Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Regular Articles

Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction Detection of Prostate-specific Antigen, Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen, and Prostate Stem Cell Antigen in One Milliliter of Peripheral Blood

Value for the Staging of Prostate Cancer

Noboru Hara, Takashi Kasahara, Takashi Kawasaki, Vladimir Bilim, Kenji Obara, Kota Takahashi and Yoshihiko Tomita
Noboru Hara
Division of Molecular Oncology, Department of Signal Transduction Research and Division of Urology, Department of Regenerative and Transplant Medicine, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata 951, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Takashi Kasahara
Division of Molecular Oncology, Department of Signal Transduction Research and Division of Urology, Department of Regenerative and Transplant Medicine, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata 951, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Takashi Kawasaki
Division of Molecular Oncology, Department of Signal Transduction Research and Division of Urology, Department of Regenerative and Transplant Medicine, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata 951, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vladimir Bilim
Division of Molecular Oncology, Department of Signal Transduction Research and Division of Urology, Department of Regenerative and Transplant Medicine, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata 951, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kenji Obara
Division of Molecular Oncology, Department of Signal Transduction Research and Division of Urology, Department of Regenerative and Transplant Medicine, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata 951, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kota Takahashi
Division of Molecular Oncology, Department of Signal Transduction Research and Division of Urology, Department of Regenerative and Transplant Medicine, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata 951, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yoshihiko Tomita
Division of Molecular Oncology, Department of Signal Transduction Research and Division of Urology, Department of Regenerative and Transplant Medicine, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata 951, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI:  Published June 2002
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Purpose: There have been several studies on the presence of circulating tumor cells in the peripheral blood of patients with malignant tumors including prostate cancer (PCa) using reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR). One of the aims of these studies was to obtain high sensitivity that would enable early-stage diagnosis. However, they varied in their detection rates, and the methods were rather complicated. We have improved the RT-PCR assay combining three prostate-associated molecules, prostate specific antigen (PSA), prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA), and prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA) to reveal patients with poor prognosis.

Experimental Design: Peripheral blood samples were obtained from 129 patients including 58 cases of PCa and 71 cases of nonmalignant disorders. Total RNA was extracted from 1 ml of whole blood using a commercially available kit.

Results: The sensitivity of PSA-, PSMA-, and PSCA-nested RT-PCR was verified with positive signals of a single LNCaP cell in 1 ml of female blood sample. PSA-, PSMA-, and PSCA-mRNA were detected in 7 (12.1%), 12 (20.7%), and 8 (13.8%) PCa, and in 1, 2, and 0 samples in nonmalignant disorders, respectively. Among 58 PCa patients, each PCR indicated the prognostic value in the hierarchy of PSCA>PSA>PSMA RT-PCR, and extraprostatic cases with positive PSCA PCR indicated lower disease-progression-free survival than those with negative PSCA PCR.

Conclusions: The present findings suggest that PSCA PCR would be most promising for the molecular staging of PCa. The present RT-PCR is a highly cost-effective and rapid procedure, enabling the molecular staging of PCa with RT-PCR as a diagnostic routine.

INTRODUCTION

PCa2 is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in men in the United States (1) and is a common cancer increasing in Japan (2) . Current staging modalities in predicting locally-advanced and metastatic PCa include sPSA level, TRUS, and computed tomography scan (3) and these corresponded to prognosis to some extent. However, the frequency of detection of distant metastasis by routine clinical analysis is not concordant with the frequency of disease recurrence after definitive local therapy (4) . Thus, new strategies are required for accurate staging of PCa to adapt appropriate treatment.

