Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Experimental Therapeutics, Preclinical Pharmacology

Eradication of Human Medulloblastoma Tumor Xenografts with a Combination of O6-Benzyl-2′-deoxyguanosine and 1,3-Bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea

Demetrius M. Kokkinakis, Robert C. Moschel, Anthony E. Pegg and S. Clifford Schold
Demetrius M. Kokkinakis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert C. Moschel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anthony E. Pegg
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Clifford Schold
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI:  Published November 1999
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

O6-Benzyl-2′-deoxyguanosine (dBG), a water-soluble inhibitor of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT), potentiates the efficacy of 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU) against MGMT-positive, BCNU-resistant Daoy human medulloblastoma tumor xenografts in athymic mice (S. C. Schold et al., Cancer Res., 56: 2076–2081, 1996). Such potentiation was comparable to that observed for O6-benzylguanine, the prototype MGMT inhibitor that is currently undergoing clinical trials. In this study, we optimized the therapeutic effect of the dBG and BCNU combination against brain tumor xenografts without inducing substantial toxicity in the host by adjusting the doses of both compounds. dBG was escalated from 133 mg/m2 to 200 and 300 mg/m2, whereas corresponding doses of BCNU were reduced from 25 mg/m2 to 17 and 11 mg/m2, respectively. The growth delays of 30.2, 38.4, and 22.3 days, respectively, observed for the above regimens suggest that the optimal drug combination is not achieved with maximum doses of dBG. In fact, the highest doses of dBG (300 mg/m2) contributed to more frequent BCNU-related toxicities, despite the reduced BCNU dosage, and a reduction of the therapeutic effect. Toxicity was related to the depletion of MGMT activity in the gut of host mice and was manifested by edema, inflammation, and hemorrhage in the bowel wall by subsequent BCNU administration. With additional dosage adjustments, we found that tumor suppression of >90 days without toxicity was observed at 200 mg/m2 dBG and 23 mg/m2 BCNU. At these doses, tumors were eradicated (regressed to an undetectable size for >90 days) in 8 of 12 animals. Thus, dBG is the first of the MGMT inhibitors to show a curative effect in combination with BCNU against a human central nervous system tumor xenograft in athymic mice.

INTRODUCTION

Inhibitors of MGMT3 potentiate the cytotoxic effect of chloroethylating and methylating antitumor drugs that produce O6-substituted guanine adducts. Such potentiation has been shown against a variety of tumors both in culture (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7) and in animal models (8, 9, 10) using the prototype MGMT inhibitor BG, which is currently undergoing clinical trials (11) . BG is one of the most potent compounds in suppressing MGMT activity in vitro and has an ED50 of <0.2 μm(12) . However, BG is only marginally soluble in aqueous solvents and has a short half-life in rodents and humans (13 , 14) . Rapid oxidation to O6-benzyl-8-oxoguanine, an equally potent MGMT inhibitor, accounts for part of its metabolic clearance and also for its persistent inhibitory capacity in vivo (13) . Decomposition involving the loss of the benzyl group and inhibitory activity is believed to be a prevailing pathway in the metabolism of BG, accounting for as much as 60% of metabolic clearance in humans (14) . These observations have stimulated the development of additional inhibitors with ED50s comparable to that of BG but with greater solubilities in aqueous solvents to ensure rapid systemic distribution. Persistence of the parent compound or active metabolites to ensure prolonged suppression of MGMT, lack of toxicity due to the parent compound or its metabolites, and possibly expression of activity against mutant MGMT proteins that are resistant to BG (15, 16, 17) are also desirable features of a new generation of MGMT inactivators. In this context, we have tested several 9-substituted derivatives of BG, and we have obtained most promising results with dBG (18) . This compound, which has an ED50 of 2 μm in cell-free systems and 0.5 μm in HeLa cells (12) , was expected to be less effective than BG in suppressing the growth of tumor xenografts in athymic mice. However, dBG was as effective as BG in delaying the growth of medulloblastoma xenografts (Daoy) in mice when used at equimolar doses to BG (8) . Because the dBG dose can be escalated more easily than BG, at least in the mouse model, we tested various doses of dBG to optimize the potentiation of BCNU. In previous experiments, we have shown that dBG is relatively resistant to metabolism as compared with BG (19 , 20) . dBG persists in the circulation for about 4 h after administration to rodents and reduces the MGMT activity in xenografted tumors to about 1% of its base value for at least 16 h after its administration (18) . Conversion of dBG to BG and to O6-benzyl-8-oxoguanine may account for the enhanced and prolonged suppression of MGMT even after the clearance of the parent nucleoside from circulation (8 , 18) that is required to effectively cross-link DNA after treatment with bifunctional nitrosoureas (21 , 22) . In this study, we demonstrate that optimal doses of dBG and BCNU in combination can actually eradicate human CNS tumor xenografts in the athymic mouse model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chemicals.

