Advertisement
Cancer Therapy: Clinical

CTLA4 Blockade Broadens the Peripheral T-Cell Receptor Repertoire

Lidia Robert, Jennifer Tsoi, Xiaoyan Wang, Ryan Emerson, Blanca Homet, Thinle Chodon, Stephen Mok, Rong Rong Huang, Alistair J. Cochran, Begoña Comin-Anduix, Richard C. Koya, Thomas G. Graeber, Harlan Robins and Antoni Ribas
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-2648 Published May 2014

This article has a correction. Please see:

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the immunomodulatory effects of cytotoxic T–lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA4) blockade with tremelimumab in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC).

Experimental Design: We used next-generation sequencing to study the complementarity-determining region 3 (CDR3) from the rearranged T-cell receptor (TCR) variable beta (V-beta) in PBMCs of 21 patients, at baseline and 30 to 60 days after receiving tremelimumab.

Results: After receiving tremelimumab, there was a median of 30% increase in unique productive sequences of TCR V-beta CDR3 in 19 out of 21 patients, and a median decrease of 30% in only 2 out of 21 patients. These changes were significant for richness (P = 0.01) and for Shannon index diversity (P = 0.04). In comparison, serially collected PBMCs from four healthy donors did not show a significant change in TCR V-beta CDR3 diversity over 1 year. There was a significant difference in the total unique productive TCR V-beta CDR3 sequences between patients experiencing toxicity with tremelimumab compared with patients without toxicity (P = 0.05). No relevant differences were noted between clinical responders and nonresponders.

Conclusions: CTLA4 blockade with tremelimumab diversifies the peripheral T-cell pool, representing a pharmacodynamic effect of how this class of antibodies modulates the human immune system. Clin Cancer Res; 20(9); 2424–32. ©2014 AACR.

Translational Relevance

By applying next-generation sequencing of T-cell receptor (TCR) variable genes in blood of patients treated with an anti-CTLA4 antibody, this study demonstrated a remarkable effect of this therapy expanding the number of unique T-cell receptor (TCR) variable beta (V-beta) in blood. Therefore, cytotoxic T–lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA4) blockade impacts the human immune system expanding the pool of circulating T cells, which may be mechanistically related to the induction of autoimmune and inflammatory toxicities.

Introduction

Blockade of the negative immune regulatory checkpoint cytotoxic T–lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA4) results in long-lasting responses in a minority of patients with advanced melanoma. CTLA4 is a coinhibitory molecule in T cells and is thought to play a critical role in regulating natural immune responses by inhibiting the CD28-B7 costimulatory signaling. Two fully human CTLA4-blocking antibodies, the immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) ipilimumab (Yervoy, formerly MDX010, Bristol-Myers Squibb) and the IgG2 tremelimumab (formerly CP-675,206, Pfizer Inc, now developed by MedImmune/AstraZeneca), have been tested in the clinic. Ipilimumab gained regulatory body approvals in many countries based on the demonstration of improved overall survival over a gp100 vaccine or dacarbazine in two randomized clinical trials (1, 2).

Phase I and II testing of the antitumor activity of tremelimumab demonstrated durable tumor regressions, most of them lasting beyond 5 years, in approximately 10% to 15% of patients with metastatic melanoma (3). The most common treatment-related serious toxicities with tremelimumab are skin rash and diarrhea/colitis, with a low percentage of patients experiencing endocrine abnormalities such as thyroiditis and hypophysitis (4–10). The objective response rate and the rate of grade 3–4 toxicities in patients treated with tremelimumab are very similar to the phase II clinical trial results with ipilimumab in a comparable population of patients (11, 12). However, tremelimumab did not lead to an improvement in overall survival in the reported phase III clinical trial (13). Median overall survival was 12.6 months in the tremelimumab arm compared with 10.7 months in the chemotherapy arm, with the differences being non-statistically significant. There was a high use of ipilimumab in patients randomized to the chemotherapy control arm, which is likely to be the major contributing factor resulting in this negative randomized trial (14, 15).

Studies in blood cells of patients treated with CTLA4-blocking antibodies have reported a mild increase in the absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), with a cutoff value of >1,000 lymphocytes correlating with patients with improved outcome after CTLA4 blockade (16, 17). The circulating lymphocytes have increased expression of activation markers mostly on CD4+ T cells (5, 18–21), but most studies have failed to detect a consistent expansion of tumor or viral antigen-specific T cells (5, 19, 21, 22). Pathologic analysis of paired tumor biopsies demonstrated that tumor responses are mediated by the intratumoral infiltration of CTLs (18, 19). However, not all patients who had a significant increase in activated intratumoral T cells had a clinical tumor regression (19). Therefore, there remains a need to further understand the immunologic effects of CTLA4-blocking antibodies. In this context, we performed deep sequencing of the complementarity-determining region 3 (CDR3) of the T-cell receptor (TCR) variable beta (V-beta) as readout of the change in T-cell clonality and diversification in peripheral blood lymphocytes of patients with melanoma treated with tremelimumab.