RT-PCR is a sensitive and useful method for detecting the presence of a specific cell type such as those cells that bear tumor-specific mRNA. There have been several studies on the presence of PSA-mRNA-bearing cells, most likely PCa cells, in the peripheral blood in patients without evidence of metastasis, and the higher frequency of PSA-mRNA-bearing cells in the peripheral blood was correlated with the extent of the disease (5) . However, detection rates in previous studies in PCa patients varied from 0 to 88% (5, 6, 7, 8, 9) , and the appropriate procedure still remains undetermined. Because one of the aims of these studies was to obtain high sensitivity enabling early-stage diagnosis, these RT-PCR methods demanded 5–15 ml of blood and great effort on the part of investigators. We have improved the RT-PCR assay, especially in RNA extraction from peripheral blood, and applied the method of combined nested RT-PCR for three prostate-associated molecules, PSA, PSMA, and PSCA, to detect circulating prostate cells with PCa and other nonmalignant disorders. PSA, which belongs to the tissue kallikrein family, is primarily produced by the prostatic epithelium (10) . PSMA is a recently cloned Mr 100,000 integral transmembrane glycoprotein (11) , for which a role as a potential prostatic marker protein has been suggested (12) and which has been reported as expressed by the neovascular endothelial cells of renal cell cancer (13) . PSCA is a 123-amino-acid glycoprotein, the mRNA of which was expressed predominantly in the basal cell epithelium of normal prostate and placenta and which is also detected in >80% of primary PCas (14 , 15) .

In the present study, we further examined the relationship between clinicopathological findings including prognosis and nested RT-PCR findings for these three molecules in PCa patients’ peripheral blood, demonstrating the potential role of nested RT-PCR, which enables the molecular staging in PCa as a diagnostic routine.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients and Their Clinicopathological Characteristics.

A total of 132 randomly selected patients complaining of dysuria, and/or with sPSA levels elevated more than 4.0 ng/ml, were enrolled for this study. Informed consent to perform the study was obtained from all of the patients. Systemic sextant prostate biopsy was performed using TRUS; 58 cases were histopathologically diagnosed as PCa and 71 cases as nonmalignant disorders including 69 BPH, 1 atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH) and 1 prostatitis case. Three cases of prostate intraepithelial neoplasm (PIN), considered to have malignant potential to some extent, were excluded from this study. Clinical staging of PCa cases was performed according to International Union Against Cancer (1997) guidelines (16) and was determined by TRUS, computed tomography scan, magnetic resonance image, isotoped bone scanning, and cystoscopy. Disease-specific survival and disease-progression-free survival were investigated in February, 2002, and the mean observation periods were 26.3 and 24.5 months, respectively. We defined disease progression if any of the following events took place: local enlargement of the tumor, appearance of new metastatic sites, or their enlargement. Also, we investigated prospectively the fraction of patients who had biochemical progressions (PSA failure) according to the definition by the American Society of Therapeutic Radiation Oncologists (ASTRO).

Blood Samples and Total RNA Extraction.

Peripheral blood samples were obtained before prostate biopsy. RNA extractions from the previous studies required relatively large amounts of whole blood (5–15 ml; Refs. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ) and, thus, were complicated. In the present study, we extracted total RNA from 1 ml of whole blood anticoagulated with EDTA using a SV total RNA isolation system (Promega, Madison, WI). This method is concise and reduces time consumption, obtaining high-quality RNA within 1 h (17 , 18) . Moreover, it does not require any special equipment or apparatus except for a centrifuge and costs only two dollars per sample.

RT-PCR.

