Advertisement
Cancer Therapy: Clinical

Caffeine and Caffeic Acid Inhibit Growth and Modify Estrogen Receptor and Insulin-like Growth Factor I Receptor Levels in Human Breast Cancer

Ann H. Rosendahl, Claire M. Perks, Li Zeng, Andrea Markkula, Maria Simonsson, Carsten Rose, Christian Ingvar, Jeff M.P. Holly and Helena Jernström
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1748 Published April 2015

Abstract

Purpose: Epidemiologic studies indicate that dietary factors, such as coffee, may influence breast cancer and modulate hormone receptor status. The purpose of this translational study was to investigate how coffee may affect breast cancer growth in relation to estrogen receptor-α (ER) status.

Experimental Design: The influence of coffee consumption on patient and tumor characteristics and disease-free survival was assessed in a population-based cohort of 1,090 patients with invasive primary breast cancer in Sweden. Cellular and molecular effects by the coffee constituents caffeine and caffeic acid were evaluated in ER+ (MCF-7) and ER− (MDA-MB-231) breast cancer cells.

Results: Moderate (2–4 cups/day) to high (≥5 cups/day) coffee intake was associated with smaller invasive primary tumors (Ptrend = 0.013) and lower proportion of ER+ tumors (Ptrend = 0.018), compared with patients with low consumption (≤1 cup/day). Moderate to high consumption was associated with lower risk for breast cancer events in tamoxifen-treated patients with ER+ tumors (adjusted HR, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.26–0.97). Caffeine and caffeic acid suppressed the growth of ER+ (P ≤ 0.01) and ER− (P ≤ 0.03) cells. Caffeine significantly reduced ER and cyclin D1 abundance in ER+ cells. Caffeine also reduced the insulin-like growth factor-I receptor (IGFIR) and pAkt levels in both ER+ and ER− cells. Together, these effects resulted in impaired cell-cycle progression and enhanced cell death.

Conclusions: The clinical and experimental findings demonstrate various anticancer properties of caffeine and caffeic acid against both ER+ and ER− breast cancer that may sensitize tumor cells to tamoxifen and reduce breast cancer growth. Clin Cancer Res; 21(8); 1877–87. ©2015 AACR.

This article is featured in Highlights of This Issue, p. 1777

Translational Relevance

Despite improved diagnostic and treatment modalities, breast cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related death among women worldwide. An increased understanding of the clinical and mechanistic effects of modifiable components of our daily diet on breast cancer characteristics and prognosis could lead to better patient information for managing disease. This study reveals that increasing coffee consumption is associated with significantly smaller invasive breast tumor sizes, a lower proportion of ER+ tumors, and improved disease-free survival among tamoxifen-treated women with ER+ breast cancer. Mechanistically, this study shows that predominantly caffeine, but also caffeic acid, mimics the actions of antiestrogens and modifies major growth regulatory pathways ER/cyclin D1 and IGFIR/pAkt, resulting in impaired cell-cycle progression and reduced cellular proliferation. Together, these translational findings provide a more comprehensive understanding of the clinical and mechanistic effects of these dietary factors that can modify breast cancer progression.

Introduction

Breast cancer is the major cancer affecting women with a lifetime risk of more than 10% in the general population in Western countries. The prevalence is, however, much lower in Asia and many economically developing countries (1). However, Asian immigrants to the United States acquire the prevalence of that country within one generation, indicating a strong effect of environmental exposures. Although the majority of primary breast cancer is estrogen-driven and often responsive to endocrine treatment, many patients progress to estrogen-insensitive disease with poor prognosis (2, 3). A critical determinant of such progression is the loss of the estrogen receptor-α (ER), which is associated with a more aggressive tumor phenotype and the loss of sensitivity to endocrine therapies such as tamoxifen (3). ER can stimulate cellular proliferation via progesterone receptor (PgR) induction and transcriptional upregulation of cyclin D1, leading to enhanced cell-cycle progression, whereas ER loss has been associated with enhanced motility and metastatic abilities of breast cancer cells. Although loss of ER activity and expression has critical consequences for breast cancers, it generally occurs without evidence of ER gene mutation or deletion. Alterations in ER levels can be regulated at transcriptional or posttranscriptional stages, or through epigenetic mechanisms (4). Given that the prevalence of breast cancer varies between different geographic locations, potential modifiable environmental, dietary, and lifestyle determinants may also influence the ER status.

The insulin-like growth factor (IGF) family has been identified as an additional driver of breast cancer. The mitogenic and antiapoptotic signals are mediated via the IGF type I receptor (IGFIR) and its downstream targets MAPK–ERK or PI3K–Akt. The ER and IGFIR signaling systems are tightly linked and subject to feedback cross-talk. For example, estrogen and IGFs coregulate several genes that affect breast cancer outcome (5). In addition, hyperactive IGFIR–PI3K–Akt signaling has been implicated to contribute in the acquisition of resistance to endocrine therapy during breast cancer progression (6). Estrogen increases IGFIR mRNA and antiestrogens, like tamoxifen, can reduce serum IGFI levels and IGF-mediated growth (7, 8). Conversely, blocking IGF actions can inhibit estrogen-mediated growth (9). Similar to ER activity, various anthropometric, lifestyle, and dietary factors can influence the IGF system with impact on cancer development and progression.

In recent years, mechanisms involved in mediating cancer chemopreventive effects of naturally derived plant polyphenols from green tea and coffee have been widely studied in several neoplasias, including breast and prostate cancer (10–13). However, there have been few translational studies on anticancer effects of coffee in relation to ER status in breast cancer. Prospective and retrospective epidemiologic studies show an association between coffee consumption and a significantly reduced risk, delayed onset, and reduced growth of breast cancer (14, 15). Coffee beans are one of the richest dietary sources of the antioxidants caffeine and the plant phenolic compound caffeic acid, both of which may be mechanistically involved in the cancer-suppressive properties of coffee. Various dietary and lifestyle factors are also known to influence the sensitivity to cancer treatment (10, 16). In line with this, our group recently showed in a subset of the present study cohort, that moderate to high coffee consumption was associated with improved disease-free survival among ER+ tamoxifen-treated women (17).