Patients and Methods

Clinical trial conduct and sample procurement

Peripheral blood samples were obtained by leukapheresis procedures from 21 patients with metastatic melanoma treated at the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) in an investigator-initiated phase II clinical trial of single agent tremelimumab (UCLA IRB# 06-06-093; IND# 100453; trial registration number NCT00471887) administered at 15 mg/kg every 3 months. Objective clinical responses were recorded following a modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). The modification in the RECIST criteria was to consider measurable disease lesions in the skin and subcutaneous lesions detectable by physical exam, but not by imaging exams, if they were adequately recorded at baseline using a camera with a measuring tape or ruler (23). Toxicities were graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) common toxicity criteria version 2.0 during the first 3 months of therapy (one cycle of tremelimumab-based therapy), as the postdosing leukapheresis was performed only during the first cycle of therapy, most frequently between 30 and 60 days from the first dose of tremelimumab. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were prospectively defined as any treatment-related toxicity equal or greater than grade 3, or the clinical evidence of grade 2 or higher autoimmune reaction in critical organs (heart, lung, kidney, bowel, bone marrow, musculoskeletal, central nervous system, and the eye). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were collected from patients receiving tremelimumab by a leukapheresis procedure. Leukaphereses were planned as part of the predosing procedures. The postdosing leukapheresis were performed at a median of 41 days after the dose of tremelimumab (range, 28–81). In all cases, concentrations of tremelimumab in peripheral blood should have been above 10 μg/mL at the time of cell harvesting by leukapheresis, which is the minimum concentration of tremelimumab that stimulated a biologic effect consistent with CTLA4 blockade in preclinical studies (24). Processing of blood to obtain PBMCs has been previously described (25).

Immunohistochemical and oncogenic analysis of tumor biopsies

Patients underwent baseline and postdosing biopsies as previously described (19). Biopsy samples were formalin fixed and paraffin embedded (FFPE) and stained by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for CD4 and CD8 T-cell markers as previously described (26), with the SimplePCI imaging system (version 5.2.1.1609; Compix Inc., Imaging Systems) to quantitatively evaluate T-cell infiltrations. The frequency of intratumoral and peritumoral lymphocytes was assessed by analyzing 10 tumor areas from each sample at ×200 magnification. The density was compared between pretreatment and posttreatment biopsies. All samples were analyzed without the knowledge of the patients' clinical outcomes (19). For 19 out of 21 patients, targeted oncogene mutational analysis was performed in baseline FFPE biopsies. After genomic-DNA (gDNA) extraction, they were sequenced with Oncomap v3, a mass spectrometry–based genotyping method, to detect 1,047 point mutations in 112 common oncogenes and tumor-suppressor genes (20)

Analysis of human TCR V-beta CDR3 repertoire in PBMCs

gDNA extraction was performed following the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen). Proteinase K was used for digestion and DNA extraction was performed following animal blood or cell protocol with RNase treatment and using spin-column method. Samples were analyzed with high-throughput deep sequencing of the TCR V-beta CDR3 region with the Illumina Genome Analyzer from Adaptive Biotechnologies using the immunoSEQ immune-profiling system (27) at the deep level. This analysis results in a 5× sequence coverage for T cells from 3.6 μg of gDNA, which means an input of 200,000 T-cell genomes with an output of 1,000,000 sequences, depending on the proportion of T cells. The product was sequenced and organized providing in-frame and out-of-frame sequences. An algorithm was applied to the in-frame sequences for collapsing reads and resulting in unique in-frame rearrangement of the CDR3 genes. In-frame unique sequences without stop codons are referred to as unique productive sequences and are object of this study. Results were compared with PBMCs from four healthy donors collected every 4 months from four different time points. The same amount of gDNA was loaded for deep sequencing of the TCR V-beta CDR3 region with subsequent immune profiling at the deep level. This was used as a comparison for patients with melanoma.

Statistical analysis

Statistical measures such as richness (number of unique TCR V-beta CDR3 sequences), the Shannon diversity index (28), and the Pielou's evenness index (29) were calculated to evaluate the diversity of TCR V-beta CDR3 sequences for both patients and healthy donors. The Shannon diversity index was defined as Embedded Image, where pi is the proportion of sequence i relative to the total N sequences. It accounted for both richness and relative abundance (evenness) of the TCR V-beta CDR3 sequences present in each sample. The larger the Shannon diversity index, the more diverse the distribution of the TCR V-beta CDR3 sequences. The Pielou's evenness index was defined as J = H/log(S), where H is the Shannon index and S is the number of unique TCR V-beta CDR3 sequences. The nonparametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the diversity measures before and after treatment among patients. Repeated measure analysis (30) was performed to assess if diversity changed over time for healthy donors. To test the hypothesis that patients with toxicity had higher diversity than those without toxicity, one-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used. Correlation between change in richness in PBMCs and density change observed in CD8 and CD4 in tumor biopsies was assessed by Spearman rank correlation coefficient (31), a robust, nonparametric correlation measure. Comparison of ALC pre- and posttreatment was done by Wilcoxon signed-rank test. For all statistical investigations, tests for significance were two-tailed unless otherwise specified. A P value less than the 0.05 significance level was considered to be statistically significant. Data analyses were carried out using statistical software R version 3.0.0 (32). The reported P values for toxicity are obtained from one-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Clonality values are calculated from entropy of the TCR V-beta CDR3 frequency distribution, and then normalized by log(# unique TCR V-beta CDR3). These values range from 0 (polyclonal distribution) to 1 (monoclonal distribution).

