivo
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Clinical Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
PI3K/mTOR Inhibition Markedly Potentiates HDAC Inhibitor Activity in NHL Cells through BIM- and MCL-1–Dependent Mechanisms In Vitro and In Vivo
Mohamed Rahmani, Mandy Mayo Aust, Elisa C. Benson, LaShanale Wallace, Jonathan Friedberg and Steven Grant
Clin Cancer Res September 15 2014 (20) (18) 4849-4860; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0034

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
PI3K/mTOR Inhibition Markedly Potentiates HDAC Inhibitor Activity in NHL Cells through BIM- and MCL-1–Dependent Mechanisms In Vitro and In Vivo
Mohamed Rahmani, Mandy Mayo Aust, Elisa C. Benson, LaShanale Wallace, Jonathan Friedberg and Steven Grant
Clin Cancer Res September 15 2014 (20) (18) 4849-4860; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0034
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Authors' Contributions
    • Grant Support
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Radiotherapy with IDO1/PD-1 Blockade Treats Advanced GBM
  • Enhanced Delivery of SN38-TOA NPs in NBs
  • Toxicity and Efficacy of a GADD34-encoding Oncolytic HSV
Show more Cancer Therapy: Preclinical
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • CCR Focus Archive
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Clinical Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Clinical Cancer Research
eISSN: 1557-3265
ISSN: 1078-0432

Advertisement