Nested PCRs, using outer and inner primer sets for PSA, PSMA, and PSCA, were applied (Fig. 1)⇓ . We previously reported the sequences used for the external and nested PSA 20-mer primers were to identify circulating prostate tumor cells in blood (17) . The sequences for PSMA and PSCA primers were determined on Primer express for Macintosh software (Perkin-Elmer Japan Applied Biosystems, Tokyo, Japan) based on the sequences obtained from the GenBank, and the specificity of the resulting primers’ sequences was examined by a BLAST search (19) . The first-strand DNA was synthesized using a Single-strand cDNA synthesis kit (Boehringer Mannheim, Inc., Mannheim, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To control for RNA integrity and to determine the significance of a negative PCR assay, we performed an RT-PCR assay involving the product of the housekeeping gene β-actin. The resulting cDNA was amplified by PCR using a set of outer primers. One μg of the RNA-equivalent cDNA was mixed in a 50-μl reaction volume with 10× PCR buffer [1.5 mm MgCl2, 0.2 mm each standard dNTP (Boehringer Mannheim), 0.1 pm forward and reverse primers, and 0.4 units AmpliTaq Gold polymerase (Applied Biosystems, Foster, CA)]. Amplification was performed in a thermal cycler 9700 (Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, CT) for 40 cycles, each cycle consisting of denaturation at 95°C for 30 s; annealing at 57°C in PSA and PSMA, and 58°C in PSCA for 30 s; and extension at 72°C for 1 min, except for the last cycle for which the extension time was 10 min. Four μl of a 4:100 dilution of the resulting PCR product DNA was amplified in a nested PCR reaction for 40 cycles using a set of inner primers. The sensitivity of the PSA, PSMA, and PSCA RT-PCR assays was examined using total RNA isolated from diluted LNCaP human PCa cells in 1 ml of human female peripheral blood. The LNCaP cell suspension was diluted from 1000 to 1 cell/ml. In each sample, The presence of LNCaP cells was confirmed with all three PCR assays (Fig. 2)⇓ . The PCR products were electrophoresed in agarose gel electrophoresis and stained with ethidium bromide to confirm the products were derived from specific mRNA, and the nucleotide sequences of some PCR products were sequenced. Each sequence was verified in both the sense and antisense directions (data not shown).

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

A, external PSA forward primer in exon 3 at nucleotides 648–667 (5′-GATGACTCCAGCCACGACCT-3′). B, external PSA reverse primer in exon 5 at nucleotides 1357–1338 (5′-CACAGACACCCCATCCTATC-3′). C, nested PSA forward primer in exon 4 at nucleotides 860–879 (5′-GCAAGTTCACCCTGAGAAGG-3′). D, nested PSA reverse primer in exon 5 at nucleotides 1315–1296 (5′-GATATGTCTCCAGGCATGGC-3′). E, external PSMA forward primer in exon 3 at nucleotides 567–587 (5′-ATTTGGCCTGGATTCTGTTGA-3′). F, external PSMA reverse primer in exon 4 at nucleotides 947–967 (5′-CCGACCCTGCTGACTACTTTG-3′). G, nested PSMA forward primers in exon 3 at nucleotides 607–632 (5′-CTGTTGTCCTACCCAAATAAGACTCA-3′). H, nested PSMA reverse primer in exon 4 at nucleotides 864–887 (5′-AATTGCCAGATATGGGAAAGTTTT-3′). I, external PSCA forward primer in exon 1 at nucleotides 31–51 (5′-TGCTTGCCCTGTTCATGGCAG-3′). J, external PSCA reverse primer in exon 3 at nucleotides 350–371 (5′-TGCACTCGGCCTGCTGCTCTG-3′). K, nested PSCA forward primer in exon 3 at nucleotides 87–106 (5′-TACTCCTGCAAAGCCCAGGT-3′). L, nested PSCA reverse primer in exon 2 at nucleotides 217–237 (5′-GCTTGAACTGCGTGGATGACT-3′).

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Detection of PSA-mRNA by single (first panel, 710 bp) and nested (second panel, 455 bp) RT-PCR. Detection of PSMA-mRNA by single (third panel, 401 bp) and nested (fourth panel, 281 bp) RT-PCR. Detection of PSCA-mRNA by single (fifth panel, 340 bp) and nested (sixth panel, 170 bp) RT-PCR. β-actin (beta-actin), a control mRNA (seventh panel, 520 bp). Lane on far left, Molecular weight marker. The next five lanes, LNCaP human PCa cells [0, none (one of the negative controls); 100, 1 cell; 101, 10 cells; 102, 100 cells; 103, 1000 cells] mixed with 1 ml of human female peripheral blood and amplified by RT-PCR. NC., a second negative control, with a reaction containing peripheral blood mononuclear cells cDNA from a healthy young male; a negative control without cDNA was also prepared (data not shown). PC., a positive control.