Results

Patient characteristics and outcomes

Among the 21 study patients (Table 1), 14 (66%) had M1c metastatic melanoma [visceral metastasis and/or high LDH (lactate dehydrogenase)], and the remaining had either in-transit (stage IIIc) or soft tissue and nodal metastasis (M1a). Toxicities were graded during the first 3 months of therapy, corresponding to the timing of leukapheresis to collect PBMCs for the current analyses. Among these patients, there were three with toxicities that met the definition of DLTs as defined in the clinical trial protocols. These included four cases of grade 3 diarrhea or colitis and 1 patient with symptomatic panhypopituitarism (grade 2 hypophysitis). None of these patients received corticosteroids before the collection of PBMCs for analysis from the postdosing leukapheresis. Four patients had an objective tumor response, resulting in sustained and durable complete tumor regressions in three of them (GA18, GA29, and GA33), while the other patient (GA5) had a partial response lasting 7 months followed by progression. All of them presented with normal levels of LDH and the 3 patients with a durable complete response (CR) had stage IIIc or M1a. There was no apparent association between the oncogenic driver mutation analysis for the tumor specimens and clinical response. Three of the patients with an objective response (GA5, GA29, and GA33) had BRAFV600E mutations, while 1 (GA18) had a NRASQ61K mutation (Table 1).

View this table:
Table 1.

Patient characteristics from patients included in the PBMC study for TCR V-beta CDR3 sequencing

Changes in ALC

There was a median increase in ALC of 11.1% (ranging from decrease of 37.9% to increase of 80%) from baseline to days 30 to 60 without overall significant changes in this series of samples (P = 0.18). Three out of 21 patients started with a baseline count lower than 1,000 lymphocytes, and none of these patients had an objective response. The ALC after treatment with a cutoff value of >1,000 lymphocytes has been previously reported to be correlated with patients with improved outcome after CTLA4 blockade (17, 33). In our series, all four responders had baseline and postdosing counts above 1,000 lymphocytes. However, two of them (GA29 and GA33) experienced a decrease in ALC comparing baseline with the post-tremelimumab values.

Increased TCR V-beta CDR3 richness and Shannon index diversity with CTLA4 blockade

To examine the dynamics of the CD8+ T-cell repertoire upon anti-CTLA4 treatment, we first analyzed the general yields from the high-throughput TCR sequencing data (Supplementary Table S1). In this series of 21 patients, the average number of productive unique TCR V-beta CDR3 sequences was 87,867 per sample at baseline and 108,150 per sample 1 month after starting the treatment. The mean increase in the total number of productive sequences was 24%. This increase was consistent in 19 of 21 patients, experiencing increases between 11% and 73.6%. Only two patients treated with tremelimumab experienced a decrease (GA28 and GA23) in their total repertoire up to 30% (Fig. 1). Both these patients had rapid disease progression and died within 4 months of starting on study (Table 1). To visually understand the diversity and changes across patients, we generated rank–rank scatter plot figures for each patient (34). Rank–rank scatter plots show the degree of overlap and shift in the relative abundances from baseline to postdosing of each sequence. Sequences are ranked in descending order by frequency in the x-axis for baseline and y-axis for postdosing, with the most highly abundant sequences proximal to the origin. Sequences not present in either the baseline or postdosing samples are assigned a frequency of 0 and are represented by the last rank on the axis. Increases in diversity after treatment are shown as an increase in the number of absent baseline sequences along the x-axis. Decreases in diversity after treatment are shown as an increase in the number of absent postdosing samples along the y-axis. Points are binned and colored on a log scale with red showing the greatest density of points. Fig. 2 shows three representative examples on how the TCR repertoire can change after treatment toward an increase (n = 14 cases of 21; Fig. 2A), decrease (n = 2; Fig. 2B), or minimal change (n = 5; Fig. 2C) in the total repertoire (the complete scatter plots for all patients are shown in Supplementary Fig. S1). The sequencing method also displays the complete V and J segment usage for each TCR. However, there were no statistical differences in usage of V or J (data not shown).

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Change in absolute number of unique productive sequences. A, changes reported between baseline and post-tremelimumab samples from 21 patients with melanoma (GA, in black) and from four healthy donors (HD, in gray). B, normalized TCR V-beta CDR3 repertoire diversity. Analysis comparing baseline and post-tremelimumab PBMC samples. The values were normalized to 1, to show increase and decrease after treatment in a comparable manner.

