Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
    • CME
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
    • CME
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Translational Cancer Mechanisms and Therapy

Expression of PD-1 by T Cells in Malignant Glioma Patients Reflects Exhaustion and Activation

Tom B. Davidson, Alexander Lee, Melody Hsu, Shaina Sedighim, Joey Orpilla, Janet Treger, Max Mastall, Saskia Roesch, Carmen Rapp, Mildred Galvez, Aaron Mochizuki, Joseph Antonios, Alejandro Garcia, Nikesh Kotecha, Nicholas Bayless, David Nathanson, Anthony Wang, Richard Everson, William H. Yong, Timothy F. Cloughesy, Linda M. Liau, Christel Herold-Mende and Robert M. Prins
Tom B. Davidson
1Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology-Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
2Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexander Lee
3Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
4Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alexander Lee
Melody Hsu
1Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology-Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shaina Sedighim
3Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joey Orpilla
3Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Joey Orpilla
Janet Treger
3Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Max Mastall
5Division of Experimental Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Saskia Roesch
5Division of Experimental Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carmen Rapp
5Division of Experimental Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mildred Galvez
3Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aaron Mochizuki
1Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology-Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Aaron Mochizuki
Joseph Antonios
3Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alejandro Garcia
6Department of Medicine/Division of Hematology-Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nikesh Kotecha
7Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, San Francisco, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicholas Bayless
7Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, San Francisco, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Nicholas Bayless
David Nathanson
4Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anthony Wang
3Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Anthony Wang
Richard Everson
3Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Richard Everson
William H. Yong
8Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Timothy F. Cloughesy
2Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
9Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Linda M. Liau
2Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
3Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
10Brain Research Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Linda M. Liau
Christel Herold-Mende
5Division of Experimental Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert M. Prins
2Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
3Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
4Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
7Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, San Francisco, California.
10Brain Research Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: rprins@mednet.ucla.edu
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1176 Published March 2019
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Purpose: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary malignant tumor in the central nervous system. Our recent preclinical work has suggested that PD-1/PD-L1 plays an important immunoregulatory role to limit effective antitumor T-cell responses induced by active immunotherapy. However, little is known about the functional role that PD-1 plays on human T lymphocytes in patients with malignant glioma.

Experimental Design: In this study, we examined the immune landscape and function of PD-1 expression by T cells from tumor and peripheral blood in patients with malignant glioma.

Results: We found several differences between PD-1+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) and patient-matched PD-1+ peripheral blood T lymphocytes. Phenotypically, PD-1+ TILs exhibited higher expression of markers of activation and exhaustion than peripheral blood PD-1+ T cells, which instead had increased markers of memory. A comparison of the T-cell receptor variable chain populations revealed decreased diversity in T cells that expressed PD-1, regardless of the location obtained. Functionally, peripheral blood PD-1+ T cells had a significantly increased proliferative capacity upon activation compared with PD-1− T cells.

Conclusions: Our evidence suggests that PD-1 expression in patients with glioma reflects chronically activated effector T cells that display hallmarks of memory and exhaustion depending on its anatomic location. The decreased diversity in PD-1+ T cells suggests that the PD-1–expressing population has a narrower range of cognate antigen targets compared with the PD-1 nonexpression population. This information can be used to inform how we interpret immune responses to PD-1–blocking therapies or other immunotherapies.

Translational Relevance

Inhibition of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis is currently being explored as a potential immunotherapy for patients with malignant gliomas. Typically, PD-1 expression on T cells in the context of cancer has been exclusively thought of as a marker of exhaustion, and current PD-1 checkpoint therapies are thought to be effective due to their ability to reactivate exhausted T-cell populations. In our study, we sought out to define and characterize the PD-1 expression on T cells in the context of malignant gliomas. We found that PD-1 expression on T cells in the tumor reflects both exhaustion and chronic activation. However, in peripheral blood T cells, PD-1 expression reflects antigen experience and chronic activation more than exhaustion. The results from this study may help inform our use of PD-1 as a biomarker and also be used to assess the clinical efficacy of using PD-1 checkpoint blockade in this malignancy.

Introduction

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary brain tumor in adults and remains one of the most lethal of all human cancers (1). Current standard of care includes surgical resection, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy and is associated with a median survival of 12 to 18 months (2–4). The dismal outcome of this disease clearly highlights the need for new approaches in therapy. Novel treatment strategies, such as GBM-targeted immunotherapy and vaccination therapy, have shown promise in both preclinical and clinical trials (5–9). However, the survival benefit has been indeterminate. Antitumor immune responses induced by immunotherapy and, more specifically active vaccination in GBM, may in turn induce an adaptive immune resistance mechanism mediated by immune checkpoints such as signaling of programmed death 1 and its ligand (PD-1/PD-L1; refs. 10–12).

PD-1 is a cell surface coinhibitory receptor that is expressed on T cells after activation and limits the immune response, resulting in what are traditionally considered functionally “exhausted” T cells (13, 14). In normal physiologic states, the function of this immune checkpoint protein is to inhibit or reduce autoimmunity and to maintain homeostasis during chronic infections (15, 16). In the setting of cancer, the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway may be an adaptive mechanism by the tumor to evade antitumor immune attack. Although PD-1 has previously been considered to be a marker of terminally differentiated exhausted T cells, PD-1 expression may in fact be a marker of continued effector or memory function needed to maintain pathogen or tumor control while minimizing tissue damage in a chronic state (17). In fact, a number of recent studies have shown that PD-1 expression of CD8+ T cells early after activation may temporally coincide with rapid proliferation and production of signature effector cytokines and be an important signaling pathway in programming of memory CD8+ T cells (18–20).

In this study, we set out to define and characterize PD-1 expression in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) and peripheral blood from patients diagnosed with malignant glioma. Numerous studies have shown PD-L1 expression in GBM as well as PD-1 expression in a subset of GBM TILs (10, 12, 13). PD-1 expression on malignant glioma TILs in comparison with peripheral blood has not been investigated, nor has the function of these malignant glioma PD-1+ TILs been examined in this detail. We found that the proportion of TILs expressing PD-1 was significantly elevated when compared with T cells in patient peripheral blood and T cells from healthy controls. Furthermore, we found increased levels of activation and exhaustion markers on PD-1+ TILs when compared with PD-1+ peripheral blood T cells, while we found increased markers of memory/antigen experience on the peripheral blood PD-1+ T cells. Our results highlight the complex relationship between PD-1 expression on T cells and its relation to exhaustion and chronic activation within human malignant brain tumors.