Statistical Analysis.

Statistical comparisons were made using the Welch-corrected t test and χ2 tests in StatView 5.0 software (Abacus Concepts, Inc., Berkeley, CA) for a Macintosh computer and Prism, version 3.02 (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA) for Windows computer. Survival curves were generated using the method of Kaplan and Meier (20) , and differences between curves were evaluated using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

The clinicopathological diagnosis, clinical stages, and PSA RT-PCR findings from 129 patients are presented in Table 1⇓ . PSA-mRNA was detected in 7 (12.1%) PCa cases and 1 prostatitis case. PSMA-mRNA was detected in 12 (20.7%) PCa cases, 1 BPH case, and 1 prostatitis case. PSCA-mRNA was detected in 8 PCa (13.8%) cases. Six of 7 PSA PCR-positive PCa cases, and all of 8 PSCA PCR-positive PCa cases were also PSMA PCR-double positive, and 5 patients were found positive for all three marker PCRs.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Summary of clinicopathological diagnoses, stages of 129 cases and RT-PCR findings

Because the patients’ diagnoses were all made by biopsy, there were no stage I patients in the present study. Significant differences between the proportion of RT-PCR positivity among the cases with extraprostatic disease (stage III or stage IV) and organ-confined disease (stage II) were observed (PSA PCR and PSMA PCR, P < 0.01; PSCA PCR, P < 0.005; Table 1⇓ ). Nevertheless, no statistical differences were seen between the RT-PCR findings of nonmalignant disorders and those of organ-confined PCa. The Gleason score of the groups with positive PSA- or PSCA-RT-PCR findings was higher than that of negative ones, but PSMA-PCR findings were not correlated with the Gleason score (Fig. 3)⇓ . Among the three RT-PCRs, patients with positive RT-PCR findings had higher sPSA levels and more cancer-involved biopsy cores than those with negative findings (P < 0.001; data not shown).

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

A, the group with positive PSA PCR had a higher Gleason score (mean, 6.57) than that with negative RT-PCR (mean, 4.01). B, the group with positive PSCA PCR also had a higher Gleason score (mean, 5.71) than that with negative RT-PCR (mean, 4.14), but (C) PSMA PCR findings were not correlated with the Gleason score.

All of the 58 PCa patients were treated with combined androgen blockade after diagnostic procedures involving prostate biopsy. Six of these cases underwent radical prostatectomy after androgen blockade for 6 or 12 months, and two patients with local progression received radiation therapy. Three patients died of disease-specific causes within 10.2, 12.6, and 16.6 months. All of these patients had stage IV PCa and were found positive for all three of the marker PCRs. Disease progressions were observed in 3 (7.3%) of 41 patients with stage II, one (50%) of 2 with stage III, and 7 (46.7%) of 15 with stage IV PCa. The disease-progression-free survival rates of patients treated only hormonally were lower in groups with positive RT-PCR findings than in those with negative findings, and the differences were significant (Fig. 4, A–C)⇓ . One case with positive PSMA PCR and another case with both positive PSA PCR and positive PSMA PCR with stage II PCa, showed no disease progression. However, one of two stage III cases, with positive PSCA as well as PSMA PCR, had disease progression in 25.1 months, whereas another stage III case with negative PCRs had no evidence of disease for 26.9 months. In addition, stage IV patients with positive PSCA PCR resulted in lower disease-progression-free survival than those with negative PSCA PCR (Fig. 4D)⇓ . The probability of double or triple positive findings for each PCR did not appear to be more significant than for PSCA PCR as a single factor regarding disease-progression-free survival (data not shown).