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Rank–rank scatter plot analysis of all the TCR V-beta CDR3 sequences. Rank–rank scatter plot matching up baseline and post-tremelimumab samples from 3 representative patients. Each sequence was ranked according to clone abundance from highest frequency (rank 1 = 0) to lowest frequency. This provides a visual representation of the changes between baseline (x-axis) and posttreatment (y-axis) distributions. Example of an increase (GA5; A), a decrease (GA23; B), and of minimal change (GA33; C) in the TCR V-beta CDR3 repertoire. Scatter plots for all patients are shown in Supplementary Fig. S1.

We compared the results of TCR V-beta CDR3 sequencing in PBMCs from patients treated with CTLA4 blockade with the serial collection of PBMC from four healthy donors (four time points separated by 4 months each). For these healthy donors, richness (number of unique productive sequences) and the Shannon diversity index (distribution of the sample) were calculated for each sample at each time point. There were no differences over time in either analysis (P = 0.93 and P = 0.68, respectively), suggesting that these four healthy donors had little change in their peripheral TCR V-beta CDR3 repertoire during the 1-year sampling time. The same analysis performed in samples of patients with melanoma treated with tremelimumab comparing baseline and posttreatment samples showed a significant increase in richness (P = 0.001 by Wilcoxon sign-rank test), which occurs with a corresponding increase in the total number of productive TCR V-beta CDR3 sequences. The Shannon diversity index was significantly larger posttreatment (P = 0.04 by Wilcoxon sign-rank test; Fig. 3). The Shannon diversity index incorporates a combination of richness and evenness. Increases in the diversity index were not attributed to changes in the distribution itself because of a nonsignificant change in the Pielou's evenness index (P = 0.5), but instead an increase of the total TCR V-beta CDR3 repertoire itself.

Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Richness and Shannon index for diversity. Differences in richness for total number of unique productive sequences (P = 0.001; A) and Shannon index for diversity of the repertoire (P = 0.04; B).

Productive unique sequences were ranked according to their abundance and the top clones were selected up to the point that their sum was equal to 25%. These top 25% abundant clones have been reported to be the most frequent and feasible to track over time (35), avoiding the noise from the most infrequent clones present in blood. In our samples, this ranged from 4 to 5,185 sequences. In this subgroup of unique productive sequences, the increase was particularly impressive (Supplementary Table S3). Nine out of 21 (43%) of the paired samples had an increase of 2-fold or more, including three of the clinical responders (GA5, GA18, and GA29). The responding patient GA33 experienced a small decrease in TCR V-beta CDR3 diversity. Only 2 out of 21 (9%) had a decrease in the diversity of 2-fold or more. The changes in unique productive sequences reported in Table 2 correlate with a highly polyclonal population, with values of clonality ranging between 0.068 and 0.27. However, the increase in diversity (richness and Shannon diversity index) does not always correlate with a more polyclonal population. In fact, despite only 2 patients (GA23 and GA28) having a decrease in richness, 12 patients showed increase in clonality. In comparison, none of the samples from the four healthy donors had changes more than 2-fold when focusing on the top 25% abundant clones (except time point four in HD4, considered an outlier sample; Supplementary Table S2).

Considering that we observed an increase in ALC, we questioned whether the increase in richness was linked to the increase seen in peripheral lymphocytes counts. However, we identified 5 patients (GA8, GA12, GA24, GA29, and GA33) with decreases in the ALC who, nevertheless, demonstrated an increase in the number of unique productive sequences. Correlation analysis showed that there was no trend (R = 0.001) and no significant correlation (P = 0.1) between changes in ALC and changes in unique productive sequences (Supplementary Fig. S2). This analysis emphasizes the consistent trend of increased unique productive sequences upon treatment, and deemphasizes the more random and diverse changes in ALC.

Weak correlation between TCR V-beta CDR3 diversity in blood and intratumoral CD8 T-cell infiltration

Figure 4 summarizes the changes in TCR V-beta CDR3 diversity for each patient and the fold-changes in density of T cells analyzed in paired baseline and post-tremelimumab biopsies from the same patients, as previously reported by our group (19). We had quantitated changes in density for CD4 and CD8 in the intratumoral and peritumoral sections of tumor biopsies stained by IHC. In that work, we noted between 1-fold and 100-fold increase in the intratumoral infiltration by CD8+ T cells in 14 out of 18 evaluable cases regardless of clinical tumor response or progression. There was no difference between the absolute number, location, or cell density of infiltrating cells between clinical responding and nonresponding lesions. In the current context, our interest was to study whether the differences in TCR V-beta CDR3 diversity in peripheral blood would correlate with the differences in CD8+ T-cell infiltration in tumor biopsies. In patients with increased TCR V-beta CDR3 diversity in PBMCs, the Spearman correlation coefficient showed a positive trend in all cases comparing fold-changes in richness to increased T-cell infiltration. CD8 peritumoral infiltration was the strongest correlations and statistical significance (Spearman correlation coefficient; ρ = 0.66; P = 0.01; Fig. 4).

Figure 4.
Figure 4.