The aim of the present translational study was to investigate the effect of coffee consumption on tumor characteristics and disease-free survival in an extended cohort of women with breast cancer in Sweden, and to establish underlying molecular mechanisms by which coffee constituents may affect breast cancer cell growth in relation to ER status. Understanding how exposure to components of our daily diet can modify tumor growth or molecular adaptations that occur within a tumor could lead to better patient information for managing disease.

Materials and Methods

Reagents

All chemicals and reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich unless stated otherwise. Cell culture media, penicillin–streptomycin, and FBS were purchased from Invitrogen. For immunoblotting, the anti-ERα antibody (1D5) was obtained from Abcam; anti-IGFIRβ (C-20) was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology; anti–phospho-AktSer473 (#4060), anti-Akt (#9272), anti–Bcl-2 (#2870), anti–Bcl-xL (#2764), anti-cleaved caspase-7 (#9491), anti-cleaved PARP (#9541), anti-cyclin D1 (#2926), and anti–glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH, #3683) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology Inc.

Study population

The present study is based on an extended cohort of 1,090 women, ages 24 to 99 years, diagnosed with primary invasive breast cancer between October 2002 and December 2012 at the Skåne University Hospital (Lund, Sweden), without preoperative treatment and with no other cancer history within the past 10 years. This is an ongoing cohort (BC Blood study) and is now updated to include almost twice as many women as recently reported by our group (17). The inclusion and exclusion criteria were compliant to the REporting recommendations for tumor MARKer prognostic study (REMARK) guidelines (18). During the preoperative visit, body measurements of weight, height, waist and hip circumference, and breast volume were collected (as previously described; refs. 19, 20). Extensive questionnaire data with information on reproductive factors, the use of exogenous hormones or other medications, lifestyle factors, including smoking, alcohol, and coffee consumption, etc., were obtained from the cohort members at the preoperative visit. Information on tumor size, lymph node status, histologic grade, proliferative index (Ki67), and hormone receptor status (ER and PgR) were obtained through pathology reports and medical records. ERα status was routinely determined until December 2009, using antibody clone 1D5 (DAKO), and from 2010 using clone SP1 (Ventana Medical Systems), as previously described (17, 21). Follow-up information of breast cancer recurrence or death was obtained from patient charts, pathology reports, the Regional Tumor Registry or the Population Registry. Written informed consents were obtained from all participating women and the study was approved by the local ethics committee at Lund University (LU 75-02, LU 37-08, LU 658-09, LU 58-12, LU 379-12, and LU 227-13).

Cell culture

The human breast cancer cell lines MCF-7, T47D (both ERα-positive) and MDA-MB-231 (ERα−) were purchased from and validated by ATCC-LGC Standards and maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and antibiotics (100 U/mL penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin) in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37°C. Tamoxifen-resistant (Tam-R) MCF-7 cells were kindly supplied by Julia Gee (Cardiff University, UK) and were derived and maintained as outlined previously (22). For in vitro experiments, cells were seeded in growth media for 24 hours followed by transfer to phenol red- and serum-free media [SFM; DMEM:Ham's nutrient mix F-12 supplemented with BSA (0.2 mg/mL), sodium bicarbonate (1.2 mg/mL), transferrin (0.01 mg/mL), l-glutamine (2 mmol/L), and antibiotics as above] and dosed as specified below.

Cell proliferation assay

MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, T47D, and Tam-R cells were exposed to caffeine (0–5 mmol/L) or caffeic acid (0–50 μmol/L) with or without tamoxifen (1 μmol/L) for 48 hours in SFM. Cell proliferation was determined following [3H]thymidine incorporation as a measure of DNA synthesis for a period of 4 hours before the end of the treatment protocol, as described in ref. 23. Total cell number and viability was assessed by trypan blue exclusion using a hemocytometer.

Cell-cycle analysis

Cells were dosed with caffeine (0–5 mmol/L) or caffeic acid (0–50 μmol/L) in SFM for 48 hours. Floating and adherent cells were collected, fixed in 70% cold ethanol, and incubated with PI/RNase buffer (BD Biosciences). Approximately 2 × 104 events (cells) were collected for each sample using a FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences) dual laser, flow cytometer with CellQuest Pro Software (BD Biosciences). Cell-cycle distribution was determined using FlowJo Software (TreeStar Inc.).

Western immunoblotting

Cells were exposed to caffeine (0–5 mmol/L) or caffeic acid (0–50 μmol/L) in SFM for 72 hours after which cell lysates were prepared and protein concentration determined, as described previously (24). Protein samples (50–60 μg/lane) were resolved by SDSPAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were blocked with 5% (w/v) milk in TBS Tween-20 (TBST) and probed with antibodies to Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, cleaved caspase-7, cleaved PARP, ERα, IGFIRβ, pAkt, Akt, cyclin D1, or GAPDH as a loading control. Protein abundance was detected with horseradish peroxidase–specific secondary antibodies and visualized by SuperSignal West Extended Duration Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using the Alpha Innotech FluorChem FC2 imaging system and AlphaView version 3.0.3.0 software (ProteinSimple) or ImageJ software (NIH).

Statistical analysis

Clinical data.

