Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
    • CME
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
    • CME
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Poster Presentations - Proffered Abstracts

Abstract 35: Molecular optimization of phase III trial failed anticancer drugs using target affinity and toxicity-centered multiple properties reinforcement learning

Sungsoo Park, Yoon Ho Ko, Bora Lee, Bonggun Shin and Bo Ram Beck
Sungsoo Park
1Deargen, Inc., Seoul, South Korea,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yoon Ho Ko
2Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bora Lee
1Deargen, Inc., Seoul, South Korea,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bonggun Shin
1Deargen, Inc., Seoul, South Korea,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bo Ram Beck
1Deargen, Inc., Seoul, South Korea,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1557-3265.ADVPRECMED20-35 Published June 2020
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading
Abstracts: AACR Special Conference on Advancing Precision Medicine Drug Development: Incorporation of Real-World Data and Other Novel Strategies; January 9-12, 2020; San Diego, CA

Abstract

Despite the potential of anticancer drugs in the early stages of drug development, many clinical trials have failed at phase III because of low efficacy and/or high toxicity profiles. To improve such issues, effective lead optimization based on machine learning (ML) is needed. Many ML-based lead optimization models have been proposed, but they are capable of optimizing only a single property of a drug; therefore, multiple models are required and would likely be significantly different from the original drug as processed by multiple models. Our contributions are as follows: 1) We devised a new deep learning architecture based on a long short-term memory on a convolutional neural network for predicting binding affinity score (AS) and absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET) prediction. 2) We adapted the Molecule Deep Q-Networks (MoleDQN) to our new reward combinations so that a single model can consider multiple properties such as quantitative estimate of drug-likeness (QED), AS, synthetic accessibility scores (SAS), and toxicity scores. 3) Binding affinity estimator and ADMET estimator are used to indicate drug efficacy and toxicities. Iniparib, brivanib, and rebimastat, which failed in phase III clinical trials, were used for this analysis, and the top two optimized candidates of each drug with an improved score were selected. Iniparib was developed as a PARP inhibitor, but QED and AS were not predicted as a potential drug in our model (QED, 0.51; SAS, 2.23; AS, 5.02). This may be related to the low efficacy reported in clinical trials. Thus, iniparib was optimized for improved QED and AS to increase efficacy. Optimized candidates OPT-INI-01 (QED, 0.85; SAS, 3.33; AS, 7.77) and OPT-INI-02 (QED, 0.83; SAS, 3.15; AS, 7.93) were qualified with QED higher than 0.8 and demonstrated AS higher than 7.0, which is equivalent to Kd < 100 nM. Brivanib (QED, 0.56; SAS, 3.42; AS, 6.13), which targets VEGFR2, failed in clinical studies with low efficacy and unexpected toxicity (heart toxicity score, hERG, 0.77). To improve the efficacy of brivanib, hERG scores were added to the optimization properties to produce less toxic molecules. BRIV-OPT-01 (QED, 0.61; SAS, 2.80; AS, 7.79, hERG, 0.45) and BRIV-OPT-02 (QED, 0.60; SAS, 3.01; AS, 7.86; hERG, 0.41) were optimized and showed less than 0.5 in hERG score with AS higher than 7.0. Rebimastat (QED, 0.26; SAS, 3.95; AS, 7.44) targeting MMPs did not show satisfactory clinical results due to skin hypersensitivity (skin toxicity score, STS, 0.74). Thus, optimization was performed with focus on the STS and AS. REB-OPT-01 (QED, 0.35; SAS, 4.48; AS, 8.44, STS, 0.49) and REB-OPT-02 (QED, 0.52; SAS, 4.33; AS, 7.80; STS, 0.53) showed less than 0.55 in STS and better overall results than that of rebimastat. In conclusion, this work may improve and accelerate drug development through ML methods that use differential weights for different properties such as efficacy and toxicity, and it may make it easily accessible and less expensive to test new drug candidates in the real world.

Citation Format: Sungsoo Park, Yoon Ho Ko, Bora Lee, Bonggun Shin, Bo Ram Beck. Molecular optimization of phase III trial failed anticancer drugs using target affinity and toxicity-centered multiple properties reinforcement learning [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advancing Precision Medicine Drug Development: Incorporation of Real-World Data and Other Novel Strategies; Jan 9-12, 2020; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2020;26(12_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 35.

  • ©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.
Previous
Back to top
Clinical Cancer Research: 26 (12 Supplement 1)
June 2020
Volume 26, Issue 12 Supplement 1
  • Table of Contents

Sign up for alerts

Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Clinical Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Abstract 35: Molecular optimization of phase III trial failed anticancer drugs using target affinity and toxicity-centered multiple properties reinforcement learning
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Clinical Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Abstract 35: Molecular optimization of phase III trial failed anticancer drugs using target affinity and toxicity-centered multiple properties reinforcement learning
Sungsoo Park, Yoon Ho Ko, Bora Lee, Bonggun Shin and Bo Ram Beck
Clin Cancer Res June 15 2020 (26) (12 Supplement 1) 35; DOI: 10.1158/1557-3265.ADVPRECMED20-35

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Abstract 35: Molecular optimization of phase III trial failed anticancer drugs using target affinity and toxicity-centered multiple properties reinforcement learning
Sungsoo Park, Yoon Ho Ko, Bora Lee, Bonggun Shin and Bo Ram Beck
Clin Cancer Res June 15 2020 (26) (12 Supplement 1) 35; DOI: 10.1158/1557-3265.ADVPRECMED20-35
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Poster Presentations - Proffered Abstracts

  • Abstract PO-036: Safety outcomes of resuming anticancer treatment in patients with lung cancer affected by COVID-19 illness
  • Abstract PO-010: Changes in lung cancer treatment as a result of the COVID19 pandemic: A prospective observational study
  • Abstract PO-070: What kills patients with severe Covid-19 might also kill patients with terminal cancer
Show more Poster Presentations - Proffered Abstracts

Proffered Abstracts

  • Abstract PO-036: Safety outcomes of resuming anticancer treatment in patients with lung cancer affected by COVID-19 illness
  • Abstract PO-010: Changes in lung cancer treatment as a result of the COVID19 pandemic: A prospective observational study
  • Abstract PO-070: What kills patients with severe Covid-19 might also kill patients with terminal cancer
Show more Proffered Abstracts
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • CCR Focus Archive
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Clinical Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Clinical Cancer Research
eISSN: 1557-3265
ISSN: 1078-0432

Advertisement