Correlation between fold-changes in top 25% abundant clones (x-axis) versus fold-changes in CD4/CD8 density (y-axis) at baseline and days 30 to 60, for CD4 intratumoral infiltration (ITI; A), CD4 peritumoral infiltration (PTI; B), CD8 ITI (C), and CD8 PTI (D).

TCR V-beta CDR3 diversity analyzed in relation to clinical response and toxicity after CTLA4 blockade

There were no significant differences in the total unique productive TCR V-beta CDR3 sequences between the 4 patients with an objective response to tremelimumab compared with patients without a tumor response, either in baseline or in posttreatment samples (P = 0.62 and 0.39 for baseline and posttreatment, respectively, two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test). We thus reasoned that the changes in TCR V-beta CDR3 usage detected in peripheral blood may reflect a broader effect of CTLA4 blockade on the immune system, as opposed to the stimulation of melanoma-specific T cells. Therefore, the TCR V-beta CDR3 diversity changes may reflect expansion of auto-reactive T cells leading to the clinically observed autoimmune toxicities of CTLA4-blocking monoclonal antibodies. This was studied by analyzing the potential correlation between TCR V-beta CDR3 diversity and the development of toxicities after administration of tremelimumab. Our results show that samples from patients with toxicity had richer and more diversely distributed TCR V-beta CDR3 sequences in the posttreatment samples compared with patients without toxicities (P = 0.05, one-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test; Fig. 5). Baseline samples had the same trend, but were not statistically significant as a predictive factor for toxicity (richness P = 0.30 and Shannon diversity index P = 0.12, by Wilcoxon rank-sum test). Interestingly, patients with toxicity had higher increases in the total number of unique productive sequences after treatment (P = 0.04, one-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test).

Figure 5.
Figure 5.

Changes in number of unique TCR V-beta CDR3 sequences related to toxicity during the first 3 months of therapy with tremelimumab.

Discussion

CTLA4 blockade provides long-lasting tumor remissions resultant from a T-cell response to cancer, but it is not fully understood how these antibodies impact on the human immune system to induce durable tumor responses or autoimmune toxicities. Our studies show an expansion of the total number of unique productive TCR V-beta CDR3 sequences in blood after CTLA4 blockade, reflecting a larger T-cell diversity in blood after treatment. There was an increase in the total amount of unique productive sequences, but no expansion of specific clones toward predominance on top of the others, suggesting that this mode of therapy does not result in the specific clonal expansion of T cells to cancer detectable in blood.

Our data are consistent with an immunologic effect of CTLA4 blockade mediated by a nonspecific T-cell proliferation and increased release to circulation, which is congruent with prior data from the literature. Evidence from many groups shows that the anti-CTLA4 antibodies tremelimumab and ipilimumab do not generally expand the number or function of tumor antigen–specific CD8 or CD4 T cells in peripheral blood (4, 5, 25, 36), even though this has been reported anecdotally in occasional patients (22, 37–39). The release of the CTLA4 checkpoint, which limits T-cell replication, with CTLA4-blocking antibodies was demonstrated in 10 of the patients included in this same series who underwent positron emission tomography (PET) imaging using the PET tracer [18F] fluoro-L-thymidine ([18F]FLT; ref. 21). [18F]FLT PET provides a noninvasive imaging for cell replication at the whole-body level. Postdosing [18F]FLT scans demonstrated increased uptake in the spleen, which is the largest lymphoid organ, consistent with the release of the CTLA4 cell-cycle checkpoint in patients treated with tremelimumab. This prior finding suggests the induction of proliferation of T lymphocytes in lymphoid organs, which may contribute to the observation of increased ALC in blood after treatment with CTLA4-blocking antibodies. CTLA4-mediated checkpoint release may also account for the longstanding detection of increase in T-cell activation markers on T cells after the administration of these antibodies, including HLA-DR and inducible costimulator (ICOS; refs. 4, 5, 36, 40–42), and our current finding of increased diversity of the TCR repertoire after CTLA4 blockade.

The increase in diversity of TCR V-beta CDR3 in peripheral blood may reflect a pharmacodynamic effect of the anti-CTLA4 antibody therapy that is more related to a general ability of that patient's immune system to be activated, rather than a correlation with tumor responses. As such, we report that the diversity change has an association with the development of toxicities after receiving tremelimumab. Prior studies to understand the mechanism of the autoimmune and inflammatory toxicities resultant from CTLA4 blockade have focused on the evidence that in some patients there is an increase in IL-17–producing T cells (Th17 cells), as interleukin (IL)-17 is a known mediator of colitis (43). Our findings suggest that the patients more likely to develop toxicity expanded the number of unique productive sequences, which may in part reflect mobilization of auto-reactive T cells.

In conclusion, we report an increased diversity of T cells (richness and Shannon diversity index) in blood after CTLA4 blockade, with no specific expansion of clonal populations. This increased T-cell diversity, together with their increased T-cell activation state, may be mechanistically linked to the development of tumor responses and toxicities in patients treated with CTLA4-blocking antibodies.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

R. Emerson is an employee of and has ownership interest (including patents) in Adaptive Biotechnologies. H. Robins is employed as a consultant for, is an advisory board member for, and has ownership interest (including patents) in Adaptive Biotechnologies. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed by the other authors.