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Disease-progression-free survival rate of all of the PCa cases. A, categorized according to PSA PCR; B, categorized according to PSMA PCR; C, categorized according to PSCA PCR. D, disease-progression-free survival of stage IV cases (T3 or T4, and/or N1, and/or M1) categorized according to PSCA PCR.

DISCUSSION

Recent studies showed that tumor cells, circulating in peripheral blood, were observed in several cancers including renal cell cancer and breast cancer, and the consequence in disease staging has been demonstrated (21 , 22) . New strategies for accurate staging of PCa have been tried including flow-cytometric detection of PSA-positive cells in peripheral blood (21) and RT-PCR, which is the most sensitive method and is applicable to the molecular staging of PCa (24, 25, 26, 27) . One of the aims of these studies was to obtain high sensitivity enabling early-stage diagnoses and the detection of micrometastases that were not identifiable with images. However, it is still controversial whether circulating tumor cells cause micrometastasis. RT-PCR is an extremely sensitive method to detect specific mRNA-bearing cells in the blood stream. It can detect a single specific mRNA-bearing cell among 107−108 cells (28) . Some studies reported that at least 104 circulating tumor cells are required for metastasis (29) . Moreover, only 0.01% of circulating cancer cells create a single metastasis (23 , 30 , 31) . The methods in the present study provide the appropriate sensitivity and are highly cost-effective and rapid, which enables the molecular staging of PCa with RT-PCR to be a diagnostic routine. Thus, with more accurate molecular biological techniques, staging before surgery may be achieved. However, the described RT-PCR assays, especially PSMA PCR, showed no differences between nonmalignant disorders and organ-confined PCa, although 12% of organ-confined PCa was reported to reach a biochemical failure within 10 years of treatment (32) .

In the present study, PSA-, PSMA-, and PSCA-mRNA-bearing cells circulating in peripheral blood were identified at higher rates in PCa patients with extraprostatic disease. These findings suggest that detection of circulating prostate cells would have diagnostic value for patients with PCa. However, several cases with extraprostatic disease including one patient, with clinical stage T4, N0, M0 and 1121 ng/ml sPSA, who showed negative RT-PCR (Table 1)⇓ . In addition, the current PCR assays furnished several false-positive cases. The only case with positive PSA PCR among nonmalignant cases was diagnosed as prostatitis by the prostate biopsy. Correspondingly, prostatitis was reported to induce hematogenous dissemination of prostate epithelial cells (33) . Although PSMA PCR showed the highest sensitivity in the present study, it picked up 2 (2.8%) false-positive cases of 71 nonmalignant disorders. The present PSMA PCR is supposed to amplify its splicing variant PSM′, which was identified by Grauer et al. (34 , 35) , and this PSM′ was presumably expressed in nonprostate tissues also. Thus, a correlation between prognosis and detection of cancer cells in blood are needed to clarify their clinical significance. Although the clinicopathological background and tumor biological behavior in patients in the present study varied, the RT-PCR-positive group demonstrated a tendency toward decreased disease- progression-free survival, which indicated that detection of circulating prostate cells might have a prognostic value. Interestingly, the above mentioned patient with clinical stage IV and 1121 ng/ml sPSA, who showed negative RT-PCR, has stayed alive without any evidence of disease or PSA failure for 26.9 months. Moreover, to our knowledge, the present study is the first to apply the PSCA PCR for detection of circulating prostate cells and to demonstrate that this can be used as a prognostic factor. Recent evidence showed that the expression levels of PSCA protein on the surface of PCa cells increased with tumor progression (36) . A longer observation period is required to draw a definite conclusion, and another modality to improve the information, such as quantitative RT-PCR, appears to be necessary for estimating the correlation between the number of circulating prostate cells and the presence of metastases or further disease progression.