Baseline characteristics of patients with low (≤1 cup/day), moderate (2–4 cups/day), or high (≥5 cups/day) coffee consumption were compared as specified by using the Jonckheere–Terpstra test for continuous variables (not normally distributed) and linear-by-linear association test for categorical variables. In survival analyses, patients were followed from inclusion until first breast cancer recurrence, last follow-up, or death, whichever came first, before January 1, 2013. Of 1,090 women, 8 were excluded because of generalized disease within 3 months of diagnosis, leaving 1,082 women included in the survival analyses. Disease-free survival was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. The log-rank test was used for univariable survival analysis of the risk of early breast cancer recurrence in relation to coffee consumption. The influence of coffee consumption on prognosis was also analyzed using multivariable Cox regression to calculate HR with 95% confidence intervals (CI), adjusted for potential confounding factors; age (<60 years), histologic grade 3 (yes/no), invasive tumor size (>20 mm, or muscular or skin involvement) and any axillary lymph node involvement (yes/no). Because few patients had an invasive tumor size ≥51 mm, or muscular or skin involvement, these patients were combined with the patients with invasive tumor sizes between 21 and 50 mm in the multivariable analyses. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics 19.0 software (IBM). A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Because this was an exploratory study, nominal P values are presented without adjustment for multiple testing.

Experimental data.

A minimum of three independent repeats were performed for each experiment. Proliferation data are expressed as means ± SE of triplicate wells. Densitometry measurements of Western blot data are expressed as means ± SE of at least three individual repeats. Statistical analyses were performed using the unpaired Student t test with Excel 2007 software. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Associations between tumor size, ER status, and coffee consumption among women with breast cancer

To evaluate the impact of coffee consumption on patient and tumor characteristics among women with breast cancer, coffee consumption was categorized into low (≤1 cup/day), moderate (2–4 cups/day), or high (≥5 cups/day), whereas no further definition of a cup was specified. Patient and tumor characteristics according to coffee consumption for the 1,090 patients included in the study are shown in Table 1. Women that were younger at their first full-term pregnancy showed a trend of drinking moderate to high amounts of coffee daily. In addition, the proportion of current smokers was higher with increasing coffee consumption, whereas the proportion of alcohol abstainers was higher with decreasing coffee consumption. Interestingly, moderate to high coffee consumption was associated with significantly smaller invasive tumor sizes (Ptrend = 0.013), whereas concomitantly lower proportion of ER+ tumors and conversely higher proportion of ER− tumors (Ptrend = 0.018). After stratification according to ER status (Table 2), increasing coffee consumption remained significantly associated with smaller invasive tumor sizes among women with ER+ tumors (Ptrend = 0.009), whereas no significant association was found among ER− tumors (Ptrend = 0.512). However, a nonsignificant trend toward lower tumor proliferation measured by the Ki67 index (Ptrend = 0.092) was observed with increasing coffee intake among women with ER− tumors. These results suggest that coffee may have growth-suppressing properties on breast cancer cells and that ER+ tumors may be more sensitive to the cellular effects by coffee.

View this table:
Table 1.

Patient and tumor characteristics of the 1,090 patients in relation to daily coffee consumption (cups/day)

View this table:
Table 2.

Selected tumor characteristics of 1,087a patients stratified by ER status in relation to daily coffee consumption (cups/day)

Effects of caffeine and caffeic acid on ER+ and ER− breast cancer cell growth and viability

Given the clinical observations of smaller breast tumor sizes and lower frequency of ER+ tumors with increasing coffee consumption, we next examined how two major coffee constituents may affect breast cancer growth in relation to ER status at the cellular level. Increasing doses of caffeine significantly suppressed the proliferation and total cell number of both ER+ MCF-7 and ER− MDA-MB-231 (Fig. 1A) breast cancer cells, with a maximum inhibition at 5 mmol/L, compared with control (P < 0.01). At 1 mmol/L caffeine, the proliferation was reduced by 80% in MCF-7 cells (P < 0.01) and by 40% in MDA-MB-231 cells (P = 0.054). Similarly, caffeic acid reduced both MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cell growth, although to a lesser extent than caffeine (Fig. 1A). A concomitant increase in cell death was observed for MCF-7, but not for MDA-MB-231 (Fig. 1A). The response to caffeine and caffeic acid were identical in the Tam-R cells as with the parental MCF-7 cells (Fig. 1B). The caffeine-induced cell death in MCF-7 was associated with reduced prosurvival Bcl-xL levels whereas increased active caspase-7 and cleaved PARP, a signature event of apoptosis (Fig. 1C and Supplementary Fig. S1). These results demonstrate that caffeine, but also caffeic acid, suppress the proliferation of human breast cancer cells, and suggest that ER+ tumors may be more sensitive to the growth inhibiting properties of the coffee constituents.

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Caffeine or caffeic acid reduces human breast cancer cell growth in vitro. ER+ (MCF-7), ER− (MDA-MB-231), and Tam-R breast cancer cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of caffeine (Caff) or caffeic acid (CaA) in SFM for 48 (A and B) or 72 hours (C). Proliferation (A and B) was assessed using [3H]thymidine incorporation as a measurement of DNA synthesis. Total cell number and cell death were assessed by cell counting (A). The graphs represent the mean ± SE of three (A) or five (B) determinations; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001, the Student t test. Total protein (C) was extracted and analyzed by immunoblotting for the expression of Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, cleaved caspase-7, and cleaved PARP. GAPDH is shown as loading control. One representative image from at least three independent experiments is shown.

Coffee constituents impair the cell-cycle progression in breast cancer cells

Having demonstrated that caffeine and caffeic acid suppressed the proliferation and viability of breast cancer cells, we further assessed their effect on cell-cycle distribution. Increasing doses of caffeine resulted in impaired G1 to S transition in both ER+ MCF-7 (P ≤ 0.003; Fig. 2A and C) and ER− MDA-MB-231 (P ≤ 0.001; Fig. 2B and D) cells, with an accumulation of cells in G0–G1, a subsequent reduction of cells in S and G2–M phases and enhanced cell death. Although caffeic acid reduced MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cell densities (Fig. 2A and B), only minor modulations of the cell-cycle distribution by caffeic acid were observed in the ER+ (Fig. 2A and C) as well as ER− cells (Fig. 2B and D).