Authors' Contributions

Conception and design: L. Robert, R.C. Koya, H. Robins, A. Ribas

Development of methodology: L. Robert, R.C. Koya, H. Robins, A. Ribas

Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): L. Robert, B. Homet, T. Chodon, S. Mok, R.R. Huang, A.J. Cochran, B. Comin-Anduix, R.C. Koya, A. Ribas

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): L. Robert, J. Tsoi, X. Wang, R. Emerson, A.J. Cochran, B. Comin-Anduix, R.C. Koya, T.G. Graeber, H. Robins, A. Ribas

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: L. Robert, J. Tsoi, X. Wang, R. Emerson, A.J. Cochran, B. Comin-Anduix, T.G. Graeber, H. Robins, A. Ribas

Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases): L. Robert, J. Tsoi, T. Chodon, A. Ribas

Study supervision: R.C. Koya, H. Robins, A. Ribas

Grant Support

This work was funded by the Melanoma Research Foundation, NIH grants 2U54 CA151819, R01 CA170689, and P01 CA168585, The Seaver Institute, the Dr. Robert Vigen Memorial Fund, the Wesley Coyle Memorial Fund, the Garcia-Corsini Family Fund, the Louise Belley and Richard Schnarr Fund, the Bila Alon Hacker Memorial Fund, the Fred L. Hartley Family Foundation, the Ruby Family Foundation, the Jonsson Cancer Center Foundation, and the Caltech-UCLA Joint Center for Translational Medicine (to A. Ribas). A. Ribas was supported by a Stand Up To Cancer—Cancer Research Institute Cancer Immunology Dream Team Translational Research Grant (SU2C-AACR-DT1012). Stand Up To Cancer is a program of the Entertainment Industry Foundation administered by the American Association for Cancer Research. L. Robert was supported by the V Foundation-Gil Nickel Family Endowed Fellowship in Melanoma Research and by a scholarship from the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology for Translational Research in reference centers. B. Homet was supported by the Rio Ortega Scholarship from the Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain. J. Tsoi is supported by NIH T32-CA009120-36. T.G. Graeber was supported by a Research Scholar Award from the American Cancer Society (RSG-12-257-01-TBE), NIH/National Center for Advancing Translational Science UCLA CTSI grant number UL1TR000124 and an Established Investigator Award from the Melanoma Research Alliance (20120279).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Footnotes

  • Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Clinical Cancer Research Online (http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/).