dBG was synthesized and purified according to previously published methods (23 , 24) . 3H-labeled methylated DNA was prepared as described previously (20 , 25) with [3H-CH3]MNU (specific activity, 17.5 Ci/mmol).

Animals.

Four-week-old BALB/c nu/nu athymic mice were purchased from Simonson (Gilroy, CA). Mice were maintained under barrier conditions and given sterilized food (Harlan Teklad laboratory diet) and water.

Tumor Lines.

Daoy, a hyperdiploid human medulloblastoma line, grows s.c. in athymic mice, with a doubling time of 4.9 days. Tumors grow upon injection of shredded tumor fragments. When growing as a xenograft in athymic mice, its untreated MGMT level is 375 ± 25 fmol/mg protein.

Drug Treatment.

All treatments were administered i.p. at a volume of 20–25 ml/m2 (approximately 0.2 ml/mouse). dBG was dissolved in 40% PEG 400 and 60% PBS. The pH of the solvent was corrected to pH 7.0 with sodium bicarbonate before the addition of the drug. BCNU was administered in 5% ethanol in water. Drug doses were calculated in mg/m2 using the formula meters (m) = weight (g)2/3 × K × 10−4, where K is 10.5 for mice (26) . In animals of 20 ± 2 g used in this study, the area surface is approximately 2.6 times the weight of the animal.

Treatment of s.c. Tumors.

Fifty μl of Daoy tumor were implanted in the left flank of 5-week-old athymic mice weighing between 18 and 22 g. Visible tumors appeared in most of the animals within 3 weeks after implantation. The tumors were subsequently measured in two perpendicular dimensions, and their volumes were estimated using the formula (α2 + β)/2, where α is the shorter of the two dimensions, and β is the longer of the two dimensions. Treatment was administered to animals with tumors ranging between 200 and 300 mm3. Tumors were measured every other day until their volumes exceeded five times the volume of the tumor at treatment. The data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, comparing the time from treatment to five times treatment volume in individual animals in each of the groups. Growth delay was the difference between the median time to five times treatment volume in the treatment group minus the median time to five times treatment volume in the control group. The number of tumor regressions (the number of tumors with a volume less than that on the treatment day) occurring in each group was also determined. Groups were compared using the two-tailed Fisher’s exact test. Two control groups received 40% PEG and 60% PBS followed by 5% ethanol/water for 1 h or 40% PEG and 60% PBS and BCNU in 5% ethanol. Between 10 and 12 animals were used in each experimental group. All treatments were repeated, but the results of duplicate treatments are not reported unless significant differences in the tumor delay or the number of animal deaths were observed.

Determination of Acute Toxicity.

The effect of BCNU on the intestinal epithelium was determined in athymic mice bearing Daoy tumor xenografts 48 h after receiving each of the following treatments: (a) PEG/ethanol, (b) dBG (133 mg/m2)/ethanol; (c) dBG (133 mg/m2)/BCNU (17 or 25 mg/m2); (d) dBG (200 mg/m2)/BCNU(17 or 23 mg/m2); and (e) dBG (300 mg/m2)/BCNU (11 or 23 mg/m2) . Forty-eight h after the treatment, animals were killed, and their jejunums were removed, cut longitudinally, and fixed in formalin. Sections were stained with H&E and Oncor ApoTag (Oncor, Gaithersburg, MD) for apoptosis and examined microscopically. Degrees of toxicity were determined by scoring for inflammation, apoptotic bodies, mitosis, and hemorrhage.