It is concluded that nested RT-PCR targeting three different prostate-associated molecules, PSA, PSMA, and PSCA, could detect tumor cells in smaller volumes of peripheral blood with high specificity and appropriate sensitivity, enabling molecular staging of the tumor as a diagnostic routine. It is suggested that the detection of circulating prostate cells has prognostic value. In the present study, PSCA PCR demonstrated higher disease specificity and independent prognostic value, and PSMA PCR indicated higher sensitivity, although its specificity was lower and all of the PSCA PCR-positive cases were also PSMA PCR-double positive, which suggested that the PSCA PCR would be the most promising for molecular staging of PCa. A prospective study examining the clinical course is required to estimate the significance of detection of circulating prostate cells in the peripheral blood for metastasis and survival.

Footnotes

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

  • ↵1 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Division of Molecular Oncology, Department of Signal Transduction Research, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Science, Niigata University, Asahimachi 1, Niigata 951, Japan. Phone: 81-25-227-2287; Fax: 81-25-227-0784; E-mail: harasho{at}med.niigata-u.ac.jp

  • ↵2 The abbreviations used are: PCa, prostate cancer; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; sPSA, serum PSA; PSMA, prostate-specific membrane antigen; PSCA, prostate stem cell antigen; BPH, benign prostatic hyperplasia; RT-PCR, reverse transcription-PCR; TRUS, transrectal ultrasound.

  • Received November 19, 2001.
  • Revision received March 25, 2002.
  • Accepted March 25, 2002.