Materials and Methods

Patients

We collected 52 patient tumor and blood specimen samples and an additional 14 peripheral blood samples from healthy donors at University of California, Los Angeles (Los Angeles, CA). In parallel, matched TILs and peripheral blood were obtained from 6 consenting patients with glioblastoma who presented to the University of Heidelberg (Heidelberg, Germany) neurosurgery service for surgical removal of their tumors. All patients provided written informed consent, and this study was conducted in accordance with recognized ethical guidelines and under Institutional Review Board–approved protocols from both institutions.

Collection of PBMCs for immune monitoring

Peripheral blood was drawn from patients prior to surgical resection of their gliomas. Once drawn, we diluted peripheral blood at 1:1 dilution of RPMI media (Thermo Fisher Scientific catalog no. MT10041CV); peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were harvested through subsequent extraction with Ficoll (Thermo Fisher Scientific catalog no. 45-001-750) gradient. After a series of two washes in RPMI media, we placed cells in freezing media made of 90% Human AB serum (Thermo Fisher Scientific catalog no. MT35060CI) and 10% DMSO (Sigma catalog no. C6295-50ML) and stored in liquid nitrogen.

Collection of TILs

TILs were collected in two ways. In the first method, we collected tumor and digested the tissue via incubation with collagenase (1 mg/mL; Advance Biofactures Corporation) and DNAse (0.02 mg/mL; Sigma catalog no. D4263-5VL) in RPMI media overnight on the day of resection. TILs were isolated using Percoll (Sigma catalog no. P4937) gradient and washed in RPMI twice. In the second method, patient-resected tumors were first digested using Miltenyi's Brain Tumor Dissociation Kit (Miltenyi Biotec catalog no. 130-095-42) and gentleMACS Dissociator (catalog no. 130-093-235) and labeled with CD45+ microbeads (catalog no. 130-045-801). CD45+ cells were positively selected for using Miltenyi LS columns (catalog no. 130-042-401) and MidiMACS Separator. TILs were frozen in the same freezing media as the PBMCs.

Flow cytometric analysis of PBMCs and TILs

We thawed donor PBMCs and patient PBMCs and TILs at 37°C for 3 minutes in a water bath and immediately washed with RPMI media to remove DMSO. We resuspended cells at 1 × 106 cells/100 μL PBS.

In the characterization of PD-1 expression of TILs and PBMCs, we first stained cells with live-dead Zombie Yellow stain (BioLegend, catalog no. 423104). In two separate experimental reactions, we stained cells with a 7-antibody and an 8-antibody panel. Two antibody panels were necessary to investigate all of the surface markers of interest due to the spectral limitations of the flow cytometer. The first antibody cocktail included seven antibodies: CD3 Pe-Cy7 (eBioscience, catalog no. 25-0038-42), CD4 Alexa Fluor 700 (BD Biosciences, catalog no. 557922), CD8 Pacific Blue (BD Biosystems, catalog no. 558207), CD16 FITC (BD Biosystems, catalog no. 555406), CTLA-4 PE (BD Biosystems, catalog no. 555853), PD-1 AF647 (eBioscience, catalog no. 51-9969-73), and CD69 PerCP-CY5.5 (BD Biosystems, catalog no. 560738) antibodies where each antibody was diluted to a 1:40 antibody to buffer ratio. The second 8-antibody cocktail contained CD3 Pe-Cy7 (eBioscience, catalog no. 25-0038-42), CD4 Alexa Fluor 700 (BD Biosystems, catalog no. 557922), CD8 Pacific Blue (BD Biosystems, catalog no. 558207), CD16 FITC (BD Biosystems, catalog no. 555406), CD19 PE (BD Biosystems, catalog no. 555413), CD25 APC-Cy7 (BD Biosystems, catalog no. 557753), CD127 AF647 (BD Biosystems, catalog no. 558598), and CD69 PE-Cy5 (BD Biosystems, catalog no. 555532) antibodies at the same dilution as above.

We used a BD LSRII flow cytometer and the BD FACS diva software to analyze all cell samples. Cytometer settings were restricted to the nine colors used. We used unstained controls to adjust FSC and SSC voltages such that the lymphocyte population became visible and then acquired single-color compensation controls, adjusting voltages such that the stained cells did not exceed 105. We set gates on stained controls in comparison with the negative control and recorded data from all samples, while subsequently applying compensation controls. We recorded staining expression at 80,000 to 100,000 events per sample, as the quantity of T cells was variable from specimen to specimen. Thus, we analyzed the data acquired from the flow cytometer by using frequency measurements rather than absolute numbers to compare sample expression profiles using FlowJo.

Mass cytometry

Patient PBMCs and TILs were collected as described above. Between 1 to 2 million patient PBMCs and TILs were labeled with Cell-ID Cisplatin (Fluidigm, catalog no. 201064) to assess for live/dead and then labeled with a variety of metal-conjugated antibodies. From the patient PBMCs, 1 × 106 cells were set aside and labeled with a smaller panel containing only cell lineage markers to aid in setting the proper gates of other markers. After labeling, cells were fixed using MaxPar Fix and Perm buffer (Fluidigm, catalog no. 201067) and labeled for single-cell discrimination with Cell-ID Intercalator-Ir (Fluidigm, CA 201192A) and run on the Helios CyTOF system.

The collected mass cytometry data were analyzed as described previously (21). Briefly, samples were normalized utilizing a bead standard, then manually gated to remove debris and dead cells. Raw marker intensities were transformed using hyperbolic inverse sine with cofactor of 5. Cell population identification was carried out utilizing the FlowSOM (22) and ConsensusClusterPlus packages in R using 11 lineage markers, with the number of clusters determined by elbow criterion. For differential analysis of cell population abundance and functional marker expression, we fit fixed and mixed linear models to our data and performed testing using the general linear hypothesis function glht in R. To account for multiple testing, we applied the Benjamini–Hochberg adjustment with a false discovery rate of 5%.

FACS of CD3+ PD-1+ and CD3+ PD-1− T-cell populations

As described above, we thawed frozen donor PBMCs and patient PBMCs and TILs, stained samples with CD3 Pe-Cy7 (eBioscience, catalog no. 25-0038-42) and PD-1 AF647 (BD Biosystems, catalog no. 558598) and sorted samples with the Aria II cell sorter (Becton Dickinson) into PD-1+ and PD-1− T-cell populations. We defined PD-1+ T cells as CD3+ and PD1+ and PD-1− T cells as CD3+ and PD1−.