Tissue MGMT Assay.

MGMT was determined in tumors and intestinal epithelium 2 h after the administration of various doses of dBG. Animals bearing Daoy xenografts were injected i.p. with various doses of dBG in 40%PEG and 60% PBS. Animals were sacrificed after 2 h, and tumors and the intestinal epithelium were removed. Tumors were also removed from animals 24 h after treatment with dBG at 133, 200, and 300 mg/m2. Three animals were used for each of the doses selected. Tissue preparation for MGMT determinations and the MGMT assay were performed as described previously (25) .

RESULTS

Treatment Efficacy of s.c. Injections and Effect of dBG Dose.

The median time from treatment to five times the tumor volume at treatment for the Daoy medulloblastoma was 9 days when tumor-bearing animals were injected with the vehicle (40% PEG and 60% PBS and 5% ethanol) and 8.8 days when animals were treated with the same vehicle plus BCNU (23 mg/m2). On the other hand, when animals with Daoy tumors were treated with various combinations of dBG and BCNU, the median time to five times the tumor volume at treatment was markedly greater (Table 1)<$REFLINK> , and growth delay (as compared to treatment with BCNU only) was highly dependent on the dBG and BCNU doses. A dose of 133 mg/m2 dBG in combination with 25 mg/m2 BCNU resulted in a tumor growth delay of 30.2 days, with one death and an average weight loss of 5.3%. A dose of 200 mg/m2 dBG in combination with doses of BCNU at 17 and 23 mg/m2 resulted in tumor growth delays of 38.4 days and more than 81 days, respectively (Fig. 1)<$REFLINK> , with no deaths and only a modest average weight loss of 4.2% and 9.0%, respectively. A 300 mg/m2 dose of dBG in combination with BCNU (17 mg/m2) produced a growth delay of only 14.4 days, with treatment-related mortality of 4 out of 12 animals and an average weight loss of 12.9%. Reduction of the BCNU dose to 11 mg/m2 produced similar results. The combination of dBG (200 mg/m2) and BCNU (17 mg/m2) was curative for 3 of 11 animals with no measurable tumor for more than 90 days after treatment. Eight of 12 animals were tumor-free survivors for at least 90 days after treatment when the BCNU dose was escalated to 23 mg/m2 in combination with 200 mg/m2 dBG . There were no 90-day survivors after treatment with any of the other dosage combinations.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Treatment of s.c. Daoy xenografts in athymic mice with dBG (200 mg/m2) plus BCNU. The treatments were administered i.p. when tumors had reached volumes of 250 ± 70 mm2 (day 9 after they were detected). ▪, dBG (200 mg/m2) + BCNU (17 mg/m2); ⋄, dBG (200 mg/m2) + BCNU (23 mg/m2); •, dBG vehicle + BCNU (23 mg/m2); ▿), vehicles for dBG and BCNU alone. dBG or its vehicle was administered 1 h before dosing with BCNU or its vehicle.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Treatments of s.c. Daoy xenografts in athymic mice with dBG/BCNU: effect of dose

Effect of dBG Dose on MGMT Levels in Tumor and Normal Tissue and Associated BCNU-related Toxicity.

