Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
    • CME
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
    • CME
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Clinical Trials: Immunotherapy

First-in-Human Phase I Trial of a Tumor-Targeted Cytokine (NHS-IL12) in Subjects with Metastatic Solid Tumors

Julius Strauss, Christopher R. Heery, Joseph W. Kim, Caroline Jochems, Renee N. Donahue, Agnes S. Montgomery, Sheri McMahon, Elizabeth Lamping, Jennifer L. Marté, Ravi A. Madan, Marijo Bilusic, Matthew R. Silver, Elisa Bertotti, Jeffrey Schlom and James L. Gulley
Julius Strauss
1Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher R. Heery
2Bavarian Nordic, Morrisville, North Carolina.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph W. Kim
3Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Caroline Jochems
1Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Renee N. Donahue
1Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Agnes S. Montgomery
4Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sheri McMahon
5Office of Research Nursing, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth Lamping
5Office of Research Nursing, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer L. Marté
6Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ravi A. Madan
6Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marijo Bilusic
6Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew R. Silver
7EMD Serono, Darmstadt, Germany.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elisa Bertotti
7EMD Serono, Darmstadt, Germany.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffrey Schlom
1Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James L. Gulley
6Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: gulleyj@mail.nih.gov
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1512 Published January 2019
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Purpose: The NHS-IL12 immunocytokine is composed of two IL12 heterodimers fused to the NHS76 antibody. Preclinical studies have shown that this antibody targets IL12 to regions of tumor necrosis by binding histones on free DNA fragments in these areas, resulting in enhanced antitumor activity. The objectives of this phase I study were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetics of NHS-IL12 in subjects with advanced solid tumors.

Patients and Methods: Subjects (n = 59) were treated subcutaneously with NHS-IL12 in a single ascending-dose cohort followed by a multiple ascending-dose cohort (n = 37 with every 4-week dosing).

Results: The most frequently observed treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) included decreased circulating lymphocytes, increased liver transaminases, and flu-like symptoms. Of the grade ≥3 TRAEs, all were transient and only one was symptomatic (hyperhidrosis). The MTD is 16.8 μg/kg. A time-dependent rise in IFNγ and an associated rise in IL10 were observed following NHS-IL12. Of peripheral immune cell subsets evaluated, most noticeable were increases in frequencies of activated and mature natural killer (NK) cells and NKT cells. Based on T-cell receptor sequencing analysis, increases in T-cell receptor diversity and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte density were observed after treatment where both biopsies and peripheral blood mononuclear cells were available. Although no objective tumor responses were observed, 5 subjects had durable stable disease (range, 6–30+ months).

Conclusions: NHS-IL12 was well tolerated up to a dose of 16.8 μg/kg, which is the recommended phase II dose. Early clinical immune-related activity warrants further studies, including combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

See related commentary by Lyerly et al., p. 9

Translational Relevance

Interleukin-12 (IL12) is a proinflammatory cytokine that activates natural killer (NK), NKT, and CD8+ T cells; drives Th1 pathway differentiation; and enhances antigen presentation and cell-mediated immunity. Therefore, administration of IL12 has the potential to promote effective antitumor immune responses. However, older systemic forms of recombinant (r)IL12 have had a narrow therapeutic window, limiting its ability to induce objective responses. NHS-IL12 is an immunocytokine composed of two IL12 heterodimers fused to the NHS76 antibody, which targets IL12 to regions of tumor necrosis and has the potential to result in enhanced antitumor activity and decreased systemic toxicity. In this phase I trial, we observed NHS-IL12 to be well tolerated and to result in enhanced immune-related activity including evidence of increased immune infiltration within the tumor microenvironment. Based on these observations, NHS-IL12 has the potential to prime otherwise nonimmunogenic tumors to checkpoint inhibition and increase the spectrum of cancers responding to immunotherapy.

Introduction

Interleukin-12 (IL12), a proinflammatory cytokine produced by activated phagocytes and dendritic cells (DC), is critical to regulating the transition from innate to adaptive immunity. IL12 acts directly on natural killer (NK), NKT, and CD8+ T cells to stimulate proliferation and increase their cytotoxic functions (1). IL12 drives differentiation of helper T cells down the Th1 pathway, thereby promoting production of cytokines, notably IFNγ, that favor cell-mediated immunity (2). IL12 also acts directly on DCs to further stimulate IL12 production and enhance antigen presentation (3). Administration of exogenous IL12 thus could promote effective antitumor immune responses by amplifying these positive immunostimulatory effects.