RNA gene expression

We used the NanoString nCounter Dx Analysis System, which measures the expression of 511 human immune function genes through digital readouts of the abundance of mRNA transcripts to analyze cell lysates of PD-1–expressing and PD-1 void cells (23). The nCounter Dx Analysis System uses gene-specific probe pairs that hybridize directly to mRNA samples. A Reporter Probe carries the fluorescent signal; a Capture Probe allows the complex to be immobilized for data collection. We included, in each assay, six positive quality controls comprised of a linear titration of in vitro transcribed RNA transcripts and corresponding probes, and eight negative quality controls consisting of probes with no sequence homology to human RNA sequences. Each Human Immunology assay run includes a reference sample consisting of in vitro transcribed RNAs of the 13 targets that are used for normalization purposes.

TCR V-β sequencing

We extracted genomic DNA from sorted CD3+ PD-1+ and CD3+ PD-1− T cells from malignant glioma patient TILs and PBMCs and from healthy donor PBMCs using DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen catalog no. 69504) and sequenced DNA at the T-cell receptor (TCR) V-β CDR3 region using high-throughput sequencing in collaboration with Adaptive Biotechnologies, as we have recently published (24).

IFNγ activation assay

CD3+ PD-1− and CD3+ PD-1+ cells were sorted in a similar manner described above. In a 96-well plate, we added 2 × 105 cells into each well at a concentration of 1 × 106 cells/mL. For the cells that were to be activated, we added 50 ng/mL anti-CD3 Ab (BioLegend, catalog no. 317304) and 1 μg/mL anti-CD28 Ab (BD Biosciences, catalog no. 555725). In all wells, we added 50 IU/mL IL2. After 24 hours, the supernatant was collected and fresh media with 50 IU/mL IL2 were added in each well, and the supernatant was collected 24 hours later (total of 48 hours after activation). To measure IFNγ levels, we used the Human IFNγ Uncoated ELISA Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog no. 88-7613-86).

Statistical analysis

The percentage of T lymphocytes expressing the various T-cell markers studied were compared between patient PBMCs, TILs, and donor PBMCs. Unpaired Welch t test was applied to compare the means of the frequencies of expression with two-sided P values (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.005; ***, P < 0.0005).

Results

Glioma-infiltrating T cells have elevated expression of PD-1 and other markers of T-cell exhaustion and activation compared with peripheral T cells

We recently demonstrated a critical role for PD-L1 on T cells infiltrating murine gliomas, as well as analogous human tumors (10, 12). To examine the role of PD-1 in human glioma, we first analyzed the PD-1 expression profile using traditional flow cytometric approaches in TILs and matched peripheral blood from 14 patients with malignant glioma undergoing surgical resection at UCLA Medical Center (Los Angeles, CA; Fig. 1A). The clinical and pathologic characteristics of our patient population are outlined in Table 1. Similarly, we simultaneously analyzed the expression of PD-1 in the peripheral blood T cells of 14 healthy donors (Supplementary Fig. S1A).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

CD3+ T cells from patients with malignant glioma demonstrate significantly elevated expression of PD-1 compared with healthy donor PBMCs and glioma patient PBMCs. A, Percent of PD-1 expression on CD3+ T cells from all the patient samples as measured by flow cytometry (*, P < 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.005; *** P ≤0.0005). B, The percentage of PD-1–expressing CD3+ T cells from a validation cohort of patients with malignant glioma from the University of Heidelberg (*, P ≤ 0.05). C, Histogram of the expression levels of the different exhaustion markers (PD-1, TIM3, LAG3, CTLA-4). D, Percentage of CD3+ T cells that express one or more markers of exhaustion (PD-1, TIM3, LAG3, CTLA-4). E, The percentage of cells expressing different combinations of the various exhaustion markers (**, P ≤ 0.005; ***, P ≤ 0.0005). Blue bars, healthy donor PBMC samples; red bars, glioma patient PBMC samples; and green bars, glioma patient TIL samples.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

The clinical and pathological characterization of our patient population

PD-1 was significantly elevated in the CD3+ TIL population (mean ± SE: 51.7% ± 7.2%) compared with the CD3+ glioma patient PBMC population (19.7% ± 1.8%, P = 0.0005) and healthy donor PBMCs (17.0% ± 2.4%, P = 0.02; Fig. 1A). The proportion of TILs expressing PD-1 was significantly elevated in the CD3+CD4+ T-cell population (mean ± SE: 53.2% ± 6.8%) as compared with patient peripheral blood (17.6% ± 2.6%, P < 0.0004) or donor peripheral blood (17.3% ± 1.9%, P < 0.0001; Supplementary Fig. S1B). Similarly, the percentage of CD3+CD8+ cells expressing PD-1 was also significantly higher in TILs (51.9% ± 7.39%) than on patient peripheral blood T cells (22.5% ± 3.13%; P < 0.0023) or donor peripheral blood T cells (15.9% ± 2.24%; P < 0.0005; Supplementary Fig. S1C). To validate these findings independently, PD-1 expression was analyzed on GBM TILs, matched patient peripheral blood T cells, and normal controls from a separate cohort of 6 patients with GBM and 6 healthy controls at the University of Heidelberg (Heidelberg, Germany). Similarly, PD-1 expression was significantly increased in the GBM TIL population when compared with matched patient peripheral blood T cells and healthy patients' T cells (Fig. 1B).

Because PD-1 has typically been associated with an exhausted phenotype, in addition to PD-1, the expression of three other exhaustion markers (CTLA-4, TIM-3, and LAG-3) was measured in the patients from our German validation cohort (Fig. 1C). The GBM TIL population showed greater expression of TIM-3 and LAG-3 and marginal increase in expression of CTLA-4 compared with both healthy donor PBMCs and patient PBMCs. To examine this further, we noted the percentage of cells in each population that showed one more of the exhaustion markers (Fig. 1D). The GBM TIL population showed the largest subpopulation of cells that expressed at least one of the exhaustion markers and the only population that contained cells that expressed more than two of the exhaustion markers. In contrast, peripheral blood T cells from matched patients rarely had up to two markers of exhaustion and T cells from healthy controls almost uniformly had no markers of exhaustion except for a small percentage with only one marker. In addition, we examined the proportion of CD3+ cells within each combination of exhaustion markers. There was a greater percentage of CD3+ TILs expressing two or more exhaustion markers across all the different combinations of exhaustion markers than PBMCs from the patients or controls (Fig. 1E). Our results suggest that malignant glioma patients possess elevated frequencies of PD-1 and other exhaustion markers on T cells from the tumor and in the peripheral blood compared with normal healthy volunteers.