Inhibition of MGMT activity in Daoy tumors implanted in athymic mice to levels as low as 8% of the base value was accomplished within 2 h after administration of 100 mg/m2 dBG (Fig. 2)<$REFLINK> . Doses higher than 150 mg/m2 dBG reduced the activity to less than 10 fmol/mg protein, a state that is considered comparable to the mer-negative phenotype (nonexpressive ). MGMT activity remained suppressed for at least 16 h after dBG administration. At doses of 134, 200, and 300 mg/m2 dBG, the levels of MGMT in the tumor were 3.5 ± 2%, 1.6 ± 1%, and less than 1% of the baseline level at 16 h after treatment. However, at 24 h, the MGMT levels were elevated to 20 ± 3%, 15 ± 2%, and 14 ± 4% of the baseline, respectively. The MGMT activity of the intestinal epithelium of the host was more difficult to suppress by dBG and remained nearly unaffected at doses less than 100 mg/m2. Suppression of MGMT activity in the intestinal epithelium was observed at dBG doses greater than 150 mg/m2, but residual activity (12–18 fmol/mg protein) was still detectable at 300 mg/m2. Acute toxicity of BCNU administered 1 h after dBG was usually manifested as early as 24 h by weight loss. Pathological changes such as inflammation and expansion of lumina propria of the villi were seen in the intestinal epithelium of animals treated with the highest dose of dBG (300 mg/m2) and a dose of BCNU as low as 11 mg/m2. No significant toxicity or animal acute deaths were observed at dBG doses of ≤200 mg/m2, despite the escalation of BCNU from 17 to 23 mg/m2 (Table 2)<$REFLINK> . Hemorrhage and severe villi disorganization were evident only in animals treated with 300 mg/m2 dBG and 23 mg/m2 BCNU 48 h after treatment. No other gross lesions were identified in moribund animals after treatments with toxic combinations of dBG and BCNU.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Suppression of MGMT in mouse intestinal epithelium (a) and human medulloblastoma xenografts (Daoy) implanted s.c. in athymic mice (b) 2 h after s.c. administration of various doses of dBG . MGMT activities are shown individually for three animals at each dose.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

Acutea toxicity of dBG/BCNU treatment on the intestinal epithelium of athymic mice bearing Daoy xenografts

DISCUSSION

Nitrosoureas were originally chosen for the treatment of CNS tumors because of their physicochemical properties, which allow them to readily penetrate the blood-brain barrier (27) . Although chemotherapy with chloroethylating agents (such as BCNU) and, most recently, with methylating agents (such as procarbazine or temozolomide) can be effective in individual cases, it has been difficult to demonstrate a consistent and significant benefit from chemotherapy in patients with primary CNS tumors with these drugs (28, 29, 30) .

Failure of nitrosoureas against CNS tumors results from tumor cell resistance to DNA damage impacted by these drugs (31) . Chloroethylnitrosoureas lead to DNA interstrand cross-links by an initial rapid reaction with the O6 position of guanine, followed by a rearrangement and a subsequent slow reaction with cytosine on the complementary strand (32 , 33) . Repair of the initial O6-chloroethylguanine adduct by MGMT prevents cross-link formation (34 , 35) . Thus, MGMT expression has been shown to be important in the resistance of human CNS tumors to nitrosoureas. In a retrospective study of patients with anaplastic gliomas who had been treated on various protocols with radiation therapy and BCNU, Belanisch et al. (36) found that patients whose tumors were “low” in MGMT activity (by immunohistochemistry) had a significantly better outcome than patients with “high” MGMT activity. This relationship remained statistically significant when other known prognostic factors were considered. Jaeckle et al. (37) has recently analyzed the largest subset of patients from the Belanisch series (the Southwest Oncology Group patients), all of whom were treated on the same protocol. The statistical relationship between MGMT expression and outcome was even stronger in this subset, despite the fact that the total number of patients was smaller.

Tumor resistance due to MGMT expression can be overcome with agents that inactivate the MGMT protein and reduce the efficiency of repair of O6-chloroethylguanine adducts. The first compound to be tested in vivo as both an inactivator of MGMT and a potentiator of BCNU was BG. This compound is capable of rapidly inactivating high levels of MGMT for prolonged time periods at relatively low concentrations (7) . When BG is administered to animals bearing a MGMT-positive, BCNU-resistant human tumor, MGMT activity in the tumor is inhibited for several hours, and during that time, the tumor becomes highly sensitive to BCNU (8 , 9) . BG is not toxic as a single agent, and Phase I trials have indicated that 100–200 mg/m2 BG results in nearly complete elimination of MGMT activity in brain tumors as early as 4 h after administration.4 In glioblastomas, such activity remains low for at least 18 h after administration ,(11) .