References

  1. ↵
    Greenlee R. T., Murray T., Thun M. Cancer statistics, 2001. CA Cancer J. Clin., 51: 15-36, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Yamamoto S. Cancer statistics digest. Comparison of crude and age-standardized death rates in Japan. Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., 29: 649 1999.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    Catalona W. J., Richie J. P., Ahmann F. R., Hudson M. A., Scardino P. T., Flanigan R. C., deKernion J. B., Ratliff T. L., Kavoussi L. R., Dalkin B. L. Comparison of digital rectal examination and serum prostate specific antigen in the early detection of prostate cancer: results of a multicenter clinical trial of 6,630 men. J. Urol., 151: 1283-1290, 1994.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    Crawford E. D., Bennett C. L., Stone N. N., Knight S. J., DeAntoni E., Sharp L., Garnick M. B., Porterfield H. A. Comparison of perspectives on prostate cancer: analyses of survey data. Urology, 50: 366-372, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    de la Taille A., Olsson C. A., Buttyan R., Benson M. C., Bagiella E., Cao Y., Burchardt M., Chopin D. K., Katz A. E. Blood-based reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assays for prostatic specific antigen: long term follow-up confirms the potential utility of this assay in identifying patients more likely to have biochemical recurrence (rising PSA) following radical prostatectomy. Int. J. Cancer, 84: 360-364, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Berteau P., Gala J. L., Eschwege P., Dumas F., Loric S. The value of a reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assay in preoperative staging and followup of patients with prostate cancer. J. Urol., 161: 924-926, 1999.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    Corey E., Corey M. J. Detection of disseminated prostate cells by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR): technical and clinical aspects. Int. J. Cancer, 77: 655-673, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Fadlon E. J., Hamdy F. C. The use of flow cytometry and RT-PCR in the detection of circulating PSA-positive cells in prostate cancer. Method Mol. Biol., 92: 215-225, 1998.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    Gomella L. G., Raj G. V., Moreno J. G. Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for prostate specific antigen in the management of prostate cancer. J. Urol., 158: 326-337, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Webber M. M., Bello D., Kleinman H. K., Wartinger D. D., Williams D. E., Rhim J. S. Prostate specific antigen and androgen receptor induction and characterization of an immortalized adult human prostatic epithelial cell line. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 17: 1641-1646, 1996.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Israeli R. S., Powell T., Fair W. R., Heston W. D. Molecular cloning of a complimentary DNA encoding a prostate-specific membrane antigen. Cancer Res, 53: 227-230, 1993.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Israeli R. S., Powell T., Corr J. G., Fair W. R., Heston W. D. Expression of the prostate-specific membrane antigen. Cancer Res., 54: 1807-1811, 1994.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Chang S. S., Reuter V. E., Heston W. D., Gaudin P. B. Metastatic renal cell carcinoma neovasculature expresses prostate- specific membrane antigen. Urology, 57: 801-805, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Antica M., Wu L., Scollay R. Stem cell antigen 2 expression in adult and developing mice. Immunol. Lett., 55: 47-51, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Reiter R. E., Sato I., Thomas G., Qian J., Gu Z., Watabe T., Loda M., Jenkins R. B. Coamplification of prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA) and MYC in locally advanced prostate cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer, 27: 95-103, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Khoury S., Cockett A., Aso Y., Chatelain C., Andersson L., Abrams P., Griffiths K., Denis L. International consultation on urological diseases: a decade of progress. Prostate, 45: 194-199, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Hara N., Kasahara T., Kawasaki T., Bilim V., Tomita Y., Obara K., Takahashi K. Frequency of PSA-mRNA bearing cells in the peripheral blood of patients after prostate biopsy. Br. J. Cancer, 85: 557-562, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Nuyts S., Van Mellaert L., Lambin P., Anne J. Efficient isolation of total RNA from Clostridium without DNA contamination. J. Microbiol. Methods, 44: 235-238, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Reiter R. E., Gu Z., Watabe T., Thomas G., Szigeti K., Davis E., Wahl M., Nisitani S., Yamashiro J., Le Beau M. M., Loda M., Witte O. N. Prostate stem cell antigen: a cell surface marker overexpressed in prostate cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95: 1735-1740, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Robinson C. V., Upton A. C. Competing-risk analysis of leukemia and nonleukemia mortality in irradiated, male RF mice. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. (Bethesda), 60: 995-1007, 1978.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. ↵
    de la Taille A., Katz A., Cao Y., McKiernan J., Buttyan R., Burchardt M., Burchardt T., Hayek O., Olsson C. A., Chopin D. K., Sawczuk I. S. Blood-based RT-PCR assays of MN/CA9 or PSMA: clinical application in renal cancer patients. Urology, 56: 393-398, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Sabbatini R., Federico M., Morselli M., Depenni R., Cagossi K., Luppi M., Torelli G., Silingardi V. Detection of circulating tumor cells by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction of maspin in patients with breast cancer undergoing conventional-dose chemotherapy. J. Clin. Oncol., 18: 1914-1920, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    Fadlon E. J., Rees R. C., McIntyre C., Sharrard R. M., Lawry J., Hamdy F. C. Detection of circulating prostate-specific antigen-positive cells in patients with prostate cancer by flow cytometry and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Br. J. Cancer, 74: 400-405, 1996.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. ↵