To explore further the findings from our standard fluorescent antibody–based flow cytometry, we conducted mass cytometry (21, 25, 26) on an additional 28 matching high-grade glioma patient TILs and PBMCs. A panel of immune lineage, memory, trafficking, activation, and exhaustion markers were used to stain these paired immune cell populations simultaneously (Supplementary Table S1). To analyze the CD3+ PD-1+ population from this set of patients, we employed FlowSom (22), an R package that uses machine learning algorithms to analyze mass cytometry data in an unbiased manner. We ran a principal component analysis using the median expression levels of all the T-cell markers from each individual patient as variables. An unsupervised clustering algorithm was used to generate a tSNE map of phenotypically defined population clusters. The principal component analysis showed a clear separation between the CD3+ PD-1+ PBMCs and the CD3+ PD-1+ TILs (Fig. 2A). The unsupervised clustering algorithm grouped a majority of the CD3+ PD-1+ TILs in distinct clusters from the CD3+ PD-1+ PBMCs (Fig. 2B; Supplementary Fig. S2A).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

High dimensional analysis of mass cytometry data shows elevated expression of markers of activation and exhaustion on CD3+ PD-1+ TILs and markers of activation and antigen experience on CD3+ PD-1+ PBMCs from patients with malignant glioma. A, A PCA plot showing CD3+ PD-1+ TILs (green dots) and PBMCs (red dots). Each dot represents an individual patient. B, tSNE plots showing which clusters the CD3+ PD-1+ TILs were grouped into (green box) and which clusters the CD3+ PD-1+ PBMCs were grouped into (red box) by the clustering algorithm. C, The median expression levels of various activation markers in TILs (green dots) and PBMCs (red dots). The same tSNE plot as B was colored to show which cells expressed the particular marker (*, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.005; ***, P ≤ 0.0005). D, Antigen experience/memory markers. E, Exhaustion markers. F, A heatmap of the median expression pattern for each of the exhaustion, activation, and memory/antigen experience markers for each individual patient.

We next looked at each individual marker and its median expression levels in all the PBMCs and TILs. For each individual marker, we highlighted the regions on the generated tSNE map where the marker was most highly expressed. For the T-cell exhaustion markers, there was significant increase in TIM-3, PD-L1, and CTLA-4 in the TIL population compared with the PBMC population (Fig. 2C). Among T-cell activation markers, there was a significant increase in expression of CD38 and HLA-DR in the TIL population compared with the PBMC population (Fig. 2D). Meanwhile, among the antigen experience and T-cell memory markers: CD45RA, CD27, and CD127, there was a significant decrease in the TIL population compared with the PBMC population (Fig. 2E). In 4 recent patients, two additional T-cell exhaustion markers CD39 and TIGIT were incorporated into our panel, and the expression levels were measured between the PBMC and TIL groups. We found a significant increase in CD39 in the TIL population (Supplementary Fig. S2C) but a nonsignificant difference in TIGIT expression between the two groups (Supplementary Fig. S2d). A heatmap of each analyzed patient's marker expression level was also generated. There was increased expression of various exhaustion and activation markers in the TIL population and increased expression of antigen experience markers in the PBMC population (Fig. 2F). The results generated from the mass cytometry data strongly suggest phenotypic differences exist between CD3+ PD-1+ cells from malignant glioma patient TILs and PBMCs.

To further investigate the possible relationship of PD-1 expression with T-cell exhaustion, activation, and memory phenotypes, we sought to characterize the gene expression of the PD-1− and PD-1+ cells by performing a tailored comparison panel on the PBMCs and TILs from three randomly selected patients and PBMCs from one healthy individual using RNA hybridization probe technology (23). When the normalized RNA counts of PD-1+ T cells and PD-1− T cells were divided to create a ratio, we found that the ratio of PD-1+/PD-1− gene expression in malignant glioma TILs had an elevated fold change for markers of exhaustion (TIM-3, CTLA-4, TIGIT) when compared with the peripheral blood T cells (Supplementary Fig. S3A). Gene expression analysis of the same samples uncovered an increase in several activation markers (OX-40, 4-1BB, CD25, BIM, ICOS) of TILs when compared with patient peripheral blood T cells (Supplementary Fig. S3B). We saw a reversal of this PD1+/ PD1− fold change for markers of memory (Supplementary Fig. S3C). These data suggest that PD-1 expression reflects activation and exhaustion in TILs and may be a marker of antigen experience in peripheral blood T cells of malignant glioma patients, similar to our findings from our phenotypic analyses.

PD-1+ T cells demonstrate decreased TCR diversity

We used high-throughput DNA sequencing of the TCR V-β region to determine the TCR diversity of CD3+ PD-1+ and CD3+ PD-1− T cells FACS-sorted from one matched patient tumor and PBMC samples, two additional distinct patient PBMC samples, and normal donor PBMCs. Because our data suggested that PD-1 reflects antigen experience, activation, and exhaustion in our malignant glioma patient samples, it was unclear what the TCR repertoire would reflect. In fact, we saw an increase in the diversity of PD-1− T cells from all populations of sorted T cells (Fig. 3A). As expected, we saw a trend toward the least amount of TCR diversity in the TIL population, but our limited number of sorted TIL precludes a clear assessment. Among the predicted productive TCR rearrangements, we also saw an expansion of clonal T-cell populations in the PBMC and TIL populations in patients with malignant glioma, possibly signifying expansion of tumor antigen-specific T cells not seen in healthy donors (Fig. 3B). These findings suggest that PD-1+ T cells are enriched for a restricted TCR population, regardless of where the cells were obtained.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

PD-1+ T cells have decreased TCR diversity compared with PD-1− cells. A, The number of estimated unique TCR sequences in PD-1− and PD-1+ populations in healthy donor PBMCs, glioma patient PBMCs, and glioma patient TILs. Each point represents a single patient. Circle points, healthy donor PBMCs; square points, glioma patient PBMCs; triangle points, glioma patient TILs (**, P ≤ 0.005). B, The frequency of a specific TCR rearrangement in the populations. The populations shown are the CD3+ PD-1− or CD3+ PD-1+ populations from healthy donor PBMCs (dotted bar), glioma patient PBMCs (the checkerboard bar), and glioma patient TILs (slanted stripes bar).