We have previously shown that dBG, a 9-substituted derivative of BG, can be as effective as BG in potentiating BCNU against human CNS tumor xenografts in athymic mice (8) , despite the difference in the ED50s of the two compounds, which favors BG as a more effective inhibitor of MGMT and predicts that BG might be more effective than dBG in potentiating the antitumor activity of BCNU or other alkylating chemotherapeutic drugs. The reason for the discrepancy between the in vitro and in vivo results is not fully understood. Examination of the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of dBG in rodents has shown that the unexpectedly robust capacity of dBG to potentiate BCNU against tumors is most likely due to its rapid systemic distribution to tissues and its metabolic conversion to compounds that are more active as MGMT inhibitors than dBG itself. In rats, dBG is converted to BG, which is found in the circulation and in several tissues examined at concentrations peaking between 2 and 6 h after dBG administration (20) . Because MGMT levels are nearly depleted in both liver and tumor 1 h after the administration of dBG, it is speculated that dBG itself reacts with the MGMT, causing its initial decline. A subsequent decline in activity and prolonged suppression to about 1% of the baseline activity for at least 16 h after dBG treatment probably results from the generation of BG and its metabolite O6-benzyl-8-oxoguanine (13 , 19) . Such potent and extensive suppression is thought to lead to maximum effectiveness of cross-linking after BCNU treatment (21 , 22) . Thus, dBG in effect acts a pro-drug for the more active MGMT inhibitors BG and O6-benzyl-8′-oxoguanine, and the greater solubility and tissue distribution of dBG enhance its therapeutic effect in combination with BCNU.

In this study, we have demonstrated that dBG in combination with BCNU not only delays the growth of s.c. MGMT-positive tumors but can also cause their eradication in a large percentage of animals receiving treatment at optimal doses. A dose of 200 mg/m2 dBG appears to reduce MGMT activity in the tumor to a degree and duration that allow maximum efficacy of BCNU without excessive toxicity. An equivalent therapeutic effect has not been found with BG and BCNU at any of the doses tested thus far in animals (8 , 9) . One of the recognized problems with MGMT inhibitors, including dBG, is the potentiation of BCNU toxicity in the host. BCNU is tolerated well as a single agent in athymic mice at doses as high as 75 mg/m2. However, coadministration of BG at a dose of 240 mg/m2 results in 100% morbidity at doses of BCNU above 50 mg/m2 (9) . A dose of 300 mg/m2 dBG in combination with 11–17 mg/m2 BCNU results in the death of 33% of the animals. The toxicities of dBG plus BCNU are attributed to the depletion of normal tissue MGMT activity. Thus, optimal dosage combinations of dBG and BCNU are capable of producing a profound therapeutic effect without mortality. We believe this can be explained by postulating that a dBG dose can be found that maximizes the sensitivity of the tumor to BCNU but allows normal tissue to retain some MGMT activity and resistance to BCNU effects. Thus, the important observation is that the optimal dose of this class of agents is not necessarily the highest possible dose and that adjustments of the doses of both the MGMT inhibitor and the alkylating drug can have profound effects on both efficacy and toxicity. Both the toxicity and tumor suppression data presented here also demonstrate that although the ED50 dose is a good prognostic factor for predicting the effectiveness of MGMT inactivators in potentiating BCNU against tumors, it is only a rough guide for predicting the outcome of in vivo experiments. Metabolism and clearance of the inhibitor are of paramount importance in determining the outcome of animal and human trials. Additional effort must be devoted to understanding the metabolism of other MGMT inhibitors and preparing additional drugs that are resistant to rapid metabolic degradation and are more specific for MGMT inactivation in tumors than in normal tissues.

Footnotes

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

  • ↵1 Supported by National Cancer Institute Grants CA 57725 and CA78561 and the National Cancer Institute, Department of Health and Human Services, under contract with ABL.