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Cell-cycle distribution after exposure to caffeine or caffeic acid. Representative images showing the morphology and cell-cycle distribution of MCF-7 (A) and MDA-MB-231 cells (B) after 48-hour exposure to the indicated concentrations of caffeine (Caff) or caffeic acid (CaA). Floating and adherent cells were collected and subjected to cell-cycle analysis using flow cytometry. Graph shows cell-cycle distribution of MCF-7 (C) and MDA-MB-231 cells (D) with the percentage of cells in sub-G1 (apoptotic), G0–G1, S, and G2–M phases, as the mean of at least three individual repeats.

Caffeine and caffeic acid alter hormone receptor levels and downstream effectors in breast cancer cells

The role of coffee constituents in modulating molecular mechanisms with impact on breast cancer cell growth in relation to ER status was further investigated. Exposure to caffeine significantly reduced the ER abundance in ER+ MCF-7 cells. In fact, 5 mmol/L caffeine almost completely abolished the ER levels (Fig. 3A). Although an approximately 50% reduction of MCF-7 proliferation was obtained by caffeic acid treatment, the effect on ER abundance was less pronounced (Fig. 3A). The ER suppression was associated with a concomitant cyclin D1 decrease, and no detectable levels remained after 5 mmol/L caffeine exposure (Fig. 3A). In contrast, caffeine exposure resulted in reexpression of ER and cyclin D1 in ER− MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig. 3B). However, caffeine did not under these conditions reactivate ER protein expression to the endogenous ER levels seen in untreated MCF-7 cells.

Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Altered hormone receptor levels and downstream effectors by coffee constituents. ER+ MCF-7 (A) and ER− MDA-MB-231 cells (B) were treated with the indicated concentrations of caffeine (Caff) or caffeic acid (CaA) in SFM for 72 hours. Total protein was extracted and analyzed by immunoblotting for the expression of ER, cyclin D1, IGFIR, pAkt, and Akt. GAPDH is shown as loading control. Relative protein abundance was quantified by densitometry analysis and corrected for GAPDH (ER, cyclin D1, and IGFIR) or total Akt (pAkt). The graphs show modulation of relative protein abundance versus untreated control and represent the mean ± SE of at least three independent experiments; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001, the Student t test.

Caffeine exposure was further associated with a 70% and a 25% reduction in IGFIR abundance in MCF-7 (Fig. 3A) and MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig. 3B), respectively, when compared with control. Increasing doses of caffeine resulted in a concomitant dose-dependent and complete inhibition of AktSer473 phosphorylation in both MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig. 3). In line with the lower magnitude in growth inhibition by caffeic acid, a 30% reduction in IGFIR levels was observed for MCF-7, but not for MDA-MB-231 cells, although a ≥50% reduction in Akt phosphorylation was found for both cell types following caffeic acid exposure. These results demonstrate that caffeine and caffeic acid significantly alter ER and cyclin D1 levels, and suppress the IGFIR–pAkt signaling pathway in both ER+ and ER− breast cancer cells.

Coffee consumption and reduced risk of early breast cancer recurrence

Finally, impact by coffee consumption on breast cancer prognosis was evaluated. Patients were followed for up to 9 years (median 3.0 years, IQR 1.0–5.1). During the study period, 100 of 1,082 patients were diagnosed with breast cancer recurrence, of them 65 patients had distant metastases. In total 76 deaths occurred, of which 45 had reported breast cancer event before death. Coffee consumption alone was not associated with disease prognosis overall or when stratifying according to ER status (all adjusted Ps ≥ 0.22). However, the disease-free survival was significantly improved among tamoxifen-treated women with ER+ tumors drinking 2 or more cups of coffee per day (log-rank P = 0.013; Fig. 4). Among these women there was a 49% decreased hazard of early breast cancer recurrence when drinking moderate to high amounts of coffee compared with low coffee consumption, adjusted HR 0.51 (95% CI, 0.26–0.97; P = 0.040). In contrast, there was no significant difference in disease-free survival in relation to coffee consumption among women with ER+ tumors treated with aromatase inhibitors, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy (all adjusted Ps ≥ 0.26). In vitro evaluation of the effects on cell proliferation of the combined exposure of tamoxifen and caffeine or caffeic acid showed that the response to the coffee constituents were maintained and additive to the inhibitory effects of tamoxifen in both ER+ MCF-7 and T47D breast cancer cells (data not shown).

Figure 4.
Figure 4.

Impact by coffee consumption on disease-free survival among tamoxifen-treated women with ER+ breast cancer. Kaplan–Meier estimates of disease-free survival in relation to coffee consumption for 506 tamoxifen-treated women with ER+ breast cancer are shown (log-rank 1 df; P = 0.013). The adjusted HR was 0.51 (95% CI, 0.24–0.97; P = 0.040). The number of patients at each follow-up is indicated. Because this is an ongoing study, the number of patients decreases with each follow-up.

Discussion

A growing body of literature indicates that modifiable dietary or lifestyle factors, such as coffee, may have a protective role against the risk or progression of breast cancer (14, 15, 17). In the present translational study, we demonstrate an association between increasing coffee consumption and significantly smaller invasive tumor sizes, whereas concomitantly lower proportion of ER+ tumors among women with breast cancer. Moreover, in the present study, mechanistic in vitro data show that caffeine and caffeic acid attenuated the growth of predominantly ER+, but also ER−, human breast cancer cells by modulating ER and IGFIR levels with impact on downstream effectors and cell-cycle progression. Finally, the present study demonstrate that tamoxifen-treated women with ER+ tumors drinking 2 or more cups of coffee per day show a significantly reduced risk of early breast cancer recurrence, compared with women with low daily coffee consumption.