PD-1+ peripheral T cells of patients with malignant gliomas exhibit an increased rate of activation compared with PD-1− T cells

To examine the functional differences between these T-cell populations, we sorted PD-1+ and PD-1− CD3+ peripheral blood T cells from patients with malignant glioma. Because of limited numbers of PD-1+ T cells in nonexpanded PBMCs, we pooled together PBMCs from multiple patients. The sorted T cells were placed in culture and activated using agonistic CD3/28 antibodies. At 24 and 48 hours postactivation, supernatants were collected and the IFNγ levels measured. At 24 hours, the amount of IFNγ produced by the CD3+ PD-1+ cells was 2.4× higher than the IFNγ produced by the CD3+ PD-1− cells (Fig. 4a). By 48 hours poststimulation, the amount of IFNγ produced by the CD3+ PD-1+ cells was 8.8× higher than the IFNγ produced by the CD3+ PD-1− cells (Fig. 4b).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

CD3+ PD-1+ T cells from pooled glioma patient PBMCs produce higher levels of IFNγ compared to the CD3+ PD-1− T cell population after T cell activation. A, The amount of IFNγ produced in CD3+ PD-1−, and CD3+ PD-1+ T cells from four glioma patient PBMCs 24 hours after CD3/CD28 activation. The dotted bar represents CD3+ PD-1− T cells that were not activated. The checkerboard bar represents CD3+ PD-1− T cells that were activated. The horizontal stripes bar represents CD3+ PD-1+ T cells that were activated. The results presented are from a representative experiment that has been repeated multiple times with similar findings. B, IFNγ produced at 48 hours from the same set of cells as in A.

Discussion

We previously demonstrated that the PD-1/PD-L1 axis plays an important immunoregulatory role in antitumor T-cell function induced by DC vaccination (10, 12). Several other studies have described T-cell exhaustion and dysfunction within the tumor microenvironment and in relation to PD-1 expression. Thommen and colleagues showed in non–small cell lung cancer patients that PD-1 expressing T cells from the tumor had higher expression of various exhaustion markers, had higher upregulation of genes related to proliferation and activation, and were more clonal (27). Analyzing TILs from both human GBM and murine tumor models, Woroniecka and colleagues showed that TILs had a more prominent exhaustion signature compared with the peripheral blood from patients with GBM and from healthy donor PBMCs (28). However, a comprehensive, high-dimensional analysis of PD-1 expression by human T lymphocytes in patients with malignant glioma has not been described. In our study, we found several differences in both phenotypic characteristics and function between PD-1+ TILs and matched PD-1+ peripheral blood T lymphocytes extracted from patients with malignant glioma. Notably, we found that PD-1 expression in the glioma TIL context may reflect T-cell activation in addition to T-cell exhaustion, but in the periphery, PD-1 expression on T cells may indicate activation and antigen experience (Fig. 5).

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

A schematic indicating what PD-1 expression means in the context of malignant glioma.

Expression of PD-1 on peripheral blood T cells of patients with malignant tumors, including malignant glioma, has previously been reported (29–34). In most of these previous studies, PD-1 was described as a marker of exhaustion by terminally differentiated effector T cells. But these reports failed to describe the phenotypic and functional differences between PD-1+ T cells in the peripheral blood and PD-1+ TILs. In our study, we performed a comprehensive analysis of PD-1 expression on T lymphocytes isolated from the tumors and peripheral blood of patients with malignant glioma. We found that PD-1 was significantly elevated in glioma patient TILs when compared with T cells in glioma patient peripheral blood and T cells from healthy controls. PD-1+ TILs are enriched for markers of activation and exhaustion (CTLA-4, TIM-3, HLA-DR, and CD38) when compared with PD-1+ peripheral blood T cells. In contrast, peripheral blood PD-1+ T cells express a complete array of central memory, effector memory, and even the CD45RA+ effector memory T-cell subsets (CD45RO, CD45RA, CD27, and CD127), suggesting diverging functionality between PD-1+ T cells obtained from distinct anatomic locale.

In the setting of chronic viral infections, similar trends have been observed. PD-1 expression has been associated with T-cell exhaustion in both mouse LCMV models and humans infected with HIV (35, 36). In studies examining the transcriptional profile of the exhausted T-cell population from a chronic LCMV mouse model, the exhausted population remained distinct from the memory T-cell population and had increased transcription of various exhaustion markers such as PD-1, TIM-3, and CTLA-4 and activation markers such as ICOS and OX40 (37, 38). In contrast, previous reports have shown that in healthy controls, PD-1+ peripheral CD8+ T cells do not show exhausted characteristics, but instead exhibit hallmarks of effector memory T cells (39). In a subset of the patients, CD45RO was included in the mass cytometry analysis, which allowed a more thorough exploration of the T-cell memory subsets. We found that the expression CD45RO is uniformly expressed on all CD3+ PD1+ T cells from the tumor but variably expressed by the peripheral blood population. In the peripheral blood, there are multiple populations of PD-1+ T cells that do not express CD45RO and are likely long-lived stem memory TSCM or effector memory TEMRA cells. Thus, our data support the conclusion that the phenotype of PD-1+ T cells obtained from tumor tissue represents a chronically activated, exhausted effector T-cell population (CD45RO+ CD27− IL-7R− HLA-DR+ CD38+ TIM-3+ LAG-3+ CTLA-4+), while the PD-1+ T-cell population obtained from peripheral blood represents the full complement of memory T-cell populations (TCM, CD45RO+ CD27+ CD45RA− IL7R+; TEM, CD45RO+ CD45RA− CD27− IL7R−; and TEMRA, CD45RO− CD27− CD45RA+ IL7R−). Therefore, our data would suggest that PD-1 expression by peripheral blood T cells may not be a good surrogate or indicator for exhaustion or tumor immune evasion. Such information must be considered when applied as a biomarker in clinical immunotherapy trials.

Interestingly, we found that PD-1 expression was associated with increased TCR clonality and decreased diversity in both the TIL population and peripheral blood T cells of patients with malignant glioma. As such, increased clonal expansion of the PD-1+ T-cell population may reflect the activation and expansion of specific antitumor antigen T cells when compared with PD-1− T cells, although future studies are needed to confirm this. In addition, our mass cytometry data revealed a significant increase in expression of CD39 in the CD3+ PD-1+ TIL population compared with the CD3+ PD-1+ PBMC population. CD39, an extracellular ATPase commonly associated with regulatory T cells, has been shown to be coexpressed with PD-1 on antigen-specific but exhausted CD8+ T cells in a chronic viral setting (40). More recently, CD39 has been proposed to be expressed by tumor-specific T cells (41, 42). The increase of clonality and CD39 expression in the PD-1+ TILs further supports their dual function phenotype of antitumor specific activation and exhaustion. Increased TCR clonality has been correlated with better outcomes after anti–PD-1 therapy in melanoma and has been associated with higher PD-1 expression in soft tissue sarcomas (11, 43). Further investigation is needed to study the association between TCR clonality and PD-1 expression in the context of tumor antigen-specific T lymphocytes.