  • ↵2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75235-8855. Phone: (214) 648-6314; Fax: (214) 648-2265.

  • ↵3 The abbreviations used are: MGMT, O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase; dBG, O6-benzyl-2′-deoxyguanosine; BG, O6-benzylguanine; BCNU, 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea; CNS, central nervous system; PEG, polyethylene glycol.

  • ↵4 Unpublished observations.

    • Accepted August 16, 1999.
    • Received May 6, 1999.
    • Revision received August 12, 1999.

References

  1. ↵
    Brent T. P., Houghton P. J., Houghton J. A. O6-Alkylguanine DNA alkyltransferase activity correlates with the therapeutic response of human rhabdomyosarcoma xenografts to 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-3-(trans-4-metylcyclohexyl)-1-nitrosourea. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 82: 2985-2989, 1985.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Dolan M. E., Mitchell R. B., Mummert C., Moschel R. C., Pegg A. E. Effect of O6-benzylguanine analogues on sensitivity of human tumor cells to the cytotoxic effects of alkylating agents. Cancer Res., 51: 3367-3372, 1991.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Chen J., Zhang Y., Sui J., Chen Y. O6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase activity and sensitivity of human tumor cell lines to bis-chloroethyl nitrosourea. Chin. Med. Sci. J., 8: 187-190, 1992.
  4. ↵
    Chen J. M., Zhang Y. P., Moschel R. C., Ikenaga M. Depletion of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase and potentiation of 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea antitumor activity by O6-benzylguanine in vitro. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 14: 1057-1060, 1993.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Pegg A. E., Swenn K., Chae M. Y., Dolan M. E., Moschel R. C. Increased killing of prostate, breast, colon, and lung tumor cells by the combination of inactivators of O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase and N,N′-bis(2-chloroethyl)-N-nitrosourea. Biochem. Pharmacol., 50: 1141-1148, 1995.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Magull-Seltenreich A., Zeller W. J. Sensitization of human colon tumor cell lines to carmustine by depletion of O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol., 121: 225-229, 1995.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Kokkinakis D. M., Ahmed M., Delgado R., Fruitwala M., Mohiuddin M., Albores-Saavedra J. Role of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase in the resistance of pancreatic tumors to DNA alkylating agents. Cancer Res., 57: 5360-5368, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Schold S. C., Kokkinakis D. M., Rudy J., Moschel R. C., Pegg A. E. Treatment of human brain xenografts with O6-benzyl-2′-deoxyguanosine and BCNU. Cancer Res., 56: 2076-2081, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Friedman H., Dolan E. M., Moschel R. C., Pegg A. E., Felker G. M., Rich J., Bigner D. D., Schold S. C. Enhancement of nitrosourea activity in medulloblastoma and glioblastoma multiforme. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 84: 1926-1931, 1992.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Kurpad S. N., Dolan M. E., McLendon R. E., Archer G. E., Moschel R. C., Pegg A. E., Bigner D. D., Friedman H. S. Intra-arterial O6-benzylguanine enables the specific therapy of nitrosourea resistant human glioma xenografts in athymic rats with N,N′-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol., 39: 307-316, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Friedman H. S., Kokkinakis D. M., Pluda J., Friedman A. H., Cokgor I., Haglund M. M., Ashley D. M., Rich J., Dolan M. E., Pegg A. E., Moschel R. C., McLendon R. E., Kerby T., Herndon J. E., Bigner D. D., Schold S. C. Phase I trial of O6-benzylguanine for patients undergoing surgery for malignant gliomas. J. Clin. Oncol., 16: 3570-3575, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  12. ↵
    Moschel R. C., McDougall M. G., Dolan M. E., Stine L., Pegg A. E. Structural features of substituted purine derivatives compatible with depletion of human O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase. J. Med. Chem., 35: 4486-4491, 1995.
  13. ↵
    Roy S. K., Gupta E., Dolan M. E. Pharmacokinetics of O6-benzylguanine in rats and its metabolism by rat. Drug Metab. Dispos., 23: 1394-1399, 1995.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  14. ↵
    Dolan M. E., Roy S. K., Fasanmade A. A., Paras P. R., Schilsky R. L., Ratain M. J. O6-Benzylguanine in humans: metabolic, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic findings. Clin. Oncol., 16: 1803-1810, 1998.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    Edara S., Kanugula S., Coodtzova K., Pegg A. E. Resistance of the human O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase containing the arginine codon 160 to inactivation by O6-benzylguanine. Cancer Res., 56: 5571-5575, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Imai Y., Oda H., Nakatsuru Y., Ishikawa T. A polymorphism at codon 160 of human O6-methylguanine-DMA methyltransferase gene in young patients with adult type cancers and functional assay. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 16: 2441-2445, 1995.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Wu M. H., Lohrbach K. E., Olopade O. I., Kokkinakis D. M., Friedman H. S., Dolan M. E. Lack of evidence for a polymorphism at codon 160 of human O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase gene in normal tissue and cancer. J. Clin. Oncol., 5: 209-213, 1999.
  18. ↵