Several epidemiologic reports suggest that coffee consumption decreases breast cancer risk (14, 25, 26), whereas other studies report no association between coffee intake and breast cancer risk (27). However, relatively few studies have examined the association with risk or progression by ER status. Sweden is among the top coffee consuming countries worldwide, and less than 1% of the coffee consumed is decaffeinated (28). Coffee contains a mixture of bioactive components, and there are several plausible biologic pathways whereby coffee might alter breast cancer risk or progression. Caffeine and the polyphenol constituents have been suggested to contribute to its anticancer activities. However, various coffee constituents may differentially affect ER+ and ER− breast cancer subtypes. The present findings demonstrate smaller invasive tumor sizes, whereas concomitant lower proportion of ER+ tumors and consequently higher proportion of ER− tumors with increasing coffee consumption. These findings from almost twice as many women, confirm the previous report from a subset of the present cohort (17). When stratifying according to ER status, the association between increasing coffee consumption and smaller invasive tumor size was only observed in ER+ tumors, suggesting that coffee suppresses breast tumor growth, and that ER+ tumors may be more sensitive to these effects. A previous report demonstrated a protective effect of caffeine intake on both ER+ and ER− breast cancer risk in the Nurses' Health Study, although only significant for the ER+ group (25). Although at the same time, no association with caffeine intake and overall breast cancer risk in the Women's Health Study was reported, the proportion of ER+ tumors was decreased and the proportion ER− tumors increased (29). The shifted ER proportions are in line with both the clinical and experimental data in the present study.

Several studies have described caffeine and caffeic acid as anticarcinogenic agents in various cell culture and in vivo models (30, 31). For instance, in hepatocellular carcinoma and epidermal JB6 cells, caffeine attenuated cell growth via induction of G0–G1 cell-cycle arrest (32, 33). Furthermore, caffeine-mediated inhibition of metastatic potential have been demonstrated for melanoma cells (34). Caffeine has also been shown to inhibit skin cancer in mice by enhancing UVB-induced apoptosis (35). The experimental doses used in the present study are equivalent to previous in vitro studies (30–33), although the higher doses are above the physiologic achievable systemic doses. Translating experimental in vitro doses to human in vivo settings frequently requires significant dose adjustments due to pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters along with differences in acute in vitro exposure versus cumulative effects following long-term exposure. Our present results demonstrate that predominantly caffeine, and to a lesser extent caffeic acid, inhibited the proliferation of ER+ MCF-7 and ER− MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells. In line with our clinical observations, the ER+ breast cancer cells appeared more sensitive to the growth inhibitory effects by the coffee constituents compared with ER− cells. Interestingly, the growth inhibitory property by caffeine on ER+ MCF-7 cells was associated with a significant reduction in ER abundance. A moderate effect was also found for caffeic acid. Downregulation of ER function and expression with subsequent growth inhibition has previously been demonstrated for green tea polyphenolic catechenins (EGCC) and the structurally related plant flavonoid wogonin (12, 13). In a similar manner to these dietary constituents, caffeine mimicked the actions of the antiestrogen fulvestrant (ICI 182,780), which inhibits ER-dependent functions and decreases ER expression, resulting in suppression of tumor cell growth (36). Similarly, endoxifen, the bioactive metabolite of tamoxifen, inhibits estrogen-induced breast cancer growth by competitively binding ER, leading to inhibition of ER transcriptional activity and targeting ER to proteasomal degradation (37). In addition, a recent study described that a derivative of caffeic acid (CAPE) specifically bound and downregulated ER expression (38).

Caffeine affected ER levels differently in ER+ versus ER− breast cancer cell lines. Surprisingly, the caffeine and caffeic acid–induced growth inhibition of ER− MDA-MB-231 cells was associated with a reexpression of ER protein abundance. MDA-MB-231 cells have densely methylated ER CpG islands and epigenetic repression via promoter methylation has been suggested to be the predominant mechanism for ER downregulation in ER− tumors (39). Caffeic acid has been reported to influence epigenetic repression and to reactivate methylation-silenced genes (40). However, the modulation of ER levels in the present study appeared to involve other mechanisms as initial investigation of the methylation of the ER promoter using Combined Bisulphite Restriction Assay revealed no effect of the coffee constituents (data not shown). Further studies are needed to identify whether other epigenetic changes such as histone acetylation played a role or whether nonepigenetic mechanisms were involved in the caffeine and caffeic acid induce reexpression of ER in ER− cells.

ER directly activates the cyclin D1 promoter, and has been demonstrated to be capable of stimulating cell-cycle progression in the absence of peptide growth factors (41). In addition, cyclin D1 can stimulate ER transcriptional activity in the absence of estrogen (42). The caffeine-mediated ER downregulation in ER+ cells was associated with a concomitant cyclin D1 reduction, impaired G1 to S cell-cycle transition, reduced growth, and induction of apoptosis. This is potentially important as cyclin D1 gene amplification and protein overexpression is associated with impaired tamoxifen response (43), and if coffee constituents modify cyclin D1 levels this may potentially augment tamoxifen treatment response. However, cyclin D1 appears to have contrasting effects in ER+ and ER− cells. Although overexpression of cyclin D1 may promote treatment resistance and a metastatic phenotype in ER+ cells, it appears to decrease migration and mammosphere formation in ER− breast cancer cells (43–45). Such contrasting effects may explain the divergent regulation of ER and cyclin D1 by caffeine in ER+ versus ER− cells, both resulting in growth inhibition.