    Slawin K. M., Shariat S. F., Nguyen C., Leventis A. K., Song W., Kattan M. W., Young C. Y., Tindall D. J., Wheeler T. M. Detection of metastatic prostate cancer using a splice variant-specific reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay for human glandular kallikrein. Cancer Res., 60: 7142-7148, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Mejean A., Vona G., Nalpas B., Damotte D., Brousse N., Chretien Y., Dufour B., Lacour B., Brechot C., Paterlini-Brechot P. Detection of circulating prostate derived cells in patients with prostate adenocarcinoma is an independent risk factor for tumor recurrence. J. Urol., 163: 2022-2029, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Su S. L., Boynton A. L., Holmes E. H., Elgamal A. A., Murphy G. P. Detection of extraprostatic prostate cells utilizing reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Semin. Surg. Oncol., 18: 17-28, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    Okegawa T., Noda H., Kato M., Miyata A., Nutahara K., Higashihara E. Value of reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assay in pathological stage T3N0 prostate cancer. Prostate, 44: 210-218, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    Raj G. V., Moreno J. G., Gomella L. G. Utilization of polymerase chain reaction technology in the detection of solid tumors. Cancer (Phila.), 82: 1419-1442, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Liotta L. A., Saidel M. G., Kleinerman J. The significance of hematogenous tumor cell clumps in the metastatic process. Cancer Res., 36: 889-894, 1976.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    Hamdy F. C., Lawry J., Anderson J. B., Parsons M. A., Rees R. C., Williams J. L. Circulating prostate specific antigen-positive cells correlate with metastatic prostate cancer. Br. J. Urol., 69: 392-396, 1992.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. ↵
    Fidler I. J. Critical factors in the biology of human cancer metastasis: twenty-eighth G. H. A. Clowes memorial award lecture. Cancer Res., 50: 6130-6138, 1990.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    Amling C. L., Bergstralh E. J., Blute M. L., Slezak J. M., Zincke H. Defining prostate specific antigen progression after radical prostatectomy: what is the most appropriate cut point?. J. Urol., 165: 1146-1151, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    Dumas F., Eschwege P., Loric S. Acute bacterial prostatitis induces hematogenous dissemination of prostate epithelial cells. Clin. Chem., 43: 2007-2008, 1997.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    Grauer L. S., Lawler K. D., Marignac J. L., Kumar A., Goel A. S., Wolfert R. L. Identification, purification, and subcellular localization of prostate-specific membrane antigen PSM′ protein in the LNCaP prostatic carcinoma cell line. Cancer Res., 58: 4787-4789, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    Zippelius A., Kufer P., Honold G., Kollermann M. W., Oberneder R., Schlimok G., Riethmuller G., Pantel K. Limitations of reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction analyses for detection of micrometastatic epithelial cancer cells in bone marrow. J. Clin. Oncol., 15: 2701-2708, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    Gu Z., Thomas G., Yamashiro J., Shintaku I. P., Dorey F., Raitano A., Witte O. N., Said J. W., Loda M., Reiter R. E. Prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA) expression increases with high Gleason score, advanced stage and bone metastasis in prostate cancer. Oncogene, 19: 1288-1296, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
June 2002
Volume 8, Issue 6
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Clinical Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction Detection of Prostate-specific Antigen, Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen, and Prostate Stem Cell Antigen in One Milliliter of Peripheral Blood
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Clinical Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction Detection of Prostate-specific Antigen, Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen, and Prostate Stem Cell Antigen in One Milliliter of Peripheral Blood
Noboru Hara, Takashi Kasahara, Takashi Kawasaki, Vladimir Bilim, Kenji Obara, Kota Takahashi and Yoshihiko Tomita
Clin Cancer Res June 1 2002 (8) (6) 1794-1799;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction Detection of Prostate-specific Antigen, Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen, and Prostate Stem Cell Antigen in One Milliliter of Peripheral Blood
Noboru Hara, Takashi Kasahara, Takashi Kawasaki, Vladimir Bilim, Kenji Obara, Kota Takahashi and Yoshihiko Tomita
Clin Cancer Res June 1 2002 (8) (6) 1794-1799;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • PATIENTS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Regular Articles

  • Intermittent Hypoxia Induces Proteasome-Dependent Down-Regulation of Estrogen Receptor α in Human Breast Carcinoma
  • Potent and Specific Antitumor Efficacy of CMC-544, a CD22-Targeted Immunoconjugate of Calicheamicin, against Systemically Disseminated B-Cell Lymphoma
  • Ring Finger Protein 43 as a New Target for Cancer Immunotherapy
Show more Regular Articles

Molecular Oncology, Markers, Clinical Correlates

  • Prognostic Impact of Hypoxia-Inducible Factors 1α and 2α in Colorectal Cancer Patients
  • Nuclear Factor-κB Nuclear Localization Is Predictive of Biochemical Recurrence in Patients with Positive Margin Prostate Cancer
  • Transcription Factor AP-2γ Is a Developmentally Regulated Marker of Testicular Carcinoma In situ and Germ Cell Tumors
Show more Molecular Oncology, Markers, Clinical Correlates
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • CCR Focus Archive
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Clinical Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Clinical Cancer Research
eISSN: 1557-3265
ISSN: 1078-0432

Advertisement