    Kokkinakis D. M., Mochel R. C., Pegg A. C., and Schold S. C. Potentiation of BCNU anti-tumor efficacy by 9 substituted O6-benzylguanines: effects of metabolism. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol., in press, 1999.
  19. ↵
    Kokkinakis D. M., Moschel R. C., Pegg A. E., Dolan M. E., Schold S. C. Metabolism and disposition of O6-benzyldeoxyguanosine in Sprague Dawley rats. Chem. Res. Toxicol., 7: 762-769, 1994.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Kokkinakis D. M., Moschel R. C., Vuong T. H., Reddy M. V., Schold S. C., Pegg A. E. Mechanism of depletion of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase activity in rat tissues by O6-benzyl-2′-deoxyguanosine role of metabolism. In Vivo., 10: 297-306, 1996.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. ↵
    Marathi U. K., Dolan M. E., Erickson L. C. Extended depletion of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase activity following O6-benzyl-2′-deoxyguanosine or O6-benzylguanine combined with streptozotocin treatment enhances 1,3-bis-2-chloroethyl-1-nitrosourea cytotoxicity. Biochem. Pharmacol., 48: 2127-2134, 1999.
  22. ↵
    Marathi U. K., Dolan M. E., Erickson L. E. Anti-neoplastic activity of sequenced administration of O6-benzylquanine, streptozotocin, and 1,3-bis(2-chlorethyl)-1-nitrosourea in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Res., 54: 4371-4375, 1994.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    Robins M. J., Khwaja T. A., Robins R. K. Purine nucleosides. XXIX. The synthesis of 2′-deoxy-l-adenosine and 2′-deoxy-l-guanosine and their α-anomers. J. Org. Chem., 35: 636-639, 1970.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Pauly G. T., Powers M., Pei G. K., Moschel R. C. Synthesis and properties of H-ras DNA sequences containing O6-substituted-2′-deoxyguanosine residues at first, second, or both positions of codon 12. Chem. Res. Toxicol., 1: 391-397, 1988.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Kokkinakis D. M., vonWronski M. A., Vuong T. H., Brent T. P., Schold S. C., Jr. Down-regulation of O6- methylguanine-DNA alkytransferase and sensitization of human tumor cell lines to nitrosoureas by methionine deprivation. Br. J. Cancer, 75: 779-788, 1997.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. ↵
    Hawk C. T., Leary S. L. Formulatory for Laboratory Animals78 Iowa State University Press Ames, IA 1995.
  27. ↵
    Schabel F. M., Johnston T. P., McCaleb G. S., Montgomery J. A., Laster W. R., Skipper H. E. Experimental evaluation of potential of anticancer agents. VIII. Effects of certain nitrosoureas on intracerebral L1210 leukemia. Cancer (Phila.), 23: 725-733, 1963.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. ↵
    Devita V. T. Principles in chemotherapy DeVita V. T., Jr. Hellman S. Rosenberg S. A. eds. . Cancer: Principles and Practices of Oncology, : 276-300, Lippincott Philadelphia 1989.
  29. ↵
    Levin V. A., Prados M. R., Wara W. M., Davis R. L., Gutin P. H., Phillips T. L., Lamborn K., Wilson C. B. Radiation therapy with bromodeoxyuridine followed by CCNU, procarbazine and vincristine chemotherapy for the treatment of anaplastic gliomas. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 32: 75-83, 1995.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    Fine H. A. The basis for current treatment recommendations for malignant gliomas. J. Neuro-Oncol., 20: 111-120, 1994.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    Wiestler O., Kleihues P., Pegg A. E. O6- Alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase activity in human brain and brain tumors. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 5: 121-124, 1977.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    Kohn K. W. Interstrand cross-linking of DNA by 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea and other 1-(2-haloethyl)-1-nitrosoureas. Cancer Res., 37: 1450-1454, 1977.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    Tong W. P., Kirk M. C., Ludlum D. B. Mechanism of action of nitrosoureas. V. Formation of O6-(2-fluoroethyl)guanine and its probable role in the crosslinking of deoxyribonucleic acids. Biochem. Pharmacol., 32: 2011-2015, 1983.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    Robins P., Harris A. L., Goldsmith I., Lindahl T. Cross linking of DNA induced by chloroethylnitrosourea is prevented by O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase. Nucleic Acid Res., 11: 7743-7758, 1983.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    Brent T. P. Suppression of cross-link formation in chloroethylnitrosourea treated DNA by an activity in extracts of human leukemic lymphoblasts. Cancer Res., 44: 1887-1892, 1984.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    Belanisch M., Pastor M., Randall T., Guerra D., Kibitel J., Alas L., Li B., Citron M., Wasserman P., White A., Eyre H., Jaeckle K., Schulman S., Rector P., Prados M., Coons S., Shapiro W., Yarosh D. Retrospective study of the correlation between DNA repair protein alkyltransferase and survival of brain tumor patients treated with carmustine. Cancer Res., 56: 783-788, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    Jaeckle K. A., Eyre H. J., Townsend J. J., Schulman S., Knudson H. M., Belanich M., Yarosh D. B., Bearman S. I., Giroux D. J., Schold S. C. Correlation of tumor O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase levels with survival of malignant astrocytoma patients treated with bis-chloroethylnitrosourea: a Southwest Oncology Group study. J. Clin. Oncol., 16: 3310-3315, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
November 1999
Volume 5, Issue 11
  • Table of Contents