In addition to modulating ER and cyclin D1 levels, caffeine treatment dose-dependently downregulated the growth and antiapoptotic IGFIR levels with subsequent impaired AktSer473 phosphorylation in both MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells, which may partially contribute to the reduced cell proliferation observed. This is to our knowledge, the first study to show a direct effect of caffeine on IGFIR regulation. Previously, inhibition of IGFIR signaling by green tea polyphenols as measured by reduced pAkt and pErk1/2, has been shown to reduce prostate cancer progression and invasion in the TRAMP mouse model (11). The IGF and estrogen growth regulatory pathways are tightly linked and compensatory mechanisms by the IGFIR have been suggested to mediate cell proliferation in tamoxifen-resistant tumors (46). Therapies targeting IGFIR may, thus, be of clinical benefit for treatment of such cancers. The association between increasing coffee consumption and reduced risk of early breast cancer recurrence among tamoxifen-treated women with ER+ tumors in the present study may mechanistically be linked to the altered ER and impaired IGFIR signaling by enhanced exposure to the coffee constituents. This could sensitize the tumor cells to further inhibitory effects by tamoxifen with improved clinical response rate. These findings are consistent with and support the previous report showing an association between increasing coffee consumption and significantly increased disease-free survival among tamoxifen-treated women with ER+ tumors, in a subset of the present cohort (17). The present cell work demonstrates that caffeine and caffeic acid have inhibitory effects that are at least additive with the effects of tamoxifen. It appears that the inhibitory effects of caffeine and caffeic acid on ER+ cells are maintained and not diminished when the ER is either inactive or effectively blocked. Furthermore, it is possible that coffee consumption could alter the pharmacokinetics of tamoxifen via, for example, CYP1A2 or CYP2C8 (17), but that would require examination in an appropriate in vivo model.

In summary, this study shows inhibitory effects by caffeine and caffeic acid on breast cancer cell growth. These results are in line with previous epidemiologic reports demonstrating protective roles of coffee constituents and the risk or progression of breast cancer. The present findings enhance the general understanding of how modifiable factors present in our daily diet, such as coffee constituents, may alter ER status, IGFIR levels, and contribute to reduced growth of ER+ and ER− breast cancer cells.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Authors' Contributions

Conception and design: A.H. Rosendahl, C.M. Perks, C. Ingvar, H. Jernström

Development of methodology: A.H. Rosendahl, C.M. Perks, L. Zeng, J.M.P. Holly, H. Jernström

Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): A.H. Rosendahl, L. Zeng, A. Markkula, M. Simonsson, C. Ingvar, J.M.P. Holly

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): A.H. Rosendahl, L. Zeng, C. Rose, C. Ingvar, J.M.P. Holly, H. Jernström

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: A.H. Rosendahl, C.M. Perks, A. Markkula, M. Simonsson, C. Rose, C. Ingvar, J.M.P. Holly, H. Jernström

Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases): A.H. Rosendahl, A. Markkula, M. Simonsson, C. Ingvar, J.M.P. Holly, H. Jernström

Study supervision: A.H. Rosendahl, C. Ingvar, H. Jernström

Other (PI of the BC Blood study): H. Jernström

Grant Support

This study was supported by grants from the Swedish Cancer Society CAN 2011/497, the Swedish Research Council K2012-54X-22027-01-3 (PI, H. Jernström), the Faculty of Medicine at Lund University, the Unit of Nursing Research at Malmö University, the Faculty of Health and Society at Malmö University, the South Swedish Health Care Region (Region Skåne ALF), the Lund Hospital Fund, the Swedish Breast Cancer Group (BRO), the Mrs. Berta Kamprad Foundation, the Crafoord Foundation, the Gunnar Nilsson Foundation, King Gustaf V's Jubilee Foundation, the Maja and Hjalmar Leander Fund, and the Royal Physiographic Society in Lund.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the research nurses Maj-Britt Hedenblad, Karin Henriksson, Anette Möller, Monika Meszaros, Anette Ahlin Gullers, Linda Ågren, and Jessica Åkesson. The authors also thank Erika Bågeman, Maria Henningson, and Maria Hjertberg for data entry.

Footnotes

  • Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Clinical Cancer Research Online (http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/).