However, recombinant (r) IL12 is not approved for any indication. A narrow therapeutic window with previously evaluated forms of systemic administration may have limited its ability to induce objective responses, delaying further clinical development (4, 5). To mitigate the side effects caused by systemic exposure, some early studies were done with intratumoral injections with viral vectors encoding IL12; however, this approach is logistically demanding (6). Furthermore, IL12 induces a counterregulation, making subjects temporarily less sensitive to the effects of IL12. This counterregulation is mediated by the induction and release of Th2 cytokines, such as IL10, which negates the IL12 response (7). If repeated doses of rIL12 are administered during this period of decreased sensitivity, increases in serum IFNγ are sharply reduced compared with levels induced by the initial dose of rIL12.

rIL12 has nonetheless shown promising clinical activity in phase I trials (8), showing an ability to induce antitumor immune responses at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) over an extended period (9). Higher objective response rates with rIL12 have been reported in certain neoplastic diseases, including T-cell lymphoma (56%; ref. 10), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (21%; ref. 11), and AIDS-related Kaposi sarcoma (50%–71%; ref. 12).

NHS-IL12 may reduce toxicities associated with systemic administration of recombinant human IL12 by altering pharmacokinetics (PK) and selectively targeting IL12 to tumors. The NHS antibody component selectively targets human lung carcinomas as a radiolabeled monoclonal antibody (13). The NHS-IL12 immunocytokine is composed of two IL12 heterodimers, each fused to one of the H chains of the NHS76. This antibody targets IL12 to regions of tumor necrosis by binding to histones on free DNA fragments in these areas, thus increasing intratumoral exposure and reducing systemic exposure (14). This targeted strategy could reduce systemic toxicity and increase immune infiltration and activity within the tumor microenvironment (15), in turn priming otherwise nonimmunogenic tumors to checkpoint inhibition and increasing the spectrum of cancers that may respond to these agents.

Data from both in vitro assays using human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and in vivo primate studies showed that immune cells produce less IFNγ following treatment with NHS-IL12, suggesting less toxicity than rIL12 alone (13). NHS-IL12 up to 0.8 mg/m2 was safely administered systematically to dogs and produced both immunologic and clinical activity (14), including complete regression of a 4.4-cm malignant melanoma. NHS-IL12 was also superior to rIL12 as an antitumor agent in 3 murine tumor models (13). Mechanistic studies all indicated that the antitumor effects of NHS-IL12 were primarily CD8+ T-cell–dependent and likely IL12 mediated.

This phase I study evaluated the safety, tolerability, PK, biological and clinical activity, effects on immune cell subsets, and T-cell receptor (TCR) clonality of NHS-IL12 in subjects with metastatic or locally advanced solid epithelial or mesenchymal tumors.

Patients and Methods

Eligibility

Eligible subjects had histologically or cytologically verified metastatic or locally advanced solid epithelial or mesenchymal tumors. All had completed, or progressed on, at least one prior therapy for metastatic disease, or were not candidates for therapy of proven efficacy for their disease. Subjects were ≥18 years old, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 2, and had adequate organ function. Subjects had no history of autoimmune disease. The study protocol (NCT01417546) was approved by the NCI's Institutional Review Board, all subjects gave written informed consent, and the study was conducted in accordance with all institutional and federal guidelines.

Assessment of toxicities

Toxicities, graded using the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v.4.0, were identified by medical history, physical examination, and laboratory studies. A dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as any grade ≥4 hematologic toxicity or grade 3 thrombocytopenia with associated bleeding and any grade ≥3 nonhematologic toxicity, with minor exceptions, that was definitely, probably, or possibly related to administration of NHS-IL12.

Study design

This phase I, open-label, single- and multiple-dose escalation study evaluated the MTD of NHS-IL12 monotherapy given subcutaneously (s.c.) as a single dose or every 4 weeks (see Table 1). Subjects were enrolled in cohorts of 3 to 6 using a standard 3 + 3 approach until MTD was reached. Dose level 8 enrolled 11 additional subjects in an expansion cohort evaluating biomarker analysis, immune infiltration of tumor, and response to treatment.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Demographic data

In the single-dose cohort, subjects received 1 dose of NHS-IL12 and were then followed for 28 days. In the multiple-dose escalation cohort, subjects received NHS-IL12 every 4 weeks at 2, 4, 8, 12, 16.8, and 21.8 μg/kg and then were observed for ≥6 weeks to evaluate DLTs.