  • Received September 27, 2013.
  • Revision received January 20, 2014.
  • Accepted February 8, 2014.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Chapman PB,
    2. Hauschild A,
    3. Robert C,
    4. Haanen JB,
    5. Ascierto P,
    6. Larkin J,
    7. et al.
    Improved survival with vemurafenib in melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation. N Engl J Med 2011;364:2507–16.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Hodi FS,
    2. O'Day SJ,
    3. McDermott DF,
    4. Weber RW,
    5. Sosman JA,
    6. Haanen JB,
    7. et al.
    Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med 2010;363:711–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Camacho LH,
    2. Antonia S,
    3. Sosman J,
    4. Kirkwood JM,
    5. Gajewski TF,
    6. Redman B,
    7. et al.
    Phase I/II trial of tremelimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:1075–81.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Phan GQ,
    2. Yang JC,
    3. Sherry RM,
    4. Hwu P,
    5. Topalian SL,
    6. Schwartzentruber DJ,
    7. et al.
    Cancer regression and autoimmunity induced by cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 blockade in patients with metastatic melanoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100:8372–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Sanderson K,
    2. Scotland R,
    3. Lee P,
    4. Liu D,
    5. Groshen S,
    6. Snively J,
    7. et al.
    Autoimmunity in a phase I trial of a fully human anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 monoclonal antibody with multiple melanoma peptides and Montanide ISA 51 for patients with resected stages III and IV melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:741–50.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Ribas A,
    2. Camacho LH,
    3. Lopez-Berestein G,
    4. Pavlov D,
    5. Bulanhagui CA,
    6. Millham R,
    7. et al.
    Antitumor activity in melanoma and anti-self responses in a phase I trial with the anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 monoclonal antibody CP-675,206. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:8968–77.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Hodi FS,
    2. Mihm MC,
    3. Soiffer RJ,
    4. Haluska FG,
    5. Butler M,
    6. Seiden MV,
    7. et al.
    Biologic activity of cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 antibody blockade in previously vaccinated metastatic melanoma and ovarian carcinoma patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100:4712–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Attia P,
    2. Phan GQ,
    3. Maker AV,
    4. Robinson MR,
    5. Quezado MM,
    6. Yang JC,
    7. et al.
    Autoimmunity correlates with tumor regression in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:6043–53.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Robinson MR,
    2. Chan CC,
    3. Yang JC,
    4. Rubin BI,
    5. Gracia GJ,
    6. Sen HN,
    7. et al.
    Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 blockade in patients with metastatic melanoma: a new cause of uveitis. J Immunother 2004;27:478–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    1. Blansfield JA,
    2. Beck KE,
    3. Tran K,
    4. Yang JC,
    5. Hughes MS,
    6. Kammula US,
    7. et al.
    Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 blockage can induce autoimmune hypophysitis in patients with metastatic melanoma and renal cancer. J Immunother 2005;28:593–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. 11.↵
    1. O'Day SJ,
    2. Maio M,
    3. Chiarion-Sileni V,
    4. Gajewski TF,
    5. Pehamberger H,
    6. Bondarenko IN,
    7. et al.
    Efficacy and safety of ipilimumab monotherapy in patients with pretreated advanced melanoma: a multicenter single-arm phase II study. Ann Oncol 2010;21:1712–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Kirkwood JM,
    2. Lorigan P,
    3. Hersey P,
    4. Hauschild A,
    5. Robert C,
    6. McDermott D,
    7. et al.
    Phase II trial of tremelimumab (CP-675,206) in patients with advanced refractory or relapsed melanoma. Clin Cancer Res 2010;16:1042–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Ribas A,
    2. Kefford R,
    3. Marshall MA,
    4. Punt CJ,
    5. Haanen JB,
    6. Marmol M,
    7. et al.
    Phase III randomized clinical trial comparing tremelimumab with standard-of-care chemotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:616–22.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Wilson KS,
    2. Kotb R
    . Is Tremelimumab Beneficial in Advanced Melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:2835–6.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Ribas A,
    2. Hauschild A,
    3. Kefford R
    . Reply to KS. Wilson et al. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:2836–7.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Wilgenhof S,
    2. Du Four S,
    3. Everaert H,
    4. Neyns B
    . Patterns of response in patients with pretreated metastatic melanoma who received ipilimumab 3 mg/kg in a European expanded access program: five illustrative case reports. Cancer Invest 2012;30:712–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Ku GY,
    2. Yuan J,
    3. Page DB,
    4. Schroeder SE,
    5. Panageas KS,
    6. Carvajal RD,
    7. et al.
    Single-institution experience with ipilimumab in advanced melanoma patients in the compassionate use setting: lymphocyte count after 2 doses correlates with survival. Cancer 2010;116:1767–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Ribas A,
    2. Comin-Anduix B,
    3. Chmielowski B,
    4. Jalil J,
    5. de la Rocha P,
    6. McCannel TA,
    7. et al.
    Dendritic cell vaccination combined with CTLA4 blockade in patients with metastatic melanoma. Clin Cancer Res 2009;15:6267–76.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Huang RR,
    2. Jalil J,
    3. Economou JS,
    4. Chmielowski B,
    5. Koya RC,
    6. Mok S,
    7. et al.
    CTLA4 blockade induces frequent tumor infiltration by activated lymphocytes regardless of clinical responses in humans. Clin Cancer Res 2011;17:4101–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. MacConaill LE,
    2. Campbell CD,
    3. Kehoe SM,
    4. Bass AJ,
    5. Hatton C,
    6. Niu L,
    7. et al.
    Profiling critical cancer gene mutations in clinical tumor samples. PLoS ONE 2009;4:e7887.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Ribas A,
    2. Benz MR,
    3. Allen-Auerbach MS,
    4. Radu C,
    5. Chmielowski B,
    6. Seja E,
    7. et al.
    Imaging of CTLA4 blockade-induced cell replication with (18)F-FLT PET in patients with advanced melanoma treated with tremelimumab. J Nucl Med 2010;51:340–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Klein O,
    2. Ebert LM,