Finally, to characterize PD-1+ peripheral blood T cells in patients with malignant glioma, we investigated the functional activation differences between PD-1+ and PD-1− peripheral blood T cells from patients with GBM. Traditionally, it has been held that effector, memory, and naïve T cells have different response rates, as measured by amount of IFNγ produced, after activation. We found that PD-1+ malignant glioma patient PBMC T cells exhibited an increased rate of IFNγ production when compared with PD-1− PBMC T cells from the same patients. Increased IFNγ is consistent with an activated memory T-cell phenotype, further highlighting that PD-1 expression in peripheral T cells is not a marker of exhaustion as we would expect in the PD-1+ population in the tumor microenvironment.

In conclusion, we demonstrate that PD-1 expression in patients with malignant glioma reflects chronically activated effector T cells that display both hallmarks of memory and exhaustion depending on its location. The use of anti–PD-1/PD-L1 antibody blockade is currently being studied in malignant glioma clinical trials. Further exploration of the effect of these checkpoint inhibitors on PD-1–expressing T cells in different anatomical environments is warranted both to understand the use of PD-1 expression as a therapeutic biomarker as well as its importance for clinical efficacy.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

N. Kotecha holds ownership interest (including patents) in Cytobank Inc. W.H. Yong reports receiving commercial research grants from Amgen. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed by the other authors.

Authors' Contributions

Conception and design: T.B. Davidson, M. Hsu, S. Sedighim, A. Garcia, L.M. Liau, C.C. Herold-Mende, R.M. Prins

Development of methodology: A. Lee, M. Hsu, J. Antonios, A. Garcia, A. Wang, R. Everson, L.M. Liau, C.C. Herold-Mende, R.M. Prins

Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): A. Lee, M. Hsu, S. Sedighim, J. Orpilla, J. Treger, M. Mastall, S. Roesch, M. Galvez, A. Mochizuki, A. Garcia, D. Nathanson, A. Wang, R. Everson, W.H. Yong, T.F. Cloughesy, C.C. Herold-Mende, R.M. Prins

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): T.B. Davidson, A. Lee, M. Hsu, S. Sedighim, J. Orpilla, M. Mastall, S. Roesch, C. Rapp, M. Galvez, A. Mochizuki, N. Kotecha, N. Bayless, A. Wang, C.C. Herold-Mende, R.M. Prins

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: T.B. Davidson, A. Lee, M. Hsu, S. Sedighim, A. Mochizuki, N. Bayless, A. Wang, R. Everson, W.H. Yong, T.F. Cloughesy, L.M. Liau, C.C. Herold-Mende, R.M. Prins

Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases): T.B. Davidson, S. Sedighim, J. Orpilla, J. Antonios, A. Garcia, N. Kotecha, T.F. Cloughesy, C.C. Herold-Mende, R.M. Prins

Study supervision: T.B. Davidson, J. Antonios, L.M. Liau, C.C. Herold-Mende, R.M. Prins

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by NIH/NCI grants R21-CA186004 and R01CA154256 (R.M. Prins), RO1 CA125244 (L.M. Liau), KL2 ULITR001881 (T.B. Davidson), R25 NS079198 and the UCLA SPORE in Brain Cancer P50 CA211015 (R.M. Prins and L.M. Liau). We also acknowledge support from the Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy (PICI; grant number 20163828), the Musella Foundation for Brain Tumor Research (R.M. Prins), the Joseph Drown Foundation (M. Hsu and T.B. Davidson), UCLA Children's Discovery and Innovation Institute Today's and Tomorrow's Children Fund (TTCF) (TBD), and the UCLA Medical Scientist Training Program (MSTP) (M. Galvez). A. Lee is a pre-doctoral fellow supported by the UCLA Tumor Immunology Training Grant (USHHS Ruth L. Kirschstein Institutional National Research Service Award # T32 CA009056). We would like to thank the Janis V. Giorgi Flow Cytometry Core Laboratory for their assistance in constructing our mass cytometry panel and running the Helios CyTOF system. We would like to thank the Center for Systems Biomedicine (Integrated Molecular Technologies Core) for their technical assistance with the NanoString studies, which is supported by CURE/P30DK41301. We also thank the UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center (JCCC) and Center for AIDS Research Flow Cytometry Core Facility that is supported by NIH awards P30 CA016042 and 5P30 AI028697. We would also like to thank the UCLA Brain Tumor Translational Resource (BTTR) and the Translational Pathology Core Laboratory (TPCL) for their assistance with paraffin-embedding and histology. Finally, we would like to express our deepest gratitude to the patients and their families for donating the samples that allowed this project to be successful.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Footnotes

  • Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Clinical Cancer Research Online (http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/).

  • T.B. Davidson and A. Lee are co-first authors of this article.