Tumor responses were assessed by CT scan of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis after every 2 treatments or 8 weeks, or, for subjects with nonmeasurable but evaluable disease, after every 4 treatments or every 16 weeks based on clinical judgment and subject preference. Responses were assessed by modified immune-related RECIST criteria. For immune-related response criteria (irRC), only index and measurable new lesions were taken into account. Overall responses were derived from changes in index, nonindex, and new lesions.

PK and pharmacodynamics

PK parameters, including T1/2, Cmax, and AUC, were determined after single and multiple s.c. doses of NHS-IL12. Pharmacodynamic (PD) data were also collected and analyzed, including changes in serum levels of cytokines (IFN γ, IL10, IL6, IL8, IL4, and TNFα) using a multiplex cytokine/chemokine kit (Meso Scale Discovery) and the human IP-10 Instant ELISA kit (eBioscience) per the manufacturer's instructions. Biopsies were collected for analysis of TCR clonality, CD8 and CD4 memory/effector cells, regulatory T cells (Treg), NK cells, and DCs.

Flow cytometry

Flow cytometry was performed as previously described (16) using 4 panels of antibodies to identify 9 immune cell subsets, including CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes, Tregs, NK cells, NKT cells, B lymphocytes, conventional and plasmacytoid DCs, and myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and 114 additional refined subsets relating to the maturation/function of standard subsets. All values were reported as a percentage of PBMCs to eliminate bias that could occur in smaller populations with fluctuations in parental leukocyte subpopulations (17). Only subsets with a frequency of ≥0.01% of PBMCs were considered. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 7 (GraphPad Software), using Wilcoxon paired samples test for comparisons between 2 time points. P values were adjusted for the large number of subsets evaluated using Holm method and adjusting within each major subset.

TCR sequencing analysis

DNA was extracted from fresh frozen liver metastases and cryopreserved PBMCs before and after therapy with NHS-IL12 using the Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen). TCR Vβ CDR3 sequencing (TCRseq) was performed at the NCI genomic core facility (Frederick, MD) using the survey (tumor) or deep (PBMC) resolution Immunoseq platform (Adaptive Biotechnologies); analysis was performed using the ImmunoSeq ANALYZER 3.0 (Adaptive Biotechnologies). Repertoire size, a measure of TCR diversity, was determined by calculating the number of individual clonotypes represented in the top 25th percentile by ranked molecule count after sorting by abundance. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) density was calculated from TCRseq data based on a human genome weight of 6.6 pg/cell: TIL density = (# productive templates)/(DNA input (pg)/6.6).

Statistical analysis

Summary statistics used to describe the study population included means, medians, ranges, and appropriate measures of variability for all demographic and baseline performance status characteristics. Results of safety evaluations were tabulated and displayed by dose level. Except for a few comparisons of biologic parameters, only exploratory statistical analyses were performed due to the limited number of subjects receiving each dose level. Descriptive statistics were examined for indications of dose-related toxicity.

Results

Altogether, 59 subjects were treated with NHS-IL12. The single ascending-dose cohort had 22 subjects who received a single dose of NHS-IL12 on day 1 and completed the study after 28 days of safety observation (see Table 1). In the multiple ascending-dose and expansion cohorts, 37 subjects were treated every 4 weeks.

The median treatment duration in the multiple ascending-dose cohort was 70.0 days (range, 28–1,410+), with a median 2.5 doses administered (range, 1–47+). The 17 subjects treated at 16.8 μg/kg MTD (dose level 8) received a median 2 doses (range, 1–8).

PK and PD data

PK data from the single- (Supplementary Table S1A) and multiple-dose (Supplementary Table S1B) cohorts show a dose-dependent increase in T1/2, Cmax, and AUC for NHS-IL12. PD data (Fig. 1A) demonstrate a time-dependent rise in IFNγ after administration and an associated rise of IL10 (Supplementary Fig. S1). These correspond to a similar rise in IL12 seen in the PK data, peaking around 36 hours and then falling to near baseline around day 8. In most multiple-dose subjects, despite a similar rise in serum IL12, IFNγ and IL10 rose to a lesser degree after the second dose. Figure 1A shows PD results for subjects dosed at the MTD of 16.8 μg/kg every 4 weeks (dose level 8). Supplementary Figs. S2, S3, and S4 show PD results for dose levels 6, 7, and 9, respectively.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

A, PK and PD parameters for NHS-IL12 dosed at the MTD of 16.8 μg/kg every 4 weeks. A time-dependent rise in IFNγ was noted after administration and a subsequent rise of IL10. These corresponded to a rise in IL12 similar to what was seen with the PK values, peaking around 36 hours and then falling to near baseline levels around day 8. When subjects were re-dosed at 4 weeks, in most cases, despite a similar rise in the serum IL12, a diminished rise was noted in IFNγ and IL10 with the second dose. B, Analysis of serum levels of IP-10 following treatment with NHS-IL12 at different dose levels. Serum levels of IP-10 were measured by ELISA before and at multiple time points following NHS-IL12.