    3. Nicholaou T,
    4. Browning J,
    5. Russell SE,
    6. Zuber M,
    7. et al.
    Melan-A-specific cytotoxic T cells are associated with tumor regression and autoimmunity following treatment with anti-CTLA-4. Clin Cancer Res 2009;15:2507–13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Comin-Anduix B,
    2. Sazegar H,
    3. Chodon T,
    4. Matsunaga D,
    5. Jalil J,
    6. von Euw E,
    7. et al.
    Modulation of cell signaling networks after CTLA4 blockade in patients with metastatic melanoma. PLoS ONE 2010;5:e12711.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Ribas A,
    2. Hanson DC,
    3. Noe DA,
    4. Millham R,
    5. Guyot DJ,
    6. Bernstein SH,
    7. et al.
    Tremelimumab (CP-675,206), a cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 blocking monoclonal antibody in clinical development for patients with cancer. Oncologist 2007;12:873–83.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Butterfield LH,
    2. Comin-Anduix B,
    3. Vujanovic L,
    4. Lee Y,
    5. Dissette VB,
    6. Yang JQ,
    7. et al.
    Adenovirus MART-1-engineered autologous dendritic cell vaccine for metastatic melanoma. J Immunother 2008;31:294–309.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. 26.↵
    1. Ribas A,
    2. Comin-Anduix B,
    3. Economou JS,
    4. Donahue TR,
    5. de la Rocha P,
    6. Morris LF,
    7. et al.
    Intratumoral immune cell infiltrates, FoxP3, and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase in patients with melanoma undergoing CTLA4 blockade. Clin Cancer Res 2009;15:390–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Robins HS,
    2. Campregher PV,
    3. Srivastava SK,
    4. Wacher A,
    5. Turtle CJ,
    6. Kahsai O,
    7. et al.
    Comprehensive assessment of T-cell receptor beta-chain diversity in alphabeta T cells. Blood 2009;114:4099–107.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Shannon CE
    . A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 1948;27:379–423.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. 29.↵
    1. Pielou BC
    . Species-Diversity and Pattern-Diversity in the Study of ecological Succession. J Theor Biol 1966;10:370–83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Fitzmaurice GM,
    2. Ravichandran C
    . A primer in longitudinal data analysis. Circulation 2008;118:2005–10.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Lehmann EL,
    2. D'Abrera HJM
    . Nonparametrics: statistical methods based on ranks. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1998.
  32. 32.↵
    1. Team RC
    . A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2013. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org.
  33. 33.↵
    1. Wilgenhof S,
    2. Du Four S,
    3. Vandenbroucke F,
    4. Everaert H,
    5. Salmon I,
    6. Lienard D,
    7. et al.
    Single-center experience with ipilimumab in an expanded access program for patients with pretreated advanced melanoma. J Immunother 2013;36:215–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. 34.↵
    1. Plaisier S,
    2. Taschereau R,
    3. Wong J,
    4. Graeber T
    . Rank-rank hypergeometric overlap: identification of statistically significant overlap between gene-expression signatures. Nucleic Acids Res 2010;38:e169.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Neller MA,
    2. Burrows JM,
    3. Rist MJ,
    4. Miles JJ,
    5. Burrows SR
    . High frequency of herpesvirus-specific clonotypes in the human T cell repertoire can remain stable over decades with minimal turnover. J Virol 2013;87:697–700.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Maker AV,
    2. Attia P,
    3. Rosenberg SA
    . Analysis of the cellular mechanism of antitumor responses and autoimmunity in patients treated with CTLA-4 blockade. J Immunol 2005;175:7746–54.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    1. Ribas A,
    2. Glaspy JA,
    3. Lee Y,
    4. Dissette VB,
    5. Seja E,
    6. Vu HT,
    7. et al.
    Role of dendritic cell phenotype, determinant spreading, and negative costimulatory blockade in dendritic cell-based melanoma immunotherapy. J Immunother 2004;27:354–67.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  38. 38.↵
    1. Yuan J,
    2. Gnjatic S,
    3. Li H,
    4. Powel S,
    5. Gallardo HF,
    6. Ritter E,
    7. et al.
    CTLA-4 blockade enhances polyfunctional NY-ESO-1 specific T cell responses in metastatic melanoma patients with clinical benefit. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008;105:20410–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Liakou CI,
    2. Kamat A,
    3. Tang DN,
    4. Chen H,
    5. Sun J,
    6. Troncoso P,
    7. et al.
    CTLA-4 blockade increases IFNgamma-producing CD4+ICOShi cells to shift the ratio of effector to regulatory T cells in cancer patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008;105:14987–92.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. Comin-Anduix B,
    2. Lee Y,
    3. Jalil J,
    4. Algazi A,
    5. de la Rocha P,
    6. Camacho LH,
    7. et al.
    Detailed analysis of immunologic effects of the cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4-blocking monoclonal antibody tremelimumab in peripheral blood of patients with melanoma. J Transl Med 2008;6:22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Kavanagh B,
    2. O'Brien S,
    3. Lee D,
    4. Hou Y,
    5. Weinberg V,
    6. Rini B,
    7. et al.
    CTLA4 blockade expands FoxP3 +regulatory and activated effector CD4+ T cells in a dose-dependent fashion. Blood 2008;112:1175–83.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. Hodi FS,
    2. Oble DA,
    3. Drappatz J,
    4. Velazquez EF,
    5. Ramaiya N,
    6. Ramakrishna N,
    7. et al.
    CTLA-4 blockade with ipilimumab induces significant clinical benefit in a female with melanoma metastases to the CNS. Nat Clin Pract Onc 2008;5:557–61.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  43. 43.↵
    1. von Euw E,
    2. Chodon T,
    3. Attar N,
    4. Jalil J,
    5. Koya RC,
    6. Comin-Anduix B,
    7. et al.
    CTLA4 blockade increases Th17 cells in patients with metastatic melanoma. J Transl Med 2009;7:35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top
Clinical Cancer Research: 20 (9)
May 2014
Volume 20, Issue 9

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
CTLA4 Blockade Broadens the Peripheral T-Cell Receptor Repertoire
Lidia Robert, Jennifer Tsoi, Xiaoyan Wang, Ryan Emerson, Blanca Homet, Thinle Chodon, Stephen Mok, Rong Rong Huang, Alistair J. Cochran, Begoña Comin-Anduix, Richard C. Koya, Thomas G. Graeber, Harlan Robins and Antoni Ribas
Clin Cancer Res May 1 2014 (20) (9) 2424-2432; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-2648
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section

Advertisement