  • Received July 8, 2014.
  • Revision received December 9, 2014.
  • Accepted February 2, 2015.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Jemal A,
    2. Bray F,
    3. Center MM,
    4. Ferlay J,
    5. Ward E,
    6. Forman D
    . Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011;61:69–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Andersen J,
    2. Poulsen HS
    . Immunohistochemical estrogen receptor determination in paraffin-embedded tissue. Prediction of response to hormonal treatment in advanced breast cancer. Cancer 1989;64:1901–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Clarke R,
    2. Leonessa F,
    3. Welch JN,
    4. Skaar TC
    . Cellular and molecular pharmacology of antiestrogen action and resistance. Pharmacol Rev 2001;53:25–71.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Yan L,
    2. Yang X,
    3. Davidson NE
    . Role of DNA methylation and histone acetylation in steroid receptor expression in breast cancer. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 2001;6:183–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Casa AJ,
    2. Potter AS,
    3. Malik S,
    4. Lazard Z,
    5. Kuiatse I,
    6. Kim HT,
    7. et al.
    Estrogen and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) independently downregulate critical repressors of breast cancer growth. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012;132:61–73.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Casa AJ,
    2. Dearth RK,
    3. Litzenburger BC,
    4. Lee AV,
    5. Cui X
    . The type I insulin-like growth factor receptor pathway: a key player in cancer therapeutic resistance. Front Biosci 2008;13:3273–87.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Lee AV,
    2. Jackson JG,
    3. Gooch JL,
    4. Hilsenbeck SG,
    5. Coronado-Heinsohn E,
    6. Osborne CK,
    7. et al.
    Enhancement of insulin-like growth factor signaling in human breast cancer: estrogen regulation of insulin receptor substrate-1 expression in vitro and in vivo. Mol Endocrinol 1999;13:787–96.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Freiss G,
    2. Rochefort H,
    3. Vignon F
    . Mechanisms of 4-hydroxytamoxifen anti-growth factor activity in breast cancer cells: alterations of growth factor receptor binding sites and tyrosine kinase activity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1990;173:919–26.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Lee AV,
    2. Weng CN,
    3. Jackson JG,
    4. Yee D
    . Activation of estrogen receptor-mediated gene transcription by IGF-I in human breast cancer cells. J Endocrinol 1997;152:39–47.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Zeng L,
    2. Holly JM,
    3. Perks CM
    . Effects of physiological levels of the green tea extract epigallocatechin-3-gallate on breast cancer cells. Front Endocrinol 2014;5:61.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. Adhami VM,
    2. Siddiqui IA,
    3. Ahmad N,
    4. Gupta S,
    5. Mukhtar H
    . Oral consumption of green tea polyphenols inhibits insulin-like growth factor-I-induced signaling in an autochthonous mouse model of prostate cancer. Cancer Res 2004;64:8715–22.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Chung H,
    2. Jung YM,
    3. Shin DH,
    4. Lee JY,
    5. Oh MY,
    6. Kim HJ,
    7. et al.
    Anticancer effects of wogonin in both estrogen receptor-positive and -negative human breast cancer cell lines in vitro and in nude mice xenografts. Int J Cancer 2008;122:816–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Farabegoli F,
    2. Barbi C,
    3. Lambertini E,
    4. Piva R
    . (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-gallate downregulates estrogen receptor alpha function in MCF-7 breast carcinoma cells. Cancer Detect Prev 2007;31:499–504.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Kotsopoulos J,
    2. Ghadirian P,
    3. El-Sohemy A,
    4. Lynch HT,
    5. Snyder C,
    6. Daly M,
    7. et al.
    The CYP1A2 genotype modifies the association between coffee consumption and breast cancer risk among BRCA1 mutation carriers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16:912–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Bageman E,
    2. Ingvar C,
    3. Rose C,
    4. Jernstrom H
    . Coffee consumption and CYP1A2*1F genotype modify age at breast cancer diagnosis and estrogen receptor status. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17:895–901.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Fleisher B,
    2. Unum J,
    3. Shao J,
    4. An G
    . Ingredients in fruit juices interact with dasatinib through inhibition of BCRP: a new mechanism of beverage-drug interaction. J Pharm Sci 2015;104:266–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Simonsson M,
    2. Soderlind V,
    3. Henningson M,
    4. Hjertberg M,
    5. Rose C,
    6. Ingvar C,
    7. et al.
    Coffee prevents early events in tamoxifen-treated breast cancer patients and modulates hormone receptor status. Cancer Causes Control 2013;24:929–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. McShane LM,
    2. Altman DG,
    3. Sauerbrei W,
    4. Taube SE,
    5. Gion M,
    6. Clark GM
    . Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK). J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:1180–4.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Ringberg A,
    2. Bageman E,
    3. Rose C,
    4. Ingvar C,
    5. Jernstrom H
    . Of cup and bra size: reply to a prospective study of breast size and premenopausal breast cancer incidence. Int J Cancer 2006;119:2242–3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Markkula A,
    2. Bromee A,
    3. Henningson M,
    4. Hietala M,
    5. Ringberg A,
    6. Ingvar C,
    7. et al.
    Given breast cancer, does breast size matter? Data from a prospective breast cancer cohort. Cancer Causes Control 2012;23:1307–16.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Jernstrom H,
    2. Bageman E,
    3. Rose C,
    4. Jonsson PE,
    5. Ingvar C
    . CYP2C8 and CYP2C9 polymorphisms in relation to tumour characteristics and early breast cancer related events among 652 breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer 2009;101:1817–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Morgan L,
    2. Gee J,
    3. Pumford S,
    4. Farrow L,
    5. Finlay P,
    6. Robertson J,
    7. et al.
    Elevated Src kinase activity attenuates Tamoxifen response in vitro and is associated with poor prognosis clinically. Cancer Biol Ther 2009;8:1550–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Clark MA,
    2. Perks CM,
    3. Winters ZE,
    4. Holly JM
    . DNA damage uncouples the mitogenic response to IGF-I in MCF-7 malignant breast cancer cells by switching the roles of PI3 kinase and p21WAF1/Cip1. Int J Cancer 2005;116:506–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Rosendahl AH,
    2. Gundewar C,
    3. Said K,
    4. Karnevi E,
    5. Andersson R
    . Celecoxib synergizes human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells to sorafenib-induced growth inhibition. Pancreatology 2012;12:219–26.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Ganmaa D,