Similar trends were seen for serum levels of IFNγ-inducible protein (IP-10, CXCL10; Fig. 1B), a chemokine secreted by macrophages after stimulation by IFNγ that acts as a chemoattractant for activated T cells and inhibits neovascularization (18). We found highly increased levels after cycle 1 and lesser increases after cycle 2. The highest levels were found in subjects treated at the highest doses of NHS-IL12 (Fig. 1B).

Toxicity

The primary objective of this trial was to determine MTD as defined by the number of DLTs. None of the subjects treated with single or multiple doses up to 12.0 μg/kg experienced a DLT. At 16.8 μg/kg, 1/6 subjects had a DLT [grade 3 increase in alanine transaminase (ALT)]. At 21.8 μg/kg, 2/6 subjects had a DLT [grade 3 increase in aspartate transaminase (AST) and ALT; grade 3 increase in lipase without clinical signs of pancreatitis]. MTD was 16.8 μg/kg.

The most frequently observed treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) was decreased lymphocyte count (27/59 subjects; 45.8%). Other TRAEs included decreased white blood cells (WBC; 24/59; 40.7%), fever and elevated AST (21 each; 35.6%), elevated ALT (20; 3.9%), and anemia and flu-like symptoms (18 each; 30.5%; Table 2; Supplementary Fig. S5). Among the cohort receiving 16.8 μg/kg, the most frequently reported TRAEs were elevated AST (75%), decreased WBCs and elevated ALT (68.8% each), and decreased lymphocyte count and fever (62.5% each).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Overview of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) and TRAEs

At least one grade ≥3 TRAE was seen in 12/59 subjects (20.3%). These included decreased lymphocyte count (5; 8.5%), decreased neutrophil count (4; 6.8%), elevated ALT (3; 5.1%), decreased WBCs (2; 3.4%), and hypokalemia, hyperhidrosis, elevated alkaline phosphatase, AST, and lipase (1 each; 1.7%). All grade ≥3 TRAEs were transient; only hyperhidrosis was symptomatic. One grade 4 TRAE was observed (asymptomatic decreased lymphocyte count); no grade 5 TRAE was observed. Toxicity was slightly worse at 16.8 μg/kg, with 5/17 subjects (29.4%) experiencing at least one grade ≥3 TRAE. Overall, 48 subjects (81.4%) experienced TRAEs (Table 2); only 2 (3.4%) were serious.

Response to therapy

No objective tumor responses were observed according to modified RECIST criteria. Of 30 subjects with measurable disease, 15 had stable disease and 15 had progressive disease as best overall response. Five subjects (prostate ×2, colorectal, breast, chordoma) stayed on study for ≥182 days. One subject with prostate cancer and one with chordoma had prolonged stable disease (30+ months and 13 months, respectively).

Changes in the peripheral immunome

Multicolor flow cytometry was used to evaluate 123 discrete immune cell subsets, including 9 standard subsets and 114 refined subsets, as previously described (16). All 123 immune cell subsets were evaluated on days 1 and 8, 1 week after the first dose, in 10 subjects receiving 16.8 μg/kg of NHS-IL12 (dose level 8). Frequencies of activated (Tim3+) NK cells, mature NK cells, and PD-1+ NKT cells increased (Fig. 2). Frequencies of terminally differentiated PD-L1+ CD4 T cells (CD4-EMRA) and plasmacytoid DCs decreased, while frequencies of the 9 standard immune cell subsets remained unchanged 1 week after therapy. PBMCs were also available from 13/17 subjects at dose level 8 for multicolor flow cytometry at baseline and day 57 after 2 cycles of NHS-IL12. Of the 9 standard subsets, only the frequency of NKT cells increased significantly from days 1 to 57 (Supplementary Table S2). No other subsets changed significantly.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

The frequencies of five refined immune cell subsets changed significantly 1 week post-cycle 1 vs. pre-NHS-IL12 treatment for 10 subjects at dose level 8 (16.8 μg/kg). Flow cytometry was performed to evaluate 123 discrete immune cell subsets, including nine standard subsets and 114 refined subsets (A). All values shown are the frequency of the subset out of all PBMCs shown as median (IQR). B–D, Graphs depicting three of these subsets.