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Clinical Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Eradication of Human Medulloblastoma Tumor Xenografts with a Combination of O6-Benzyl-2′-deoxyguanosine and 1,3-Bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Clinical Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Eradication of Human Medulloblastoma Tumor Xenografts with a Combination of O6-Benzyl-2′-deoxyguanosine and 1,3-Bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea
Demetrius M. Kokkinakis, Robert C. Moschel, Anthony E. Pegg and S. Clifford Schold
Clin Cancer Res November 1 1999 (5) (11) 3676-3681;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Eradication of Human Medulloblastoma Tumor Xenografts with a Combination of O6-Benzyl-2′-deoxyguanosine and 1,3-Bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea
Demetrius M. Kokkinakis, Robert C. Moschel, Anthony E. Pegg and S. Clifford Schold
Clin Cancer Res November 1 1999 (5) (11) 3676-3681;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Ring Finger Protein 43 as a New Target for Cancer Immunotherapy
  • Antifolate Resistance in a HeLa Cell Line Associated With Impaired Transport Independent of the Reduced Folate Carrier
  • ZD6474, a Potent Inhibitor of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Signaling, Combined With Radiotherapy
Show more Experimental Therapeutics, Preclinical Pharmacology
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • CCR Focus Archive
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Clinical Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Clinical Cancer Research
eISSN: 1557-3265
ISSN: 1078-0432

Advertisement