    2. Willett WC,
    3. Li TY,
    4. Feskanich D,
    5. van Dam RM,
    6. Lopez-Garcia E,
    7. et al.
    Coffee, tea, caffeine and risk of breast cancer: a 22-year follow-up. Int J Cancer 2008;122:2071–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Li J,
    2. Seibold P,
    3. Chang-Claude J,
    4. Flesch-Janys D,
    5. Liu J,
    6. Czene K,
    7. et al.
    Coffee consumption modifies risk of estrogen-receptor negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2011;13:R49.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Gierach GL,
    2. Freedman ND,
    3. Andaya A,
    4. Hollenbeck AR,
    5. Park Y,
    6. Schatzkin A,
    7. et al.
    Coffee intake and breast cancer risk in the NIH-AARP diet and health study cohort. Int J Cancer 2012;131:452–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Federation EC
    . European Coffee Report 2012/2013. 2014; Available from: http://www.ecf-coffee.org/images/European_Coffee_Report_2012-13_European_chapter.pdf.
  29. 29.↵
    1. Ishitani K,
    2. Lin J,
    3. Manson JE,
    4. Buring JE,
    5. Zhang SM
    . Caffeine consumption and the risk of breast cancer in a large prospective cohort of women. Arch Intern Med 2008;168:2022–31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Ravi D,
    2. Muniyappa H,
    3. Das KC
    . Caffeine inhibits UV-mediated NF-kappaB activation in A2058 melanoma cells: an ATM-PKCdelta-p38 MAPK-dependent mechanism. Mol Cell Biochem 2008;308:193–200.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Jung JE,
    2. Kim HS,
    3. Lee CS,
    4. Park DH,
    5. Kim YN,
    6. Lee MJ,
    7. et al.
    Caffeic acid and its synthetic derivative CADPE suppress tumor angiogenesis by blocking STAT3-mediated VEGF expression in human renal carcinoma cells. Carcinogenesis 2007;28:1780–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. Okano J,
    2. Nagahara T,
    3. Matsumoto K,
    4. Murawaki Y
    . Caffeine inhibits the proliferation of liver cancer cells and activates the MEK/ERK/EGFR signalling pathway. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2008;102:543–51.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Hashimoto T,
    2. He Z,
    3. Ma WY,
    4. Schmid PC,
    5. Bode AM,
    6. Yang CS,
    7. et al.
    Caffeine inhibits cell proliferation by G0/G1 phase arrest in JB6 cells. Cancer Res 2004;64:3344–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Gude RP,
    2. Menon LG,
    3. Rao SG
    . Effect of Caffeine, a xanthine derivative, in the inhibition of experimental lung metastasis induced by B16F10 melanoma cells. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2001;20:287–92.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Lu YP,
    2. Lou YR,
    3. Xie JG,
    4. Peng QY,
    5. Zhou S,
    6. Lin Y,
    7. et al.
    Caffeine and caffeine sodium benzoate have a sunscreen effect, enhance UVB-induced apoptosis, and inhibit UVB-induced skin carcinogenesis in SKH-1 mice. Carcinogenesis 2007;28:199–206.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Oliveira CA,
    2. Nie R,
    3. Carnes K,
    4. Franca LR,
    5. Prins GS,
    6. Saunders PT,
    7. et al.
    The antiestrogen ICI 182,780 decreases the expression of estrogen receptor-alpha but has no effect on estrogen receptor-beta and androgen receptor in rat efferent ductules. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2003;1:75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Wu X,
    2. Hawse JR,
    3. Subramaniam M,
    4. Goetz MP,
    5. Ingle JN,
    6. Spelsberg TC
    . The tamoxifen metabolite, endoxifen, is a potent antiestrogen that targets estrogen receptor alpha for degradation in breast cancer cells. Cancer Res 2009;69:1722–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. Jung BI,
    2. Kim MS,
    3. Kim HA,
    4. Kim D,
    5. Yang J,
    6. Her S,
    7. et al.
    Caffeic acid phenethyl ester, a component of beehive propolis, is a novel selective estrogen receptor modulator. Phytother Res 2010;24:295–300.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Yang X,
    2. Phillips DL,
    3. Ferguson AT,
    4. Nelson WG,
    5. Herman JG,
    6. Davidson NE
    . Synergistic activation of functional estrogen receptor (ER)-alpha by DNA methyltransferase and histone deacetylase inhibition in human ER-alpha-negative breast cancer cells. Cancer Res 2001;61:7025–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. Lee WJ,
    2. Zhu BT
    . Inhibition of DNA methylation by caffeic acid and chlorogenic acid, two common catechol-containing coffee polyphenols. Carcinogenesis 2006;27:269–77.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Sabbah M,
    2. Courilleau D,
    3. Mester J,
    4. Redeuilh G
    . Estrogen induction of the cyclin D1 promoter: involvement of a cAMP response-like element. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999;96:11217–22.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. Zwijsen RM,
    2. Wientjens E,
    3. Klompmaker R,
    4. van der Sman J,
    5. Bernards R,
    6. Michalides RJ
    . CDK-independent activation of estrogen receptor by cyclin D1. Cell 1997;88:405–15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Jirstrom K,
    2. Stendahl M,
    3. Ryden L,
    4. Kronblad A,
    5. Bendahl PO,
    6. Stal O,
    7. et al.
    Adverse effect of adjuvant tamoxifen in premenopausal breast cancer with cyclin D1 gene amplification. Cancer Res 2005;65:8009–16.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. 44.↵
    1. Kenny FS,
    2. Hui R,
    3. Musgrove EA,
    4. Gee JM,
    5. Blamey RW,
    6. Nicholson RI,
    7. et al.
    Overexpression of cyclin D1 messenger RNA predicts for poor prognosis in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 1999;5:2069–76.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. 45.↵
    1. Lamb R,
    2. Lehn S,
    3. Rogerson L,
    4. Clarke RB,
    5. Landberg G
    . Cell-cycle regulators cyclin D1 and CDK4/6 have estrogen receptor-dependent divergent functions in breast cancer migration and stem cell-like activity. Cell Cycle 2013;12:2384–94.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    1. Knowlden JM,
    2. Hutcheson IR,
    3. Barrow D,
    4. Gee JM,
    5. Nicholson RI
    . Insulin-like growth factor-I receptor signaling in tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer: a supporting role to the epidermal growth factor receptor. Endocrinology 2005;146:4609–18.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
Back to top
Clinical Cancer Research: 21 (8)
April 2015
Volume 21, Issue 8

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Caffeine and Caffeic Acid Inhibit Growth and Modify Estrogen Receptor and Insulin-like Growth Factor I Receptor Levels in Human Breast Cancer
Ann H. Rosendahl, Claire M. Perks, Li Zeng, Andrea Markkula, Maria Simonsson, Carsten Rose, Christian Ingvar, Jeff M.P. Holly and Helena Jernström
Clin Cancer Res April 15 2015 (21) (8) 1877-1887; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1748
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section

Advertisement