Changes in immune cell infiltration

Three pre- and posttreatment paired biopsies were evaluated using the MultiOmyx mIF-IHC TIL Panel (NeoGenomics) to assess potential NHS-IL12–induced changes in immune cell infiltration and PD-L1 expression. A trend toward increased PD-L1 expression was detected in 2/3 pairs. No large changes in various immune cell readouts were observed; however, sample size was limited.

TCR sequencing

To investigate whether NHS-IL12 induces remodeling of the T-cell repertoire, we performed TCRseq on available tumor biopsies and corresponding PBMCs pre- and post–NHS-IL12 from 4 subjects in the dose level 8 expansion cohort (Fig. 3A). Representative TCRβ clonotype frequency plots of the biopsy (Fig. 3B) and PBMCs (Fig. 3C) of a subject with a high systemic IFNγ response (PT58) are depicted pre- and post–NHS-IL12 therapy. TCR diversity increased 6- to 14-fold in biopsies of subjects with a high (PT58) or intermediate (PT57) IFNγ response, but was unchanged or decreased in biopsies of subjects with a low (PT51, PT59) IFNγ response (Fig. 3D).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Effect of NHS-IL12 on remodeling of T-cell repertoire in four subjects from dose level 8 expansion with varying IFNγ responses. A, Subject characteristics, peak IFNγ levels, and tissues assayed by TCRseq are indicated. B and C, TCRβ clonotype frequency plots are depicted from the tumor biopsy (B) and PBMCs (C) of subject 58 before and day 35 after treatment with NHS-IL12. Clones remaining stable in abundance are found on the X = Y diagonal, whereas those that increase or decrease following treatment are found above or below the diagonal, respectively. D, TCR diversity, measured by the metric of repertoire size, in the biopsy of subjects before and after NHS-IL12. Values indicate the number of individual clonotypes comprising the top 25th percentile by ranked molecule count after sorting by abundance. E, Overall TIL density calculated from TCRseq data using the formula: TIL density = (# productive templates)/(DNA input (pg)/6.6). This formula is based on the human genome weighing 6.6 pg/cell.

We next investigated whether any unique clones expanded in the tumor and periphery after NHS-IL12 therapy. Up to 6 of the top 10 clones that increased the most in a subject's biopsy also increased in PBMCs (Table 3A); moreover, as many as 5 of the top 10 clones that increased the most in a subject's PBMCs also increased in the biopsy, but often to a lesser extent (Table 3B). TIL density (see Materials and Methods) also increased 1.3- to 8.6-fold in subjects with a high or intermediate IFNγ response, but decreased in subjects with a low IFNγ response (Fig. 3E).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

Degree of overlap of expanded clones in the biopsy and PBMCs of 3 subjects following versus before NHS-IL12 treatment

Discussion

PD data from this trial (Fig. 1A) demonstrated a time-dependent rise in IFNγ after treatment and an associated rise in IL10. Despite a similar rise in serum IL12, most multiple-dose subjects had a diminished rise in IFNγ and IL10 on the second dose. This observation is consistent with the finding that the second and subsequent doses of NHS-IL12 were generally better tolerated and had decreased toxicity compared with the first dose (Supplementary Table S3). These data also support the hypothesis that the frequency of NHS-IL12 may feasibly be increased to every 2 weeks with minimal risk for dose stacking and added toxicities. Based on these data, a 2-week dosing schedule is currently being evaluated. Although we have not seen responses with this agent at the doses and frequencies tested so far, more frequent dosing may lead to greater efficacy.