  • Received April 27, 2018.
  • Revision received August 27, 2018.
  • Accepted November 26, 2018.
  • Published first November 29, 2018.
  • ©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Ostrom QT,
    2. Gittleman H,
    3. Xu J,
    4. Kromer C,
    5. Wolinsky Y,
    6. Kruchko C,
    7. et al.
    CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2009-2013. Neuro Oncol 2016;18:v1–v75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Preusser M,
    2. de Ribaupierre S,
    3. Wohrer A,
    4. Erridge SC,
    5. Hegi M,
    6. Weller M,
    7. et al.
    Current concepts and management of glioblastoma. Ann Neurol 2011;70:9–21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Stupp R,
    2. Mason WP,
    3. van den Bent MJ,
    4. Weller M,
    5. Fisher B,
    6. Taphoorn MJ,
    7. et al.
    Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 2005;352:987–96.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Miranda A,
    2. Blanco-Prieto M,
    3. Sousa J,
    4. Pais A,
    5. Vitorino C
    . Breaching barriers in glioblastoma. Part II: targeted drug delivery and lipid nanoparticles. Int J Pharm 2017;531:389–410.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Liau LM,
    2. Prins RM,
    3. Kiertscher SM,
    4. Odesa SK,
    5. Kremen TJ,
    6. Giovannone AJ,
    7. et al.
    Dendritic cell vaccination in glioblastoma patients induces systemic and intracranial T-cell responses modulated by the local central nervous system tumor microenvironment. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:5515–25.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Prins RM,
    2. Soto H,
    3. Konkankit V,
    4. Odesa SK,
    5. Eskin A,
    6. Yong WH,
    7. et al.
    Gene expression profile correlates with T-cell infiltration and relative survival in glioblastoma patients vaccinated with dendritic cell immunotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 2011;17:1603–15.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Prins RM,
    2. Wang X,
    3. Soto H,
    4. Young E,
    5. Lisiero DN,
    6. Fong B,
    7. et al.
    Comparison of glioma-associated antigen peptide-loaded versus autologous tumor lysate-loaded dendritic cell vaccination in malignant glioma patients. J Immunother 2013;36:152–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. 8.↵
    1. Heimberger AB,
    2. Crotty LE,
    3. Archer GE,
    4. Hess KR,
    5. Wikstrand CJ,
    6. Friedman AH,
    7. et al.
    Epidermal growth factor receptor VIII peptide vaccination is efficacious against established intracerebral tumors. Clin Cancer Res 2003;9:4247–54.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Kanaly CW,
    2. Ding D,
    3. Heimberger AB,
    4. Sampson JH
    . Clinical applications of a peptide-based vaccine for glioblastoma. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2010;21:95–109.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Antonios JP,
    2. Soto H,
    3. Everson RG,
    4. Orpilla J,
    5. Moughon D,
    6. Shin N,
    7. et al.
    PD-1 blockade enhances the vaccination-induced immune response in glioma. JCI Insight 2016;1:e87059.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. Tumeh PC,
    2. Harview CL,
    3. Yearley JH,
    4. Shintaku IP,
    5. Taylor EJ,
    6. Robert L,
    7. et al.
    PD-1 blockade induces responses by inhibiting adaptive immune resistance. Nature 2014;515:568–71.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Antonios JP,
    2. Soto H,
    3. Everson RG,
    4. Moughon D,
    5. Orpilla JR,
    6. Shin NP,
    7. et al.
    Immunosuppressive tumor-infiltrating myeloid cells mediate adaptive immune resistance via a PD-1/PD-L1 mechanism in glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol 2017;19:796–807.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    1. Berghoff AS,
    2. Kiesel B,
    3. Widhalm G,
    4. Rajky O,
    5. Ricken G,
    6. Wohrer A,
    7. et al.
    Programmed death ligand 1 expression and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol 2015;17:1064–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. McDermott DF,
    2. Atkins MB
    . PD-1 as a potential target in cancer therapy. Cancer Med 2013;2:662–73.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Maxwell R,
    2. Jackson CM,
    3. Lim M
    . Clinical trials investigating immune checkpoint blockade in glioblastoma. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2017;18:51.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. Topalian SL,
    2. Taube JM,
    3. Anders RA,
    4. Pardoll DM
    . Mechanism-driven biomarkers to guide immune checkpoint blockade in cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 2016;16:275–87.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Speiser DE,
    2. Utzschneider DT,
    3. Oberle SG,
    4. Munz C,
    5. Romero P,
    6. Zehn D
    . T cell differentiation in chronic infection and cancer: functional adaptation or exhaustion? Nat Rev Immunol 2014;14:768–74.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Yuzefpolskiy Y BF,
    2. Penny L,
    3. Kalia V,
    4. Sarkar S
    . PD-1 signals instruct a critical metabolic switch for maintenance of T cell memory. J Immunol 2017;198(1 supplement).
  19. 19.↵
    1. Charlton JJ,
    2. Chatzidakis I,
    3. Tsoukatou D,
    4. Boumpas DT,
    5. Garinis GA,
    6. Mamalaki C
    . Programmed death-1 shapes memory phenotype CD8 T cell subsets in a cell-intrinsic manner. J Immunol 2013;190:6104–14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Hong JJ,
    2. Amancha PK,
    3. Rogers K,
    4. Ansari AA,
    5. Villinger F
    . Re-evaluation of PD-1 expression by T cells as a marker for immune exhaustion during SIV infection. PLoS One 2013;8:e60186.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Nowicka M,
    2. Krieg C,
    3. Weber LM,
    4. Hartmann FJ,
    5. Guglietta S,
    6. Becher B,
    7. et al.
    CyTOF workflow: differential discovery in high-throughput high-dimensional cytometry datasets. F1000Res 2017;6:748.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.↵
    1. Van Gassen S,
    2. Callebaut B,
    3. Van Helden MJ,
    4. Lambrecht BN,
    5. Demeester P,
    6. Dhaene T,
    7. et al.
    FlowSOM: using self-organizing maps for visualization and interpretation of cytometry data. Cytometry A 2015;87:636–45.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Geiss GK,
    2. Bumgarner RE,
    3. Birditt B,
    4. Dahl T,
    5. Dowidar N,
    6. Dunaway DL,
    7. et al.
    Direct multiplexed measurement of gene expression with color-coded probe pairs. Nat Biotechnol 2008;26:317–25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Hsu MS,
    2. Sedighim S,
    3. Wang T,
    4. Antonios JP,
    5. Everson RG,
    6. Tucker AM,
    7. et al.
    TCR sequencing can identify and track glioma-infiltrating T cells after DC vaccination. Cancer Immunol Res 2016;4:412–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Bendall SC,
    2. Simonds EF,
    3. Qiu P,
    4. Amir el AD,
    5. Krutzik PO,
    6. Finck R,
    7. et al.
    Single-cell mass cytometry of differential immune and drug responses across a human hematopoietic continuum. Science 2011;332:687–96.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Leipold MD,
    2. Maecker HT
    . Mass cytometry: protocol for daily tuning and running cell samples on a CyTOF mass cytometer. J Vis Exp 2012(69):e4398.
  27. 27.↵
    1. Thommen DS,
    2. Koelzer VH,
    3. Herzig P,
    4. Roller A,
    5. Trefny M,
    6. Dimeloe S,
    7. et al.
    A transcriptionally and functionally distinct PD-1(+) CD8(+) T cell pool with predictive potential in non-small-cell lung cancer treated with PD-1 blockade. Nat Med 2018;24:994–1004.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. 28.↵
    1. Woroniecka K,
    2. Chongsathidkiet P,
    3. Rhodin K,
    4. Kemeny H,
    5. Dechant C,
    6. Farber SH,
    7. et al.
    T-cell exhaustion signatures vary with tumor type and are severe in glioblastoma. Clin Cancer Res 2018;24:4175–86.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Waki K,
    2. Yamada T,
    3. Yoshiyama K,
    4. Terazaki Y,
    5. Sakamoto S,
    6. Matsueda S,
    7. et al.
    PD-1 expression on peripheral blood T-cell subsets correlates with prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Sci 2014;105:1229–35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Zheng H,
    2. Liu X,
    3. Zhang J,
    4. Rice SJ,
    5. Wagman M,
    6. Kong Y,
    7. et al.
    Expression of PD-1 on CD4+ T cells in peripheral blood associates with poor clinical outcome in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncotarget 2016;7:56233–40.
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.↵
    1. Rutkowski J,
    2. Cyman M,
    3. Slebioda T,
    4. Bemben K,
    5. Rutkowska A,
    6. Gruchala M,
    7. et al.
    Evaluation of peripheral blood T lymphocyte surface activation markers and transcription factors in patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer. Cell Immunol 2017;322:26–33.
    OpenUrl
  32. 32.↵
    1. Wang W,
    2. Shen G,
    3. Wu S,
    4. Song S,
    5. Ni Y,
    6. Suo Z,
    7. et al.
    PD-1 mRNA expression in peripheral blood cells and its modulation characteristics in cancer patients. Oncotarget 2017;8:50782–91.
    OpenUrl
  33. 33.↵
    1. MacFarlane AWt,
    2. Jillab M,
    3. Plimack ER,
    4. Hudes GR,
    5. Uzzo RG,
    6. Litwin S,
    7. et al.
    PD-1 expression on peripheral blood cells increases with stage in renal cell carcinoma patients and is rapidly reduced after surgical tumor resection. Cancer Immunol Res 2014;2:320–31.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Wei B,
    2. Wang L,
    3. Zhao X,
    4. Du C,
    5. Guo Y,
    6. Sun Z
    . The upregulation of programmed death 1 on peripheral blood T cells of glioma is correlated with disease progression. Tumour Biol 2014;35:2923–9.
    OpenUrl
  35. 35.↵
    1. Barber DL,
    2. Wherry EJ,
    3. Masopust D,
    4. Zhu B,
    5. Allison JP,
    6. Sharpe AH,
    7. et al.
    Restoring function in exhausted CD8 T cells during chronic viral infection. Nature 2006;439:682–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Day CL,
    2. Kaufmann DE,
    3. Kiepiela P,
    4. Brown JA,
    5. Moodley ES,
    6. Reddy S,
    7. et al.
    PD-1 expression on HIV-specific T cells is associated with T-cell exhaustion and disease progression. Nature 2006;443:350–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Crawford A,
    2. Angelosanto JM,
    3. Kao C,
    4. Doering TA,
    5. Odorizzi PM,
    6. Barnett BE,
    7. et al.
    Molecular and transcriptional basis of CD4(+) T cell dysfunction during chronic infection. Immunity 2014;40:289–302.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Wherry EJ,
    2. Ha SJ,
    3. Kaech SM,
    4. Haining WN,
    5. Sarkar S,
    6. Kalia V,
    7. et al.
    Molecular signature of CD8+ T cell exhaustion during chronic viral infection. Immunity 2007;27:670–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Duraiswamy J,
    2. Ibegbu CC,
    3. Masopust D,
    4. Miller JD,
    5. Araki K,
    6. Doho GH,
    7. et al.
    Phenotype, function, and gene expression profiles of programmed death-1(hi) CD8 T cells in healthy human adults. J Immunol 2011;186:4200–12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. Gupta PK,
    2. Godec J,
    3. Wolski D,
    4. Adland E,
    5. Yates K,
    6. Pauken KE,
    7. et al.
    CD39 expression identifies terminally exhausted CD8+ T Cells. PLoS Pathog 2015;11:e1005177.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Duhen T,
    2. Duhen R,
    3. Montler R,
    4. Moses J,
    5. Moudgil T,
    6. de Miranda NF,
    7. et al.
    Co-expression of CD39 and CD103 identifies tumor-reactive CD8 T cells in human solid tumors. Nat Commun 2018;9:2724.
    OpenUrl
  42. 42.↵
    1. Simoni Y,
    2. Becht E,
    3. Fehlings M,
    4. Loh CY,
    5. Koo SL,
    6. Teng KWW,
    7. et al.
    Bystander CD8(+) T cells are abundant and phenotypically distinct in human tumour infiltrates. Nature 2018;557:575–9.
    OpenUrl
  43. 43.↵
    1. Pollack SM,
    2. He Q,
    3. Yearley JH,
    4. Emerson R,
    5. Vignali M,
    6. Zhang Y,
    7. et al.
    T-cell infiltration and clonality correlate with programmed cell death protein 1 and programmed death-ligand 1 expression in patients with soft tissue sarcomas. Cancer 2017;123:3291–304.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top
Clinical Cancer Research: 25 (6)
March 2019
Volume 25, Issue 6
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Editorial Board (PDF)