This therapy was evaluated in subjects with a wide array of locally advanced or metastatic cancers, many of which were refractory to multiple standard therapies. In addition, while NHS-IL12′s antitumor activity may be modest as a monotherapy, a great deal of preclinical data suggest that its combination with other treatment modalities, including radiation, chemotherapy, or other immunotherapies, may improve antitumor responses (13, 15, 19). For example, the combination of NHS-IL12 with localized fractionated radiotherapy, sunitinib, or gemcitabine showed additive tumor growth inhibition relative to these agents as monotherapies (13, 20). The combination of NHS-IL12 and avelumab has also been shown to enhance antitumor efficacy more than either therapy alone in multiple murine tumor models (21). Antitumor efficacy correlated with higher frequency of tumor antigen-specific splenic CD8+ T cells and enhanced T-cell activation over a wide range of NHS-IL12 concentrations. Based on these data, NHS-IL12 plus avelumab is now being evaluated (NCT02994953), and a number of clinical trials are planned to evaluate NHS-IL12 in combination with other therapies. Notably, the potential for combination of tumor-directed IL12 therapy plus checkpoint inhibitor therapy over checkpoint inhibitor therapy alone was recently demonstrated in KEYNOTE 695, a phase II trial evaluating intratumoral plasmid IL12 injection with electroporation in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced melanoma. In this study, 11/22 patients (50%) who were deemed unlikely to respond to checkpoint inhibition, based upon baseline biomarker data, had an objective response, and 3/9 patients (33%) who had progressed on prior checkpoint inhibitor therapy developed objective responses. Because NHS-IL12 is an immunocytokine, one would expect to see changes in the peripheral immunome soon after treatment. The earliest that PBMCs were available for evaluation was 1 week after NHS-IL12 infusion, at which time there were increased levels of activated (Tim3+) and mature (CD16+ CD56dim) NK cells, as well as PD-1+ NKT cells. These changes are expected, because it is well known that IL12 increases both proliferation and lytic capacity of NK cells (1). Levels of terminally differentiated CD4+ T cells and plasmacytoid DCs decreased. Similar changes were also observed 1 week after the second infusion (data not shown). In contrast, only NKT cells were still increased 2 months after treatment. Interestingly, NKT cells have a dual role in tumor progression and treatment, and when they are stimulated by self-antigens in the presence of IL12, they are among the first lymphocytes to become activated to promote antitumor responses by producing IFNγ and by stimulating IL12 production from myeloid DCs (22).

Sequencing of TCR CDR3 regions is a valuable technique for evaluating T-cell clonal representation in both tumors and peripheral blood. We performed TCRseq on tumor biopsies and matching PBMCs, where available, from 4 subjects with varying systemic IFNγ responses in the dose level 8 expansion cohort. Although only a very small number of subjects were assayed, the results demonstrate that subjects with a high/medium IFNγ response to NHS-IL12 had an increase in TIL density and TCR diversity within the tumor. This broadening of TCR diversity within the tumor suggests that NHS-IL12 may facilitate trafficking of T cells into the tumor, is consistent with other immunotherapy studies, and does not conflict with a concurrent focusing of an underlying antitumor immune response (23, 24). Comparison of TCRseq data from the biopsy and peripheral blood showed that some clones increased in both.

Conclusions

NHS-IL12 proved to be generally well tolerated, and preclinical data suggest its potential to improve antitumor responses when given with other standard treatments and immunotherapies. The next step will be to evaluate NHS-IL12 in combination therapy. Because NHS-IL12 can increase immune infiltration within the tumor microenvironment, it may also prime otherwise nonimmunogenic tumors to checkpoint inhibition and increase the spectrum of cancers responding to immunotherapy. Given this potential, multiple clinical studies are evaluating the combination of NHS-IL12 and checkpoint inhibition.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Authors' Contributions

Conception and design: C.R. Heery, M. Bilusic, J. Schlom, J.L. Gulley

Development of methodology: C.R. Heery, J.L. Gulley

Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): J. Strauss, C.R. Heery, J.W. Kim, C. Jochems, R.N. Donahue, A.S. Montgomery, S. McMahon, E. Lamping, R.A. Madan, M. Bilusic, M.R. Silver, J. Schlom, J.L. Gulley

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): J. Strauss, C.R. Heery, C. Jochems, R.N. Donahue, A.S. Montgomery, J.L. Marté, M.R. Silver, J. Schlom, J.L. Gulley

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: J. Strauss, C.R. Heery, J.W. Kim, R.N. Donahue, A.S. Montgomery, R.A. Madan, J. Schlom, J.L. Gulley

Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases): J. Strauss, A.S. Montgomery, J.L. Gulley

Study supervision: E. Lamping, J.L. Gulley

Other (bioanalyses of clinical samples): E. Bertotti

Acknowledgments

This research was sponsored and supported by the Intramural Research Program of the Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH. EMD Serono supplied NHS-IL12 under a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) with the NCI.

The authors are indebted to the subjects who donated their tissue, blood, and time and to the clinical teams who facilitated subject informed consent, as well as sample and data acquisition. The authors thank Debra Weingarten for her assistance in the preparation of this article.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Footnotes

  • Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Clinical Cancer Research Online (http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/).

  • Received May 14, 2018.
  • Revision received June 25, 2018.
  • Accepted August 16, 2018.
  • Published first August 21, 2018.
  • ©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Aste-Amezaga M,
    2. D'Andrea A,
    3. Kubin M,
    4. Trinchieri G
    . Cooperation of natural killer cell stimulatory factor/interleukin-12 with other stimuli in the induction of cytokines and cytotoxic cell-associated molecules in human T and NK cells. Cell Immunol 1994;156:480–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. van Herpen CM,
    2. van der Voort R,
    3. van der Laak JA,
    4. Klasen IS,
    5. de Graaf AO,
    6. van Kempen LC,
    7. et al.
    Intratumoral rhIL-12 administration in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients induces B cell activation. Int J Cancer 2008;123:2354–61.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Grohmann U,
    2. Belladonna ML,
    3. Bianchi R,
    4. Orabona C,
    5. Ayroldi E,
    6. Fioretti MC,
    7. et al.
    IL-12 acts directly on DC to promote nuclear localization of NF-kappaB and primes DC for IL-12 production. Immunity 1998;9:315–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Del Vecchio M,
    2. Bajetta E,
    3. Canova S,
    4. Lotze MT,
    5. Wesa A,
    6. Parmiani G,
    7. et al.
    Interleukin-12: biological properties and clinical application. Clin Cancer Res 2007;13:4677–85.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Lacy MQ,
    2. Jacobus S,
    3. Blood EA,
    4. Kay NE,
    5. Rajkumar SV,
    6. Greipp PR
    . Phase II study of interleukin-12 for treatment of plateau phase multiple myeloma (E1A96): a trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Leuk Res 2009;33:1485–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Sangro B,
    2. Mazzolini G,
    3. Ruiz J,
    4. Herraiz M,
    5. Quiroga J,
    6. Herrero I,
    7. et al.
    Phase I trial of intratumoral injection of an adenovirus encoding interleukin-12 for advanced digestive tumors. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:1389–97.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Coughlin CM,
    2. Wysocka M,
    3. Trinchieri G,
    4. Lee WM
    . The effect of interleukin 12 desensitization on the antitumor efficacy of recombinant interleukin 12. Cancer Res 1997;57:2460–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Gollob JA,
    2. Mier JW,
    3. Veenstra K,
    4. McDermott DF,
    5. Clancy D,
    6. Clancy M,
    7. et al.
    Phase I trial of twice-weekly intravenous interleukin 12 in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer or malignant melanoma: ability to maintain IFN-gamma induction is associated with clinical response. Clin Cancer Res 2000;6:1678–92.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Mortarini R,
    2. Borri A,
    3. Tragni G,
    4. Bersani I,
    5. Vegetti C,
    6. Bajetta E,
    7. et al.
    Peripheral burst of tumor-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes and infiltration of metastatic lesions by memory CD8+ T cells in melanoma patients receiving interleukin 12. Cancer Res 2000;60:3559–68.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Rook AH,
    2. Wood GS,
    3. Yoo EK,
    4. Elenitsas R,
    5. Kao DM,
    6. Sherman ML,
    7. et al.
    Interleukin-12 therapy of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma induces lesion regression and cytotoxic T-cell responses. Blood 1999;94:902–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Younes A,
    2. Pro B,
    3. Robertson MJ,
    4. Flinn IW,
    5. Romaguera JE,
    6. Hagemeister F,
    7. et al.
    Phase II clinical trial of interleukin-12 in patients with relapsed and refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and Hodgkin's disease. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:5432–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Little RF,
    2. Pluda JM,
    3. Wyvill KM,
    4. Rodriguez-Chavez IR,
    5. Tosato G,
    6. Catanzaro AT,
    7. et al.
    Activity of subcutaneous interleukin-12 in AIDS-related Kaposi sarcoma. Blood 2006;107:4650–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Fallon J,
    2. Tighe R,
    3. Kradjian G,
    4. Guzman W,
    5. Bernhardt A,
    6. Neuteboom B,
    7. et al.
    The immunocytokine NHS-IL12 as a potential cancer therapeutic. Oncotarget 2014;5:1869–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Paoloni M,
    2. Mazcko C,
    3. Selting K,
    4. Lana S,
    5. Barber L,
    6. Phillips J,
    7. et al.
    Defining the pharmacodynamic profile and therapeutic index of NHS-IL12 immunocytokine in dogs with malignant melanoma. PLoS One 2015;10:e0129954.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Xu C,
    2. Zhang Y,
    3. Rolfe PA,
    4. Hernandez VM,
    5. Guzman W,
    6. Kradjian G,
    7. et al.
    Combination therapy with NHS-muIL12 and avelumab (anti-PD-L1) enhances antitumor efficacy in preclinical cancer models. Clin Cancer Res 2017;23:5869–80.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Donahue RN,
    2. Lepone LM,
    3. Grenga I,
    4. Jochems C,
    5. Fantini M,
    6. Madan RA,
    7. et al.
    Analyses of the peripheral immunome following multiple administrations of avelumab, a human IgG1 anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody. J Immunother Cancer 2017;5:20.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    1. Idorn M,
    2. Kollgaard T,
    3. Kongsted P,
    4. Sengelov L,
    5. Thor Straten P
    . Correlation between frequencies of blood monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells, regulatory T cells and negative prognostic markers in patients with castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2014;63:1177–87.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Sgadari C,
    2. Angiolillo AL,
    3. Tosato G
    . Inhibition of angiogenesis by interleukin-12 is mediated by the interferon-inducible protein 10. Blood 1996;87:3877–82.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Lee P,
    2. Wang F,
    3. Kuniyoshi J,
    4. Rubio V,
    5. Stuges T,
    6. Groshen S,
    7. et al.
    Effects of interleukin-12 on the immune response to a multipeptide vaccine for resected metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:3836–47.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Eckert F,
    2. Schmitt J,
    3. Zips D,
    4. Krueger MA,
    5. Pichler BJ,
    6. Gillies SD,
    7. et al.
    Enhanced binding of necrosis-targeting immunocytokine NHS-IL12 after local tumour irradiation in murine xenograft models. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2016;65:1003–13.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.↵
    1. Fallon JK,
    2. Vandeveer AJ,
    3. Schlom J,
    4. Greiner JW
    . Enhanced antitumor effects by combining an IL-12/anti-DNA fusion protein with avelumab, an anti-PD-L1 antibody. Oncotarget 2017;8:20558–71.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.↵
    1. Gumperz JE
    . CD1d-restricted "NKT" cells and myeloid IL-12 production: an immunological crossroads leading to promotion or suppression of effective anti-tumor immune responses? J Leukoc Biol 2004;76:307–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Sheikh N,
    2. Cham J,
    3. Zhang L,
    4. DeVries T,
    5. Letarte S,
    6. Pufnock J,
    7. et al.
    Clonotypic diversification of intratumoral T cells following Sipuleucel-T treatment in prostate cancer subjects. Cancer Res 2016;76:3711–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Cha E,
    2. Fong L
    . Shuffling the deck with CTLA-4 therapy: Deep sequencing of rearranged TCRB genes demonstrates T cell repertoire remodeling in cancer patients. Oncoimmunology 2018;7:4.
    OpenUrl
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Clinical Cancer Research: 25 (1)
January 2019
Volume 25, Issue 1
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Editorial Board (PDF)