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Clinical Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Expression of PD-1 by T Cells in Malignant Glioma Patients Reflects Exhaustion and Activation
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Clinical Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Expression of PD-1 by T Cells in Malignant Glioma Patients Reflects Exhaustion and Activation
Tom B. Davidson, Alexander Lee, Melody Hsu, Shaina Sedighim, Joey Orpilla, Janet Treger, Max Mastall, Saskia Roesch, Carmen Rapp, Mildred Galvez, Aaron Mochizuki, Joseph Antonios, Alejandro Garcia, Nikesh Kotecha, Nicholas Bayless, David Nathanson, Anthony Wang, Richard Everson, William H. Yong, Timothy F. Cloughesy, Linda M. Liau, Christel Herold-Mende and Robert M. Prins
Clin Cancer Res March 15 2019 (25) (6) 1913-1922; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1176

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Expression of PD-1 by T Cells in Malignant Glioma Patients Reflects Exhaustion and Activation
Tom B. Davidson, Alexander Lee, Melody Hsu, Shaina Sedighim, Joey Orpilla, Janet Treger, Max Mastall, Saskia Roesch, Carmen Rapp, Mildred Galvez, Aaron Mochizuki, Joseph Antonios, Alejandro Garcia, Nikesh Kotecha, Nicholas Bayless, David Nathanson, Anthony Wang, Richard Everson, William H. Yong, Timothy F. Cloughesy, Linda M. Liau, Christel Herold-Mende and Robert M. Prins
Clin Cancer Res March 15 2019 (25) (6) 1913-1922; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1176
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Authors' Contributions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • High IFN Signaling and Resistance to CDK4/6 Inhibitors
  • CD1d-Specific Vγ9Vδ2-T Cell Engager in CLL
  • The Genomics of 9/11 World Trade Center Myelomas
Show more Translational Cancer Mechanisms and Therapy
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • CCR Focus Archive
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Clinical Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Clinical Cancer Research
eISSN: 1557-3265
ISSN: 1078-0432

Advertisement