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Clinical Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
First-in-Human Phase I Trial of a Tumor-Targeted Cytokine (NHS-IL12) in Subjects with Metastatic Solid Tumors
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Clinical Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
First-in-Human Phase I Trial of a Tumor-Targeted Cytokine (NHS-IL12) in Subjects with Metastatic Solid Tumors
Julius Strauss, Christopher R. Heery, Joseph W. Kim, Caroline Jochems, Renee N. Donahue, Agnes S. Montgomery, Sheri McMahon, Elizabeth Lamping, Jennifer L. Marté, Ravi A. Madan, Marijo Bilusic, Matthew R. Silver, Elisa Bertotti, Jeffrey Schlom and James L. Gulley
Clin Cancer Res January 1 2019 (25) (1) 99-109; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1512

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
First-in-Human Phase I Trial of a Tumor-Targeted Cytokine (NHS-IL12) in Subjects with Metastatic Solid Tumors
Julius Strauss, Christopher R. Heery, Joseph W. Kim, Caroline Jochems, Renee N. Donahue, Agnes S. Montgomery, Sheri McMahon, Elizabeth Lamping, Jennifer L. Marté, Ravi A. Madan, Marijo Bilusic, Matthew R. Silver, Elisa Bertotti, Jeffrey Schlom and James L. Gulley
Clin Cancer Res January 1 2019 (25) (1) 99-109; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1512
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Authors' Contributions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Is Dose-Escalation Trial Design Suitable for ICIs?
  • BMS-986178 in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors
  • A Novel CD19 CAR T Therapy for B-Cell Lymphoma
Show more Clinical Trials: Immunotherapy
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • CCR Focus Archive
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Clinical Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Clinical Cancer Research
eISSN: 1557-3265
ISSN: 1078-0432

Advertisement